Elementary students' understanding of the equal sign in number sentences;Cómo entienden los alumnos de primaria el signo igual en las ecuaciones numéricas

Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 341-368

  Molina, Marta ^a   Castro, Encarnación ^a   Castro, Enrique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Early algebra; Equal sign; Equality; Number sentences; Relational thinking; Understanding

Indexed keywords

EID: 69349090436     PISSN: 16995880     EISSN: 16962095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Baroody, A. J. & Ginsburg, H. P. (1983). The effects of instruction on children's understanding of the “equals” sign. The Elementary School Journal, 84(2), 199-212.
2. Bastable, V. & Schifter, D. (2008). Classroom Stories: Examples of Elementary Students Engaged in Early Algebra. In J.J., Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M.L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the Early Grades (pp. 165-184). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Behr, M, Erlwanger, S., & Nichols, E. (1980). How children view the equal sign. Mathematics Teaching, 92, 13-15.
4. Blanton, M. L. & Kaput, J. (2005). Characterizing a Classroom Practice that Promotes Algebraic Reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 412-446.
5. th Conference of Psychology of Mathematics Education North America (Vol. 2, pp. 137- 144). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.
6. Byers, V. & Herscovics, N. (1977). Understanding school mathematics. Mathematics Teaching, 81, 24-27.
7. Cajori, F. (1993). A history of mathematical notations. New York: Dover Publications.
8. Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
9. Carraher, D. W. & Schliemann, A. D. (2007). Early algebra and algebraic reasoning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 669-705). Reston, VA: NCTM e IAP.
10. Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D. & Brizuela, B. M. (2000, october). Early algebra, early arithmetic: Treating operations as functions. Presented at the Twenty-second Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Tucson, Arizona.
11. Castro, E., & Molina, M. (2007). Desarrollo de pensamiento relacional mediante trabajo con igualdades numéricas en aritmética básica. Educación Matemática, 19(2), 67-94
12. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., Disessa, A., Lehrer, R. & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiment in Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
13. Davis, R. B. (1985). ICME-5 Report: Algebraic thinking in the early grades. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 4, 195-208.
14. Freudenthal, H. (1994). Fenomenológica didáctica de las estructuras matemáticas (Textos seleccionados). Traducción, notas e introducción de L. Puig. México D.F.: Cinvestav del IPN.
15. th Conference of Psychology of Mathematics Education North America (Vol. 1, pp. 49-66). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.
16. Hejny, M., Jirotkova, D., & Kratochvilova J. (2006). Early conceptual thinking. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 289-296). Prague: Program Committee.
17. Hoch, M., & Dreyfus, T. (2004). Structure sense in high school algebra: the effect of brackets. In M. Johnsen & A. Berit (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 49-56). Bergen: Program Committee.
18. Hoch, M., & Dreyfus, T. (2005). Students' difficulties with applying a familiar formula in an unfamiliar context. In H.L. Chick & J.L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 145-152). Melbourne: PME.
19. Kaput, J. (1998). Teaching and Learning a new algebra with understanding. Dartmouth, MA: NCISLA.
20. Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(3), 317-326.
21. Kieran, C. (1989). The early learning of algebra: a structural perspective. In S. Wagner & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (Vol. 4, pp. 33-59). Reston, VA.: LEA & NCTM.
22. Lindvall, C. M. & Ibarra, C. G. (1980). Incorrect procedures used by primary grade pupils in solving open addition and subtraction sentences. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11(1), 50-62.
23. Mevarech, Z. R. & Yitschak, D. (1983). Students' misconceptions of the equivalence relationship. In Hershkowitz, Weizmann Institute of Science (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 313-318). Rehobot, Israel.
24. Molina, M. (2006). Desarrollo de pensamiento relacional y comprensión del signo igual por alumnos de tercero de Primaria. Dissertation, University of Granada. Available at http://cumbia.ath.cx:591/pna/Archivos/MolinaM07-2822.pdf
25. Molina, M. & Ambrose, R. (2008). From an operational to a relational conception of the equal sign. Thirds graders' developing algebraic thinking. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 30(1), 61-80.
26. Molina, M., Castro, E., & Castro, E. (2007). Teaching Experiments within Design Research. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 2(4), 435-440
27. Pirie, S. & Martin, L. (1997). The equation, the whole equation and nothing but the equation! One approach to the teaching of linear equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(2), 159-181.
28. Rojano, T. (2002). Mathematics Learning in the Junior Secondary School: Students' Access to Significant Mathematical Ideas. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 143-163). Mahwak, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Resnick, L. B. (1992). From protoquantities to operators: Building mathematical competence on a foundation of everyday knowledge. In G. Leinhardt, R. Putnam & R. A. Hattrup (Eds), Analysis de arithmetic for mathematics teaching (pp. 373-429). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. th Conference of Psychology of Mathematics Education North America (Vol. 4, pp. 127-134). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.
31. Stallings, L. (2000). A Brief History of Algebraic Notation. School, Science and Mathematics, 100(5), 230.
32. Steffe, L. & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: underlying principles and essential elements. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-306). Mahwah: NJ: LEA.
33. Stephens, M. (2006). Describing and exploring the power of relational thinking. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen & M. Chinnappan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the MERGA (pp. 479-486). Canberra: MERGA.
34. Van ameron, B. A. (2002). Reinvention of early algebra. Developmental research on the transition form arithmetic to algebra. U°trecht: CD-β Press & Center for Science and Mathematics Education.
35. Vergnaud, G. (1988). Long terme et court terme dans l'apprentissage de l'algèbre. In C. Laborde (Ed.), Actes du premier colloque franco-allemand de didactique des mathematiques et de l'informatique (pp. 189-199). Paris: La Pensée Sauvage.
36. th Conference of Psychology of Mathematics Education North America (Vol. 4, pp. 379-387). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.
37. Wheeler, R. F. (1981). Rethinking Mathematical Concepts. Chichester: Ellis Horwood Limited