U-shaped development in math: 7-year-olds outperform 9-year-olds on equivalence problems.

Developmental Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 687-695

  McNeil, Nicole M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Age; Cognitive development; Mathematical problem solving; U shaped development

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY;

AGE FACTORS; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 34248396379     PISSN: 00121649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.687     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Adams, J. W., & Hitch, G. J. (1997). Working memory and children's mental addition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 67, 21-38.
2. Alibali, M. W. (1999). How children change their minds: Strategy change can be gradual or abrupt. Developmental Psychology, 35, 127-145.
3. Alibali, M. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child's state of mind. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 468-523.
4. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Lebiere, C. (1996). Working memory: Activation limitations on retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 221-256.
5. Ashcraft, M. H. (1992). Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory. Cognition, 44, 76-106.
6. Baroody, A. J., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1983). The effects of instruction on children's understanding of the "equals" sign. Elementary School Journal, 84, 199-212.
7. Barrouillet, P., & Lepine, R. (2005). Working memory and children's use of retrieval to solve addition problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 183-204.
8. Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
9. Behr, M., Erlwanger, S., & Nichols, E. (1980). How children view the equal sign. Mathematics Teaching, 92, 13-15.
10. Bjorklund, D. F., & Harnishfeger, K. K. (1990). The resources construct in cognitive development: Diverse sources of evidence and a theory of inefficient inhibition. Developmental Review, 10, 48-71.
11. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 2, 123-152.
12. Bruner, J. S., & Postman, L. (1949). On the perception of incongruity: A paradigm. Journal of Personality, 18, 206-223.
13. Bull, R., & Johnston, R. S. (1997). Children's arithmetical difficulties: Contributions from processing speed, item identification, and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 1-24.
14. Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15. Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Farnsworth, V. (2000). Building a foundation for learning algebra in the elementary grades. Madison, WI: National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics Education.
16. Church, R. B., Kelly, S. D., & Lynch, K. (2000). Immediate memory for mismatched speech and representational gesture across development. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 151-174.
17. Crowley, K., Shrager, J., & Siegler, R. S. (1997). Strategy discovery as a competitive negotiation between metacognitive and associative mechanisms. Developmental Review, 17, 462-489.
18. Dempster, F. N. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Towards a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12, 45-75.
19. Dixon, J. A., & Moore, C. F. (1996). The developmental role of intuitive principles in choosing mathematical strategies. Developmental Psychology, 32, 241-253.
20. Dowker, A. D. (1992). Computational estimation strategies of professional mathematicians. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 45-55.
21. Dowker, A. D., Hood, A., Griffiths, H., Harriss, L., & Hook, L. (1996). Estimation strategies of four groups. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 113-135.
22. Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J. (2000). Working memory deficits in children with low achievements in the national curriculum at 7 years. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 177-194.
23. Geary, D. C., Bow Thomas, C. C., Liu, F., & Siegler, R. S. (1996). Development of arithmetical competencies in Chinese and American children: Influence of age, language, and schooling. Child Development, 67, 2022-2044.
24. Gelman, R., Meck, E., & Merkin, S. (1986). Young children's numerical competence. Cognitive Development, 1, 1-29.
25. Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M. W., & Church, R. B. (1993). Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind. Psychological Review, 100, 279-297.
26. Gray, W. D., & Fu, W.-T. (2001). Ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head: Implications of rational analysis for interface design. CHI Letters, 3, 112-119.
27. Hatano, G. (1988). Social and motivational bases for mathematical understanding. In G. B. Saxe & M. Gearhart (Eds.), Children's mathematics (pp. 55-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Haverty, L. A. (1999). The importance of basic number knowledge to advanced mathematical problem solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
29. Haverty, L. A., Koedinger, K. R., Klahr, D., & Alibali, M. W. (2000). Solving inductive reasoning problems in mathematics: Not so trivial pursuit. Cognitive Science, 24, 249-298.
30. Hecht, S. A., Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2001). The relations between phonological processing abilities and emerging individual differences in mathematical computation skills: A longitudinal study from second to fifth grades. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 192-227.
31. Hitch, G. J. (1978). The role of short-term working memory in mental arithmetic. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 302-323.
32. Hitch, G. J., Towse, J. N., & Hutton, U. (2001). What limits children's working memory span? Theoretical accounts and applications for scholastic development. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 184-198.
33. Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence (A. Parsons & S. Milgram, Trans.). New York: Basic Books (Original work published 1955).
34. Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 317-326.
35. Knuth, E. J., Stephens, A. C., McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 297-312.
36. Kotovsky, K., Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1985). Why are some problems hard? Evidence from the tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 248-294.
37. Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). It doesn't add up: African American students' mathematics achievement. In C. E. Malloy & L. Brader-Araje (Eds.), Challenges in the mathematics education of African American children: Proceedings of the Benjamin Banneker Association Leadership Conference (pp. 7-14). Reston, VA: NCTM.
38. Lorsbach, T. C., Katz, G. A., & Cupak, A. J. (1998). Developmental differences in the ability to inhibit the initial misinterpretation of garden path passages. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 275-296.
39. Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 54 (6, Whole No. 248).
40. Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1950). New experimental attempts at preventing mechanization in problem solving. Journal of General Psychology, 42, 279-297.
41. Marcovitch, S., & Zelazo, P. D. (1999). The A-not-B error: Results from a logistic meta-analysis. Child Development, 70, 1297-1313.
42. Marcovitch, S., & Zelazo, P. D. (2006). The influence of number of A trials on 2-year-olds' behavior in two A-not-B-type search tasks: A test of the hierarchical competing systems model. Journal of Cognition and Development, 7, 477-501.
43. McNeil, N. M. (2004). Don't teach me 2 + 2 = 4: Knowledge of arithmetic operations hinders equation learning. In K. D. Forbus, D. Gentner, & R. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 938-943). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2000). Learning mathematics from procedural instruction: Externally imposed goals influence what is learned. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 734-744.
45. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2004). You'll see what you mean: Students encode equations based on their knowledge of arithmetic. Cognitive Science, 28, 451-466.
46. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005a). Knowledge change as a function of mathematics experience: All contexts are not created equal. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 285-306.
47. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005b). Why won't you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations. Child Development, 76, 1-17.
48. Miller, K. F., & Paredes, D. R. (1990). Starting to add worse: Effects of learning to multiply on children's addition. Cognition, 37, 213-242.
49. Mix, K. S., Levine, S. C., & Huttenlocher, J. (1999). Early fraction calculation ability. Developmental Psychology, 35, 164-174.
50. Moses, R., & Cobb, C. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston: Beacon Press.
51. Munakata, Y. (1998). Infant perseveration and implications for object permanence theories: A PDP model of the A-not-B task. Developmental Science, 1, 161-211.
52. Namy, L. L., Campbell, A. L., & Tomasello, M. (2004). The changing role of iconicity in non-verbal symbol learning: A U-shaped trajectory in the acquisition of arbitrary gestures. Journal of Cognition and. Development, 5, 37-57.
53. National Research Council. (1998). The nature and role of algebra in the K-14 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
54. National Science Board. (2002). Science and engineering indicators - 2002 (NSB-02-1). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
55. Perry, M. (1991). Learning and transfer: Instructional conditions and conceptual change. Cognitive Development, 6, 449-468.
56. Perry, M., Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1988). Transitional knowledge in the acquisition of concepts. Cognitive Development, 3, 359-400.
57. Qin, Y., Carter, C. S., Silk, E., Stenger, V. A., Fissell, K., Goode, A., et al. (2004). The change of the brain activation patterns as children learn algebra equation solving. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 101, 5686-5691.
58. Ridderinkhof, K. R., van der Molen, M. W., Band, G. P. H., & Bashore, T. R. (1997). Sources of interference from irrelevant information: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 315-341.
59. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 175-189.
60. Rogers, T. T., Rakison, D. H., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). U-shaped curves in development: A PDP approach. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 137-145.
61. Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building block of cognition. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928.
63. Schwartz, D. L., & Black, J. B. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science, 20, 457-497.
64. Seo, K-H., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2003). "You've got to carefully read the math sentence. . .": Classroom context and children's interpretations of the equals sign. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. 161-187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
65. Shinskey, J. L., & Munakata, Y. (2005). Familiarity breeds searching: Infants reverse their novelty preferences when reaching for hidden objects. Psychological Science, 16, 596-600.
66. Siegler, R. S. (2004). U-shaped interest in U-shaped development-and what it means. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 1-10.
67. Siegler, R. S., & Stern, E. (1998). Conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 377-397.
68. Svenson, O., & Sjoberg, K. (1983). Evolution of cognitive processes for solving simple additions during the first three school years. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 117-124.
69. Swanson, H. L., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for math disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 471-491.
70. Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189-208.
71. Valverde, G. A., & Schmidt, W. H. (1997). Refocusing U.S. math and science education. Issues in Science and Technology, 14, 60-67.
72. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1-29.