Continuity in representation between children and adults: Arithmetic knowledge hinders undergraduates' algebraic problem solving

Journal of Cognition and Development

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 437-457

  McNeil, Nicole M ^a   Rittle Johnson, Bethany ^b   Hattikudur, Shanta ^c   Petersen, Lori A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARITHMETIC; ARTICLE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; MATHEMATICS; PROBLEM SOLVING; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 78149392989     PISSN: 15248372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2010.516421     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Agresti, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
2. Alibali, M. W. (1999). How children change their minds: Strategy change can be gradual or abrupt. Developmental Psychology, 35, 127-145.
3. Alibali, M. W., Phillips, K. M. O., & Fischer, A. D. (2009). Learning new problem-solving strategies leads to changes in problem representation. Cognitive Development, 24, 89-101.
4. Anderson, J. R. (2002). Spanning seven orders of magnitude: A challenge for cognitive modeling. Cognitive Science, 26, 85-112.
5. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 167-207.
6. Baroody, A. J., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1983). The effects of instruction on children's understanding of the "equals" sign. Elementary School Journal, 84, 199-212.
7. Barsalou, L. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory & Cognition, 10, 82-93.
8. Behr, M., Erlwanger, S., & Nichols, E. (1980). How children view the equal sign. Mathematics Teaching, 92, 13-15.
9. Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 412-446.
10. Booth, J. L., & Koedinger, K. (2007, March). Are diagrams always helpful tools? The effect of presentation format on students' solutions of algebra problems. Poster session presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, MA.
11. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 2, 123-152.
12. Campbell, J. I. D., & Timm, J. C. (2000). Adults' strategy choices for simple addition: Effects of retrieval interference. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 692-699.
13. Campbell, J. I. D., & Xue, Q. (2001). Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 299-315.
14. Capraro, R. M., Yetkiner, Z. E., Özel, S., Corlu, M. S., Capraro, M. M., Ye, S., & Kim, H. G. (2009). An international perspective on students' understanding of the equal sign. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Diego, CA.
15. Carnine, D. W. (1980). Preteaching versus concurrent teaching of the component skills of a multiplication algorithm. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 11, 375-378.
16. Carpenter, T., & Levi, L. (2000). Developing conceptions of algebraic reasoning in the primary grades (Report No. 00-2). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.
17. Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
18. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
19. Chen, Z. (1999). Schema induction in children's analogical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 703-715.
20. Chen, Z., & Mo, L. (2004). Schema induction in problem solving: A multidimensional analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 583-600.
21. Clement, J., Lochhead, J., & Monk, G. S. (1981). Translation difficulties in learning mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly, 88, 286-290.
22. Cobb, P. (1987). An investigation of young children's academic arithmetic contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 109-124.
23. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257-271.
25. Crooks, N. M., & McNeil, N. M. (2009). Increased practice with 'set' problems hinders performance on the water jar task. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 643-648). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
26. De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1981). Children's solution processes in elementary arithmetic problems: Analysis and improvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 765-779.
27. Denmark, T., Barco, E., & Voran, J. (1976). Final report: A teaching experiment on equality (PMDC Technical Report No. 6). Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
28. Diamond, A., & Kirkham, N. (2005). Not quite as grown up as we like to think: Parallels between cognition in childhood and adulthood. Psychological Science, 16, 291-297.
29. Falkner, K. P., Levi, L., & Carpenter, T. P. (1999). Children's understanding of equality: A foundation for algebra. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6, 232-236.
30. Frensch, P. A., & Geary, D. C. (1993). Effects of practice on component processes in complexmental addition Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 433-456.
31. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction in analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
32. Gray, W. D., & Fu, W. (2001). Ignoring perfect knowledge in the world for imperfect knowledge in the head: Implications of rational analysis for interface design. CHI Letters, 3,112-119.
33. Haverty, L. A. (1999). The importance of basic number knowledge to advanced mathematical problem solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
34. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., ...Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25, 12-21.
35. Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Battey, D. (2007). Professional development focused on children's algebraic reasoning in elementary school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 258-288.
36. Kaput, J. J. (1998, May). Transforming algebra from an engine of inequity to an engine of mathematical power by 'algebrafying' the K-12 curriculum. Paper presented at the Algebra Symposium, Washington, DC.
37. Kaye, D. B. (1986). The development of mathematical cognition. Cognitive Development, 1, 157-170.
38. Kieran, C. (1981). . Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 317-326.
39. Koedinger, K. R., Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Trade-offs between grounded and abstract representations: Evidence from algebra problem solving. Cognitive Science, 32, 366-397.
40. Kotovsky, K., Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1985). Why are some problems hard? Evidence from the tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 248-294.
41. Kuhn, D., Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A., & Andersen, C. (1995). Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Development, 60, 157.
42. Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2007). How abstract is symbolic thought? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 720-733.
43. Langer, E. (2000). Mindful learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 220-223. Larkin, J. (1983). The role of problem representations in physics. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 53-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Lee, F. J., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Does learning of a complex task have to be complex? A study in learning decomposition. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 267-316.
45. LeFevre, J.-A., Sadesky, G. S., & Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 216-230.
46. Li, X., Ding, M., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2008). Sources of differences in children's understandings of mathematical equality: Comparative analysis of teacher guides and student texts in China and the United States. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 195-217.
47. Lorist, M. M., Klein, M., Nieuwenhuis, S., De Jong, R., Mulder, G., & Meijman, T. F. (2000). Mental fatigue and task control: Planning and preparation. Psychophysiology, 37, 614-625.
48. Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving-the effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs, 54(6), No. 248, 1-95.
49. Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1950). New experimental attempts at preventing mechanization in problem solving. The Journal of General Psychology, 42, 279-297.
50. Matthews, P., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2009). In pursuit of knowledge: Comparing self-explanations, concepts, and procedures as pedagogical tools. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 1-21.
51. McGilly, K., & Siegler, R. S. (1990). The influence of encoding and strategic knowledge on children's choices among serial recall strategies. Developmental Psychology, 26, 931-941.
52. McNeil, N. M. (2008). Limitations to teaching children 2+ 21/4 4: Typical arithmetic problems can hinder learning of mathematical equivalence. Child Development, 79, 1524-1537.
53. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2004). You'll see what you mean: Students encode equations based on their knowledge of arithmetic. Cognitive Science, 28, 451-466.
54. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005). Knowledge change as a function of mathematics experience: All contexts are not created equal. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 285-306.
55. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005). Why won't you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations. Child Development, 76,883-899.
56. McNeil, N. M., Grandau, L., Knuth, E. J., Alibali, M. W., Stephens, A. S., Hattikudur, S., & Krill, D. E. (2006). Middle-school students' understanding of the equal sign: The books they read can't help. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 367-385.
57. Munakata, Y., McClelland, J. L., Johnson, M. H., & Siegler, R. S. (1997). Rethinking infant knowledge: Toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. Psychological Review, 104(4), 686-713.
58. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
59. Ohlsson, S. (2009). Resubsumption: A possible mechanism for conceptual change and belief revision. Educational Psychologist, 44, 20-40.
60. Perry, M., Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1988). Transitional knowledge in the acquisition of concepts. Cognitive Development, 3, 359-400.
61. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 175-189.
62. Rosnick, P., & Clement, J. (1980). Learning without understanding: The effect of tutoring strategies on algebra misconceptions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 3, 3-27.
63. Saenz-Ludlow, A., & Walgamuth, C. (1998). Third graders'. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 153-187.
64. Seo, K.-H., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2003). 'You've got to carefully read the math sentence.. .': Classroom context and children's interpretations of the equals sign. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. 161-187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
65. Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
66. Siegler, R. S., & Stern, E. (1998). Conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 377-397.
67. Sophian, C. (1997). Beyond competence: The significance of performance for conceptual development. Cognitive Development, 12, 281-303.
68. Tennyson, R. D., & Tennyson, C. L. (1975). Rule acquisition design strategy variables: Degree of instance divergence, sequence, and instance analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67,852-859.
69. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
70. Valverde, G. A., & Schmidt, W. H. (1997). Refocusing U.S. math and science education. Issues in Science and Technology, 14, 60-67.
71. VanderStoep, S. W., & Seifert, C. M. (1993). Learning 'how' versus learning 'when': Improving transfer of problem-solving principles. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 93-111.
72. Watchorn, R., Lai, M., & Bisanz, J. (2009, October). Failure on equivalence problems is not universal. Poster session presented at the biennial meeting of the Cognitive Development Society, San Antonio, TX.
73. Weaver, F. (1973). The symmetric property of the equality relation and young children's ability to solve open addition and subtraction sentences. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4, 45-56.