Why won't you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations

Child Development

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 883-899

  McNeil, Nicole M ^a,b   Alibali, Martha W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; CHILD; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; LEARNING; MALE; MATHEMATICS; METHODOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; REVIEW; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TEACHING;

ATTENTION; CHILD; COGNITION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; LEARNING; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PROBLEM SOLVING; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); TEACHING;

EID: 23844468227     PISSN: 00093920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00884.x     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. ACT Inc. (2005). National ranks for test scores and composite score [online]. Available from http://www.actstudent.org/scores/norms1.html
2. Adelson, B. (1984). When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of a task may increase with expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 483-495.
3. Adolph, K. E. (1997). Learning in the development of infant locomotion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 62(Serial No. 251).
4. Alibali, M. W. (1999). How children change their minds: Strategy change can be gradual or abrupt. Developmental Psychology, 35, 127-145.
5. Alibali, M. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child's state of mind. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 468-523.
6. Alibali, M. W., McNeil, N. M., & Perrott, M. A. (1998). What makes children change their minds? Changes in encoding lead to changes in strategy selection. In M. A. Gernsbacher & S. Deny (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 36-41) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Anderson, J. R. (2002). Spanning seven orders of magnitude: A challenge for cognitive modeling. Cognitive Science, 26, 85-112.
8. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Lebiere, C. (1996). Working memory: Activation limitations on retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 221-256.
9. Baroody, A. J., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1983). The effects of instruction on children's understanding of the "equals" sign. Elementary School Journal, 84, 199-212.
10. Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
11. Behr, M., Erlwanger, S., & Nichols, E. (1980). How children view the equal sign. Mathematics Teaching, 92, 13-15.
12. Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 775-794.
13. Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2003). Developing elementary teachers' "algebra eyes and ears." Teaching Children Mathematics, 10, 70-77.
14. Bodanskii, F. (1991). The formation of an algebraic method of problem solving in primary school children. In V. Davydov (Ed.), Soviet studies in mathematics education (Vol. 6, pp. 275-338). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
15. Bouton, M. E., Nelson, J. B., & Rosas, J. M. (1999). Stimulus generalization, context change, and forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 171-186.
16. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 2, 123-152.
17. Bruner, J. S., & Postman, L. (1949). On the perception of incongruity: A paradigm. Journal of Personality, 18, 206-223.
18. Case, R., Kurland, M., & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386-404.
19. Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking Mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
20. Carraher, D., Schliemann, A., & Brizuela, B. (2001). Can young students operate on unknowns? In Proceedings of the XXV Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Vol. 1, pp. 130-140). Columbus, OH: ERIC.
21. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
22. Chi, M T. H. (1978). Knowledge structures and memory development. In R. S. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 73-96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Clement, J., Lochhead, J., & Monk, G. (1981). Translation difficulties in learning mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly, 88, 286-290.
24. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257-271.
25. Cowan, N., Nugent, L. D., Elliot, E. M., Ponomarev, I., & Saults, J. S. (1999). The role of attention in the development of short-term memory: Age differences in the verbal span of apprehension. Child Development, 70, 1082-1097.
26. Dixon, J. A., & Bangert, A. (2002). The prehistory of discovery: Precursors of representational change in solving gear system problems. Developmental Psychology, 38, 918-933.
27. Dowker, A. D. (1992). Computational estimation strategies of professional mathematicians, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 45-55.
28. Dowker, A. D., Flood, A., Griffiths, H., Harriss, L., & Hook, L. (1996). Estimation strategies of four groups. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 113-135.
29. Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 169-186.
30. Flege, J. E., Yeni Komshian, G. H., & Liu, F. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition, Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78-104.
31. Geary, D. C., & Burlingham-Dubree, M. (1989). External validation of the strategy choice model for addition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 175-192.
32. Gershkoff-Stowe, L. (2002). Object naming, vocabulary growth, and the development of word retrieval abilities. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 665-687.
33. Gray, W. D., & Fu, W.-T. (2001). Ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head: Implications of rational analysis for interface design. CHI Letters, 3, 112-119.
34. Hatano, G. (1988). Social and motivational bases for mathematical understanding. In G. B. Saxe & M. Gearhart (Eds.), Children's mathematics (pp. 55-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Haverty, L. A. (1999). The importance of basic number knowledge to advanced mathematical problem solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.
36. Hulme, C., Thomson, N., Muir, C., & Lawrence, A. (1984). Speech rate and the development of spoken words: The role of rehearsal and item identification processes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 241-253.
37. Kail, R., & Park, Y.-S. (1994). Processing time, articulation time, and memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 281-291.
38. Kail, R., & Salthouse, T. A. (1994). Processing speed and mental capacity. Acta Psychologica, 86, 199-225.
39. Kessen, W. (1984). Introduction: The end of the age of development. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Mechanisms of cognitive development (pp. 1-17). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
40. Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 317-326.
41. Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., & Rhenius, D. (1999). Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1534-1555.
42. Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 29, 1000-1009.
43. Kotovsky, K., Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1985). Why are some problems hard? Evidence from the Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 248-294.
44. Kuhl, P. K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97, 11850-11857.
45. Kuo, Z.-Y. (1976). The dynamics of behavior development: An epigenetic view. New York: Plenum.
46. Larkin, J. H. (1983). The role of problem representation in physics. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 75-97). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. LeFevre, J.-A., Smith-Chant, B. L., Hiscock, K., Daley, K. E., & Morris, J. (2003). Young adults' strategic choices in simple arithmetic: Implications for the development of mathematical representations. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. 203-228). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Luchins, A. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 54, (6, Serial No. 248).
49. McClelland, J. L. (1995). A connectionist perspective on knowledge and development. In T. J. Simon & G. S. Halford (Eds.), Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling (pp. 157-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2000). Learning mathematics from procedural instruction: Externally imposed goals influence what is learned. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 734-744.
51. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2002). A strong schema can interfere with learning: The case of children's typical addition schema. In C. D. Schunn & W. Gray (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 661-666). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2004). You'll see what you mean: Students encode equations based on their knowledge of arithmetic. Cognitive Science, 28, 451-466.
53. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (in press). Knowledge change as a function of mathematics experience: All contexts are not created equal. Journal of Cognition and Development.
54. McNeil, N. M., Grandau, L., Stephens, A. C., Krill, D. E., Alibali, M. W., & Knuth, E. J. (2004). Middle-school students' experience with the equal sign: Saxon Math≠Connected Mathematics. In D. McDougall (Ed.), Proceedings of the XXVI Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME-NA), Toronto, Canada (Vol. 1, pp. 271-276). Columbus, OH: ERIC.
55. Munakata, Y., McClelland, J. L., Johnson, M. H., & Siegler, R. S. (1997). Rethinking infant knowledge: Toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. Psychological Review, 104, 686-713.
56. Pascual-Leone, J. A. (1970). A mathematical model for transition in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32, 301-345.
57. Perry, M. (1991). Learning and transfer: Instructional conditions and conceptual change. Cognitive Development, 6, 449-468.
58. Perry, M., Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1988). Transitional knowledge in the acquisition of concepts. Cognitive Development, 3, 359-400.
59. Piaget, J., & Szeminska, A. (1995). The child's conception of number (C. Gattegno & F. M. Hodgson, Trans.). In H. E. Gruber & J. J. Voneche (Eds.), The essential Piaget (pp. 298-341). Northvale, NJ: Aronson (Original work published 1941).
60. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 175-189.
61. Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 346-362.
62. Rosnick, P. (1981). Some misconceptions concerning the concept of variable. Are you careful about defining your variables? Mathematics Teacher, 74, 418-420, 450.
63. Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building block of cognition. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Samuelson, L. K. (2001). Statistical regularities in vocabulary guide language acquisition in connectionist models and 15-20 month olds. Developmental Psychology, 38, 1016-1037.
65. Schauble, L. (1990). Belief revision in children: The role of prior knowledge and strategies for generating evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 31-57.
66. Seo, K.-H., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2003). "You've got to carefully read the math sentence...": Classroom context and children's interpretations of the equals sign. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. 161-187). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. Sfard, A., & Linchevski, L. (1994). The gains and the pitfalls of reification - The case of algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 191-228.
68. Shrager, J., & Siegler, R. S. (1998). SCADS: A model of children's strategy choices and strategy discoveries. Psychological Science, 9, 405-410.
69. Siegler, R. S. (1983). How knowledge influences learning. American Scientist, 71, 631-638.
70. Siegler, R. S. (1987). The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's addition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 250-264.
71. Siegler, R. S. (1989). Mechanisms of cognitive development. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 353-379.
72. Siegler, R. S. (1994). Cognitive variability: A key to understanding cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 1-5.
73. Siegler, R. S. (1995). How does change occur: A microgenetic study of number conservation. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 225-273.
74. Siegler, R. S. (2000). The rebirth of children's learning. Child Development, 71, 26-35.
75. Siegler, R. S., & Shrager, J. (1984). Strategy choices in addition and subtraction: How do Children Know what to do? In C. Sophian (Ed.), The origins of cognitive skills (pp. 229-293). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
76. Siegler, R. S., & Stern, E. (1998). Conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 377-397.
77. Sophian, C. (1997). Beyond competence: The significance of performance for conceptual development. Cognitive Development, 12, 281-303.
78. Spencer, J. P., Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (2001). Tests of a dynamic systems account of the A-not-B error: The influence of prior experience on the spatial memory abilities of two-year-olds. Child Development, 72, 1327-1346.
79. Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189-208.
80. Valverde, G. A., & Schmidt, W. H. (1997). Refocusing U.S. math and science education. Issues in Science and Technology, 14, 60-67.
81. Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 26, 716-730.
82. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1-29.