Comparison of three intraocular pressure measurement methods including biomechanical properties of the cornea

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 666-673

  Smedowski, Adrian ^a   Weglarz, Beata ^a   Tarnawska, Dorota ^a,b   Kaarniranta, Kai ^c,d   Wylegala, Edward ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^d KUOPIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Corneal biomechanics; Intraocular pressure; Tonometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA; CORNEA EDEMA; CORNEAL PACHYMETRY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICE; KERATOCONUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHEIMPFLUG CAMERA; SLIT LAMP; TONOMETRY; ULTRASOUND PACHYMETER;

CORNEAL BIOMECHANICS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; TONOMETRY;

CORNEA; CORNEAL EDEMA; CORNEAL PACHYMETRY; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOCONUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 84893304314     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-13172     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Casson RJ, Chidlow G, Wood JP, Crowston JG, Goldberg I. Definition of glaucoma: clinical and experimental concepts. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2012;40:341-349.
2. Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Niziol LM, Lichter PR, Varma R; CIGTS Study Group. Intraocular pressure control and longterm visual field loss in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1766-1773.
3. Kwon TH, Ghaboussi J, Pecknold DA, Hashash YM. Effect of cornea material stiffness on measured intraocular pressure. J Biomech. 2008;4:1707-1713.
4. Hamilton KE, Pye DC. Young's modulus in normal corneas and the effect on applanation tonometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;8:445-450.
5. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:146-155.
6. Feizi S, Einollahi B, Yazdani S, Hashemloo A. Graft biomechanical properties after penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Cornea. 2012;31:855-858.
7. Chihara E. Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008; 53:203-218.
8. Ouyang PB, Li CY, Zhu XH, Duan XC. Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert ocular response analyzer, Goldmann applanation tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy individuals. Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5:102-107.
9. Goldmann H, Schmidt T. Über Applanationstonometrie. Ophthalmologica. 1957;134:221-242.
10. Roszkowska AM, De Grazia L, Cirone M, Ferreri G. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in the measurement of intraocular pressure in eyes with different corneal thicknesses. Ophthalmologica. 2009;223:244-249.
11. Brubaker RF. Tonometry and corneal thickness. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:104-105.
12. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1975;53:34-43.
13. Kontiola AI. A new electromechanical method for measuring intraocular pressure. Doc Ophthalmol. 1997;93:265-276.
14. Danias J, Kontiola AI, Filippopoulos T, Mittag T. Method for the noninvasive measurement of intraocular pressure in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1138-1141.
15. Gandhi NG, Prakalapakorn SG, El-Dairi MA, Jones SK, Freedman SF. Icare ONE rebound vs Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with known or suspected glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154:843-849.
16. Ambrósio R Jr, Nogueira LP, Caldas DL, et al. Evaluation of corneal shape and biomechanics before LASIK. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2011;51:11-38.
17. Hon Y, Lam AK. Corneal deformation measurement using Scheimpflug noncontact tonometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2013; 90:e1-e8.
18. Kaushik S, Pandav SS, Banger A, Aggarwal K, Gupta A. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153: 840-849.
19. Yu AY, Duan SF, Zhao YE, et al. Correlation between corneal biomechanical properties, applanation tonometry and direct intracameral tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96: 640-644.
20. Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R, Chui WS. Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:909-914.
21. Carbonaro F, Andrew T, Mackey DA, Spector TD, Hammond CJ. Comparison of three methods of intraocular pressure measurement and their relation to central corneal thickness. Eye (Lond). 2010;24:1165-1170.
22. Kim KN, Jeoung JW, Park KH, Yang MK, Kim DM. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91:e392-e396.
23. Lomoriello DS, Lombardo M, Tranchina L, et al. Repeatability of intra-ocular pressure and central corneal thickness measurements provided by a non-contact method of tonometry and pachymetry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:429-434.
24. Brencher HL, Kohl P, Reinke AR, Yolton RL. Clinical comparison of air-puff and Goldmann tonometers. J Am Optom Assoc. 1991;62:395-402.
25. Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG, Garway-Heath DF. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:730-737.
26. Hong J, Xu J, Wei A, et al. A new tonometer-the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:659-665.
27. Beutelspacher SC, Serbecic N, Scheuerle AF. Assessment of central corneal thickness using OCT, ultrasound, optical low coherence reflectometry and Scheimpflug pachymetry. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011;21:132-137.
28. Gunvant P, O'Leary DJ, Baskaran M, Broadway DC, Watkins RJ, Vijaya L. Evaluation of tonometric correction factors. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:337-343.
29. Elsheikh A, Gunvant P, Jones SW, Pye D, Garway-Heath D. Correction factors for Goldmann tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2013;22:156-163.
30. Gunvant P, Newcomb RD, Kirstein EM, Malinovsky VE, Madonna RJ, Meetz RE. Measuring accurate IOPs: does correction factor help or hurt? Clin Ophthalmol. 2010;4: 611-616.
31. Brandt JD, Gordon MO, Gao F, Beiser JA, Miller JP, Kass MA; Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. Adjusting intraocular pressure for central corneal thickness does not improve prediction models for primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:437-442.
32. Nemeth G, Hassan Z, Csutak A, Szalai E, Berta A, Modis L Jr. Repeatability of ocular biomechanical data measurements with a Scheimpflug-based noncontact device on normal corneas. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:558-563.
33. Gatzioufas Z, Labiris G, Stachs O, et al. Biomechanical profile of the cornea in primary congenital glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91:e29-e34.