Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 84, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 909-914

  Lam, Andrew ^a   Chen, Davie ^a   Chiu, Roger ^a   Chui, Wan Sang ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Corneal hysteresis; Corneal resistance factor; Corneal thickness; Intraocular pressure; Ocular response analyzer

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE; OPTOMETERS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER (GAT); OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER (ORA); ULTRASOUND PACHOMETRY;

VISION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHINA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; EYE EXAMINATION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PACHOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TONOMETER;

ADULT; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 34548695879     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181559db2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;44:367-408.
2. Orssengo GJ, Pye DC. Determination of the true intraocular pressure and modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo. Bull Mathematical Biol 1999;61:551-72.
3. Shimmyo M, Ross AJ, Moy A, Mostafavi R. Intraocular pressure, Goldmann applanation tension, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature in Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:603-13.
4. Kirstein EM, Husler A. Evaluation of the Orssengo-Pye IOP corrective algorithm in LASIK patients with thick corneas. Optometry 2005;76:536-43.
5. Givner S. Central corneal thickness and normal tension glaucoma: a cross-sectional study. Optometry 2006;77:134-40; comment in 325.
6. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:146-55.
7. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31:156-62.
8. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D, Quigley HA. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:868-75.
9. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, Mantry S. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29:257-62.
10. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:5337-47.
11. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:39-47.
12. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A, Mendez-Hernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:4410-4.
13. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. J Glaucoma 2006;15:364-70.
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1: 307-10.
15. Lleo A, Marcos A, Calatayud M, Alonso L, Rahhal SM, Sanchis-Gimeno JA. The relationship between central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Clin Exp Optom 2003;86: 104-8.
16. Nakamura M, Darhad U, Tatsumi Y, Fujioka M, Kusuhara A, Maeda H, Negi A. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:332-4.
17. Herndon LW. Measuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006; 17:115-9.
18. Friedenwald JS. Tonometer calibration; an attempt to remove discrepancies found in the 1954 calibration scale for Schiotz tonometers. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1957;61:108-22.
19. Vucicevic ZM, Ralston J. Influences of the volume and hydration changes on scleral rigidity. Ann Ophthalmol 1972;4:715-6.
20. Becker B, Gay AJ. Applanation tonometry in the diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma: an evaluation of decreased scleral rigidity. AMA Arch Ophthalmol 1959;62:211-5.
21. Friedman E, Ivry M, Ebert E, Glynn R, Gragoudas E, Seddon J. Increased scleral rigidity and age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 1989;96:104-8.
22. Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Ginis HS, Kounis GA, Tsilimbaris MK. Ocular rigidity in living human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:409-14.
23. Lu F, Xu S, Qu J, Shen M, Wang X, Fang H, Wang J. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis during corneal swelling induced by contact lens wear with eye closure. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143: 616-22.
24. Moses RA, Liu CH. Repeated applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1968;66:89-91.
25. Gunvant P, Watkins RJ, Broadway DC, O'Leary DJ. Repeatability and effects of sequential measurements with POBF tonograph. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:794-9.
26. Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Cunliffe I, Shah S. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: relevance in clinical context. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006;34:114-8.
27. Kida T, Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Effect of 24-hour corneal biomechanical changes on intraocular pressure measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:4422-6.
28. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:990-2.