Intraocular Pressure Measurement Precision with the Goldmann Applanation, Dynamic Contour, and Ocular Response Analyzer Tonometers

Ophthalmology

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 730-737

  Kotecha, Aachal ^a,b   White, Edward ^a   Schlottmann, Patricio G ^a   Garway Heath, David F ^a,b,c  

^a MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c IRCCS FONDAZIONE BIETTI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMETRY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PASCAL DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETER; POST HOC ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REICHERT OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYSER TONOMETER; REPRODUCIBILITY; TONOMETER; ULTRASOUND; WAVEFORM;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77949658771     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.020     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Doughty M.J., and Zaman M.L. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44 (2000) 367-408
2. Liu J., and Roberts C.J. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 146-155
3. Kanngiesser H.E., Kniestedt C., and Robert Y.C. Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma 14 (2005) 344-350
4. Kniestedt C., Lin S., Choe J., et al. Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry. Arch Ophthalmol 123 (2005) 1532-1537
5. Kaufmann C., Bachmann L.M., and Thiel M.A. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 (2003) 3790-3794
6. Kotecha A., White E.T., Shewry J.M., et al. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 89 (2005) 1572-1575
7. Boehm A.G., Weber A., Pillunat L.E., et al. Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 (2008) 2472-2477
8. Luce D.A. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 156-162
9. Medeiros F.A., and Weinreb R.N. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. J Glaucoma 15 (2006) 364-370
10. Tonnu P.A., Ho T., Sharma K., et al. A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability. Br J Ophthalmol 89 (2005) 847-850
11. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Measurement error. BMJ 313 (1996) 744
12. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
13. Kotecha A., Elsheikh A., Roberts C.R., et al. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 (2006) 5337-5347
14. Shields M.B. The non-contact tonometer: its value and limitations. Surv Ophthalmol 24 (1980) 211-219
15. Vernon S.A. Intra-eye pressure range and pulse profiles in normals with the Pulsair non-contact tonometer. Eye 7 (1993) 134-137
16. Dielemans I., Vingerling J.R., Hofman A., et al. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurement with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in epidemiological studies. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232 (1994) 141-144
17. Pandav S.S., Sharma A., Gupta A., et al. Reliability of proton and Goldmann applanation tonometers in normal and postkeratoplasty eyes. Ophthalmology 109 (2002) 979-984
18. Moreno-Montanes J., Maldonado M.J., Garcia N., et al. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 (2008) 968-974
19. Pepose J.S., Feigenbaum S.K., Qazi M.A., et al. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 143 (2007) 39-47
20. Francis B.A., Hsieh A., Lai M.Y., et al. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology 114 (2007) 20-26
21. Sherrard E.S., Novakovic P., and Speedwell L. Age-related changes of the corneal endothelium and stroma as seen in vivo by specular microscopy. Eye 1 (1987) 197-203
22. Daxer A., Misof K., Grabner B., et al. Collagen fibrils in the human corneal stroma: structure and aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39 (1998) 644-648
23. Malik N.S., Moss S.J., Ahmed N., et al. Ageing of the human corneal stroma: structural and biochemical changes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1138 (1992) 222-228
24. Elsheikh A., Wang D., Brown M., et al. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and their variation with age. Curr Eye Res 32 (2007) 11-19
25. Downs J.C., Suh J.K., Thomas K.A., et al. Viscoelastic material properties of the peripapillary sclera in normal and early-glaucoma monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 (2005) 540-546