Corneal deformation measurement using scheimpflug noncontact tonometry

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Hon, Ying ^a   Lam, Andrew K C ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

corneal biomechanics; corneal deformation amplitude; noncontact tonometry; repeatability; reproducibility

Indexed keywords

CORNEAL BIOMECHANICS; DEFORMATION AMPLITUDE; NON-CONTACT; REPEATABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITIES;

BIOMECHANICS; OPTICAL VARIABLES MEASUREMENT;

DEFORMATION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; CORNEA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84872175054     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318279eb87     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Asejczyk-Widlicka M, Pierscionek BK. The elasticity and rigidity of the outer coats of the eye. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1415-8.
2. Boyce BL, Grazier JM, Jones RE, Nguyen TD. Full-field deformation of bovine cornea under constrained inflation conditions. Biomaterials 2008;29:3896-904.
3. Elsheikh A, Wang D, Rama P, Campanelli M, Garway-Heath D. Experimental assessment of human corneal hysteresis. Curr Eye Res 2008;33:205-13.
4. Glass DH, Roberts CJ, Litsky AS, Weber PA. A viscoelastic biomechanical model of the cornea describing the effect of viscosity and elasticity on hysteresis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:3919-26.
5. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:146-55. (Pubitemid 40260702)
6. Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52(Suppl. 2):S109-14. (Pubitemid 350060960)
7. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:156-62. (Pubitemid 40260703)
8. McMonnies CW. Assessing corneal hysteresis using the ocular response analyzer. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:343-9.
9. Dorronsoro C, Pascual D, Perez-Merino P, Kling S, Marcos S. Dynamic OCT measurement of corneal deformation by an air puff in normal and cross-linked corneas. Biomed Opt Express 2012;3: 473-87.
10. Alonso-Caneiro D, Karnowski K, Kaluzny BJ, Kowalczyk A, Wojtkowski M. Assessment of corneal dynamics with high-speed swept source optical coherence tomography combined with an air puff system. Opt Express 2011;19:14188-99.
11. Ambro'sio R, Jr., Caldas DL, Ramos IC, Santos RT, Pimentel LN, Roberts CJ, Belin MW. Corneal biomechanical assessment using dynamic ultra high-speed Scheimpflug technology noncontact tonometry (UHS-ST NCT): Preliminary results. Presented at ASCRSASOA, San Diego, CA, March 25-29, 2011. Available at: http://www.optomes.com.tr/TR/dosya/1-604/h/corvisstascrs2011final.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2012.
12. Ambrósio R, Jr., Nogueira LP, Caldas DL, Fontes BM, Luz A, Cazal JO, Alves MR, Belin MW. Evaluation of corneal shape and biomechanics before LASIK. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2011;51:11-38.
13. Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Ramos I, Caldas D, de Silva RS, Ambro'sio R, Jr. Factors influencing corneal deformation and estimation of intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52:4384.
14. McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K. Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011;31:330-8.
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. BMJ 1996;312:1654. (Pubitemid 26229459)
16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1: 307-10. (Pubitemid 16134762)
17. AlMubrad TM, Ogbuehi KC. The effect of repeated applanation on subsequent IOP measurements. Clin Exp Optom 2008;91:524-9.
18. Tonnu PA, Ho T, Sharma K, White E, Bunce C, Garway-Heath D. A comparison of four methods of tonometry: Method agreement and interobserver variability. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:847-50. (Pubitemid 40904807)
19. Cho P, Lui T. Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:51-8. (Pubitemid 27114509)
20. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, GobbeM. Repeatability of intraoperative central corneal and residual stromal thickness measurement using a handheld ultrasound pachymeter. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38: 278-82.
21. Schiano Lomoriello D, Lombardo M, Tranchina L, Oddone F, Serrao S, Ducoli P. Repeatability of intra-ocular pressure and central corneal thickness measurements provided by a noncontact method of tonometry and pachymetry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249:429-34.
22. Marsich MW, Bullimore MA. The repeatability of corneal thickness measures. Cornea 2000;19:792-5.
23. Read SA, Collins MJ. Diurnal variation of corneal shape and thickness. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86:170-80.
24. Harper CL, Boulton ME, Bennett D, Marcyniuk B, Jarvis-Evans JH, Tullo AB, Ridgway AE. Diurnal variations in human corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:1068-72. (Pubitemid 27010842)
25. Hurmeric V, Sahin A, Ozge G, Bayer A. The relationship between corneal biomechanical properties and confocal microscopy findings in normal and keratoconic eyes. Cornea 2010;29:641-9.
26. del Buey MA, Cristobal JA, Ascaso FJ, Lavilla L, Lanchares E. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in Fuchs' corneal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:3199-202.
27. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:3026-31. (Pubitemid 351261143)
28. Anand A, De Moraes CG, Teng CC, Tello C, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Corneal hysteresis and visual field asymmetry in open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:6514-8.
29. Sullivan-Mee M, Billingsley SC, Patel AD, Halverson KD, Alldredge BR, Qualls C. Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:463-70.
30. CongdonNG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, GroverD, QuigleyHA. rCentral corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:868-75.
31. Fontes BM, Ambrosio Junior R, Jardim D, Velarde GC, Nose W. Ability of corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment data in the differentiation of keratoconus and healthy corneas. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2010;73:333-7.
32. Dupps WJ, Jr. Hysteresis: New mechanospeak for the ophthalmologist. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1499-501. (Pubitemid 47284783)