Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann applanation tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy individuals

International Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 102-107

  Ouyang, Ping Bo ^a   Li, Cong Yi ^a   Zhu, Xiao Hua ^a   Duan, Xuan Chu ^a  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Central corneal thickness; Intraocular pressure; Tonometry

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891659509     PISSN: 22223959     EISSN: 22274898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.01.21     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Goldmann H, Schmidt T. Applanation tonometry. Ophthalmologica. 1957; 134(4):221-242.
2. Park SJ, Ang GS, Nicholas S, Wells AP The Effect of Thin, Thick, and Normal Corneas on Goldmann Intraocular Pressure Measurements and Correction Formulae in Individual Eyes. Ophthalmology. 2011
3. Gelaw Y, Kollmann M, Irungu N M, Ilako DR The influence of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measured by goldmann applanation tonometry among selected Ethiopian communities. J Glaucoma. 2010; 19(8):514-518.
4. Wong TT, Wong TY, Foster P.J., Crowston JG, Fong CW, Aung T. The relationship of intraocular pressure with age, systolic blood pressure, and central corneal thickness in an asian population. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50(9):4097-4102.
5. Thapa SS, Paudyal I, Khanal S., Paudel N, Mansberger SL, van Rens GH. Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure in a Nepalese Population: The Bhaktapur Glaucoma Study. J Glaucoma. 2011
6. Wu Q, Duan X, Jiang Y. [The influence of the central corneal thickness on the intraocular pressure value measured by Goldmann applanation tonometer] Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology. 2004; 22:778-782.
7. Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J. Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85(1):85-87.
8. Ang GS, Nicholas S, Wells AP Poor utility of intraocular pressure correction formulae in individual glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011; 39(2):111-118.
9. Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2006; 15(1):2-6.
10. Sullivan-Mee M., Billingsley SC, Patela D, Halverson KD, Alldredge B.R., Qualls C. Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 2008; 85(6):463-470.
11. Fan F, Li C, Li Y., Duan X, Pan D. Intraocular pressure instrument reading comparisons after LASIK. Optom Vis Sci. 2011; 88(7):850-854.
12. Doyle A, Lachkar Y. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldman applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma. 2005; 14(4):288-292.
13. Nakamoto K, Yasuda N, Fukuda T. [Correlation of age and intraocular pressure with visual field damage in patients with normal-tension glaucoma] Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2008; 112(4):371-375.
14. Burvenich H, Burvenich E, Vincent C. Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus non-contact tonometry (NCT): a comparison study. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2005;(298):63-69.
15. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. J Glaucoma. 2006; 15(5):364-370.
16. Cheng L, Cui J, Duan X. Comparative study of intraocular pressure measurement by dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry in normal subjects. Yanke. 2011; 20(1):33-37.
17. Herdener S, Hafizovic D, Pache M., Lautebach S, Funk J. Is the PASCAL-Tonometer suitable for measuring intraocular pressure in clinical routine? Long- and short-term reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008; 18(1):39-43.
18. Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry J.M., Garway-Heath DF. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89(12):1572-1575.
19. Meyenberg A, Iliev ME, Eschmann R, Frueh BE Dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus and postkeratoplasty eyes. Cornea. 2008; 27(3):305-310.
20. Mehdizadeh A, Hoseinzadeh A, Fazelzadeh A. Central corneal thickness as a risk factor for glaucoma. Med Hypotheses. 2007; 69(6):1205-1207.
21. Kirstein EM, Husler A. Evaluation of the Orssengo-Pye IOP corrective algorithm in LASIK patients with thick corneas. Optometry. 2005; 76(9):536-543.
22. Herdener S, Pache M, Lautebach S., Funk J. Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) -a comparison of agreement and reproducibility. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007; 245(7):1027-1030.