New perspectives in historical linguistics

The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 65-102

  Kiparsky, Paul ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892435976     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (330)

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2002. Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2006. Grammars in contact: a cross-linguistic perspective. In Alexandra Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds) Areal grammars in contact: a cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–66.
3. Aikio, Ante. 2004. An essay on substrate studies and the origin of Saami. In Hyvärinen, Irma, Petri Kallio and Jarmo Korhonen (eds) Etymologie, Entlehnungen und Entwicklungen: Festschrift für Jorma Koivulehto zum 70. Geburtstag. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique, 5–34.
4. Aikio, Ante. 2006. On Germanic-Saami contacts and Saami prehistory. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 91: 9–55.
5. Albright, Adam. 2008. Explaining universal tendencies and language particulars in analogical change. In Good (ed.), 215–230.
6. Allen, Cynthia. 1995. Case-marking and reanalysis: grammatical relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. Alpher, Barry. 2004. Pama-Nyungan: phonological reconstruction and status as a phylogenetic group. In Bowern and Koch (eds), 93–126.
8. Andersen, Henning. 1973. Abductive and deductive change. Language 49: 765–793.
9. Andersen, Henning. 1988. Centre and periphery: adoption, diffusion and spread. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.) Historical dialectology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 39–85.
10. Andersen, Henning. 2001. Actualization and the (uni)directionality of change. In Henning Andersen (ed.) Actualization: linguistic change in progress. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 225–248.
11. Anthony, David W. 2007. The horse, the wheel and language: how Bronze-Age riders from the Eurasian steppes shaped the modern world. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
12. Anttila, Arto. 1997. Deriving variation from grammar. In Frans Hinskens, Roeland van Hout and Leo Wetzels (eds), Variation, change and phonological theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, 35–68.
13. Anttila, Arto. 2007. Variation and optionality. In de Lacy (ed.), 519–536.
14. Atkinson, Quentin. 2011. Phonemic diversity supports a serial founder effect model of language expansion from Africa. Science 332: 346–349.
15. Austerlitz, Robert. 1965. A Finnish/Swedish phonological parallel. In Carl F. Bayerschmidt and Erik J. Friis (ed.) Scandinavian studies: essays presented to H. G. Leach. Seattle: University of Washington Press and the American-Scandinavian Foundation, 111–124.
16. Babel, Molly, Andrew Garrett, Michael J. Houser, and Maziar Toosarvandani. 2009. Descent and diffusion in language diversib cation: a study of Western Numic dialectology. [Available at: www.linguistics.berkeley.edu/~mhouser/Papers/numic_dialectology.pdf; accessed 14 October 2013]
17. Bakker, Peter. 1997. A language of our own: the genesis of Michif, the mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Metis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Bane, Max. 2010. Deriving the structure of variation from the structure of non-variation in the English dative alternation. In Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer, and Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds) Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 42–50.
19. Barbançon, François, Steven N. Evans, Luay Nakhleh, Don Ringe and Tandy Warnow. 2013. An experimental study comparing linguistic phylogenetic reconstruction methods. Diachronica 30: 143–170.
20. Barnes, Jonathan. 2006. Strength and weakness at the interface: positional neutralization in phonetics and phonology. Berlin: Mouton.
21. Batllori, Montserrat, Maria-Lluisa Hernanz, Carme Picallo and Francesc Roca. 2005. Grammaticalization and parametric variation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Benediktson, Hreinn. 1982. Nordic umlaut and breaking: thirty years of research (1951–1980). Nordic Journal of Linguisitcs 5: 1–60.
23. Bergs, Alexander and Gabriele Diewald. 2008. Constructions and language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
24. Berman, Howard. 2006. Studies in Blackfoot prehistory. International Journal of American Linguistics 72: 264–284.
25. Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 1999. Constraint interaction in language change: quantity in English and Germanic. PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.
26. Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2006. Phonological change in Optimality Theory. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Volume 9. 2nd edition. Oxford: Elsevier, 497–505.
27. Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2007. Diachronic phonology. In de Lacy (ed.), 497–517. in press. Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes. In Honeybone and Salmons (eds).
28. Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo and Richard M. Hogg. 2003. The actuation problem in Optimality Theory: phonologisation, rule inversion, and rule loss. In D. Eric Holt (ed.) Optimality Theory and language change. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 91–119. Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo and Graeme Trousdale. forthcoming. Cycles and continua: on unidirectionality and gradualness in language change. In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds) Handbook on the history of English: rethinking and extending approaches and methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Biberauer, Teresa. 2012. Competing reinforcements: when languages opt out of Jespersen’s Cycle. In van Kemenade and de Haas (eds), 3–30.
30. Biberauer, Teresa, Anders Holmberg, and Ian Roberts. 2013. A syntactic universal and its consequences. Linguistic Inquiry.
31. Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Blevins, Juliette. 2006. A theoretical synopsis of evolutionary phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32: 117–166.
33. Blevins, Juliette 2007a. The importance of typology in explaining recurrent sound patterns. Linguistic Typology 11(1): 107–113.
34. Blevins, Juliette 2007b. A long-lost sister of Proto-Austronesian? Proto-Ongan, mother of Jarawa and Onge. Oceanic Linguistics 46: 154–198.
35. Blevins, Juliette 2008a. Phonetic explanation without compromise. Diachronica 25: 1–19.
36. Blevins, Juliette 2008b. Consonant epenthesis. In Good (ed.), 215–230.
37. Blevins, Juliette 2008c. Natural and unnatural sound patterns: a pocket b eld guide. In Klaas Willems and Ludovic De Cuypere (eds) Naturalness and iconicity in language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 121–148. ——in press. Evolutionary phonology. In Honeybone and Salmons (eds).
38. Blevins, Juliette and Andrew Garrett. 2004. The evolution of metathesis. In Bruce Hayes, Robert Kirchner, and Donca Steriade, (eds) Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 117–56.
39. Bloombeld, Leonard. 1925. On the sound system of Central Algonquian. Language 1: 130–156.
40. Bloombeld, Leonard. 1946. Algonquian. In Harry Hoijer and Cornelius Osgood (eds) Linguistic structures of Native America. New York: Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, 85–129.
41. Blust, Robert. 2005. Must sound change be linguistically motivated? Diachronica 22: 219–269.
42. Bomhard, Allan R. 2008. Reconstructing Proto-Nostratic: comparative phonology, morphology, and vocabulary. 2 Volumes. Leiden: Brill.
43. Bonet, Eulalia. 1994. The person-case constraint: a morphological approach. In H. Harley and C. Philips (eds) The morphosyntax connection. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 22: 33–52.
44. Börjars, Kersti and Nigel Vincent. 2011. Grammaticalization and directionality. In Narrog and Heine (eds), 163–176. Bouckaert, Remco, Philippe Lemey, Michael Dunn, Simon J. Greenhill, Alexander V. Alekseyenko
45. Alexei J. Drummond, Russell D. Gray, Marc A. Suchard, Quentin D. Atkinson. 2012. Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 337: 957–960.
46. Bowern, Claire. 2010. Historical linguistics in Australia: trees, networks and their implications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 365(1559): 3845–3854.
47. Bowern, Claire and Harold Koch (eds). 2004. Australian languages: classib cation and the comparative method. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
48. Breitbarth, Anne. 2009. A hybrid approach to Jespersen’s Cycle in West Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12: 81–114.
49. Breitbarth, Anne. 2013. Indeb nites, negation and Jespersen’s Cycle in the history of Low German. Diachronica 30: 171–201.
50. Brown, Cecil H., Søren Wichmann and David Beck. to appear. Chitimacha: a Mesoamerican language in the Lower Mississippi Valley. International Journal of American Linguistics.
51. Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Bybee, Joan. 2007. Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Campbell, Alistair. 1983. Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
55. Campbell, Lyle. 1997. American Indian languages. The historical linguistics of Native America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Campbell, Lyle. 2001. What’s wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences 23: 113–161.
57. Campbell, Lyle. 2011. Review of James Kari and Ben A. Potter (eds) The Dene-Yeniseian Connection. International Journal of American Linguistics 77: 445–451.
58. Campbell, Lyle and William Poser. 2008. Language classib cation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Carpelan, Christian, Asko Parpola and Petteri Koskikallio (eds) 2001. Early contacts between Uralic and Indo-European: linguistic and archaeological considerations. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia 242.
60. Chen, Matthew and William S.-Y. Wang. 1975. Sound change: actuation and implementation. Language 51: 255–281.
61. Cho, Young-mee Yu. 1999. Parameters of consonantal assimilation. München: Lincom.
62. Clark, Robin and Ian Roberts. 1993. A computational approach to language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 299–345.
63. Condoravdi, Cleo and Ashwini Deo. 2008. Aspect shifts in Indo-Aryan. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Linguists. Seoul: Linguistic Society of Korea, 2057–2076.
64. Condoravdi, Cleo and Paul Kiparsky. 2004. Clitics and clause structure: the Late Medieval Greek system. Journal of Greek Linguistics 5: 159–183.
65. Cook, Eung-Do. 2006. The patterns of consonantal acquisition and change in Chipewyan (Dëne Siné). International Journal of American Linguistics 72: 236–263.
66. Corbett, Greville. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Cser, András. 2003. The typology and modelling of obstruent lenition and fortition processes. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. ——in press. Types of phonological change. In Honeybone and Salmons (eds).
68. Culbertson, Jennifer, Paul Smolensky, Géraldine Legendre. 2012. Learning biases predict a word order universal. Cognition 122: 306–329.
69. Curnow, Timothy J. 2001. What can be ‘borrowed’? In Alexandra Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds) Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: problems in comparative linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 412–436.
70. Cysouw, Michael. 2003. The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
72. Dahl, Östen. 2000. Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton.
73. Dahl, Otto Christian. 1991. Migration from Kalimantan to Madagascar. Oslo: Aschehoug.
74. Darden, Bill. 2001. On the question of the Anatolian origin of Indo-Hittite. In Robert Drews (ed.) Greater Anatolia and the Indo-Hittite language family. Washington: Journal of Indo-European Studies, 184–228.
75. Dawkins, Richard M. 1916. Modern Greek in Asia Minor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. de Lacy, Paul (ed.). 2007. The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Deo, Ashwini. 2006. Tense and aspect in Indo-Aryan languages: variation and diachrony. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
78. Deo, Ashwini. 2009. Unifying the imperfective and the progressive: partitions as quantibcational domains. Linguistics and Philosophy 32(5): 475–521.
79. Deo, Ashwini. 2012. The imperfective-perfective contrast in Middle Indic. Journal of South Asian Languages 5: 3–33.
80. Donohue, Mark. 2003. Agreement in the Skou language: a historical account. Oceanic Linguistics 42: 479–498.
81. Donohue, Mark and Tim Denham. 2010. Farming and language in island Southeast Asia. Reframing Austronesian history. Current Anthropology 51: 223–256.
82. Donohue, Mark and Charles E. Grimes. 2008. Yet more on the position of the languages of eastern Indonesia and East Timor. Oceanic Linguistics 47: 115–158.
83. Dost, Ascander and Vera Gribanova. 2006. Deb niteness marking in Bulgarian. In Donald Baumer, David Montero and Michael Scanlon (eds) Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 132–140.
84. Dresher, B. Elan. 2013. The in_ uence of loanwords on Norwegian and English stress. Nordlyd 40(1): 55–65.
85. Dresher, B. Elan and Aditi Lahiri. 2005. Main stress left in early Middle English. In Michael Fortescue, Eva Skafte Jensen, Jens Erik Mogensen and Lene Schøsler (eds) Historical linguistics 2003. Selected papers from the 16th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 75–85.
86. Dunn, Michael, Simon J. Greenhill, Stephen Levinson, Russell D. Gray. 2011. Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specib c trends in word-order universals. Nature 473: 79–82.
87. Durie, Mark and Malcolm Ross (eds). 1996. The Comparative Method reviewed: regularity and irregularity in language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
88. Dybo, Vladimir. 1981. Slavjanskaja akcentologija. Moskva: Nauka.
89. Dybo, Vladimir. 1989. Indo-European and East-Nostratic velar stops. In Vitaly Shevoroshkin (ed.) Explorations in language macrofamilies. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Brockmeyer, 41–46.
90. Dybo, Vladimir. 2011. Znazenie zapadnokavkazskoj akcentnoj sistemy dlja izuzenija balto-slavjanskoj i japonskix akcentnyx sistem. In Tijmen Pronk and Rick Derksen (eds) Accent matters: papers on Balto-Slavic accentology. New York: Rodopi.
91. Eckardt, Regine. 2006. Meaning change in grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
92. Eckardt, Regine. 2011. Semantic reanalysis and language change. Language and Linguistics Compass 5: 33–46.
93. Ehret, Christopher. 2001. Bantu expansions: re-envisioning a central problem of early African history. The International Journal of African Historical Studies 34: 5–41.
94. Enbeld, N. J. 2005. Areal linguistics and Mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 181–206.
95. Evans, Nicholas and Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 429–492.
96. Evans, Nicholas and Patrick McConvell. 1998. The enigma of Pama-Nyungan expansion in Australia. In Roger Blench and Matthew Spriggs (eds) Archaeology and language II: Archaeological data and linguistic hypotheses. London: Routledge, 174–191.
97. Filppula, Markku. 2013. Contact and the early history of English. In Raymond Hickey (ed.) The handbook of language contact. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 432–453.
98. Forchheimer, Paul. 1953. The category of person in language. Berlin: de Gruyter.
99. Friedman, Victor A. 2006. Balkanizing the Balkan sprachbund: a closer look at grammatical permeability and feature distribution. In Alexandra Aikhenvald and Robert M.W. Dixon (eds) Grammars in contact: a cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–66.
100. Gabelentz, Georg von der. 1901. Die Sprachwissenschaft; ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: Tauchnitz.
101. Galves, Charlotte, Sonia Cyrino, Ruth Lopes, Filomena Sandalo and Juanito Avelar. 2012. Parameter theory and linguistic change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
102. Gardani, Francesco. 2008. Borrowing of in ectional morphemes in language contact. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
103. Gardani, Francesco. 2012. Plural across injection and derivation, fusion and agglutination. In Lars Johanson and Martine Robbeets (eds), 71–97.
104. Garde, Paul. 1976. Histoire de l’accentuation slave. Paris: Institut d’études slaves.
105. Garde, Paul. 2011. Spécib cités de l’accentologie. Baltistica Supplement 7: 87–102.
106. Garey, Howard. 1959. Verte, grande and longue: three types of analogy in Old French. Language 35: 605–611.
107. Garrett, Andrew. 2004. The evolution of Algic verbal stem structure: new evidence from Yurok. In Marc Ettlinger, Nicholas Fleisher and Mischa Park-Doob (eds) Proceedings of the Thirtieth AnnualMeeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 13–16, 2004: Special Session on the Morphology of American Indian Languages. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 46–60.
108. Garrett, Andrew. 2006. Convergence in the formation of Indo-European subgroups: phylogeny and chronology. In Peter Forster and Colin Renfrew (eds) Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 138–151.
109. Garrett, Andrew. 2008. Paradigmatic uniformity and markedness. In Good (ed.), 125–143.
110. Garrett, Andrew. 2012. The historical syntax problem: reanalysis and directionality. In Jonas, Whitman and Garrett (eds), 52–72.
111. Garrett, Andrew and Keith Johnson. 2013. Phonetic bias in sound change. In Alan C. L. Yu (ed.) Origins of sound change: approaches to phonologization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51–97.
112. Gelderen, Elly van. 1993. The rise of functional categories. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
113. Gelderen, Elly van. 2004. Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
114. Gelderen, Elly van. 2011. The linguistic cycle: language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
115. Gell-Mann, Murray and Merritt Ruhlen. 2011. The origin and evolution of word order. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108(42): 17290–17295.
116. Goddard, Ives. 1979. Comparative Algonquian. In Lyle Campbell and Marianne Mithun (eds) The languages of native North America: historical and comparative assessment. Austin: University of Texas Press, 70–132.
117. Goddard, Ives. 1994. The west-to-east cline in Algonquian dialectology. In William Cowan (ed.) Papers of the 25th Algonquian Conference. Ottawa: Carleton University, 187–211.
118. Goddard, Ives. 1990. Algonquian linguistic change and reconstruction. In Philip Baldi (ed.) Linguistic change and reconstruction methodology. Berlin: Mouton, 99–114.
119. Good, Jeff (ed.). 2008. Linguistic universals and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gordon, Matthew J. in press. Chain shifts, mergers and near-mergers as changes in progress. In Honeybone and Salmons (eds).
120. Gray, Russell D. and Quentin D. Atkinson. 2003. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426: 435–439.
121. Greenberg, Joseph H. 1971. The Indo-Pacib c hypothesis. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.) Current Trends in Linguistics. Volume 8: Linguistics in Oceania. The Hague: Mouton, 808–871.
122. Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. Diachrony, synchrony and language universals. In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson and Edith Moravcsik (eds) Universals of human language Volume 1: Method and theory. Stanford: Stanford University, 61–91.
123. Greenberg, Joseph H. 1987. Language in the Americas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
124. Greenberg, Joseph H. 2000. Indo-European and its closest relatives: the Eurasiatic language family. Volume 1: Grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
125. Greenberg, Joseph H. and Merritt Ruhlen. 1992. Linguistic origins of Native Americans. Scientib c American 267: 94–99.
126. Grimshaw, Jane and C. Rosen. 1990. Obeying the Binding Theory. In Lyn Frazier and Jill de Villiers (eds) Language processing and language acquisition. Boston: Kluwer, 357–367.
127. Gvozdanovi, Jadranka. 2012. Criteria for differentiating inherent and contact-induced changes in linguistic reconstruction. In van Kemenade and de Haas (eds), 49–86.
128. Haas, Mary R. 1958. Algonkian–Ritwan: The end of a controversy. International Journal of American Linguistics 24: 159–173.
129. Hajek, John. 1997. Universals of sound change in nasalization. Oxford: Blackwell.
130. Häkkinen, Jaakko. 2007. Kantauralin murteutuminen vokaalivastaavuuksien valossa. MA Dissertation. University of Helsinki. [Available at: https://oa.doria.b /handle/10024/7044; accessed 14 October 2013].
131. Häkkinen, Jaakko. 2009. Kantauralin ajoitus ja paikannus: perustelut puntarissa. Journal de la Société Finno- Ougrienne 92: 9–56.
132. Häkkinen, Jaakko. 2012a. After the protolanguage: invisible convergence, false divergence and boundary shift. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 61: 7–28.
133. Häkkinen, Jaakko. 2012b. Problems in the method and interpretations of the computational phylogenetics based on linguistic data. An example of wishful thinking: Bouckaert et al. 2012. Unpublished Ms. [Available at: www.elisanet.b /alkupera/Problems_of_phylogenetics.pdf; accessed 14 October 2013].
134. Häkkinen, Jaakko. 2012c. Early contacts between Uralic and Yukaghir. Per Urales ad Orientem: Iter polyphonicum multilingue. Festskrift tillägnad Juha Janhunen på hans sextioårsdag den 12 februari 2012. [Available at: www.sgr.b /sust/sust264/sust264_hakkinenj.pdf].
135. Häkkinen, Kaisa. 1984. Wäre es schon an der Zeit, den Stammbaum zu fällen? Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher Neue Folge 4: 1–24.
136. Hale, Kenneth L. 1966. The Paman group of the Pama–Nyungan family. Languages of the World: Indo- Pacib c. Fascicle 6. Anthropological Linguistics 8: 162–197.
137. Hale, Mark. 2007. Historical linguistics. Theory and method. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
138. Hale, Mark, Madelyn Kissock and Charles Reiss. 2006. Microvariation, variation, and the features of universal grammar. Lingua 117: 645–665.
139. Hale, Mark, Madelyn Kissock and Charles Reiss. in press. An I-Language approach to phonologization and lexib cation. In Honeybone and Salmons (eds).
140. Hall, Robert A., Jr. 1944. Chinese Pidgin English: Grammar and texts. Journal of the American Oriental Society 64: 95–113.
141. Hankamer Jorge and Line Mikkelsen. 2005. When movement must be blocked: a Reply to Embick and Noyer. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 85–125.
142. Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur. 2008. Diachronic explanations of sound patterns. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 859–893.
143. Hargus, Sharon. 1988. The Lexical Phonology of Sekani. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
144. Harizanov, Boris and Vera Gribanova. to appear. 2012. Inward sensitive contextual allomorphy and its conditioning factors. Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society.
145. Harris, Alice and Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical linguistics in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
146. Harris, Alice C. 2008. On the explanation of typologically unusual structures. In Jeff Good (ed.) Linguistic universals and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 54–76.
147. Harris, Alice. 2010. Explaining typologically unusual structures: the role of probability. In J. Wohlgemuth and M. Cysouw (ed.) Rethinking universals: how rarities affect linguistic theory. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton, 91–103.
148. Harris, John. 1990. Derived phonological contrasts. In S. Ramsaran (ed.) Studies in the pronunciation of English: a commemorative volume in Honour of A. C. Gimson. London: Routledge, 87–105.
149. Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. Explaining the ditransitive person-role constraint: a usage-based approach. Unpublished Ms. [Available at: www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/staff/haspelmath/pdf/2004dpr.pdf; accessed 14 October 2013].
150. Haspelmath, Martin and Uri Tadmor. 2009. Loanwords in the world’s languages: a comparative handbook. Berlin: de Gruyter.
151. Heggarty, Paul. 2012. Commentary on Chen et al.’s ‘Worldwide Analysis of Genetic and Linguistic Relationships of Human Populations’ (1995). Human Biology 84(5): 571–578.
152. Heinämäki, Orvokki. 1976. Papers from the Third Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Text Linguistics Research Group, Academy of Finland, Turku.
153. Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
154. Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
155. Hilpert, Martin. 2008. Germanic future constructions. A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
156. Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
157. Hock, Hans Henrich. 2010. Suprasegmental and prosodic phonological change. In Luraghi and Bubenik (eds), 106–113.
158. Hoenigswald, Henry M. 1965. Language change and linguistic reconstruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
159. Holt, D. Eric. 2003. Optimality theory and language change. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
160. Hombert, Jean-Marie, John J. Ohala and William G. Ewan. 1979. Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language 55: 37–58.
161. Honeybone, Patrick and J. Salmons (eds). in press. Handbook of historical phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
162. Honti, László. 2007. Syntaktische Konstruktionen fremden Ursprungs: Eine skeptische Stellungnahme. Incontri Linguistici, 30: 49–70.
163. Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
164. Hunley, Keith, Claire Bowern and Meghan Healy. 2012. Rejection of a serial founder effects model of genetic and linguistic coevolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 279(1736): 2281–2288. Itkonen, Terho. 1998: Re_ ections on Pre-Uralic and Sámi-Finnic protolanguage. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 54: 229–266.
165. Iverson, Gregory K. and Joseph C. Salmons. 2009. Naturalness and the lifecycle of sound change. In Patrick Steinkrüger and Manfred Krifka (eds) On injection: in memory of Wolfgang U. Wurzel. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 89–105.
166. Jaker, Alessandro. 2012. Prosodic Reversal in Dogrib (Weledeh Dialect). PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.
167. Jakobson, Roman, Gunnar Fant and Morris Halle. 1952. Preliminaries to speech analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
168. Janda, Richard D. 2003. ‘Phonologization’ as the start of dephoneticization – or, on sound change and its aftermath: of extension, lexicalization, and morphologization. In Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds) The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 401–422.
169. Janhunen, Juha. 2001. Indo-Uralic and Ural-Altaic: On the diachronic implications of areal typology. In Carpelan, Parpola and Koskikallio (eds), pp. 207–220.
170. Janhunen, Juha. 2007. Typological expansion in the Ural-Altaic belt. Incontri Linguistici, 30: 71–83.
171. Janse, Mark. 2009. Greek-Turkish language contact in Asia Minor. Hellenic Studies 17: 37–54.
172. Jasanoff, Jay. 2003. Plus ça change…Lachmann’s Law in Latin. In J. H. W. Penney (ed.) Indo-European papers in honour of Anna Morpurgo Davies. New York: Oxford University Press, 405–416.
173. Johanson, Lars and Martine Robbeets (eds) 2012. Copies versus cognates in bound morphology. Leiden: Brill.
174. Jonas, Dianne, John Whitman and Andrew Garrett (eds). 2012. Grammatical change: origins, nature, outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
175. Joseph, Brian. 2001. Is there such a thing as grammaticalization? Language Sciences 22: 163–186.
176. Joseph, Brian. 2010. Internal reconstruction. In Luraghi and Bubenik (eds), 52–58.
177. Jurafsky, Daniel, Alan Bell, Michelle Gregory and William D. Raymond. 2001. Probabilistic relations between words: evidence from reduction in lexical production. In Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper (eds) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 229–254.
178. Kallio, Petri. 2000. Posti’s Superstrate Theory at the threshold of a new millennium. In Johanna Laakso (ed.). Facing Finnic. Some challenges to historical and contact linguistics. Helsinki: Suomalais- Ugrilainen Seura, 80–99.
179. Kang, Y. 2010. Tutorial overview: suprasegmental adaptation in loanwords. Lingua 120: 2295–2310.
180. Kari, James and Ben A. Potter. 2010. The Dene-Yeniseian connection. Fairbanks: Department of Anthropology and the Alaska Native Languages Center.
181. Kavitskaya, Darya. 2002. Compensatory lengthening: phonetics, phonology, diachrony. London: Routledge.
182. Keenan, Edward. 2009. Linguistic theory and the historical creation of English re_ exives. In P. Crisma and G. Longobardi (eds) Historical syntax and linguistic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17–40.
183. Kemenade, Ans van and Nynke de Haas (eds). 2012. Historical linguistics 2009. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Kessler, Brett. in press. Computational and quantitative approaches to historical phonology. In Honeybone and Salmons (eds).
184. King, Robert D. 1973. Rule insertion. Language 49: 551–578.
185. Kiparsky, Paul. 1992. Analogy. In W. Bright (ed.) International encyclopedia of linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press, 59–61.
186. Kiparsky, Paul. 1995. The phonological basis of sound change. In John Goldsmith (ed.) The handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 640–670. [Reprinted in Richard D. Janda and Brian D. Joseph (eds) 2003. Handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 313–342.]
187. Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. The rise of positional licensing. In Ans van Kemenade and Nigel Vincent (eds) Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 460–493.
188. Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. Sievers’ Law as prosodic optimization. In Jay Jasanoff, H. Craig Melchert and Lisi Oliver (eds), Mír Curad: Studies in honor of Calvert Watkins. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.
189. Kiparsky, Paul. 2000a. Analogy as optimization: ‘exceptions’ to Sievers’ Law in Gothic. In Aditi Lahiri (ed.) Analogy, levelling, markedness. Principles of change in phonology and morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 15–46.
190. Kiparsky, Paul. 2000b. Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17: 351–367.
191. Kiparsky, Paul. 2006. Amphichronic linguistics vs. Evolutionary phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32: 217–236.
192. Kiparsky, Paul. 2008. Fenno-Swedish quantity: contrast in Stratal OT. In Andrew Nevins and Bert Vaux (eds) Rules, constraints, and phonological phenomena. Oxford University Press, 185–219.
193. Kiparsky, Paul. 2008. Universals constrain change; change results in typological generalizations. In Good (ed.), 23–53.
194. Kiparsky, Paul. 2010. Dvandvas, blocking, and the associative: the bumpy ride from phrase to word. Language 86(2): 302–321.
195. Kiparsky, Paul. 2010. Compositional vs. paradigmatic approaches to accent and Ablaut. In Stephanie W. Jamison, H. Craig Melchert and Brent Vine (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference. Bremen: Hempen.
196. Kiparsky, Paul. 2011. Compensatory lengthening. In Charles E. Cairns and Eric Raimy (eds) Handbook of the syllable. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 33–70.
197. Kiparsky, Paul. 2012a. Grammaticalization as optimization. In Jonas, Whitman and Garrett (eds), 15–51.
198. Kiparsky, Paul. 2012b. Two-stress accent systems in Swedish. Paper presented at the b fth European Conference on Tone and Intonation, Oxford, 6–8 September 2012.
199. Kiparsky, Paul. in press. Phonologization. In Honeybone and Salmons (eds).
200. Kiparsky, Paul and Cleo Condoravdi. 2006. Tracking Jespersen’s Cycle. In Mark Janse, Brian D. Joseph and A. Ralli (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory. Patras: University of Patras, 172–197.
201. Kiparsky, Paul and Morris Halle. 1977. Towards a reconstruction of the Indo-European accent. In Larry Hyman (ed.), Studies in stress and accent. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4: 209–238.
202. Klein, W. and C. Perdue. 1997. The basic variety or: couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?. Second Language Research 13: 301–347.
203. Koch, Harold. 2004. A methodological history of Australian linguistic classib cation. In Bowern and Koch (eds), 17–66.
204. Korhonen, Mikko. 1969. Die Entwicklung der morphologischen Methode im Lappischen. Finnisch- Ugrische Forschungen 37: 203–262.
205. Krauss, Michael E. 1973. Na-Dene. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.) Linguistics in North America. The Hague: Mouton, 903–978.
206. Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju. 1998. Regularity of sound change through lexical diffusion: a study of Gondi dialects. Language Variation and Change 10: 193–220.
207. Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language variation and change 1: 199–244.
208. Kroch, Anthony. 2001. Syntactic change. In Mark Baltin and Cris Collins (eds) The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 699–729.
209. Kroch, Anthony, Ann Taylor and Donald Ringe. 1995. The Middle English verb-second constraint: a case study in language contact and language change. In Susan C. Herring, Pieter van Reenen and Lene Schøsler (eds) Textual parameters in older language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
210. Kümmel, Martin. 2007. Konsonantenwandel: Bausteine zu einer Typologie des Lautwandels und ihre Konsequenzen. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
211. Kury_owicz, Jerzy. 1965. The evolution of grammatical categories. Diogenes 51: 55–71.
212. Kuteva, Tania and Bernd Heine. 2008. On the explanatory value of grammaticalization. In Good (ed.), 215–230.
213. Labov, William. 1994. Principles of language change, Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
214. Labov, William, Mark Karen and Corey Miller. 1991. Near-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast. Language Variation and Change 3: 33–74.
215. Labov, William, Ingrid Rosenfelder and Josef Fruehwald. 2013. One hundred years of sound change in Philadelphia: Linear incrementation, reversal, and reanalysis. Language 89: 30–65.
216. Lahiri, Aditi. in press. Change in stress patterns. In Honeybone and Salmons (eds).
217. Lahiri, Aditi and B. Elan Dresher. 1999. Open syllable lengthening in West Germanic. In Harry van der Hulst (ed.) Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe. Berlin: de Gruyter, 678–719.
218. Lahiri, Aditi, Tomas Riad, and Haike Jacobs. 1999. Diachronic prosody. Language 75: 678–719.
219. Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. Syntactic reanalysis. In Charles N. Li (ed.) Mechanisms of syntactic change. Austin: University of Texas Press, 57–139.
220. Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
221. Leed, Richard. 1970. Distinctive features and analogy. Lingua 26: 1–24.
222. Li, Michelle, Stephen Matthews and Geoff P. Smith. 2005. Pidgin English texts from the Chinese English Instructor. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics 10: 79–167.
223. Liberman, Anatoly. 1991. Phonologization in Germanic: umlaut and vowel shifts. In Elmer H. Antonsen and Hans Hock (eds) Stæfcræft. Studies in Germanic linguistics: select papers from the 1st and 2nd symposium on Germanic linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
224. Liberman, Mark. 2011. Phonemic diversity decays ‘out of Africa’? Language Log. [Available at: http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3090].
225. Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
226. Lightfoot, David. 1991. How to set parameters: arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
227. Lightfoot, David. 1999. The development of language: acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
228. Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2001. Formal syntax, diachronic minimalism, and etymology: The history of French chez. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 275–302.
229. Luraghi, Silvia and Vit Bubenik (eds). 2010. Continuum companion to historical linguistics. London/New York: Continuum. [Republished in 2013 as The Bloomsbury companion to historical linguistics.]
230. Mallory, J. P. 1989. In search of the Indo-Europeans: language, archaeology and myth. London: Thames and Hudson.
231. Mamet, Ingo. 2011. Cupeño Stress Shift: Diachronic Perspectives. International Journal of American Linguistics 77: 247–83.
232. Masica, Colin P. 1976. Deb ning a linguistic area: South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
233. Matras, Yaron. 2009. Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
234. Matras, Yaron and Jeanette Sakel. 2007. The borrowability of structural categories. In Yaron Matras and Jeanette Sakel (eds) Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton, 31–74.
235. McConvell, Patrick and Claire Bowern. 2011. The prehistory and internal relationships of Australian languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 5: 19–32.
236. Meier-Brügger, Michael. 2002. Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin: de Gruyter
237. Mithun, Marianne. 2011. Grammaticalization and explanation. In Narrog and Heine (eds), 177–192.
238. Morpurgo Davies, Anna. 1978. Analogy, Segmentation and the early Neogrammarians. Transactions of the Philological Society, 76(1): 36–60.
239. Morpurgo Davies, Anna. 1998. Nineteenth-century linguistics. Volume IV of G. Lepschy (ed.) History of linguistics. London: Longman.
240. Mühlhäusler, Peter and Rom Harré. 1990. Pronouns and people. The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
241. Myers, Scott. 2002. Gaps in factorial typology: the case of voicing in consonant clusters. Rutgers Optimality Archive. [Available at: http://roa.rutgers.edu/].
242. Nakhleh, Luay, Donald Ringe and Tandy Warnow. 2005. Perfect phylogenetic networks: a new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Language 81: 382–420.
243. Naro, Anthony Julius. 1981. The social and structural dimensions of a syntactic change. Language 57: 63–98.
244. Narrog, Heiko and Bernd Heine (eds). 2011. The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
245. Nathan, Geoffrey and Patricia Donegan. in press. Natural phonology and change. In Honeybone and Salmons (eds).
246. Newman, John. 1996. Footnotes to a history of Cantonese. In Durie and Ross (eds), 180–217.
247. Newmeyer, Frederick. 1988. Language form and language function. Cambridge: MIT Press.
248. Newmeyer, Frederick. 2001. Deconstructing grammaticalization. Language Sciences 23: 187–229.
249. Nicolle, Steve. 2012. Diachrony and grammaticalization. In Robert Binnick (ed.) The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 370–397.
250. Nikolaeva, Irina. 2000. The status of schwa in the phonological description of Northern Ostyak. Finnisch-ugrische Mitteilungen 23: 121–148.
251. Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
252. O’Grady, Geoffrey and Kenneth Hale. 2004. The coherence and distinctiveness of the Pama-Nyungan language family within the Australian linguistic phylum. In Bowern and Koch (eds), 69–92.
253. Ohala, John J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In C. S. Masek, R. A. Hendrick and M. F. Miller (eds), Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 178–203.
254. Ohala, John J. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. In Charles Jones (ed.) Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives. London: Longman, 237–278.
255. Ohala, John J. 2012. The listener as source of sound change: an update. In Maria-Josep Solé and Daniel Recasens (eds) The initiation of sound change: perception, production, and social factors. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 21–26.
256. Page, B. Richard. 2007. On the irregularity of open syllable lengthening in German. In Joseph Salmons and Shannon Dubenion-Smith (eds) Historical linguistics 2005, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 337–350.
257. Paradis, C. and D. LaCharité. 1997. Preservation and minimality in loanword adaptation. Journal of Linguistics 33: 379–430.
258. Pawley, Andrew. 2009. Greenberg’s Indo-Pacib c hypothesis: an assessment. In Bethwyn Evans (ed.) Discovering history through language: papers in honour of Malcolm Ross. Canberra: Pacib c Linguistics, 153–180.
259. Pawley, Andrew. 2011. On the position of Bugotu and Gela in the Guadalcanal-Nggelic subgroup of Oceanic. Oceanic Linguistics 50: 1–24.
260. Pawley, Andrew. Andrew. 2012. How reconstructable is Proto Trans New Guinea? Problems, progress, prospects. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia. Special Issue 2012 (Part I): 88–164.
261. Phillips, Betty S. 1984. Word frequency and the actuation of sound change. Language 60: 320–342.
262. Phillips, Betty S. 2001. Lexical diffusion, lexical frequency, and lexical analysis. In Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper (eds) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 123–136.
263. Phillips, Betty S. 2006. Word frequency and lexical diffusion. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
264. Phillips, Betty S. in press. Lexical diffusion in historical phonology. In Honeybone and Salmons (eds).
265. Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper (eds) Frequency effects and the emergence of lexical structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, 137–157.
266. Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2002. Word-specib c phonetics. Laboratory Phonology VII. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 101–139.
267. Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2003. Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech 46: 115–154.
268. Plank, Frans. 1995. Entgrammatisierung – Spiegelbild der Grammatisierung? In Norbert Boretzky, Wolfgang Dressler and Andreas Bittner (eds) Natürlichkeitstheorie und Sprachwandel. Bochum: Brockmeyer, 199–219.
269. Plank, Frans. 2006. Das grammatische Raritätenkabinett. Unpublished Ms. [Available at: http://typo.unikonstanz. de/rara/intro/index.php?pt=1; accessed 15 October 2013].
270. Ratliff, Martha. 2013. Tonogenesis and tone change. In Honeybone and Salmons (eds).
271. Reid, Lawrence A. 2005. The current status of Austric: a review and evaluation of the lexical and morphosyntactic evidence. In Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench and Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (ed.) The peopling of East Asia: putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics. London: Routledge Curzon, 132–160.
272. Reiss, Charles. 2003. Language change without constraint reranking. In Eric D. Holt (ed.) Optimality Theory and language change. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 143–168.
273. Renfrew, Colin. 1987. Archaeology and language: The puzzle of Indo-European origins. London: Cape.
274. Renfrew, Colin. 1999. Time depth, convergence theory and innovation in Proto-Indo-European. Journal of Indo- European Studies 27: 257–293.
275. Renfrew, Colin. 2000. 10,000 or 5000 years ago? – Questions of time depth. In Colin Renfrew, April McMahon and Larry Trask (eds) Time depth in historical linguistics. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 413–439.
276. Renfrew, Colin. 2001. The Anatolian origins of Proto-Indo-European and the autochthony of the Hittites. In Robert Drews Greater Anatolia and the Indo-Hittite language family. Washington: Journal of Indo- European Studies, 36–63.
277. Rezac, Milan. 2008. The syntax of eccentric agreement: the Person Case Constraint and absolutive displacement in Basque. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 61–106
278. Riad, Tomas. 2003. Diachrony of the Scandinavian accent typology. In Paula Fikkert and Haike Jacobs (eds) Development in prosodic systems. Berlin: Mouton, 91–144.
279. Rice, Keren. 1989. A Grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton. Riggle, Jason. 2010/To Appear. The Sampling Model of Variation. In Proceedings of the 46th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society.
280. Roberts, Ian. 2007. Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
281. Roberts, Ian and Anna Roussou. 1999. A formal approach to grammaticalization. Linguistics 37: 1011–1041.
282. Roberts, Ian and Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change: a formal theory of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
283. Roberts, Philip. 2012. Towards a computer model of the historical phonology and morphology of Latin. PhD. Dissertation, Oxford University.
284. Romero, Sergio F. 2012. A Maya Version of Jespersen’s Cycle: the diachronic evolution of negative markers in K’iche’ Maya. International Journal of American Linguistics 78: 77–96.
285. Ross, Malcolm. 1996. Contact induced change and the Comparative Method: cases from Papua New Guinea. In Durie and Ross (eds), 180–217.
286. Ross, Malcolm. 2001. Contact-induced change in Oceanic languages of North-west Melanesia. In Alexandra Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon (eds) Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: problems in comparative linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 134–166.
287. Ross, Malcolm. 2003. Diagnosing prehistoric language contact. In Raymond Hickey (ed.) Motives for language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 174–198.
288. Ross, Malcolm and Mark Durie. 1996. Introduction. In Durie and Ross (eds), 180–217.
289. Sajantila, Antti and Svante Pääbo. 1995. Language replacement in Scandinavia. Nature Genetics 11: 359–360.
290. Salminen, Tapani. 2002. Problems in the taxonomy of the Uralic languages in the light of modern comparative studies. In Salmons, Joseph. 1992. Northwest Indo-European vocabulary and substrate phonology. In Roger Pearson (ed.) Perspectives on Indo-European language, culture and religion: studies in honor of Edgar C. Polomé. Volume 2. Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series 9: 265–279.
291. Salminen, Tapani. 2010. Segmental phonological change. In Luraghi and Bubenik (eds), 89–105.
292. De Saussure, Ferdinand. 1914. Cours de linguistique générale. [Translated by Wade Baskin, Course in General Linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library, 1959.]
293. Scherre, Maria Marta Pereira and Anthony Julius Naro. 2010. Perceptual vs. grammatical constraints and social factors in subject-verb agreement in Brazilian Portuguese. Selected Papers from NWAV 38, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16(2): 165–171.
294. Schrijver, Peter C. H. 2001. Lost languages of Northern Europe. In Carpelan, Parpola and Koskikallio (eds), 417–425.
295. Schrijver, Peter C. H. 2009. Celtic in_ uence on Old English: phonological and phonetic evidence. English language and Linguistics 13: 193–211.
296. Schrijver, Peter C. H. 2011. The High German consonant shift and language contact. In Cornelius Hasselblatt, H. Peter Houtzagers, Remco van Pareren (eds) Language contact in times of globalization. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
297. Schuchardt, Hugo. 1885. Über die Lautgesetze: gegen die Junggrammatiker. Berlin: R. Oppenheim.
298. Schwenter, Scott. 2006. Fine-tuning Jespersen’s Cycle. In Betty J. Birner and Gregory Ward (eds) Drawing the boundaries of meaning. Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
299. Schwenter, Scott and Elizabeth Traugott. 2000. Invoking scalarity: the development of in fact. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1: 7–25.
300. Sicoli, Mark A. and Gary Holton. 2014. Linguistic phylogenies support back-migration from Beringia to Asia. PLoS ONE 9(3): e91722.
301. Sievers, Eduard and Karl Brunner. 1942. Altenglische grammatik. Dritte, neubearbeitete Au_ age. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
302. Sloos, Marjoleine. 2013. Phonological grammar and frequency: An integrated approach. Groningen: Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics.
303. De Smet, Hendrik. 2012. The course of actualization. Language 88: 601–633.
304. de Smet, Hendrik. 2013. Spreading patterns: diffusional change in the English system of complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
305. Smith, Jennifer L. 2005. Phonological augmentation in prominent positions. London: Routledge.
306. Sproat, Richard. 2010. Ancient symbols, computational linguistics, and the reviewing practices of the general science journals. Computational Linguistics 36: 585–594.
307. Starostin, Sergei A., Anna V. Dybo and Oleg A. Mudrak. 2003. Etymological dictionary of the Altaic languages. Leiden: Brill.
308. Steinitz, Wolfgang. 1964. Zur Periodisierung der alten baltischen und germanischen Lehnwörter im Finnischen. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe 13(213): 335–339.
309. Stilo, Donald. 2004. Iranian as buffer zone between the universal typologies of Turkic and Semitic. In Éva Ágnes Csató, Bo Isaksson and Carina Jahani (eds) Linguistic convergence and areal diffusion: case studies from Iranian, Semitic and Turkic. London: Routledge Courzon, 35–63.
310. Thomason, Sarah Grey and Terence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
311. Thurgood, Graham. 2002. Vietnamese and tonogenesis: Revising the model and the analysis. Diachronica 19: 333–363.
312. Traugott, Elizabeth. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectib cation in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55.
313. Traugott, Elizabeth. 1995. Subjectib cation in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds) Subjectivity and subjectivisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 37–54.
314. Traugott, Elizabeth. 2010. Grammaticalization. In Luraghi and Bubenik (eds), 271–285.
315. Traugott, Elizabeth and Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
316. Traugott, Elizabeth and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
317. Trousdale, Graeme. 2012. Grammaticalization, constructions and the grammaticalization of constructions. In Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems and Tanja Mortelmans (eds) Grammaticalization and language change: new re_ ections. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 167–198.
318. Trudgill Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Uffmann, Christian. in press. Loanword adaptation. In Honeybone and Salmons (eds).
319. Vajda, Edward J. 2010a. A Siberian link with the Na-Dene. Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska 5 (New Series): 31–99.
320. Vajda, Edward J. 2010b. Yeniseian, Na-Dene and historical linguistics. Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska 5 (New Series): 100–118.
321. de Vogelaer, G. and J. van der Auwera. 2010. When typological rara generate rarissima: the analogical extension of verbal agreement in Dutch dialects. In J. Wohlgemuth and M. Cysouw (eds) Rara and rarissima: documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 47–73.
322. Walker, Rachel. 2011. Vowel patterns in language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
323. Warner, Anthony. 2006. Variation and the interpretation of change in periphrastic do. In Ans van Kemenade and Bettelou Los (eds) The handbook of the history of English. Blackwell 2006, 45–67.
324. Wedel, Andrew. 2006. Exemplar models, evolution and language change. The Linguistic Review 23: 247–274.
325. Whitman, John. 2012. Misparsing and syntactic reanalysis. In van Kemenade and de Haas (eds), 70–87.
326. Willis, David. 2012. A minimalist approach to Jespersen’s Cycle in Welsh. In Jonas, Whitman and Garrett (eds), 93–119.
327. Winford, Donald. 2013. Social factors in contact languages. In Yaron Matras and Peter Bakker (eds) Contact languages: a comprehensive guide. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 369–425.
328. Witzel, Michael. 1999. Early sources for South Asian substrate languages. Mother Tongue. Special Issue: 1–70.
329. Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich. 1989. In_ ectional morphology and naturalness.
330. Yu, Alan. 2007. Understanding near mergers: the case of morphological tone in Cantonese. Phonology 24: 187–214.