The syntax of eccentric agreement: The Person Case Constraint and absolutive displacement in Basque

Natural Language and Linguistic Theory

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 61-106

  Rezac, Milan ^a  

^a University of Nantes LLING EA 3827   (France)

Author keywords

Agreement; Case; Ergativity; Person Case Constraint

Indexed keywords

EID: 43349100482     PISSN: 0167806X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11049-008-9032-6     Document Type: Article

References (166)

1. Ackema, P., & Neeleman, A. (2005). Beyond morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Adger, D., & Harbour, D. (2007). Syntax and syncretisms of the Person Case Constraint. Syntax,10, 2-37.
3. Agirre, J. M. (2004). Datiboaren lekualdatzeaz. Ms., University of the Basque Country.
4. Albizu, P. (1997). Generalized Person-Case constraint: A case for a syntax-driven inflectional morphology. In: M. Uribe-Etxebarria & A. Mendikoetxea (Eds.), Theoretical issues on the morphology-syntax interface (pp. 1-33). Donostia: Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundia/EHU.
5. Albizu, P. (2001). Datibo sintagmen izaera sintaktikoaren inguruan: Eztabaidarako oinarrizko zenbait datu. In: B. Fernández & P. Albizu (Eds.), On Case and agreement (pp. 49-69). Bilbo: EHUko Argitalpen Zerbitzua.
6. Albizu, P. (2002). Basque verbal morphology: Redefining cases. In: P. Goenaga & J. A. Lakarra (Eds.), Erramu Boneta: Festschrift for Rudolf P. G. de Rijk (pp. 1-19). Bilbo: EHUko Argitalpen Zerbitzua.
7. Albizu, P., & Eguren, L. (2000). An optimality theoretic account for "ergative displacement" in Basque. In U. D. Wolfgang, O. E. Pfeiffer, M. A. Pöchtrager, & J. R. Rennison (Eds.), Morphological analysis in comparison (pp. 1-23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Albizu, P., & Fernández, B. (2002). Datives' intervention effect on ergativity on Basque. Paper presented at the XII Coloquio de Gramática Generativa, Universidad Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa (April 15-17, 2002).
9. Albizu, P., & Fernández, B. (2006). Licit and illicit ERG-DAT pairings. In: B. Fernández & I. Laka (Eds.), Andolin gogoan: Essays in honour of professor Eguzkitza (pp. 69-96). Bilbo: UPV/EHU.
10. Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing AGR: Word-order, V-movement, and EPP-checking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 16, 491-539.
11. Anagnostopoulou, E. (2003). The syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from clitics. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
12. Anagnostopoulou, E. (forthcoming). Notes on the person case constraint in Germanic. In: R. D'Alessandro, S. Fischer, & G. Hrafnbjargarson (Eds.), Agreement restrictions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. In a volume to appear June 2008, see: http://degruyter.de/cont/imp/mouton/detailEn.cfm?isbn= 9783110200652&sel=kw.
13. Arregi, K. (2004). The have/be alternation in Basque. Ms., University of Illinois. https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/karlos/www/Arregi-have.pdf. Accessed 12 December 2007.
14. Arregi, K., & Nevins, A. (forthcoming).Agreement restrictions and their realization in Basque morphology. In: R. D'Alessandro, S. Fischer, & G. Hrafnbjargarson (Eds.), Agreement restrictions, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. In a volume to appear June 2008, see: http://degruyter.de/cont/imp/mouton/ detailEn.cfm?isbn=9783110200652&sel=kw.
15. Arretxe, J. (1994). Basauriko euskara. Basauri: Basauriko Udala.
16. Artiagoitia, X. (2000). Hatserreak eta parametroak lantzen. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea and Arabako Foru Aldundia.
17. Artiagoitia, X. (2001a). Seemingly ergative and ergatively seeming. In: J. Herschensohn, E. Mallén, & K. Zagona (Eds.), Features and interfaces in Romance: Essays in honor of Heles Contreras (pp. 1-22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Artiagoitia, X. (2001b). Irudiak eta emaileak. Ms., University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz.
19. Artiagoitia, X, (2003a). Reflexive and reciprocal structures. In: J. I. Hualde & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Grammar of Basque (pp. 607-631). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
20. Artiagoitia, X. (2003b). Subordination. In: J. I. Hualde & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Grammar of Basque (pp. 632-761). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
21. Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Baker, M. (1996). The Polysynthesis parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Baker, M. (2003). Agreement, dislocation, and partial configurationality. In: A. Carnie, et al. (Eds.), Formal approaches to function in grammar (pp. 107-132). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24. Béjar, S. (2003). Phi-syntax: A theory of agreement. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
25. Béjar, S., & Milan, R. (2003). Person licensing and the derivation of PCC effects. In: A.-T. Pérez-Leroux & Y. Roberge (Eds.), Romance linguistics: Theory and acquisition (pp. 49-62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Bhatt, R. (2006). Long distance agreement in Hindi-Urdu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23, 757-807.
27. Bianchi, V. (2006). On the syntax of person arguments. Lingua, 116, 2023-2067.
28. Bickel, B. (2004). The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In: P. Bhaskararao & K. V. Subbarao (Eds.), Non-nominative subjects (Vol. 1, pp. 77-111). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29. Bickel, B., & Yadava, Y. P. (2000). A fresh look at grammatical relations in Indo-Aryan. Lingua, 110, 343-373.
30. Bitter, M., & Hale, K. (1996). The structural determination of Case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry, 27, 1-68.
31. Bobaljik, J. D. (1993). Ergativity and ergative unergatives. In: C. Philips (Ed.), Papers on Case and agreement 2, MIT working papers in linguistics (Vol. 19, pp. 45-88). Cambridge, Mass.: MITWPL, Department of Linguistics & Philosophy, MIT.
32. Bobaljik, J. D. (2000). The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. In: K. K. Grohmann & C. Struijke (Eds.), University of Maryland Working papers in linguistics (Vol. 10, pp. 35-71). College Park: University of Maryland.
33. Bobaljik, J. D. (to appear). Where's φ? In: D. Harbour, D. Adger & S. Béjar (Eds.), Φ theory: Φ-features across interfaces and modules. Oxford: Oxford University Press. In a volume to appear April 2008, see http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Linguistics/SyntaxMorphology/? view=usa&ci=9780199213771.
34. Bobaljik, J. D., & Branigan, P. (2006). Eccentric agreement and multiple case checking. In: A. Johns, D. Massam, & J. Ndayiragije (Eds.), Ergativity: Emerging issues (pp 47-77). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
35. Boeckx, C. (2000). Quirky agreement. Studia Linguistica, 54, 354-380.
36. Boeckx, C. (2003). Intricacies of Icelandic agreement. Ms, Harvard University.
37. Boeckx, C., & Niinuma, F. (2004). Conditions on agreement in Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, 453-480.
38. Bonet, E. (1991). Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
39. Borer, H. (1989). Anaphoric AGR. In O. Jaeggli & K. J. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 69-109). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
40. Bošković, Ž. (2002). A-movement and the EPP. Syntax, 5, 167-218.
41. Brandi, L., & Cordin, P. (1989). Two Italian dialects and the Null Subject Parameter. In: O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 111-142). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
42. Brody, M. (1995). Lexico-logical form: A radically minimalist theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
43. Brody, M. (2002). On the status of representations and derivations. In: S. D. Epstein & T. D. Seely (Eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program (pp. 19-41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax: A Government-Binding approach. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
45. Carnie, A., & Jelinek, E. (2003). Argument hierarchies and the mapping principle. In: A. Carnie, H. Harley, & M. A. Willie (Eds.), Formal approaches to function in grammar (pp. 265-296). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
46. Carstens, V. (2005). Agree and EPP in Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23, 219-279.
47. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
48. Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In: R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89-156). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
49. Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In: M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1-52). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
50. Chomsky, N. (2005). On phases. Ms., MIT.
51. Cole, P., Hermon, G., & Sung, L.-M. (1990). Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 1-22.
52. Collins, C. (1997). Local economy. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
53. Cuervo, C. (2003). Datives at large. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
54. D'Alessandro, R. (2004). Impersonal si constructions: Agreement and interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stuttgart.
55. Davison, A. (2004). Non-nominative subjects in Hindi-Urdu: VP structure and Case parameters. In: P. Bhaskararao & K. V. Subbarao (Eds.), Non-nominative subjects (Vol. 1, pp 71-98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
56. de Azkue, R. M. (1924) [1969]. Morfología vasca (Vol. 2). Bilbo: La Gran Enciclopedia Vasca.
57. de Yrizar, P. (1981). Contribución a la dialectología de la lengua vasca, (Vol. 1). Donostia: Gipuzkoako Aurrezki Kutxa Probintziala.
58. de Yrizar, P. (1992). Morfología del verbo auxiliar alto Navarro septentrional (estudio dialectológico, Vol. 2). Iruñea: Euskaltzaindia.
59. de Zabala, J. M. (1848). El verbo regular vascongado del dialecto vizcaino. San Sebastian: Ignacio Ramon Baroja.
60. den Dikken, M. (2001). "Pluringulars", pronouns and quirky agreement. The Linguistic Review, 18, 19-41.
61. den Dikken, M. (2004). Agreement and "clause union". In: K. E. Kiss & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Verb clusters (pp. 445-98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
62. Elordieta, A. (2001). Verb movement and constituent permutation in Basque. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden.
63. Elortza, J. (1999). Arrasateko euskara. Arrasate: Arrasateko Udala.
64. Embick, D. (2000). Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 185-230.
65. Embick, D., & Marantz, A. (2006). Architecture and blocking. Ms, University of Pennsylvania and MIT.
66. Embick, D., & Noyer, R. (2001). Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 555-595.
67. Etxepare, R. (2003). Menpeko infinitiboak eta urruneko komunztadura euskaraz. Lapurdum, 8, 167-206.
68. Etxepare, R. (2005). Number long distance agreement in (substandard) Basque. In: J. Lakarra & J. I. Hualde (Eds.), In honor of Larry Trask. San Sebastián: Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa.
69. Fernández, B. (2001). Absolutibo komunztaduradun ergatiboak, absolutibo komunztaduradun datiboak: Ergatiboaren Lekualdatzetik Datiboaren Lekualdatzera. In: B. Fernández & P. Albizu (Eds.), On Case and Agreement (pp. 147-165). Bilbo: EHUko Argitalpen Zerbitzua.
70. Fernández, B. (2004). Gustatzen nau gustatzen dizu: Aditz laguntzaile eta komuntzadura bitxiak perpaus ez-akusatiboetan. In: P. Arbizu & B. Fernández (Eds.), Euskal gramatika XXI. mendearen atarian: Arazo zaharark, azterbide berriak (pp. 89-112). Gazteiz: Arabako Foru Aldundia.
71. Fernández, B., & Albizu, P. (2000). Ergative displacement in Basque and the division of labour between morphology and syntax. In: A. Okrent & J. P. Boyle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Chicago linguistic society 36 (Vol. 2, pp. 103-118). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
72. Fox, D. (2000). Economy and semantic interpretation. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.
73. Hale, K. (2001). Eccentric agreement. In: P. Albizu & B. Fernández (Eds.), On case and agreement (pp. 15-48). Bilbo: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.
74. Hale, K., Jeanne, L. M., & Pranka, P. (1991). On suppletion, selection, and agreement. In: C. Georgopoulos & R. Ishihara (Eds.), Essays in honor of S.Y. Kuroda (pp. 255-70). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
75. Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In: K. Hale & J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building (Vol. 20, pp. 111-176). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
76. Harley, H., & Noyer, R. (1999). Distributed morphology. GLOT, 4.4, 3-9.
77. Harris, A. (1981). Georgian syntax: A study in relational grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Haspelmath, M. (2004). Explaining the ditransitive Person Case constraint: A usage-based approach. Constructions 2. http://www.constructions- online.de/articles/35. Accessed 12 December 2007.
79. Holmberg, A. (2000). Scandinavian stylistic fronting: How any category can become an expletive. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 445-483.
80. Holmberg, A., & Hróarsdóttir, P. (2003). Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions. Lingua, 113, 997-1019.
81. Hornstein, N. (1995). Logical form: From GB to minimalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
82. Jónsson, J. G. (1996). Clausal architecture and case in Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
83. Joppen, S., & Wunderlich, D. (1995). Argument linking in Basque. Lingua, 97, 123-169.
84. Kayne, R. (1975). French syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
85. Kayne, R. (1989). Facets of Romance past participle agreement. In: P. Benincà (Ed.), Dialect variation and the theory of grammar (pp. 85-103). Dordrecht: Foris.
86. Kučerová, I. (2007). Agreement in Icelandic: An argument for derivational theory of intervention effects. In E. Bainbridge & B. Agbayani (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th WECOL 2006 (pp. 272-284). Department of Linguistics, California State University: Fresno.
87. Lafitte, P. (1979) [1995]. Grammaire Basque (Navarro-Labourdin littéraire). Donosti: Elkar.
88. e siècle. Baiona: Elkar.
89. Laka, I. (1993a). Unergatives that assign ergative, unaccusatives that assign accusative. In: J. D. Bobaljik & C. Phillips (Eds.), Papers on case and agreement 1, MIT working papers in linguistics (Vol. 18, pp. 149-172). Cambridge, Mass.: MITWPL, Department of Linguistics & Philosophy, MIT.
90. 0 syntax. In: J. I. Hualde & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Generative studies in Basque linguistics (pp. 21-70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
91. Laka, I. (2000). Thetablind case: Burzio's generalisation and its image in the mirror. In: E. Reuland (Ed.), Arguments and case: Explaning Burzio's generalisation (pp. 103-129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
92. Landau, I. (2000). Elements of control. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
93. Lavine, J. E., & Freidin, R. (2002). The subject of defective T(ense) in Slavic. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 10, 253-289.
94. Legendre, G. (1989). Inversion with certain French experiencer verbs. Language, 65, 752-782.
95. Letamendia, J. A., & Sagarzazu, T. (1992). Hondarribiko hizkera Roque Jazinto Salazarren predikuan (1778). Iker, 7, 497-553.
96. Mahajan, A. K. (1989). Agreement and agreement phrases. In: I. Laka & A. K. Mahajan (Eds.), Functional heads and clause structure, MIT working papers in linguistics (Vol. 10, pp. 217-252). Cambridge, Mass.: MITWPL.
97. Marandin, J.-M. (2001). Unaccusative inversion in French. In: Y. D'Hulst, J. Rooryck, & J. Schroten (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 1999. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
98. Marantz, A. (1991). Case and Licensing. In: G. Westphal, B. Ao, & H.-R. Chae (Eds.), Proceedings of ESCOL '91 (pp. 234-253). Cornell: Cornell Linguistics Club.
99. Masullo, P. (1993). Two types of quirky subjects: Spanish versus Icelandic. In: A. Schafer (Ed.), Proceedings of the north eastern linguistic society (Vol. 23, pp. 303-317). Amherst: GLSA.
100. Matushansky, O. (2006). Head-movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 37, 69-109.
101. McGinnis, M. (1995). Projection and position: Evidence from Georgian. In: J. Costa, R. Goedemans, & R. van der Vijver (Eds.), Proceedings of ConSole IV (pp. 203-220). Leiden: HIL.
102. McGinnis, M. (1998). Locality in A-movement. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
103. Migdalski, K. (2006). The syntax of compound tenses in Slavic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht.
104. Ndayiragije, J. (1999). Checking economy. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 399-444.
105. Nevins, A. (2007). The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 273-313.
106. Nichols, L. (2001). The syntactic basis of referential hierarchy phenomena: Clues from languages with and without morphological case. Lingua, 111, 515-537.
107. Noyer, R. (1997). Features, Positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. New York: Garland.
108. O'Herin, B. (2001). Abaza applicatives. Language, 77, 477-493.
109. Ormazabal, J. (2000). A conspiracy theory of case and agreement. In: R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Papers in honour of Howard Lasnik (pp. 235-260). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
110. Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J. (1998). On the syntactic nature of the me-lui and the Person-Case Constraint. Anuario del Seminario Julio de Urquijo, 32, 415-434.
111. Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J. (2007). Object agreement restrictions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 315-347.
112. Ortiz de Urbina, J. (1989). Parameters in the grammar of Basque. Dordrecht: Foris.
113. Ortiz de Urbina, J. (2003). Causatives. In: J. I. Hualde & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Grammar of Basque (pp. 592-606). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
114. Oyharçabal, B. (1992). Structural case and inherent case marking: Ergaccusativity in Basque. In: J. A. Lakarra & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Syntactic theory and Basque syntax (pp. 309-342). Donostia: Gipuzkoako Diputazioa.
115. Oyharçabal, B. (2000). A propos de l'ergativité: Le cas du basque. Cérès, 120, 237-259.
116. Oyharçabal, B. (2003). Lexical causatives and causative alternation in Basque. In: B. Oyharçabal (Ed.), Inquiries into the syntax-lexicon relations in Basque [Supplements of ASJU XLVI] (pp. 223-253).
117. Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
118. Pesetsky, D., & Torrego, E. (forthcoming). The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In: S. Karimi, V. Samian, & W. Wilkins (Eds.), Clever and right: A festschrift for Joe Emonds. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. In a volume to appear June 2008, see: http://degruyter.de/cont/imp/ mouton/detailEn.cfm?isbn=9783110200652&sel=kw.
119. Pica, P. (1987). On the nature of the reflexivization cycle. In J. Mcdonough & B. Plunkett (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 17 (pp. 483-499). Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.
120. Polinsky, M., & Potsdam, E. (2006). Expanding the scope of control and raising. Syntax, 9, 171-192.
121. Postal, P. M. (1981). A failed analysis of the French cohesive infinitive construction. Linguistic Analysis, 8, 281-323.
122. Postal, P. M. (1984). French indirect object cliticisation and SSC/BT. Linguistic Analysis, 14, 111-172.
123. Postal, P. M. (1989). Masked inversion in French. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
124. Postal, P. M. (1990). French indirect object demotion. In: P. M. Postal & B. D. Joseph (Eds.), Studies in relational grammar (Vol. 3, pp. 104-200). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
125. Pylkkänen, L. (in press). Introducing arguments. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
126. Quicoli, A. C. (1984). Remarks on French clitic systems. Linguistic Analysis, 14, 55-95.
127. Quinn, H. (2005). The distribution of pronoun case forms in english. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
128. Rebuschi, G. (1984). Structure de l'énoncé en basque. Paris: SELAF.
129. Reinhart, T. (2006). Interface strategies. MIT Press.
130. Reinhart, T., & Reuland, E. (1991). Anaphors and logophors: An argument structure perspective. In: J. Koster & E. Reuland (Eds.), Long-distance anaphora (pp. 283-321). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
131. Rezac, M. (2003). The fine structure of cyclic Agree. Syntax, 6, 156-182.
132. Rezac, M. (2004). Elements of cyclic syntax: Agree and Merge. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
133. Rezac, M. (2006). Agreement displacement in Basque. Ms., University of the Basque Country. http://members.lycos.co.uk/loargann/. Accessed 12 December 2007.
134. Rezac, M. (2007). Escaping the Person Case Constraint: Referential computation in the φ-system. Linguistic variation yearbook, 6, 97-138.
135. Rezac, M. (in prep). Module encapsulation at the interfaces of syntax: Evidence from clitics and agreement. Presented at the Linguistics Association of Great Britain, University College of London, September 2007.
136. Rezac, M. (to appear). Φ-Agree and θ-related case. In: D. Harbour, D. Adger, & S. Béjar (Eds.), Φ theory: Φ-features across interfaces and modules. Oxford: Oxford University Press. In a volume to appear April 2008, see http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/ Linguistics/SyntaxMorphology/?view=usa&ci=9780199213771
137. Rice, K., & Saxon, L. (1994). The subject position in Athapaskan languages. In: MIT working papers in linguistics (Vol. 22, 173-195). Cambridge, Mass: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
138. Richards, M. D. (2004a). Object shift and scrambling in North and West Germanic: A case study in parametric syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
139. Richards, N. (2004b). Against bans on lowering. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 453-464.
140. Richards, N. (2005). Person-Case effect in Tagalog and the nature of long distance extraction. In: J. Heinz & D. Ntelitheos (Eds.), Proceedings of the twelfth annual conference of the austronesian formal linguistics association, UCLA working papers in linguistics (Vol. 12, pp. 383-394). Los Angeles, Calif.: UCLA.
141. Rigau, G. (2005). Number agreement variation in Catalan dialects. In: G. Cinque & R. S. Kayne (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax (pp. 775-805). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
142. Rivero, M. L. (2004). Spanish quirky subjects, person restrictions, and the Person-Case Constraint. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 494-502.
143. Rivero, M. L. (2005). Topics in Bulgarian morphology and syntax: A minimalist perspective. Lingua, 115, 1083-1128.
144. Roberge, Y., & Troberg, M. (2007). Thematic indirect objects in French. French Language Studies, 17, 297-322.
145. San Martin, I. (1999). Control in Basque. Ms., University of Maryland.
146. Sauerland, U. (2003). Intermediate adjunction with A-movement. Linguistic Inquiry, 34, 308-314.
147. Schütze, C. T. (1997). INFL in child and adult language: Agreement, Case, and licensing. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
148. Schütze, C. T. (2001). On the nature of default Case. Syntax, 2, 205-238.
149. Sigurosson, H. Á. (1996). Icelandic finite verb agreement. In: C. Platzack (Ed.), Working papers in scandinavian syntax (Vol. 57, pp. 1-46). Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages, University of Lund.
150. Sigurosson, H. Á. (2002). To be an oblique subject: Icelandic vs. Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20, 691-724.
151. Sigurosson, H. Á. (2004). Icelandic non-nominative subjects. In: P. Bhaskararao & K. V. Subbarao (Eds.), Non-nominative subjects (Vol. 2, pp. 137-159). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
152. Sigurosson, H. Á., & Holmberg, A. (forthcoming). Icelandic dative intervention: Person and number are separate probes. In: R. d'Alessandro, G. H. Hrafnbjargarson, & S. Fischer (Eds.), Agreement restrictions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Draft: http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/000371. Accessed 12 December 2007. In a volume to appear June 2008.
153. see: http://degruyter.de/cont/imp/mouton/detailEn.cfm?isbn= 9783110200652&sel=kw.
154. Sobin, N. (1997). Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 318-343.
155. Sproat, R. (1985). On deriving the lexicon. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
156. Taraldsen, K. T. (1981). Case-conflict in Norwegian Topicalization. In: V. Burke & J. Pustejovsky (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS (Vol. 11, pp. 77-398). Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.
157. Taraldsen, K. T. (1995). On agreement and nominative objects in Icelandic. In: H. Haider, S. Olsen, & S. Vikner (Eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax (pp. 237-307). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
158. Trevidig, A. (1987). Dibarderioù rannyezh ar Poc'her. Hor Yezh, 171-2, 71-79.
159. Ura, H. (2000). Checking theory and grammatical functions in Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
160. Uriagereka, J. (1999). Minimal restrictions on Basque movements. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 17, 403-444.
161. van Koppen, M. (2005). One probe - two goals: Aspects of agreement in Dutch dialects. Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht.
162. Wali, K., & Koul, O. N. (1997). Kashmiri: A cognitive-descriptive grammar. New York: Routledge.
163. Watanabe, A. (2000). Feature copying and binding: Evidence from complementizer agreement and switch reference. Syntax, 3, 159-181.
164. Woolford, E. (1997). Four-way case systems: Ergative, nominative, objective, and accusative. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15, 181-227.
165. Woolford, E. (2006). Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 37, 111-130.
166. Young, K. McC. (1988). Multiple case assignment. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.