Invoking scalarity the development of in fact

Journal of Historical Pragmatics

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 7-25

  Schwenter, Scott A ^a   Traugott, Elizabeth Closs ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989402441     PISSN: 15665852     EISSN: 15699854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/jhp.1.1.04sch     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aligned-Hansard A. 1988. Aligned-Hansard Corpus ofCanadian Parliament Proceedings.
2. Anscombre, Jean-Claude, and Oswald Ducrot. 1983. L’Argumentation dans la Langue. Brussels: Mardaga.
3. Ariel, Mira. 1994. Pragmatic operators. In: R. E. Asher and J. M. Y. Simpson (eds.). The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 6. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 3250-3253.
4. Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Blumenthal, Peter. 1996. Le connecteur enfait. In: Claude Muller (ed.). Dependence et Integration Syntaxique: Subordination, Coordination, Connexion. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 257-69.
6. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975. Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry 4, 353-75.
9. Ferrara, Kathleen. 1997. Form and function of the discourse marker anyway: Implications for discourse analysis. Linguistics 35, 343-378.
10. Fraser, Bruce. 1988. Types of English discourse markers. Acta LinguisticaHungarica 38, 19-33.
11. Fraser, Bruce. 1996. Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6, 167-190.
12. Fraser, Bruce and M. Malamud-Makowski. 1996. English and Spanish contrastive discourse markers. Language Sciences 18, 863-881.
13. Geis, Michael L., and Arnold M. Zwicky. 1971. On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 561-566.
14. Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In: Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds.). Speech Acts (Syntax and Semantics 3). New York: Academic Press, 41-58.
15. Horn, Laurence R. 1972. On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
16. Horn, Laurence R. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In: Deborah Schiffrin (ed.). Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, GURT 84. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 11 -42.
17. König, Ekkehard. 1991. The Meaning of Focus Particles: a Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
18. Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Subjectification Cognitive Linguistics 1, 5-38.
19. Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Losing control: grammaticization, subjectification, and transparency. In: Andreas Blank and Peter Koch (eds.). Historical Semantics and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 147-75.
20. Levinson, Stephen C. 1995. Three levels of meaning. In: F. R. Palmer (ed.,). Grammar and Meaning: Essays in Honor of Sir John Lyons. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 90-115.
21. Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. LLC: London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English.
23. Macaulay, Ronald K. S. 1995. The adverbs of authority. English World-Wide 16, 37-60.
24. Matsumoto, Yo. 1997. Scales, implicatures, and in fact, if not, and let alone constructions. In: Masatomo Ukaji, Toshio Nakao, Masaru Kajita, and Shuji Chiba (eds.). Studies in English: Festschrift for Professor Akira Ota on the occasion of his eightieth birthday. Tokyo: Taishuukan, 685-99.
25. Nicolle, Steve. 1998. A relevance theory perspective on grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 9, 1-35.
26. OED: Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd. ed.
27. Powell, Mava Jo. 1992. The systematic development of correlated interpersonal and metalinguistic uses in stance adverbs. Cognitive Linguistics 3, 75-110.
28. Rissanen, Matti, Merja Kyto and Minna Palander-Collin (eds.). 1993. Early English in the Computer Age: Explorations through the Helsinki Corpus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
29. Rossari, Corinne. 1994. Les Opérations de Reformulation: Analyse du Processus et des Marques dans une Perspective Contrastive Français-Italien. Bern: Peter Lang.
30. Roulet, Eddy. 1987. Complétude interactive et connecteurs reformulatifs. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 8, 111-40.
31. Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Schwenter, Scott A. 1998. The scalar link between exclusivity and additivity. Paper presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New York City.
33. Schwenter, Scott A. 1999. Pragmatics ofConditional Marking: Implicature, Scalarity, and Exclusivity. (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics.) New York: Garland.
34. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
35. Sweetser, Eve E. 1988. Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In: Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser, and Helen Singmaster (eds.). Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 389-405.
36. Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Talmy, Leonard. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 2, 49-100.
38. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65, 31-55.
39. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. The role of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester, UK.
40. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1999. The rhetoric of counter-expectation in semantic change: A study in subjectification. In: Andreas Blank and Peter Koch (eds.). Historical Semantics and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 177-96.
41. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Richard Dasher. In prep. Regularity in Semantic Change.