Instructional design: The ADDIE approach

Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-203

  Branch, Robert Maribe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892308888     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6     Document Type: Book

References (129)

1. van den Akker, J., Branch, R., Gustafson, K. L., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2000). Design approaches and tools in education and training. New York, NY: Springer.
2. Anglin, J. G. (Ed.). (1993). Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (2nd ed.). Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.
3. Armstrong, A. (2003). Instructional design in the real world: A view from the trenches. New York: Idea Group, Incorporated.
4. Banathy, B. H. (1991). Educational systems design: A journey to create the future. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
5. Bass, C., & Romiszowski, A. (Eds.). (1997). Instructional development paradigms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
6. Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory. New York: Braziller.
7. Branch, R., & Fitztgerald, M. (Eds.). (2000). Educational technology and media technology Yearbook, vol. 25. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, Incorporated.
8. Briggs, L. J., Gustafson, K. L., & Tillman, M. H. (Eds.). (1991). Instructional design: Principles and applications, (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
9. Cennamo, K., & Kalk, D. (2005). Real world instructional design. Belmont, California: Thomson Wadsworth.
10. Conrad, K., & Voris, A. C. (Eds.). (2000). Instructional design for web-based training. New York: HRD Press.
11. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson.
12. Dijkstra, S., Tennyson, R. D., Schott, F., & Seel, N. (1997). Instructional design: international perspectives. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
13. Dills, C. R.,&Romiszowski, A. J. (Eds.). (1997). Instructional development paradigms. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
14. Ertmer, P., & Quinn, J. (2007). The ID casebook: Case studies in instructional design (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
15. Gagné, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design, 5th ed. United States: Thomson Wadsworth.
16. Gardener, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books Incorporated.
17. Gentry, C. G. (1994). Introduction to instructional development: Process and technique. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
18. Gerlach, V. S., & Ely, D. P. (1980). Teaching and media: A systematic approach (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Incorporated.
19. Gilbert, T. (1978) Human competence: Engineering worthy performance.New York:McGraw-Hill.
20. Greer, M. (1996). The project manager's partner: A step-by-step guide to project management. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
21. Greer, M. (1992). ID project management: Tools and techniques for instructional designers and developers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
22. Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. (2002). Survey of instructional development models, 4th ed. Syracuse, New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology, Syracuse University.
23. Harless, J. (1975). An ounce of analysis is worth a pound of cure. Newnan, Georgia: Harless Performance Guild.
24. Johnson, K. A., & Foa, L. J. (1989). Instructional design: New alternatives for effective education and training. New York, New York: Macmillan
25. Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.). (1996). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
26. Jonassen, D. H., Tessmer, M., & Hannum, W. H. (1999). Task analysis methods for instructional design. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
27. Kemp, J., Morrison, G., & Ross, S. (1998). Designing effective instruction (2nd ed.). New York: Merrill.
28. Koper, R., & Tattersall, C. (Eds.). (2005). Learning design: A handbook on modeling and delivering networked education and training. New York, NY: Springer.
29. Ledford, B. R., & Sleeman, P. J. (2002). Instructional design: System strategies. Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing, Incorporated.
30. Ledford, B.R.,&Sleeman, P. J. (2000). Instructional design:Aprimer.Greenwhich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing, Incorporated.
31. Leshin, C. B., Pollock, J., &Reigeluth, C. M. (1992). Instructional design strategies and tactics. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
32. Mager, R. (1984). Goal Analysis. Belmont, CA: Pitman Management and Training.
33. Mager, R. (1984). Preparing instructional objectives (2nd ed.). Belmont, California: Pitman Management and Training.
34. McCombs, B. L., & Whistler, J. S. (1997). The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35. McGill, I., & Beaty, L. (1995). Action learning: A guide for professional, management and educational development (2nd ed.). London, UK: Kogan Page.
36. Morrison, G., Ross, S.,&Kemp, J. (2001). Designing effective instruction (5th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
37. Piskurich, G. M. (2006). Rapid instructional design: Learning ID fast and right (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
38. Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1983). Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
39. Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1999). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
40. Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (Eds.). (2009). Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
41. Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2007). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill.
42. Reiser, R. A., & Dick, W. (1996). Instructional planning: A guide for teachers (2nd ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
43. Reiser, R., & Gagné, R. (1983). Selecting media for instruction. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
44. Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., & Foxon, M. (2000). Instructional design competencies: The standards, 3rd ed. Syracuse,NewYork: ERICClearinghouse on Information and Technology, Syracuse University.
45. Romiszowski, A. J. (1986). Developing auto-instructional materials. London: Kogan Page.
46. Romiszowski, A. J. (1981). Designing instructional systems. London: Kogan Page.
47. Seels, B. B. (Ed.). (1995). Instructional design fundamentals: A reconsideration. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
48. Seels, B., & Glasgow, Z. (1998). Making instructional design decisions (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill.
49. Shambaugh, N., & Magliaro, S. G. (2006). Instructional design: A systematic approach for reflective practice. New York, New York: Pearson.
50. Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L.,&Russell, J. D. (2007). Instructional technology and media for learning (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill.
51. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Jossey Education.
52. Silvern, L. C. (1965). Basic analysis. Los Angeles, California: Education and Training Consultants Company.
53. Spector, M. J., Polson, M. C.,&Muraida, D. J. (Eds.) (1993). Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
54. West, C. K., Farmer, J. A., & Wolff, P. M. (1991). Instructional design: Implications from cognitive science. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Incorporated.
55. Banathy, B. H. (1987). Instructional systems design. In R. M. Gagne (Ed.), Instructional technology: Foundations (pp. 85-112). Hillsdale,New Jersey: Lawrence EarlbaumAssociates, Incorporated.
56. Beckschi, P., & Doty, M. (2000). Instructional systems design: A little bit of ADDIEtude, please. In G. Piskurich, P. Beckschi, & B. Hall (Eds.), The ASTD handbook of training design and delivery. New York: McGraw-Hill.
57. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning: As a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 361-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. Branch, R. (2000). Instructional design: A parallel processor for navigating learning space. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. L. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 145-154). New York, New York: Springer.
59. Branch, R. (1997). Perceptions of instructional design process models. In R. E. Griffin, D. G. Beauchamp. J. M. Hunter, & C. B. Schiffman (Eds.), Selected readings of the 28th annual convention of the international visual literacy association. Cheyenne, Wyoming.
60. Branch, R. (1996). Instructional design as a response to the complexities of instruction. In N. Venkataiah (Ed.), Educational Technology (pp. 21-49).New Delhi: Ashish Publishing House.
61. Burton, J., Moore, D., & Magliaro, S. (1996). Behaviorism and instructional technology. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. New York: Macmillan.
62. Dorsey, L., Goodrum, D., & Schwen, T. (1997). Rapid collaborative prototyping as an instructional development paradigm. In C. Dills & A. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructional development paradigms (pp. 445-465). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 407 932)
63. Earle, R. (1998). Instructional design and teacher planning: Reflections and perspectives. In R. Branch & MFitzgerald (Ed.), Educational technology and media yearbook (pp. 29-41). Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.
64. Goodyear, P. (1997). Instructional design environments: Methods and tools for the design of complex instructional systems. In S. Dijkstra, N. Seel, F. Schott, & R. Tennyson (Eds.), Instructional design: International perspectives, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
65. Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. (2007). What is instructional design? In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 11-16). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
66. Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2000). Student-centered learning environments. In D. H. Jonassen & S.M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. Merrill, D. M. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructionaldesign: Theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 279-334). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Incorporated.
68. Reigeluth, C. M., & Nelson, L. M. (1997). A new paradigm of ISD? In R. Branch & B. Minor (Eds.), Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, 22, 24-35. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.
69. Rossett, A. (1993). Needs assessment. In G. J. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (2nd ed.) (pp. 156-169). Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.
70. Seel, N. (1997). Models of instructional design: Introduction & overview. In R. Tennyson, F. Schott, N. Seel, & S. Dijkstra (Eds.), Instructional design: International perspectives, Vol. 1. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
71. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP Model for program evaluation. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human service evaluation (pp.117-142). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
72. Visscher-Voerman, I., Gustafson, K., & Plomp, T. (2000). Educational design and development: An overview of paradigms. In van den Akker, J., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (Eds.), Design methodology and developmental research in education and training. Twente, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
73. Altun, S., & Büyükduman, F. (2007). Teacher and student beliefs on constructivist instructional design: A case study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7(1), 30-39.
74. Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 3(4), 2-16.
75. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: An instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292-302.
76. Bannan-Ritland, B. (2001). Teaching instructional design: An action learning approach. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14(2), 37-52.
77. van Berlo, M., Lowyck, J., & Schaafstal, A. (2007). Supporting the instructional design process for team training. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1145-1161.
78. Braden, R. A. (1996). The case for linear instructional design and development: A commentary on models, challenges, and myths. Educational Technology, 26(3), 5-23.
79. Branch, R. (1994). Common instructional design practices for secondary school teachers. Educational Technology, 34(3), 25-33.
80. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
81. Cennamo, K. (2003). Design as knowledge construction: Constructing knowledge of design. Computers in the Schools, 20(4), 13-35.
82. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-458.
83. Cook,M. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90(6), 1073-1091.
84. Dick,W. (1996). TheDick and Careymodel:Will it survive the decade? Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 55-63.
85. Dickey, M. D. (2006). Girl gamers: The controversy of girl games and the relevance of femaleoriented game design for instructional design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 785-793.
86. Edmonds, G., Branch, R., & Mukherjee, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for comparing instructional design models. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(4), 55-62.
87. Fox, E. J. (2006). Constructing a pragmatic science of learning and instruction with functional contextualism. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(1), 5-36.
88. Gustafson, K. L. & Branch, R. (1997). Revisioning models of instructional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 73-89.
89. Hannafin, M. J. (2006). Functional contextualism in learning and instruction: Pragmatic science or objectivism revisited? Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(1), 37-41.
90. Hannafin, M. J., & Hill, J. R. (1997). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implication. Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94-99.
91. Hannafin, M. J., Hill, J. R., & Land, S. M. (1997). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implications. Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94-97.
92. Hannafin, M. J., & Land, S. M. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technologyenhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25(3), 167-202.
93. Hoogveld, A., Paas, F., Jochems,W., & VanMerrienboer, J. (2002). Exploring teachers' instructional design practices from a systems design perspective. Instructional Science, 30(4), 291.
94. Howe, R. J., & Pearlstein, G. (1995). Shortcuts for pilot testing instructional materials. Performance and Instruction, 34(2), 34-37.
95. Hughes, M. A. (1998). Active learning for software products. Technical Communications, 45(3), 343-352.
96. Kember, D. (1991). Instructional design for meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 20(4), 289-310.
97. Kester, L., Kirschner, P., & Corbalan, G. (2007). Designing support to facilitate learning in powerful electronic learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1047-1054.
98. Kissell, J. (1997). Understanding and dealing with client resistance. Performance Improvement, 36(1), 10-13.
99. Koper, R., Giesbers, B., van Rosmalen, P., Sloep, P., van Bruggen, J., Tattersall, C., et al. (2005). A design model for lifelong learning networks. Interactive Learning Environments, 13(1-2), 71-92.
100. Magliaro, S., & Shambaugh, N. (2006). Student models of instructional design. Educational Technology Research & Development, 54(1), 83-106.
101. McAlpine, L. (1992). Highlighting formative evaluation: An instructional design model derived from practice. Performance and Instruction, December, 16-18.
102. Merrill, M. D. (1997). Learning-oriented instructional development tools. Performance Improvement, 36(3), 51-55.
103. Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147-177.
104. Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., Pratt, J., & The ID2 Research Group at Utah State University. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology, 26(7), 5-7.
105. Moallem, M.,&Earle,R. S. (1998). Instructional designmodels and teacher thinking: Toward a new conceptual model for research and development. Educational Technology, 38(2), 5-22.
106. Nadolski, R. J., Kirschner, P. A., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Woretshofer, J. (2005). Development of an instrument for measuring the complexity of learning tasks. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(1), 1-27.
107. Orlin, J. P. (1992). The mix that makes a good instructional designer. Technical & Skills Training, October, 13-17.
108. O'Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., & Baker, E. L. (2005). Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature. Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 455-474.
109. Ritchie, D., & Earnest, J. (1999). The future of instructional design: Results of a Delphi study. Educational Technology, 29(1), 35-42.
110. Rowland, G., Fixl, A., & Yung, K. (1992). Educating the reflective designer. Educational Technology, December, 36-44.
111. Salter, D., Richards, L., & Carey, T. (2004). The "T5" design model: An instructional model and learning environment to support the integration of online and campus-based courses. Educational Media International, 41(3), 207-218.
112. Schwabe, G., & Goth, C. (2005). Mobile learning with a mobile game: Design and motivational effects. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 204-216.
113. Schwartzman, R. (2006). Virtual group problem solving in the basic communication course: Lessons for online learning. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(1), 3-14.
114. Scriven, M. (2002). An overview of evaluation theories. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 1(1), pp. 61-69.
115. Song, H.-D., Grabowski, B. L., Koszalka, T. A., & Harkness, W. L. (2006). Patterns of instructional-design factors prompting reflective thinking in middle-school and college level problem-based learning environments. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 34(1), 63-87.
116. Stubbs, M., Martin, I., & Endlar, L. (2006). The structuration of blended learning: Putting holistic design principles into practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 163-175.
117. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Webster, W. J. (1980). An analysis of alternative approaches to evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2(3), 5-19.
118. Tessmer, M., & Wedman, J. (1995). Context-sensitive instructional design models: A response to design research studies and criticism. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(3), 38-54.
119. Tennyson, R., & Barron, A. E. (Eds.). (1995). Automating instructional design: Computerbased development and delivery tools. Proceedings of the NATO advanced study institute on automating instructional design: Computer-based development and delivery tools, held in Grimstad, Norway, July 12-23, 1993. New York, New York: Springer.
120. Tripp, S., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research & Development, 38(1), 31-44.
121. Van Gerven, P. W. M., Paas, F., & Tabbers, H. K. (2006). Cognitive aging and computer-based instructional design: Where dowe go from here? Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 141-157.
122. Verstegen, D. M. L., Barnard, Y. F., & Pilot, A. (2006). Which events can cause iteration in instructional design? An empirical study of the design process. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 34(6), 481-517.
123. Wang, H. (2007). Performing a course material enhancement process with asynchronous interactive online system. Computers & Education, 48(4), 567-581.
124. Wedman, J., & Tessmer, M. (1991) Adapting instructional design to project circumstance: The layers of necessity model. Educational Technology, 21, 48-52.
125. Westgard, O. (1997). Editor's notes. Performance Improvement, 36(4), 3.
126. Yancey, C. (1995). The ABCs of working with SMEs. Performance and Instruction, 35(1), 6-9.
127. You, Y. (1993). Wha we can learning from chaos theory? An alternative approach to instructional systems design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3).
128. Zuber-Skerritt,O. (2002). The concept of action learning. TheLearningOrganization, 9(3), 114-124.
129. Thiagarajan, S. (1999). Rapid instructional design. Retrieved 10 February 2009, from http://www.thiagi.com/article-rid.html