Which events can cause iteration in instructional design? An empirical study of the design process

Instructional Science

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 481-517

  Verstegen, D M L ^a   Barnard, Y F ^b   Pilot, A ^c  

^a Erasmus University Rotterdam   (Netherlands)

^b EURISCO International   (France)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Causes for iteration; Instructional design; Iteration; Iterative design process; Specification of instructional products; Support for iteration; Training simulators

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750449012     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-005-3346-0     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In van den J. Akker, R. Branch, K.L. Gustafson, N. Nieveen & T. Plomp, eds, Design approaches and tools in education and training, pp. 1-14. Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
2. Alessi, S.M. & Trollip, S.R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Andrews, D.H. & Goodson, L.A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development 3: 2-16.
4. van Berlo, M. (2002). Experimental validation of instructional design guidelines supporting the analysis of team tasks. Soesterberg, the Netherlands: TNO Human Factors Report No. TM-02-B004.
5. Blessing, L.T.M. (1994). A Process-Based Approach to Computer-Supported Engineering Design. Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
6. van den Bosch, K., Barnard, Y.F. & Helsdingen, A.S. (1999). Taak- en trainingsanalyse beeldanalist SPERWER (Task and Training Analysis Image Interpreter SPERWER). Soesterberg, the Netherlands (in Dutch): TNO Human Factors Report No. TM-99-A018.
7. Braha, D. & Maimon, O. (1997). The design process: Properties, paradigms, and structure. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 27(2): 146-166.
8. DE 2.0. (1997). Designer's Edge, Version 2.0 (Computer software). Salt Lake City, Utah: Allen Communication.
9. Dehncke, R.W. & Brooks, D.J. (1998). Program management of a complex simulation program: Lessons learned from STOW. In Proceedings of the 20th Interservice/ industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference, pp. 33-42. Arlington, VA: National Training Systems Association (NTSA).
10. Dijkstra, S. (2001). Epistemology, psychology of learning and instructional design (Special issue). Instructional Science 29(4-5).
11. Farmer, E.W., Jorna, P.G.A.M., Riemersma, J.B.J., van Rooij, J.C.G.M. & Moraal, J. (1999). Handbook of simulator-based training. London: Ashgate.
12. Gilbert, L. (1999). Some valuable lessons from the teaching and learning technology programme in the UK. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 10(1): 67-85.
13. Goel, V. & Pirolli, P. (1989). Motivating the notion of generic design within information-processing theory: The design problem space. AI Magazine 10(1): 19-36.
14. Goel, V. & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science 16(3): 395-429.
15. Greeno, J.G., Korpi, M.K., Jackson III, D.N. & Michalchik, V.S. (1990). Processes and knowledge in designing instruction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Report No. N00014-88-K-0152.
16. Gustafson, K.L. (1991). Survey of instructional development models. (2nd edn.) Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University(ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED 335 027).
17. Halff, H.M. (1993). Prospects for automating instructional design. In J.M. Spector, M.C. Poison & D.J. Muraida, eds, Automating instructional design, pp. 67-132. Educational Technology Publications: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18. Hamel, R. (1990). Over het denken van de architect: Een cognitief psychologische beschrijving van het ontwerpproces bij architecten (On Designing by Architects: A Cognitive Psychological Description of the Architectural Design Process). Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands (in Dutch).
19. Holcomb, C., Wedman, J.F. & Tessmer, M. (1996). ID activities and project success: Perceptions of practitioners. Performance Improvement Quarterly 9(1): 49-61.
20. Hoogveld, A.W.M., Paas, F., Jochems, W.M.G. & van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (2001). The effects of a web-based training in an instructional systems design approach on teachers' instructional design behavior. Computers in Human Behavior 17: 363-371.
21. van der Hulst, A.M., de Hoog, R. & Wielemaker, J. (1999). BOOT: Decision support for the selection of facilities for education and training. The Hague the Netherlands: TNO Physics and Electronic Laboratory Report No. FEL-99-A188.
22. Jong A.J.M. de (1986). Kennis en het oplossen van vakinhoudelijke problemen.: Een voorbeeld uit een natuurkundig domein (Knowledge Based Problem Solving: An Example from a Physics Domain). Doctoral dissertation, Technical University of Eindhoven, the Netherlands (in Dutch).
23. Kearsley, G. (2003). Explorations in learning and instruction: The theory into practice (TIP) database. Retrieved September 20, 2003, from http://tip.psychology.org.
24. Kerr, S.T. (1983). Inside the black box: Making design decisions for instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology 14(1): 45-58.
25. Kessels, J.W.M. (1993). Towards Design Standards for Curriculum Consistency in Corporate Education. Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
26. Kincaid, B. (1997). A Dinosaur in Whitehall: The true cost of defence procurement bureaucracy. London: Brassey's.
27. Le Maistre, K. & Weston, C. (1996). The priorities established among data sources when instructional designers revise written materials. Educational Technology Research and Development 44(1): 61-70.
28. van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
29. Merrill, M.D., The ID2 Research Group (1996). Instructional transaction theory: Instructional design based on knowledge objects. Educational Technology 36(3): 30-37.
30. Mettes, C.T.C.W., Pilot, A. & Roossink, H.J. (1981). Linking factual and procedural knowledge in solving science problems: A case study in a thermodynamics course. Instructional Science 10: 333-361.
31. Microsoft NetMeeting, version 2.1. (Computer software) (1997). Microsoft Corporation.
32. Nelson, W.A., Magliaro, S. & Sherman, T.M. (1988). The intellectual content of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development 11(1): 29-35.
33. Odenthal, L., Kuiper, W., Voogt, J. & Terwindt, S. (2000). Balanceren tussen ruimte en structuur: Lerarenopleiders van de Educatieve Faculteit Amsterdam als curriculumontwikkelaars (Balancing between space and structure: Teacher-trainers of the Educational Faculty of Amsterdam as curriculum developers). HRD Thema 1: 22-32 (in Dutch).
34. Pena-Shaff, J., Martin, W. & Gay, G. (2001). An epistemological framework for analyzing student interactions in computer-mediated communication environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 12: 41-68.
35. Perez, R.S., Fleming-Johnson, J. & Emery, C.D. (1995). Instructional design expertise: A cognitive model of design. Instructional Science 23: 321-349.
36. Perez, R.S. & Neiderman, E.C. (1993). Modelling the expert training developer. In R.J. Seidel & P.R. Chatelier, eds, Advanced technologies applied to training design, pp. 261-280. Plenum Press: New York.
37. Pieters, J.M. & Bergman, R. (1995). The empirical basis of designing instruction. Performance Improvement Quarterly 8(3): 118-129.
38. Reigeluth, C.M. (1983). Instructional design: What is it and why is it? In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 3-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Reigeluth, C.M. (1999). Instructional design theories and models: Vol. 2. A new paradigm of instructional theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Reigeluth, C.M. & Frick, T.W. (1999). In C.M. Reigeluth, ed., Instructional design theories and models: Vol. 2. A new paradigm of instructional theory, pp. 633-651. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Riemersma, J.B.J., van Rooij, J.C.G.M., Just, J., Farmer, E., Paris, Ph., Fuchs, M., Reinschlüssel, R., Jorna, P.G.A.M. & Bermejo Muñoz, J. (1994). Reference Framework. Soesterberg, the Netherlands: TNO Human FactorsEUCLID RTP 11.1 MASTER Deliverable Dl.1.
42. van Rooij, J.C.G.M. (1997). Onderwijskundige richtlijnen ten behoeve van de specificatie van simulatoreisen (Didactic guidelines for the specification of simulator requirements). Report No. TM-97-A077, TNO Human Factors, Soesterberg, the Netherlands (in Dutch).
43. van Rooij, J.C.G.M. (2002 May). Digitalisatie van het trainingsveld (Digitalisation in the field of training). Opleiding and Training 2002(17): 4-8 (in Dutch).
44. Rowland, G. (1991). Problem Solving in Instructional Design. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Indiana.
45. Rowland, G. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly 5(2): 65-86.
46. Rowland, G. (1993). Designing and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development 41(1): 79-91.
47. Rowland, G. & Adams, A. (1999). Systems thinking in instructional design. In van den J. Akker, R. Branch, K.L. Gustafson, N. Nieveen & T. Plomp, eds, Design approaches and tools in education and training, pp. 29-44. Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
48. Ryder, M. (2003). Instructional design models (d.d. 16-9-2003). Retrieved September 20, 2003, from http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc/idmodels.html.
49. Saroyan, A. (1993). Differences in expert practice: A case from formative evaluation. Instructional Science 21: 451-472.
50. Seel, N.M., Eichenwald, L.D. & Penterman, N.F.N. (1995). Automating decision support in instructional system development: The case of delivery systems. In R.D. Tennyson & A.E. Barron, eds, Automating instructional design: Computer-based development and delivery tools, pp. 177-216. Springer-Verlag: Berlin Germany.
51. Tripp, S.D. & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research & Development 38(1): 31-44.
52. Verstegen, D.M.L. (2003). Iteration in Instructional Design: An Empirical Study on the Specification of Training Simulators. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. Can be retrieved from: http://www.library. uu.nl/digiarchief/dip/diss/ 2004-0130-092005/inhoud.htm.
53. Verstegen, D.M.L., Barnard, Y.F. & Pilot, A. (2002). Do training simulators support instruction and practice? Results of field visits to 44 simulators. Soesterberg, the Netherlands: TNO Human Factors Report No. TM-02-B005.
54. Verstegen, D.M.L., Barnard, Y.F. & Pilot, A. (2003). Iterative design of training programs: Results of an evaluation study. Soesterberg, the Netherlands: TNO Human Factors Report No. TM-03-B005.
55. Verstegen, D.M.L., Barnard, Y.F. & Pilot, A. (2004). Second evaluation of iterative design of training programs. Soesterberg, the Netherlands: TNO Human Factors Report No. TM-04-B006.
56. Verstegen, D.M.L. & van der Hulst, A.H. (2000). Standardized development of a needs Statement for advanced training means. In Proceedings of the 22th Interservice/ Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference, pp. 1136-1144. Arlington, VA: National Training Systems Association, (NTSA).
57. Verstegen, D.M.L., Steutel, S. & Barnard, Y.F. (2000). Support for iteration in training program design. Soesterberg, the Netherlands: TNO Human Factors Report No. TM-00-B009.
58. Verstegen, D.M.L., Veldhuis, G.J., Staalstra, J. & Hendriks, M. (2001). Report on the use of training material in scenarios and organisational learning, final feedback RNLAF. Soesterberg, the Netherlands: TNO Human Factors IMAT Deliverable R.I.3.
59. Visscher-Voerman, I. (1999). Design Approaches in Training and Education: A Reconstructive Study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
60. Visscher-Voerman, I. (2000). Ontwerpbenaderingen in opleidingspraktijken (Design Approaches in Training). HRD Thema 1: 5-15 (in Dutch).
61. Visscher-Voerman, I., Gustafson, K.L. & Plomp, T. (1999). Educational design and development: An overview of paradigms. In van den J. Akker, R. Branch, K.L. Gustafson, N. Nieveen & T. Plomp, eds, Design approaches and tools in education and training, pp. 15-28. Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
62. van Wagenberg, M.J.G.M. (1992). Gericht CAD-ondersteund ontwerpen en organiseren (Goaloriented CAD-Supported Designing and Organising). Doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands (in Dutch).
63. Wedman, J.F. & Tessmer, M. (1993). Instructional designers' decisions and priorities: A survey of design practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly 6(2): 43-57.