Design as knowledge construction: Constructing knowledge of design

Computers in the Schools

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 13-35

  Cennamo, Katherine S ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative design; Constructivist; Holistic design; Instructional design; Iterative design; Math education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859938115     PISSN: 07380569     EISSN: 15287033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J025v20n04_03     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abell, S. K., Cennamo, K. S., Anderson, M. A., Bryan, L. A., Campbell, L. M., and Hugg, J. W., 1996. Integrated media classroom cases in elementary science teacher education. Journal of Computers in Math and Science Teaching, 15(1/2):137–151.
2. Ainley, J., 1988. Perceptions of teachers' questioning styles. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 1988, Vesprim, Hungary. pp.92–99. Psychology of Mathematics Education.
3. Antaki, C., 1994. Explaining and arguing, London:Sage Publications.
4. Branham, R. L., 1991. Debate and critical analysis:The harmony of conflict, Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Cennamo, K. S., Abell, S. K., and Chung, M., 1996. Designing constructivist materials:A layers of negotiation model. Educational Technology, 36 July-August:39–48.
6. Cennamo, K. S., Abell, S. K., George, E. J., and Chung, M., 1996. The development of integrated media cases for use in science teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 4(1):19–36.
7. Choi, J., and Hannafin, M., 1995. Situated cognition and learning environments:Roles, structures, and implications for design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2):53–69.
8. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. 1992. The Jasper experiment:An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1):65–80.
9. Dick, W., and Carey, L., 1996. The systematic design of instruction, 4th ed., Glenview, IL:Scott Foresman.
10. Dillon, J. T., 1990. The practice of questioning, London:Routledge.
11. Driscoll, M. P., 1994. Psychology of learning for instruction, Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
12. Feldman, A., 1996. Enhancing the practice of physics teachers:Mechanism for the generation and sharing of knowledge and understanding in collaborative action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33:513–540.
13. Goldsmith, L. T., and Schifter, D., 1993. Characteristics of a model for the development of mathematics teaching, Newton, MA:Center for the Development of Teaching, Education Development Center, Inc.
14. Gustafson, K. L., and Branch, R., 1997. Revisioning models of instructional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3):73–89.
15. Jaworski, B., 1989. Using classroom videotape to develop your teaching, Milton Keynes, UK:The Open University.
16. Kagan, D. M., 1992. Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2):129–169.
17. Mathematical Association. 1991. Develop your teaching, Cheltenham, UK:Stanley Thornes.
18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1991. Professional standards for teaching mathematics, Reston, VA:Author.
19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1989. Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA:Author.
20. Osborne, R., and Freyberg, P., 1985. Learning in science:The implications of children's science, Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
21. Piaget, J., 1985. The equilibration of cognitive structures, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
22. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., and Boyle, R. A., 1993. Beyond cold conceptual change:The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63:167–195.
23. Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., and Gertzog, W., 1982. Accommodation of a scientific conception:Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66:211–227.
24. Rowland, G., 1992. What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(2):65–86.
25. Rowland, G., 1993. Designing and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1):79–91.
26. Solomon, J., 1989. “The social construction of school science”. In Doing science:Images of science in science education, Edited by:Millar, R., 126–136. New York:Falmer Press.
27. Willis, J., 1995. A recursive, reflective instructional design model based on constructivist-interpretivist theory. Educational Technology, 35 November/December:5–23.
28. Willis, J., 1998. Alternative instructional design paradigms:What's worth discussing and what isn't. Educational Technology, 38 May-June:5–16.
29. Willis, J., 2000. The maturing of constructivist instructional design:Some basic principles that can guide practice. Educational Technology, 40 January-February:5–15.
30. Willis, J., and Wright, K. E., 2000. A general set of procedures for constructivist instructional design:The new R2D2 model. Educational Technology, 40 March-April:5–20.
31. Wood, T., Cobb, P., Yackel, E., and Dillon, D., 1993. “Rethinking elementary school mathematics:Insights and issues”. In Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph No. 6 Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
32. Wood, T., Turner-Vorbeck, T., and Walker, W., 1996a. Mathematical discussion or argumentation? Differences among teachers in the constitution of norms for interaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April1996a, New York.
33. Wood, T., Turner-Vorbeck, T., and Walker, W., 1996b. Recreating mathematics teaching:A theoretical and methodological framework for analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April1996b, New York.
34. Wood, T., Walker, W., and Turner-Vorbeck, T., 1996. The interrelationship of teachers' questioning and student reasoning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April1996, New York.
35. Young, M. F., 1993. Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development Journal, 41:43–58.