Functional contextualism in learning and instruction: Pragmatic science or objectivism revisited?

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 37-41

  Hannafin, Michael J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Constructivism; Functional contextualism; Instructional design

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645899965     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-006-6492-4     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2. Gagné, R. (1984). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
3. Glaser, R. (1976). Components of a psychology of instruction: Toward a science of design. Review of Educational Research, 46, 1-24.
4. Hannafin, M. J., Hannafin, K. M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1997). Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 101-117.
5. Jacobson, M., & Kozma, R. (Eds.) (2000). Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 4-16.
7. Moran, D., & Malott, R. (Eds.) (2004). Evidence-based educational methods. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.
8. Rieber, L. (1993). A pragmatic view of instructional technology. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.