The ‘T5’ design model: An instructional model and learning environment to support the integration of online and campus-based courses;Le modèle de design T5 : Un modèle d'enseignement et environnement de formation qui soutient l'integration de cours en ligne et sur le campus;Das T5 Unterrichtsmodell: Ein lehrmodell und lernumfeld zur unterstützung der integration von online- und hochschulkursen

Educational Media International

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 207-218

  Salter, Diane ^a   Richards, Leslie ^b   Carey, Tom ^b  

^a Sheridan College Institute for Technology   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747357919     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09523980410001680824     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bishop T, (2003) Linking cost effectiveness with institutional goals: best practices in online education. In Bourne, J and Moore, JC (eds) Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction 4 Sloan-C Series pp. 75–86
2. Bligh DA, (1972) What's the Use of Lectures? Penguin, Harmondsworth
3. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR, (2001) How people learn: brain, mind, experience and school National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Available online at: http://www.nap.edu, accessed 12 December 2003
4. Chickering A, Ehrmann SC, (1996) Implementing the seven principles: technology as a lever AAHE Bulletin October, 3–6. Available online at: http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html, accessed 12 December 2003
5. Epper RM, Bates AW, (2001) Teaching Faculty How to Use Technology Oryx Press, Westport, CT
6. Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision and dissonance. Stanford Studies in Ppsychology, 3 (7): 163
7. Garrison DR, (2003) Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: the role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition In Bourne, J and Moore, JC (eds) Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction 4 Sloan-C Series 47 58
8. Harley, D, Maher, M, Henke, JN, and Lawrence, S. (2003). An analysis of technology enhancements in a large lecture course. Educause Quarterly, 3: 26–33.
9. Littlejohn A, (2003) Reusing Online Resources Kogan Page, London
10. Lou, Y, Abrami, PC, and d'Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71 (3): 449–521.
11. McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited (2003) Technology & student success in higher education: A research study on faculty perceptions of technology and student success Toronto: McGraw-Hill
12. MERLOT (Multimedia Educational Resources for Learning and Online Teaching) (1997–2003) Available online at: http://www.merlot.org accessed 31 January 2004
13. Moore, MG. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 14 (2): 1–6.
14. Novak G, (1999) Just-in-time teaching: Blending active learning with web technology Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
15. Piaget J, (1954) The child's construction of reality Basic Books, New York
16. Salter D, Richards L, Carey T, (2003) A task-based approach to integrate faculty development in pedagogy and technology Elearn
17. Swan K, (2003) Learning effectiveness: what the research tells us In Bourne, J and Moore, JC (eds) Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction 4 13 45
18. University of Waterloo (2003) The Learning Design Faculty Series Available online at: http://lt3.uwaterloo.ca/faculty, accessed 19 December 2003
19. Van Weigel B, (2002) Deep learning in a digital age Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
20. Vella J, (2000) Taking Learning to Task Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
21. Wiley DA, (2000) Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: a definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy In Wiley, DA (ed.) The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version Available online at: http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc, accessed 19 December 2003