Integrating feedback into prospective english language teachers' writing process via blogs and portfolios

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 131-150

  Arslan, Recep Şahin ^a  

^a PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Blogging; Feedback; Portfolio keeping; Pre service teachers of English; Writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891648069     PISSN: 13036521     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Apple, M. & Shimo, E. (2004). Learners to teacher: Portfolios, please! perceptions of portfolio assessment in EFL classrooms. In the interface between interlanguage, pragmatics and assessment. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual JALT Pan-SIG conference (pp. 53-58). Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Keizai University.
2. Arslan, R. Ş. & Ki{dotless}zi{dotless}l, A. (2007). Extending writing instruction beyond school walls. Proceedings of the International Conference of Foreign Language Education, 24-26 May 2007, Sabanci{dotless} University, School of Languages, İstanbul, Turkey.
3. Arslan, R. Ş. & Şahin-Ki{dotless}zi{dotless}l, A. (2010). How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning. 23(3), 183-197.
4. Aydin, S. (2010). A qualitative research on portfolio keeping in English as a foreign language writing. The Qualitative Report. 15(3), 475-488.
5. Baturay, M. H. & and Daloǧlu, A. (2010). E-portfolio assessment in an online English language course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(5), 413-428.
6. Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response ESL students' revision types and writing quality: Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 215-241.
7. Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 191-205.
8. Bitchener J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing. 17, 102-118.
9. Blackstone, B., Spiri, J. & Naganuma, N. (2007). Blogs in English language teaching and learning Pedagogical uses and student responses. Journal of RELT. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1-20.
10. Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.
11. Cohen, A.D. & Cavalcanti, M.C. (1990). Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing (pp. 155-177). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Çiftçi, H. (2009). The Effect of Blog Peer Feedback on Turkish EFL Students' Writing Performance and Their Perceptions. Unpublished Master's thesis, Yeditepe University.
13. Drexler, W., Dawson, K., & Ferdig, R. E. (2007). Collaborative blogging as a means to develop elementary expository writing skills. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 16, 140-160.
14. Eastment, D. (2005). Blogging. ELT Journal. 59(4), 358-361.
15. Fathman, A. & Whalley. E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights/or the classroom. (pp. 178-190). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Fellner, T. & Apple, M. (2006). Developing writing fluency and lexical complexity with blogs. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(1), 15-26.
17. Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33-53.
18. Ferris, D. & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes. How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184.
19. Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language writing classes. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
20. Ferris, D. (2004). The "grammar correction" debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime.?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49-62.
21. Goldstein, L. M. (2004). Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: teachers and students working together. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 63-80.
22. Guénette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 40-53.
23. Hamp-Lyons, L. (2006). Feedback in portfolio-based writing courses. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: contexts and issues (pp. 140-161). New York: Cambridge.
24. Hansen, J. G. (2005). Cooperative learning methods and the teaching of English writing: Peer response. STETS Language & Communication Review, 4(1), 9-14.
25. Harmer, J. (2004). How to Teach Writing. Harlow: Longman-Pearson.
26. Hendron, J. (2008). RSS for educators. Blogs, newsfeeds, podcasts, and wikis in the classroom. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
27. Hu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research, 9, 321-342.
28. Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 255-286.
29. Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83-101.
31. Jacobs, H.L., Zinkgraf, S.A., Wormuth, D.R., Hartfiel, V.F., Hughey, J.B. (1981). Testing ESL Composition: A Practical Approach. Massachusetts: Newbury House.
32. Jacobs, G. M., Curtis, A., Braine, G., & Huang, S. (1998). Feedback on student writing: Taking the middle path. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 307-17.
33. Lan, Y., Hung, C., & Hsu, H. (2011). Effects of guided writing strategies on students' writing attitudes based on media richness theory. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 148-164.
34. Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 285-312.
35. Lee, G. & Schallert, D. L. (2008). Meeting in the margins: Effects of the teacher-student relationship on revision processes of EFL college students taking a composition course. Journal of Second Language Writing. 17, 165-182.
36. Leki, I. (1990). Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes. CATESOL Journal, 3, 5-19
37. Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 203-218.
38. Lundstrom, K. & Baker, W. (2008). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30-43.
39. Matsuno, S. (2009). Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms. Language Testing, 26(1), 75-100.
40. Mendoca, C. O. & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiation: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745-69.
41. Miaoa, Y., Badger, R. & Zhen, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179-200.
42. Miceli, T., Murray, S. M., & Kennedy, C. (2010). Using an L2 blog to enhance learners' participation and sense of community. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(4), 321-341.
43. Min, H. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118-141.
44. Montgomery, J. L. & Baker, W. (2007). Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance, Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 82-99.
45. Nelson, G. L. & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), 113-131.
46. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. (2011). 6+1 Traits of Analytic Writing Assessment Scoring Guide (Rubric) Retrieved on 24 October 2011 from http://openedpractices.org/files/6plus1 rubric very nfluential NWREL.pdf
47. Ok, S. (2012). Opinions of ELT students in freshman class on using portfolio as an assessment tool. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eǧitim Fakültesi Dergisi (Pamukkale University Faculty of Education Journal), 32(II), 1-11.
48. Öztürk, H. & Çeçen, S. (2007). The effects of portfolio keeping on writing anxiety of EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 3(2), 218-236.
49. Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265-89.
50. Pinkman K. (2005). Using blogs in the foreign language classroom: encouraging learner independence. The JALT CALL Journal, 1(1), 12-24.
51. Richardson, W. (2009). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. California: Corwin Press.
52. Reid, J. (1994). Responding to ESL students' texts: The myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 273-292.
53. Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23, 103-110.
54. Smalley, R. L., Ruetten, M. R., & Kozyrev, J. R. (2001). Refining Composition Skills. Rhetoric and Grammar. Fifth Edition. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
55. Song, B. & August, B. (2002). Using portfolios to assess the writing of ESL students: A powerful alternative. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 49-72.
56. Stanley, J. (1992). Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing 1(3), 217-33.
57. Storch, N. & Tapper, J. (1997). Student annotations: what NNS and NS university students say about their own writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(3), 245-264.
58. Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153-173.
59. Straub, R. (1997). Students' reactions to teacher comments: an exploratory study. Research in the Teaching of English, 31(1), 91-119.
60. Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
62. Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337-343.
63. Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing. 16, 255-272.
64. Truscott, J. & Hsu, A. Y. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292-305.
65. Tsui, A. B. M. & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing. 9(2), 147-170.
66. Wu, W. (2006). The effect of blog peer review and teacher feedback on the revisions of EFL writers. Journal of Education and Foreign Languages and Literature, 3, 125-139.
67. Zhang, S. (1995). Re-examining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 209-22.
68. Zhu, W. (2001). Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 251-276.