Stress myocardial perfusion imaging with multidetector CT

Radiology

Volumn 270, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 25-46

  Rossi, Alexia ^a   Merkus, Daphne ^a   Klotz, Ernst ^b   Mollet, Nico ^a   De Feyter, Pim J ^a   Krestin, Gabriel P ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEART SCINTISCANNING; HEART STRESS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS CONTROL; PROCESS DESIGN; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS TECHNOLOGY; REVIEW;

CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY CIRCULATION; EXERCISE TEST; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84891119653     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13112739     Document Type: Review

References (117)

1. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008; 359(22):2324-2336.
2. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52(21):1724-1732.
3. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52(25):2135-2144.
4. Di Carli MF, Dorbala S, Curillova Z, et al. Relationship between CT coronary angiography and stress perfusion imaging in patients with suspected ischemic heart disease assessed by integrated PET-CT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14(6):799-809.
5. Hacker M, Jakobs T, Matthiesen F, et al. Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions: first clinical experiences. J Nucl Med 2005; 46(8):1294-1300.
6. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48(12):2508-2514.
7. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52(8):636-643.
8. Sarno G, Decraemer I, Vanhoenacker PK, et al. On the inappropriateness of noninvasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to trigger coronary revascularization: a comparison with invasive angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2(6):550-557.
9. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012;367(11):991-1001.
10. Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P, et al. Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2008;359(7):677-687.
11. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360(3):213-224.
12. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 2003;107(23):2900-2907.
13. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, et al. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 2011;260 (3):689-698.
14. Bamberg F, Hinkel R, Schwarz F, et al. Accuracy of dynamic computed tomography adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in estimating myocardial blood flow at various degrees of coronary artery stenosis using a porcine animal model. Invest Radiol 2012;47(1):71-77.
15. Bamberg F, Klotz E, Flohr T, et al. Dynamic myocardial stress perfusion imaging using fast dual-source CT with alternating table positions: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2010;20(5):1168-1173.
16. Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum MA, Kang DK, Rowe GW, Schoepf UJ. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol 2010;45(6):306-313.
17. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54(12):1072-1084.
18. Cury RC, Magalhães TA, Paladino AT, et al. Dipyridamole stress and rest transmural myocardial perfusion ratio evaluation by 64 detector-row computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5(6):443-448.
19. Cury RC, Nieman K, Shapiro MD, et al. Comprehensive assessment of myocardial perfusion defects, regional wall motion, and left ventricular function by using 64-section multidetector CT. Radiology 2008;248(2):466-475.
20. Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, et al. Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dualsource myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4(5):540-549.
21. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, et al. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2012; 33(1):67-77.
22. Ko SM, Choi JW, Song MG, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosineinduced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 2011;21(1):26-35.
23. Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Pietsch H, et al. Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT imaging as noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary artery stenosis: preliminary animal experience. Invest Radiol 2010;45(6):298-305.
24. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, et al. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with 320-row detector computed tomography accurately detects myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5(3):333-340.
25. Ho KT, Chua KC, Klotz E, Panknin C. Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3(8):811-820.
26. Huber AM, Leber V, Gramer BM, et al. Myocardium: dynamic versus single-shot CT perfusion imaging. Radiology 2013 Jun 20. [Epub ahead of print]
27. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leung M, et al. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5(11): 1097-1111.
28. Nasis A, Ko BS, Leung MC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study. Eur Radiol 2013;23(7):1812-1821.
29. Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD, et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology 2010;254(2): 410-419.
30. Rossi A, Dharampal A, Wragg A, et al. Diagnostic performance of hyperaemic myocardial blood flow index obtained by dynamic computed tomography: does it predict functionally significant coronary lesions? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013 Aug 9. [Epub ahead of print]
31. So A, Wisenberg G, Islam A, et al. Noninvasive assessment of functionally relevant coronary artery stenoses with quantitative CT perfusion: preliminary clinical experiences. Eur Radiol 2012;22(1):39-50.
32. Duncker DJ, Bache RJ. Regulation of coronary blood flow during exercise. Physiol Rev 2008;88(3):1009-1086.
33. Wu XS, Ewert DL, Liu YH, Ritman EL. In vivo relation of intramyocardial blood volume to myocardial perfusion: evidence supporting microvascular site for autoregulation. Circulation 1992;85(2):730-737.
34. Lerman LO, Siripornpitak S, Maffei NL, Sheedy PF 2nd, Ritman EL. Measurement of in vivo myocardial microcirculatory function with electron beam CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23(3):390-398.
35. Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 1974;33(1):87-94.
36. Gould KL, Kirkeeide RL, Buchi M. Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15(2):459-474.
37. Uren NG, Melin JA, De Bruyne B, Wijns W, Baudhuin T, Camici PG. Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 1994;330(25):1782-1788.
38. Canty JM Jr, Smith TP Jr. Adenosinerecruitable flow reserve is absent during myocardial ischemia in unanesthetized dogs studied in the basal state. Circ Res 1995;76(6):1079-1087.
39. Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1993;87(4):1354-1367.
40. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronaryartery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996; 334(26):1703-1708.
41. Reimer KA, Jennings RB. The "wavefront phenomenon" of myocardial ischemic cell death. II. Transmural progression of necrosis within the framework of ischemic bed size (myocardium at risk) and collateral flow. Lab Invest 1979;40(6):633-644.
42. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2(3):174-182.
43. Ball RM, Bache RJ. Distribution of myocardial blood flow in the exercising dog with restricted coronary artery inflow. Circ Res 1976;38(2):60-66.
44. Rumberger JA, Feiring AJ, Lipton MJ, Higgins CB, Ell SR, Marcus ML. Use of ultrafast computed tomography to quantitate regional myocardial perfusion: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;9(1):59-69.
45. Bell MR, Lerman LO, Rumberger JA. Validation of minimally invasive measurement of myocardial perfusion using electron beam computed tomography and application in human volunteers. Heart 1999; 81(6):628-635.
46. Rumberger JA, Bell MR. Measurement of myocardial perfusion and cardiac output using intravenous injection methods by ultrafast (cine) computed tomography. Invest Radiol 1992;27(Suppl 2):S40-S46.
47. Newhouse JH, Murphy RX Jr. Tissue distribution of soluble contrast: effect of dose variation and changes with time. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981;136(3):463-467.
48. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al. First performance evaluation of a dualsource CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 2006;16(2):256-268.
49. Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T, et al. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol 2009;19(11):2576-2583.
50. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Cerci RJ, et al. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-MDCT: the CT angiography and perfusion methods of the CORE320 multicenter multinational diagnostic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197(4):829-837.
51. George RT, Jerosch-Herold M, Silva C, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2007;42(12):815-822.
52. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA, et al. Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48(1):153-160.
53. Keller MR, Kessler RM, Brooks RA, Kirkland LR. Optimum energy for performing CT iodinated contrast studies. Br J Radiol 1980;53(630):576-579.
54. Yoneyama K, Vavere AL, Cerci R, et al. Influence of image acquisition settings on radiation dose and image quality in coronary angiography by 320-detector volume computed tomography: the CORE320 pilot experience. Heart Int 2012;7(2):e11.
55. Bischoff B, Bamberg F, Marcus R, et al. Optimal timing for first-pass stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29(2):435-442.
56. So A, Hsieh J, Narayanan S, et al. Dualenergy CT and its potential use for quantitative myocardial CT perfusion. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012;6(5):308-317.
57. Schwarz F, Ruzsics B, Schoepf UJ, et al. Dual-energy CT of the heart-principles and protocols. Eur J Radiol 2008;68(3):423-433.
58. Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2007;17(6): 1510-1517.
59. Kang DK, Schoepf UJ, Bastarrika G, Nance JW Jr, Abro JA, Ruzsics B. Dualenergy computed tomography for integrative imaging of coronary artery disease: principles and clinical applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2010;31(4):276-291.
60. Nagao M, Kido T, Watanabe K, et al. Functional assessment of coronary artery flow using adenosine stress dual-energy CT: a preliminary study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;27(3):471-481.
61. Meyer M, Nance JW Jr, Schoepf UJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of substituting dual-energy CT for SPECT in the assessment of myocardial perfusion for the workup of coronary artery disease. Eur J Radiol 2012;81(12):3719-3725.
62. Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ, et al. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol 2009;104(3):318-326.
63. Nance JW Jr, Bastarrika G, Kang DK, et al. High-temporal resolution dual-energy computed tomography of the heart using a novel hybrid image reconstruction algorithm: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011;35(1):119-125.
64. So A, Lee TY, Imai Y, et al. Quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging using rapid kVp switch dual-energy CT: preliminary experience. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5(6):430-442.
65. Matsumoto K, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y, Ueno A, Yamada M, Kuribayashi S. Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: improved image quality as compared with that obtained with conventional 120-kVp CT. Radiology 2011;259(1):257-262.
66. Boll DT, Merkle EM, Paulson EK, Fleiter TR. Coronary stent patency: dual-energy multidetector CT assessment in a pilot study with anthropomorphic phantom. Radiology 2008;247(3):687-695.
67. Haberland U, Klotz E, Abolmaali N. Performance assessment of dynamic spiral scan modes with variable pitch for quantitative perfusion computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2010;45(7):378-386.
68. Ebersberger U, Marcus RP, Schoepf UJ, et al. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging: performance of 3D semi-automated evaluation software. Eur Radiol 2013 Sep 7. [Epub ahead of print]
69. Greif M, von Ziegler F, Bamberg F, et al. CT stress perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis as defined by FFR. Heart 2013;99(14):1004-1011.
70. Kim SM, Kim YN, Choe YH. Adenosinestress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging using 128-slice dual-source CT: optimization of the CT protocol to reduce the radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29(4):875-884.
71. Gramer BM, Muenzel D, Leber V, et al. Impact of iterative reconstruction on CNR and SNR in dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging in an animal model. Eur Radiol 2012;22(12):2654-2661.
72. Bøttcher M, Refsgaard J, Madsen MM, et al. Effect of antianginal medication on resting myocardial perfusion and pharmacologically induced hyperemia. J Nucl Cardiol 2003;10(4):345-352.
73. Yoon AJ, Melduni RM, Duncan SA, Ostfeld RJ, Travin MI. The effect of beta-blockers on the diagnostic accuracy of vasodilator pharmacologic SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16(3):358-367.
74. Scanlan JG, Gustafson DE, Chevalier PA, Robb RA, Ritman EL. Evaluation of ischemic heart disease with a prototype volume imaging computed tomographic (CT) scanner: preliminary experiments. Am J Cardiol 1980;46(7):1263-1268.
75. Zoghbi GJ, Dorfman TA, Iskandrian AE. The effects of medications on myocardial perfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52(6): 401-416.
76. Neefjes LA, Dharampal AS, Rossi A, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure using different low-dose scan protocols in dual-source CT coronary angiography: randomized study. Radiology 2011; 261(3):779-786.
77. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-tohead pilot investigation. Circulation 2009; 120(10):867-875.
78. Achenbach S, Goroll T, Seltmann M, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, highpitch spiral coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4(4):328-337.
79. Druz RS. Current advances in vasodilator pharmacological stress perfusion imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2009;39(3):204-209.
80. Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ, et al. Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrastenhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation 2006;113(6):823-833.
81. Buecker A, Katoh M, Krombach GA, et al. A feasibility study of contrast enhancement of acute myocardial infarction in multislice computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and gross morphology in pigs. Invest Radiol 2005;40(11):700-704.
82. Mahnken AH, Bruners P, Mühlenbruch G, et al. Low tube voltage improves computed tomography imaging of delayed myocardial contrast enhancement in an experimental acute myocardial infarction model. Invest Radiol 2007;42(2):123-129.
83. Crossett MP, Schneider-Kolsky M, Troupis J. Normal perfusion of the left ventricular myocardium using 320 MDCT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5(6):406-411.
84. Kurata A, Mochizuki T, Koyama Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ J 2005;69(5):550-557.
85. Hoffmann U, Millea R, Enzweiler C, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT in a porcine model. Radiology 2004;231(3):697-701.
86. Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Ferencik M, et al. Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology 2008;247(1):49-56.
87. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45(12):2042- 2047.
88. Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Dibbets-Schneider P, et al. Comparison of multislice computed tomography to gated single-photon emission computed tomography for imaging of healed myocardial infarcts. Am J Cardiol 2008;101(2):144-148.
89. Nikolaou K, Sanz J, Poon M, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability from routine contrast-enhanced 16-detector-row computed tomography of the heart: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2005;15(5):864-871.
90. Baks T, Cademartiri F, Moelker AD, et al. Multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48(1):144-152.
91. Schuleri KH, Centola M, George RT, et al. Characterization of peri-infarct zone heterogeneity by contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53(18):1699-1707.
92. le Polain de Waroux JB, Pouleur AC, Goffinet C, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Combined coronary and late-enhanced multidetector-computed tomography for delineation of the etiology of left ventricular dysfunction: comparison with coronary angiography and contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 2008;29(20): 2544-2551.
93. Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, et al. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2000;101(12):1379-1383.
94. al-Saadi N, Gross M, Bornstedt A, et al. Comparison of various parameters for determining an index of myocardial perfusion reserve in detecting coronary stenosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance tomography [in German]. Z Kardiol 2001; 90(11):824-834.
95. Wang Y, Qin L, Shi X, et al. Adenosinestress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198(3):521-529.
96. Gould RG, Lipton MJ, McNamara MT, Sievers RE, Koshold S, Higgins CB. Measurement of regional myocardial blood flow in dogs by ultrafast CT. Invest Radiol 1988;23(5):348-353.
97. Rienmüller R, Baumgartner C, Kern R, et al. Quantitative determination of left ventricular myocardial perfusion with electron beam computerized tomography [in German]. Herz 1997;22(2):63-71.
98. Groves AM, Goh V, Rajasekharan S, et al. CT coronary angiography: quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion using test bolus data-initial experience. Eur Radiol 2008;18(10):2155-2163.
99. St Lawrence KS, Lee TY. An adiabatic approximation to the tissue homogeneity model for water exchange in the brain. I. Theoretical derivation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998;18(12):1365-1377.
100. Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB, et al. Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report. Eur Heart J 2004;25(21): 1940-1965.
101. Braunwald E, Kloner RA. The stunned myocardium: prolonged, postischemic ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 1982;66(6):1146-1149.
102. Rahimtoola SH, Dilsizian V, Kramer CM, Marwick TH, Vanoverschelde JL. Chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction: from pathophysiology to imaging and its integration into clinical practice. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1(4):536-555.
103. Rodríguez-Granillo GA, Rosales MA, Degrossi E, Rodriguez AE. Signal density of left ventricular myocardial segments and impact of beam hardening artifact: implications for myocardial perfusion assessment by multidetector CT coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;26(3):345-354.
104. Stenner P, Schmidt B, Allmendinger T, Flohr T, Kachelrie M. Dynamic iterative beam hardening correction (DIBHC) in myocardial perfusion imaging using contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2010;45(6):314-323.
105. Kitagawa K, George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Lima JA, Lardo AC. Characterization and correction of beam-hardening artifacts during dynamic volume CT assessment of myocardial perfusion. Radiology 2010;256(1):111-118.
106. So A, Hsieh J, Imai Y, et al. Prospectively ECG-triggered rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT for quantitative imaging of myocardial perfusion. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5(8):829-836.
107. Adams DF, Hessel SJ, Judy PF, Stein JA, Abrams HL. Computed tomography of the normal and infarcted myocardium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1976;126(4):786-791.
108. Siemers PT, Higgins CB, Schmidt W, Ashburn W, Hagan P. Detection, quantitation and contrast enhancement of myocardial infarction utilizing computerized axial tomography: comparison with histochemical staining and 99mTc-pyrophosphate imaging. Invest Radiol 1978;13(2):103-109.
109. Powell WJ Jr, Wittenberg J, Maturi RA, Dinsmore RE, Miller SW. Detection of edema associated with myocardial ischemia by computerized tomography in isolated, arrested canine hearts. Circulation 1977;55(1):99-108.
110. Ko SM, Choi JW, Hwang HK, Song MG, Shin JK, Chee HK. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive anatomic and functional assessment with dual-source CT and adenosine-induced stress dual-energy CT for detection of significant coronary stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198(3):512-520.
111. Christian TF, Frankish ML, Sisemoore JH, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging with first-pass computed tomographic imaging: measurement of coronary flow reserve in an animal model of regional hyperemia. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17(4):625-630.
112. Rossi A, Uitterdijk A, Dijkshoorn M, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow by adenosine-stress CT perfusion imaging in pigs during various degrees of stenosis correlates well with coronary artery blood flow and fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;14(4):331-338.
113. Kido T, Kurata A, Higashino H, et al. Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using first-pass multidetector-row computed tomography and adenosine triphosphate in coronary artery disease. Circ J 2008;72(7):1086-1091.
114. Magalhães TA, Cury RC, Pereira AC, et al. Additional value of dipyridamole stress myocardial perfusion by 64-row computed tomography in patients with coronary stents. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5(6):449-458.
115. Arnoldi E, Lee YS, Ruzsics B, et al. CT detection of myocardial blood volume deficits: dual-energy CT compared with singleenergy CT spectra. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5(6):421-429.
116. Weininger M, Schoepf UJ, Ramachandra A, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic realtime myocardial perfusion CT and adenosine-stress first-pass dual-energy myocardial perfusion CT for the assessment of acute chest pain: initial results. Eur J Radiol 2012;81(12):3703-3710.
117. So A, Hsieh J, Li JY, Hadway J, Kong HF, Lee TY. Quantitative myocardial perfusion measurement using CT perfusion: a validation study in a porcine model of reperfused acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28(5):1237-1248.