Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: Comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation

Circulation

Volumn 120, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 867-875

  Dewey, Marc ^a,b   Zimmermann, Elke ^a   Deissenrieder, Florian ^a   Laule, Michael ^a   Dübel, Hans Peter ^a   Schlattmann, Peter ^a   Knebel, Fabian ^a   Rutsch, Wolfgang ^a   Hamm, Bernd ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Angiography; Computed tomography; Coronary disease; Coronary vessels; Imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; AGED; BODY BURDEN; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

AGED; BODY BURDEN; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 70349774691     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: 15244539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.859280     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. 1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern SM, Ho M, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lloyd-Jones D, McDermott M, Meigs J, Moy C, Nichol G, O'Donnell C, Roger V, Sorlie P, Steinberger J, Thorn T, Wilson M, Hong Y. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2008 update: a report from, the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008; 117:e25-el46. (Pubitemid 46226160)
2. Klever-Deichert G, Hinzpeter B, Hunsche E, Lauterbach KW. Costs of coronary heart diseases over the remaining life time in coronary heart disease cases-an analysis of the current status of coronary heart disease cases in Germany from the social perspective [in German], Z Kardiol. 1999;88:991-1000.
3. Noto TJ Jr, Johnson LW, Krone R, Weaver WF, Clark DA, Kramer JR Jr, Vetrovec GW. Cardiac catheterization 1990: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I). Cathet Cardiovasc. Diagn. 1991;24:75-83.
4. Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, Gerber TC, Gersh B, Hillis LD, Hundley WG, Manning WJ, Printz BF, Stuber M, Woodard PK. Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed, tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Circulation. 2008;118:586-606.
5. 5.DeweyM,TeigeF,SchnapauffD,LauleM,BorgesAC,WerneckeKD,SchinkT,BaumannG, RutschW,RogallaP,TaupitzM,Hamm.B. Noninvasivedetectionofcoronaryarterystenoses withmultislicecomputedtomographyormagneticresonanceimaging.AnnInternMed. 2006;145:407-415.(Pubitemid46768571)
6. 6. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, van der Wall EE, Wijns W. Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am. Heart J. 2006;151:404-411. (Pubitemid 43144743)
7. Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS, Wilde P, Oberhoff M, Karsch KR, Baumbach A. Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1840-1845.
8. Redberg RF, Walsh J. Pay now, benefits may follow: the case of cardiac computed tomographic angiography. N Engl J Med. 2008;359: 2309-2311.
9. Hausleiter J. International prospective multicenter study on radiation dose estimates of coronary CT angiography in daily practice: results from the PROTECTION I Study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2008;2:S19-S20.
10. 10. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk, of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;298:317-323. (Pubitemid 47080486)
11. 11. Knottnerus JA, Muris JW. Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1118-1128. (Pubitemid 37386337)
12. 12.BossuytPM,ReitsmaJB,BrunsDE,GatsonisCA,GlasziouPP,IrwigLM,LijmerJG, MoherD,RennieD,deVetHC. Towardscompleteandaccuratereportingofstudiesofdiagnosticaccuracy: theSTARDinitiative.AnnInternMed.2003;138:40-44.(Pubitemid36232093)
13. 13. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC, Lijmer JG. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern. Med. 2003;138:W1-W12. (Pubitemid 36163903)
14. 14.WhitingP,RutjesAW,ReitsmaJB,GlasAS,BossuytPM,KleijnenJ. Sourcesofvariationandbiasinstudiesofdiagnosticaccuracy:asystematicreview. AnnInternMed.2004;140:189-202.(Pubitemid38155650)
15. 15. Dewey M, Hoffmann H, Hamm. B. Multislice CT coronary angiography: effect of sublingual nitroglycerine on the diameter of coronary arteries. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2006;178:600-604. (Pubitemid 44194930)
16. 16. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Laule M, Rutsch W, Hamm B. Three-vessel coronary artery disease examined with 320-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1669. (Pubitemid 351957533)
17. Engelken FJ, Lembcke A, Hamm B, Dewey M. Determining optimal acquisition parameters for computed tomography coronary angiography: evaluation of a software-assisted, breathhold exam simulation. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:239-243.
18. Dewey M. Examination and reconstruction. In: Dewey M, ed. Coronary CT Angiography. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2008.
19. Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR. Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology. 2008;248:995-1003.
20. 20. Dewey M, Laule M, Krug L, Schnapauff D, Rogalla P, Rutsch. W, Hamm B, Lembcke A. Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:223-229. (Pubitemid 38391787)
21. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, McGoon DC, Murphy ML, Roe BB. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975;51:5-40.
22. 22. Dewey M, Schnapauff D, Laule M, Lembcke A, Borges AC, Rutsch W, Hamm B, Rogalla P. Multislice CT coronary angiography: evaluation, of an automatic vessel detection tool. Rofo. 2004;176:478-483. (Pubitemid 38724239)
23. 23. Dewey M, Rutsch W, Schnapauff D, Teige F, Hamm. B. Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:78-84. (Pubitemid 46104887)
24. Leung KC, Martin. CJ. Effective doses for coronary angiography. Br J Radiol. 1996;69:426-431.
25. Rawles J. Regression analysis. Lancet. 1986:614.
26. 26. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310. (Pubitemid 16134762)
27. Miller JM, Dewey M, Vavere AL, Rochitte CE, Niinuma H, Arbab-Zadeh A, Paul N, Hoe J, de Roos A, Yoshioka K, Lemos PA, Bush DE, Lardo AC, Texter J, Brinker J, Cox C, Clouse ME, Lima JA. Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multicentre trial CORE-64. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:816-828.
28. Schönenberger E, Schnapauff D, Teige F, Laule M, Hamm. B, Dewey M. Patient acceptance of noninvasive and invasive coronary angiography. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e246.
29. Newcombe R, Altman D. Proportions and their differences. In: Altman D, Machin D, Bryant T, Gardner M, eds. Statistics with Confidence. London, UK: BMJ Books; 2000:45-56.
30. Altman D. Diagnostic tests. In: Altman D, Machin D, Bryant T, Gardner M, eds. Statistics with. Confidence. London, UK: BMJ Books; 2000:105-109.
31. Dang Q, Mazumdar S, Houck PR. Sample size and power calculations based on generalized linear mixed models with correlated binary outcomes. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008;91:122-127.
32. Team RDC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Available at: http://www.r-project.org. Accessed February 10, 2009.
33. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1979;300: 1350-1358.
34. 34.AgatstonAS,JanowitzWR,HildnerFJ,ZusmerNR,ViamonteMJr,DetranoR. Quantificationofcoronaryarterycalciumusingultrafastcomputedtomography. JAmCollCardiol.1990;15:827-832.(Pubitemid20101575)
35. 35. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, Agostoni P, Morello R, Valgimigli M. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48: 1896-1910. (Pubitemid 44755022)
36. 36. Hamon. M, Morello R, Riddell JW. Coronary arteries: diagnostic performance of 16- versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography: meta-analysis. Radiology. 2007;245:720-731. (Pubitemid 350127342)
37. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halameit E, Scherer M, Bellinger R, Martin A, Benton R, Delago A, Min JK. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52: 1724-1732.
38. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, Paul N, Clouse ME, Shapiro EP, Hoe J, Lardo AC, Bush DE, de Roos A, Cox C, Brinker J, Lima JA. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2324-2336.
39. Dewey M. Indications. In: Dewey M, ed. Coronary CT Angiography. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2008:chap 5.
40. Geleijns J, Calzado A, Dewey M, Joemai R, Mather R, de Roos A, Salvado M. Dose assessment for a multicenter study on diagnostic performance of cardiac 64-slice CT. Presented at: European Congress of Radiology; March 7-11, 2008; Vienna, Austria.
41. Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML, Vorobiof G, Nallamshetty L, Mitsouras D, Ersoy H, Mather RT, Judy PF, Cai T, Coyner K, Schultz K, Whitmore AG, Di Carli MF. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography, Int. J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008; 24:535-546.
42. 42. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277-2284. (Pubitemid 350190758)
43. 43.GreenlandP.Whoisacandidatefornoninvasivecoronaryangiography? AnnInternMed.2006;145:466-467.(Pubitemid46768578)
44. 44. Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CA, Mollet NR, Pugliese F, Weustink AC, van Pelt N, Cademartiri F, Nieman K, Boersma E, de Jaegere P, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ. 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with, high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1469-1475. (Pubitemid 47496246)
45. 45. Hoffmann. MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, Schmid FT, Lieberknecht M, Schulze R, Ludwig B, Kroschel U, Jahnke N, Haerer W, Brambs HJ, Aschoff AJ. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA. 2005;293:2471-2478. (Pubitemid 40705728)
46. 46. Cury RC, Pomerantsev EV, Ferencik M, Hoffmann U, Nieman K, Moselewski F, Abbara S, Jang IK, Brady TJ, Achenbach S. Comparison of the degree of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography versus by quantitative coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:784-787. (Pubitemid 41317650)
47. 47. Refer J, Coche E, Legros G, Pasquet A, Grandin C, Van. Beers BE, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:92-100. (Pubitemid 40905135)
48. 48. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:552-557. (Pubitemid 41040301)
49. 49. Cury RC, Ferencik M, Achenbach S, Pomerantsev E, Nieman K, Moselewski F, Abbara S, Jang IK, Brady TJ, Hoffmann U. Accuracy of 16-slice multi-detector CT to quantify the degree of coronary artery stenosis: assessment of cross-sectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57:345-350. (Pubitemid 43254913)
50. Iglehart JK. Health insurers and medical-imaging policy: a work in. progress. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1030-1037.
51. 51. Dewey M, Hamm B. Cost effectiveness of coronary angiography and calcium scoring using CT and stress MRI for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1301-1309. (Pubitemid 46691961)
52. Braunwald E, Antman EM. Evidence-based coronary care. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:551-553.