Diagnostic Accuracy of 64-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography. A Prospective, Multicenter, Multivendor Study

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 52, Issue 25, 2008, Pages 2135-2144

  Meijboom, W Bob ^a   Meijs, Matthijs F L ^b   Schuijf, Joanne D ^c   Cramer, Maarten J ^b   Mollet, Nico R ^a   van Mieghem, Carlos A G ^a   Nieman, Koen ^a   van Werkhoven, Jacob M ^b,c   Pundziute, Gabija ^b,c   Weustink, Annick C ^a   de Vos, Alexander M ^b   Pugliese, Francesca ^a   Rensing, Benno ^d   Jukema, J Wouter ^c   Bax, Jeroen J ^c   Prokop, Mathias ^b   Doevendans, Pieter A ^b   Hunink, Myriam G M ^a   Krestin, Gabriel P ^a   de Feyter, Pim J ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

computed tomography; coronary angiography; coronary artery disease; multicenter; prospective

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY CALCIFICATION; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS;

AGED; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 57449115879     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.058     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Garcia M.J., Lessick J., and Hoffmann M.H. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 296 (2006) 403-411
2. Achenbach S., Giesler T., Ropers D., et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 103 (2001) 2535-2538
3. Nieman K., Oudkerk M., Rensing B.J., et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 357 (2001) 599-603
4. Ehara M., Surmely J.F., Kawai M., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 70 (2006) 564-571
5. Fine J.J., Hopkins C.B., Ruff N., and Newton F.C. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 97 (2006) 173-174
6. Hamon M., Biondi-Zoccai G.G., Malagutti P., et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 1896-1910
7. Herzog C., Zwerner P.L., Doll J.R., et al. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 244 (2007) 112-120
8. Leber A.W., Knez A., von Ziegler F., et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 147-154
9. Leschka S., Alkadhi H., Plass A., et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26 (2005) 1482-1487
10. Mollet N.R., Cademartiri F., van Mieghem C.A., et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112 (2005) 2318-2323
11. Nikolaou K., Knez A., Rist C., et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 (2006) 111-117
12. Pugliese F., Mollet N.R., Runza G., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 575-582
13. Raff G.L., Gallagher M.J., O'Neill W.W., and Goldstein J.A. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 552-557
14. Ropers D., Rixe J., Anders K., et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- × 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 97 (2006) 343-348
15. Schuijf J.D., Pundziute G., Jukema J.W., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 98 (2006) 145-148
16. Vanhoenacker P.K., Heijenbrok-Kal M.H., Van Heste R., et al. Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis. Radiology 244 (2007) 419-428
17. Einstein A.J., Henzlova M.J., and Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 298 (2007) 317-323
18. Menzel H., Schibila H., and Teunen D. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography (2000), European Commission Publication, Luxembourg No. EUR 16262 EN
19. Austen W.G., Edwards J.E., Frye R.L., et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51 (1975) 5-40
20. Reiber J.H., Serruys P.W., Kooijman C.J., et al. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation 71 (1985) 280-288
21. Fleiss J.L., Levin B., and Cho Paik M. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 3rd edition (2003), John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY
22. Scanlon P.J., Faxon D.P., Audet A.M., et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 33 (1999) 1756-1824
23. Zhou X.H., Obuchowski N.A., and McClish D.K. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine (2002), Wiley & Sons-Interscience, New York, NY
24. Efron B., and Tibshirani R.J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap (1993), Chapman & Hall, New York, NY
25. Gilard M., Le Gal G., Cornily J.C., et al. Midterm prognosis of patients with suspected coronary artery disease and normal multislice computed tomographic findings: a prospective management outcome study. Arch Intern Med 167 (2007) 1686-1689
26. Min J.K., Shaw L.J., Devereux R.B., et al. Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 50 (2007) 1161-1170
27. Hendel R.C., Patel M.R., Kramer C.M., et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 1475-1497
28. Budoff M.J., Achenbach S., Blumenthal R.S., et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 114 (2006) 1761-1791