Diagnostic Performance of 64-Multidetector Row Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Individuals Without Known Coronary Artery Disease. Results From the Prospective Multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) Trial

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 52, Issue 21, 2008, Pages 1724-1732

  Budoff, Matthew J ^a   Dowe, David ^b   Jollis, James G ^c   Gitter, Michael ^d   Sutherland, John ^e   Halamert, Edward ^f   Scherer, Markus ^g   Bellinger, Raye ^h   Martin, Arthur ⁱ   Benton, Robert ^j   Delago, Augustin ^j   Min, James K ^k  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Atlantic Medical Imaging ^*  (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Appleton Cardiology Associates   (United States)

^e ARIZONA HEART INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f Rehabilitation Associates of Indiana   (United States)

^g Carolinas Medical Center NorthEast   (United States)

^h Heart Research Foundation of Sacramento   (United States)

ⁱ Southern Heart Center   (United States)

^j Capital Psychological Associates   (United States)

^k WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

angiography; computed tomography; coronary artery disease

Indexed keywords

BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; IODIXANOL; METOPROLOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OBESITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THORAX PAIN;

AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; CALCINOSIS; CHEST PAIN; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 54549122949     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Hamon M., Biondi-Zoccai G.G., Malagutti P., et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 1896-1910
2. Hamon M., Morello R., Riddell J.W., and Hamon M. Coronary arteries: diagnostic performance of 16- versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography-meta-analysis. Radiology 245 (2007) 720-731
3. Austen W.G., Edwards J.E., Frye R.L., et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51 (1975) 5-40
4. Leschka S., Alkadhi H., Plass A., et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26 (2005) 1482-1487
5. Mollet N.R., Cademartiri F., Krestin G.P., et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 45 (2005) 128-132
6. Lin F., Shaw L.J., Berman D.S., et al. Multidetector computed tomography coronary artery plaque predictors of stress-induced myocardial ischemia by SPECT. Atherosclerosis 197 (2008) 700-709
7. Budoff M.J., Achenbach S., Blumenthal R.S., et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography, a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 114 (2006) 1761-1791
8. Budoff M.J., Rasouli M.L., Shavelle D.M., et al. Cardiac CT angiography (CTA) and nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)-a comparison in detecting significant coronary artery disease. Acad Radiol 14 (2007) 252-257
9. Schuijf J.D., Wijns W., Jukema J.W., et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 2508-2514
10. Garcia M.J., Lessick J., Hoffmann M.H., and CATSCAN Study Investigators. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 296 (2006) 403-411
11. Abdulla J., Abildstrom S.Z., Gotzsche O., Christensen E., Kober L., and Torp-Pedersen C. 64-Multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 28 (2007) 3042-3050
12. Raff G.L., Gallagher M.J., O'Neill W.W., and Goldstein J.A. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 552-557
13. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Overweight and obesity. http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/ Accessed August 14, 2008
14. Bashore T.M., Bates E.R., Berger P.B., et al. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions clinical expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37 (2001) 2170-2214
15. Natarajan M.K., Mehta S.R., Holder D.H., et al. The risks of waiting for cardiac catheterization: a prospective study. CMAJ 167 (2002) 1233-1240
16. Hendel R.C., Patel M.R., Kramer C.M., et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 1475-1497
17. Moer R., van Weert A.W., Myreng Y., and Mølstad P. Variability of quantitative coronary angiography: an evaluation of on-site versus core laboratory analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 19 (2003) 457-464
18. Danchin N., Juillière Y., Foley D., and Serruys P.W. Visual versus quantitative assessment of the severity of coronary artery stenoses: can the angiographer's eye be reeducated?. Am Heart J 126 (1993) 594-600
19. Ferencik M., Ropers D., Abbara S., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of image postprocessing methods for the detection of coronary artery stenoses by using multidetector CT. Radiology 243 (2007) 696-702