Where am I and why? Synthesizing range biology and the eco-evolutionary dynamics of dispersal

Oikos

Volumn 123, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 5-22

  Kubisch, Alexander ^a,b   Holt, Robert D ^d   Poethke, Hans Joachim ^b   Fronhofer, Emanuel A ^b,c  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^c SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; COLONIZATION; DISPERSAL; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; HABITAT USE; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; LOCAL ADAPTATION; METAPOPULATION; SPECIES OCCURRENCE;

EID: 84890807082     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00706.x     Document Type: Article

References (138)

1. Al-Hiyaly S. A. K. et al. 1993. The effect of zinc contamination from electricity pylons. Genetic constraints on selection for zinc tolerance. Heredity 70: 22-32.
2. Amarasekare P. 2004. The role of density-dependent dispersal in source-sink dynamics. J. Theor. Biol. 226: 159-168.
3. Andrewartha H. G. and Birch L. C. 1954. The distribution and abundance of animals. - Univ. of Chicago Press.
4. Armsworth P. R. and Roughgarden J. E. 2005. The impact of directed versus random movement on population dynamics and biodiversity patterns. Am. Nat. 165: 449-465.
5. Baguette M. 2004. The classical metapopulation theory and the real, natural world: a critical appraisal. Basic Appl. Ecol. 5: 213-224.
6. Baguette M. et al. 2003. Effect of habitat fragmentation on dispersal in the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Crit. Rev. Biol. 326: 200-209.
7. Beverton R. J. H. and Holt S. J. 1957. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. - Chapman and Hall.
8. Bitume E. V. et al. 2013. Density and genetic relatedness increase dispersal distance in a subsocial organism. Ecol. Lett. 16: 430-437.
9. Boeye J. et al. 2013. More rapid climate change promotes evolutionary rescue through selection for increased dispersal distance. Evol. Appl. 6: 353-364.
10. Bolnick D. I. and Nosil P. 2007. Natural selection in populations subject to a migration load. Evolution 61: 2229-2243.
11. Bolnick D. I. et al. 2008. Evidence for asymmetric migration load in a pair of ecologically divergent stickleback populations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 94: 273-287.
12. Bonte D. et al. 2010. Evolution of dispersal polymorphism and local adaptation of dispersal distance in spatially structured landscapes. Oikos 119: 560-566.
13. Bonte D. et al. 2012. Costs of dispersal. Biol. Rev. 87: 290-312.
14. Booy G. et al. 2000. Genetic diversity and the survival of populations. Plant Biol. 2: 379-395.
15. Bowler D. E. and Benton T. G. 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol. Rev. 80: 205-225.
16. Bradshaw A. D. 1984. The importance of evolutionary ideas in ecology - and vice versa. - In: Schorrocks B. (ed.), Evolutionary ecology. Blackwell, pp. 1-25.
17. Bridle J. R. and Vines T. H. 2007. Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail? Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 140-147.
18. Burton O. J. et al. 2010. Tradeoffs and the evolution of life histories during range expansion. Ecol. Lett. 13: 1210-1220.
19. Cabral J. S. and Schurr F. M. 2010. Estimating demographic models for the range dynamics of plant species. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 19: 85-97.
20. Cabral J. S. and Kreft H. 2012. Linking ecological niche, community ecology and biogeography: insights from a mechanistic niche model. J. Biogeogr. 39: 2212-2224.
21. Cadet C. et al. 2003. The evolution of dispersal under demographic stochasticity. Am. Nat. 162: 427-441.
22. Carroll S. P. et al. 2007. Evolution on ecological time-scales. Funct. Ecol. 21: 387-393.
23. Case T. J. et al. 2005. The community context of species' borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Oikos 108: 28-46.
24. Chaianunporn T. and Hovestadt T. 2012. Evolution of dispersal in metacommunities of interacting species. J. Evol. Biol. 25: 2511-2525.
25. Chipperfield J. D. et al. 2011. An updated algorithm for the generation of neutral landscapes by spectral synthesis. PLoS ONE 6: e17040.
26. Clobert J. et al. 2012. Dispersal ecology and evolution. - Oxford Univ. Press.
27. Cody M. L. and Overton J. M. 1996. Short-term evolution of reduced dispersal in island plant populations. J. Ecol. 84: 53-61.
28. Conradt L. et al. 2000. Non-random dispersal in the butterfly Maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models. Proc. R. Soc. B 267: 1505-1510.
29. Cote J. et al. 2010. Personality traits and dispersal tendency in the invasive mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Proc. R. Soc. B 277: 1571-1579.
30. Courchamp F. et al. 2010. Allee effects in ecology and conservation. - Oxford Univ. Press.
31. De Meester N. and Bonte D. 2010. Information use and density-dependent emigration in an agrobiont spider. Behav. Ecol. 21: 992-998.
32. Dingemanse N. J. et al. 2003. Natal dispersal and personalities in great tits (Parus major). Proc. R. Soc. B 270: 741-747.
33. Doebeli M. and Knowlton N. 1998. The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95: 8676-8680.
34. Dormann C. F. 2007. Promising the future? Global change projections of species distributions. Basic Appl. Ecol. 8: 387-397.
35. Driscoll D. A. et al. 2010. Classic metapopulations are rare among common beetle species from a naturally fragmented landscape. J. Anim. Ecol. 79: 294-303.
36. Duckworth R. A. 2008. Adaptive dispersal strategies and the dynamics of a range expansion. Am. Nat. 172: S4-S17.
37. Edelaar P. and Bolnick D. I. 2012. Non-random gene flow: an underappreciated force in evolution and ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27: 659-665.
38. Elith J. and Leathwick J. R. 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 677-697.
39. Enfjäll K. and Leimar O. 2009. The evolution of dispersal - the importance of information about population density and habitat characteristics. Oikos 118: 291-299.
40. Excoffier L. and Ray N. 2008. Surfing during population expansions promotes genetic revolutions and structuration. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 347-351.
41. Ferriere R. and Legendre S. 2013. Eco-evolutionary feedbacks, adaptive dynamics and evolutionary rescue theory. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 368: 20120081.
42. Frankham R. 2008. Inbreeding and extinction: island populations. Conserv. Biol. 12: 665-675.
43. Fronhofer E. A. et al. 2011. Assortative mating counteracts the evolution of dispersal polymorphisms. Evolution 65: 2461-2469.
44. Fronhofer E. A. et al. 2012. Why are metapopulations so rare? Ecology 93: 1967-1978.
45. Fronhofer E. A. et al. 2013. From random walks to informed movement. Oikos 122: 857-866.
46. García-Ramos G. and Kirkpatrick M. 1997. Genetic models of adaptation and gene flow in peripheral populations. Evolution 51: 21-28.
47. Gaston K. J. 2009. Geographic range limits: achieving synthesis. Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 1395-1406.
48. Geber M. A. 2011. Ecological and evolutionary limits to species geographic ranges. Am. Nat. 178: S1-S5.
49. Gomulkiewicz R. et al. 1999. The effects of density dependence and immigration on local adaptation and niche evolution in a black-hole sink environment. Theor. Popul. Biol. 55: 283-296.
50. Gonzalez-Guzman L. I. and Mehlman D. W. 2001. Developmental stability across the breeding distribution of the scissor- tailed flycatcher (Tyrannus forficatus). Ecol. Lett. 4: 444-452.
51. Gotelli N. J. 1991. Metapopulation models: the rescue effect, the propagule rain, and the core-satellite hypothesis. Am. Nat. 138: 768-776.
52. Gros A. et al. 2006. Evolution of local adaptations in dispersal strategies. Oikos 114: 544-552.
53. Gros A. et al. 2008. Evolution of sex-biased dispersal: the role of sex-specific dispersal costs, demographic stochasticity, and inbreeding. Ecol. Modell. 219: 226-233.
54. Haldane J. B. S. 1956. The relationship between density regulation and natural selection. Proc. R. Soc. B 145: 306-308.
55. Hallatschek O. et al. 2007. Genetic drift at expanding frontiers promotes gene segregation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104: 19926-19930.
56. Hamilton W. D. and May R. M. 1977. Dispersal in stable habitats. Nature 269: 578-581.
57. Hampe A. 2004. Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 13: 469-471.
58. Hastings A. 1983. Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal? Theor. Popul. Biol. 24: 244-251.
59. Hochberg M. E. and Ives A. R. 1999. Can natural enemies enforce geographical range limits? Ecography 22: 268-276.
60. Hof C. et al. 2011. Rethinking species' ability to cope with rapid climate change. Global Change Biol. 17: 2987-2990.
61. Holling C. S. 1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 91: 385-398.
62. Holt R. D. 1984. Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions, and the coexistence of prey species. Am. Nat. 124: 377-406.
63. Holt R. D. 1985. Population dynamics in two-patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theor. Popul. Biol. 28: 181-208.
64. Holt R. D. 1987. Population dynamics and evolutionary processes: the manifold roles of habitat selection. Evol. Ecol. 1: 331-347.
65. Holt R. D. and McPeek M. A. 1996. Chaotic population dynamics favors the evolution of dispersal. Am. Nat. 148: 709-718.
66. Holt R. D. and Gomulkiewicz R. 1997. How does immigration influence local adaptation? A reexamination of a familiar paradigm. Am. Nat. 149: 563-572.
67. Holt R. D. and Keitt T. H. 2000. Alternative causes for range limits: a metapopulation perspective. Ecol. Lett. 3: 41-47.
68. Holt R. D. and Barfield M. 2009. Trophic interactions and range limits: the diverse roles of predation. Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 1435-1442.
69. Holt R. D. and Barfield M. 2011. Theoretical perspectives on the statics and dynamics of species' borders in patchy environments. Am. Nat. 178: S6-S25.
70. Holt R. D. et al. 2005. Theories of niche conservatism and evolution: could exotic species be potential tests? - In: Sax D. et al. (eds), Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution and biogeography. Sinauer, pp. 259-290.
71. Holt R. et al. 2011. Predation and the evolutionary dynamics of species ranges. Am. Nat. 178: 488-500.
72. Hovestadt T. and Poethke H. J. 2006. The control of emigration and its consequences for the survival of populations. Ecol. Modell. 190: 443-453.
73. Hovestadt T. et al. 2001. Evolution of reduced dispersal mortality and "fat-tailed" dispersal kernels in autocorrelated landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. B 268: 385-391.
74. Hovestadt T. et al. 2010. Information processing in models for density-dependent emigration: a comparison. Ecol. Modell. 221: 405-410.
75. Howe H. F. 1986. Seed dispersal by fruit-eating birds and mammals. - In: Murray D. R. (ed.), Seed dispersal. Academic Press, pp. 123-189.
76. Jankowski J. E. et al. 2010. Squeezed at the top: interspecific aggression may constrain elevational ranges in tropical birds. Ecology 91: 1877-1884.
77. Johnson D. M. et al. 2006. Allee effects and pulsed invasion by the gypsy moth. Nature 444: 361-363.
78. Jump A. S. and Peñuelas J. 2005. Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecol. Lett. 8: 1010-1020.
79. Kanarek A. R. et al. 2013. Allee effects, aggregation and invasion success. Theor. Ecol. 6: 153-164.
80. Kawecki T. J. 2008. Adaptation to marginal habitats. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39: 321-342.
81. Kawecki T. J. and Ebert D. 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7: 1225-1241.
82. Keitt T. H. et al. 2001. Allee effects, invasion pinning, and species' borders. Am. Nat. 157: 203-216.
83. Killingback T. et al. 1999. Variable investment, the Continuous Prisoner's Dilemma, and the origin of cooperation. Proc. R. Soc. B 266: 1723-1728.
84. Kissling W. D. et al. 2012. Towards novel approaches to modelling biotic interactions in multispecies assemblages at large spatial extents. J. Biogeogr. 39: 2163-2178.
85. Klopfstein S. et al. 2006. The fate of mutations surfing on the wave of a range expansion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23: 482-490.
86. Kubisch A. et al. 2011. Density-dependent dispersal and the formation of range borders. Ecography 34: 1002-1008.
87. Kubisch A. et al. 2013a. Kin competition as a major driving force for invasions. Am. Nat. 181: 700-706.
88. Kubisch A. et al. 2013b. Predicting range shifts under global change: the balance between local adaptation and dispersal. Ecography 36: 873-882.
89. Lande R. 1998. Demographic stochasticity and Allee effect on a scale with isotropic noise. Oikos 83: 353-358.
90. Lehe R. et al. 2012. The rate of beneficial mutations surfing on a wave of range expansion. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8: e1002447.
91. Leimu R. et al. 2010. Habitat fragmentation, climate change and inbreeding in plants. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci 1195: 84-98.
92. Leonardo T. E. and Mondor E. B. 2006. Symbiont modifies host life-history traits that affect gene flow. Proc. R. Soc. B 273: 1079-1084.
93. Lowe W. 2009. What drives long-distance dispersal? A test of theoretical predictions. Ecology 90: 1456-1462.
94. Mack K. M. L. 2012. Selective feedback between dispersal distance and the stability of mutualism. Oikos 121: 442-448.
95. Magle S. B. et al. 2010. Extirpation, colonization, and habitat dynamics of a keystone species along an urban gradient. Biol. Conserv. 143: 2146-2155.
96. McPeek M. A. and Holt R. D. 1992. The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. Am. Nat. 140: 1010-1027.
97. Münkemüller T. and Johst K. 2007. How does intraspecific density regulation influence metapopulation synchrony and persistence? J. Theor. Biol. 245: 553-563.
98. Nara K. and Hogetsu T. 2004. Ectomycorrhizal fungi in established schrubs facilitate subsequent seedling establishment of successional plant species. Ecology 85: 1700-1707.
99. Nowicki P. and Vrabec V. 2011. Evidence for positive density-dependent emigration in butterfly metapopulations. Oecologia 167: 657-665.
100. Parvinen K. and Metz J. A. 2008. A novel fitness proxy in structured locally finite metapopulations with diploid genetics, with an application to dispersal evolution. Theor. Popul. Biol. 73: 517-528.
101. Pearson R. G. and Dawson T. P. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bio climate envelope models useful? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 12: 361-371.
102. Phillips B. L. et al. 2010. Evolutionarily accelerated invasions: the rate of dispersal evolves upwards during the range advance of cane toads. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 2595-2601.
103. Poethke H. J. and Hovestadt T. 2002. Evolution of density- and patch-size-dependent dispersal rates. Proc. R. Soc. B 269: 637-645.
104. Poethke H. J. et al. 2007. The relative contribution of individual and kin selection to the evolution of density-dependent dispersal rates. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9: 41-50.
105. Poethke H. J. et al. 2010. Predator-induced dispersal and the evolution of conditional dispersal in correlated environments. Am. Nat. 175: 577-586.
106. Poethke H. J. et al. 2011. A metapopulation paradox: partial improvement of habitat may reduce metapopulation persistence. Am. Nat. 177: 792-799.
107. Prakash S. and De Roos A. M. 2002. Habitat destruction in a simple predator-prey patch model: how predators enhance prey persistence and abundance. Theor. Popul. Biol. 62: 231-249.
108. Prentis P. E. et al. 2008. Adaptive evolution in invasive species. Trends Plant Sci. 13: 288-294.
109. Price T. D. and Kirkpatrick M. 2009. Evolutionarily stable range limits set by interspecific competition. Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 1429-1434.
110. Rieseberg L. H. et al. 2003. Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowes facilitated by hybridization. Science 301: 1211-1216.
111. Ronce O. 2007. How does it feel to be like a rolling stone? Ten questions about dispersal evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38: 231-253.
112. Ronce O. et al. 2000. Evolutionarily stable dispersal rates do not always increase with local extinction rates. Am. Nat. 155: 485-496.
113. le Roux P.C. et al. 2012. Biotic interactions affect the elevational ranges of high-latitude plant species. Ecography 35: 1048-1056.
114. Ruxton G. D. and Rohani P. 1999. Fitness-dependent dispersal in metapopulations and its consequences for persistence and synchrony. J. Anim. Ecol. 67: 530-539.
115. Saastamoinen M. 2007. Heritability of dispersal rate and other life history traits in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Heredity 100: 39-46.
116. Scheiner S. M. et al. 2012. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. XI. Joint evolution of plasticity and dispersal rate. Ecol. Evol. 2: 2027-2039.
117. Schloss C. A. et al. 2012. Dispersal will limit ability of mammals to to track climate change in the Western Hemisphere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109: 8606-8611.
118. Sherratt J. 2001. Periodic travelling waves in cyclic predator-prey systems. Ecol. Lett. 4: 30-37.
119. Shine R. et al. 2011. An evolutionary process that assembles phenotypes through space rather than through time. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108: 5708-5711.
120. Sinervo B. and Clobert J. 2003. Morphs, dispersal behavior, genetic similarity, and the evolution of cooperation. Science 300: 1949-1951.
121. Sinha S. and Parthasarathy S. 1996. Unusual dynamics of extinction in a simple ecological model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93: 1504-1508.
122. Skellam J. G. 1951. Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38: 196-218.
123. Stockwell C. A. et al. 2003. Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 94-101.
124. Taylor P. D. 1992. Altruism in viscous populations - an inclusive fitness model. Evol. Ecol. 6: 352-356.
125. Taylor C. M. and Hastings A. 2005. Allee effects in biological invasions. Ecol. Lett. 8: 895-908.
126. Travis J. M. J. and Dytham C. 2002. Dispersal evolution during invasions. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4: 1119-1129.
127. Travis J. M. J. and Dytham C. 2004. A method for simulating patterns of habitat availability at static and dynamic range margins. Oikos 104: 410-416.
128. Travis J. M. J. et al. 1999. The evolution of density-dependent dispersal. Proc. R. Soc. B 266: 1837-1842.
129. Travis J. M. J. et al. 2005. The interplay of positive and negative species interactions across an environmental gradient: insights from an individual-based simulation model. Biol. Lett. 1: 5-8.
130. Travis J. M. J. et al. 2007. Deleterious mutations can surf to high densities on the wave front of an expanding population. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 2334-2343.
131. Travis J. M. J. et al. 2009. Accelerating invasion rates result from the evolution of density-dependent dispersal. J. Theor. Biol. 259: 151-158.
132. Travis J. M. J. et al. 2010. Mutation surfing and the evolution of dispersal during range expansions. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 2656-67.
133. Vercken E. et al. 2011. Critical patch size generated by Allee effect in gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.). Ecol. Lett. 14: 179-186.
134. Virgos E. 2001. Role of isolation and habitat quality in shaping species abundance: a test with badgers (Meles meles L.) in a gradient of forest fragmentation. J. Biogeogr. 28: 381-389.
135. Weisser W. W. et al. 1999. Predator-induced morphological shift in the pea aphid. Proc. R. Soc. B 266: 1175-1181.
136. Yeaman S. and Whitlock M. C. 2011. The genetic architecture of adaptation under migration-selection balance. Evolution 65: 1897-1911.
137. Zajitschek S. et al. 2012. The importance of habitat resistance for movement decisions in the common lizard, Lacerta vivipara. BMC Ecol. 12: 13.
138. Zurell D. et al. 2012. Uncertainty in predictions of range dynamics: black grouse climbing the Swiss Alps. Ecography 35: 590-603.