How does immigration influence local adaptation? A reexamination of a familiar paradigm

American Naturalist

Volumn 149, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 563-572

  Holt, Robert D ^a   Gomulkiewich, Richard ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION; DENSITY DEPENDENCE; GENE FLOW; IMMIGRATION; LOCAL ADAPTATION; SINK POPULATION;

EID: 0030986889     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/286005     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Antonovics, J. 1976. The nature of limits to natural selection. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 63:224-247.
2. Bradshaw, A. D. 1991. The Croonian Lecture 1991: genostasis and the limits to evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 333:289-305.
3. Bradshaw, A. D., and T. McNeilly. 1991. Evolutionary response to global climate change. Annals of Botany 67(Suppl. 1):5-14.
4. Endler, J. A. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
5. Ginzburg, L. R. 1983. Theory of natural selection and population growth. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, Calif.
6. Gomulkiewicz, R., and R. D. Holt. 1995. When does evolution by natural selection prevent extinction? Evolution 49:201-207.
7. Huffman, A. A., and M. W. Blows. 1994. Species borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9:223-227.
8. Holt, R. D. 1983. Immigration and the dynamics of peripheral populations. Pages 680-694 in A. G. J. Rhodin and K. Miyata, eds. Advances in herpetology and evolutionary biology. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
9. _1993. Ecology at the mesoscale: the influence of regional processes on local communities. Pages 77-88 in R. Ricklefs and D. Schluter, eds. Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
10. _1996. Demographic constraints in evolution: towards unifying the evolutionary theories of senescence and niche conservatism. Evolutionary Ecology 10:1-11.
11. Holt, R. D., and M. S. Gaines. 1992. Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for the evolution of fundamental niches. Evolutionary Ecology 6:433-447.
12. Holt, R. D., and R. Gomulkiewicz. In press. The evolution of species' niches: a population dynamic perspective. Pages 25-50 in H. G. Othmer, F. R. Adler, M. A. Lewis, and J. C. Dalton, eds. Case studies in mathematical modeling: ecology, physiology, and cell biology. Prentice Hall, New York.
13. Huntley, B., P. J. Bartlein, and I. C. Prentice. 1989. Climatic control of the distribution and abundance of beech (Fagus L.) in Europe and North America. Journal of Biogeography 16:551-560.
14. Kawecki, T. J. 1995. Demography of source-sink populations and the evolution of ecological niches. Evolutionary Ecology 9:38-44.
15. Keddy, P. A. 1981. Experimental demography of the sand-dune annual, Cakile edentula, growing along an environmental gradient in Nova Scotia. Journal of Ecology 69:615-630.
16. _1982. Population ecology on an environmental gradient: Cakile edentula on a sand dune. Oecologia (Berlin) 52:345-355.
17. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
18. Nagylaki, T. 1977. Selection in one- and two-locus systems. Springer, Berlin.
19. Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132:652-661.
20. Ricklefs, R. E., and R. E. Latham. 1992. Intercontinental correlation of geographical ranges suggests stasis in ecological traits of relict genera of temperate perennial herbs. American Naturalist 139:1305-1321.
21. Shmida, A., and S. Ellner. 1984. Coexistence of plant species with similar niches. Vegetatio 58:29-55.
22. Svirezhev, Y. M., and V. P. Passekov. 1990. Fundamentals of mathematical evolutionary genetics. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.