The role of density-dependent dispersal in source-sink dynamics

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 226, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 159-168

  Amarasekare, Priyanga ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost of dispersal; Density dependent dispersal; Population persistence; Rescue effect; Source sink dynamics

Indexed keywords

DENSITY DEPENDENCE; DISPERSAL; PERSISTENCE; SOURCE-SINK DYNAMICS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DYNAMICS; ECOSYSTEM; GROWTH; MIGRATION; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOURCE SINK RELATIONSHIP; SPECIES EXTINCTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORY;

EID: 0345305376     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aars J., Ims R.A. Population dynamic and genetic consequences of spatial density-dependent dispersal in patchy populations. Am. Nat. 155:2000;252-265.
2. Amarasekare P., Nisbet R. Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics and the local coexistence of competing species. Am. Nat. 158:2001;572-584.
3. Birkhead T.R. The effect of habitat and density on breeding success of the common guillemot (Uria aalge). J. Anim. Ecol. 46:1977;751-764.
4. Denno R.F., Peterson M.A. Density-dependent dispersal and its consequences for population dynamics. Cappuccino N., Price P.W. Population Dynamics. 1995;113-130 Academic Press, New York.
5. Dias P.C. Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:1996;326-330.
6. Diffendorfer J.E. Testing models of source-sink dynamics and balanced dispersal. Oikos. 81:1998;417-433.
7. Doak D.F. Source-sink models and the problem of habitat degradation. general models and applications to the Yellowstone Grizzly Conserv. Biol. 9:1995;1370-1379.
8. Doncaster C.P., Colbert J., Doligez B., Gustafsson L., Danchin E. Balanced dispersal between spatially varying local populations. an alternative to the source-sink model Am. Nat. 150:1997;424-445.
9. Fonseca D.M., Hart D.D. Density-dependent dispersal of black fly neonates is mediated by flow. Oikos. 75:1996;49-58.
10. Gilpin M., Hanski I. Metapopulation Dynamics: Brief History and Conceptual Domain. 1991;Academic Press, London.
11. Groom M.J. Allee effects limit population viability of an annual plant. Am. Nat. 151:1998;487-498.
12. Gundersen G., Johannensen E., Andreassen H.P., Ims R.A. Source-sink dynamics. how sinks affect demography of sources Ecol. Lett. 4:2001;14-21.
13. Hanski I. Metapopulation Ecology. 1999;Oxford University Press, New York.
14. Hanski I., Gilpin M. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. 1997;Academic Press, London.
15. Herzig A.L. Effects of population density on long-distance dispersal in the goldenrod beetle Trirhabda virgata. Ecology. 76:1995;2044-2054.
16. Holt R.D. Population dynamics in two-patch environments. some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution Theor. Popul. Biol. 28:1985;181-208.
17. Holt R.D. Ecology at the mesoscale: the influence of regional processes on local communities. Ricklefs R.E., Schluter D. Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographical Perspectives. 1993;77-88 University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
18. Holling C.S. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 91:1959;385-398.
19. Howe R.W., Davis G.J., Mosca G.J. The demographic significance of sink populations. Biol. Conser. 57:1991;239-255.
20. Kuussaari M., Sacceri I., Camara M., Hanski I. Allee effect and population dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Oikos. 82:1998;384-392.
21. Lamont B.B., Klinkhamer P.G.L., Witkowski E.T.F. Population fragmentation may reduce fertility to zero in Banksia goodii. a demonstration of the Allee effect Oecologia. 94:1993;446-450.
22. Levin S.A. Dispersion and population interactions. Am. Nat. 108:1974;207-228.
23. Murdoch W.W., Oaten A. Predation and population stability. Adv. Ecol. Res. 9:1975;1-131.
24. Murray J.D. Mathematical Biology. 1993;Springer, New York.
25. Pacala S.W., Roughgarden J. Spatial heterogeneity and interspecific competition. Theor. Popul. Biol. 21:1982;92-113.
26. Pulliam R. Sources, sinks and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132:1988;652-661.
27. Pulliam H.R., Danielson B.J. Sources, sinks and habitat selection. a landscape perspective on population dynamics Am. Nat. 137:1991;s50-s66.
28. Rhainds M., Gries G., Saleh A. Density and pupation site of apterous female bagworms, Metisa plana (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Psychidae), influence the distribution of emergent larvae. Can. Entomol. 130:1998;603-613.
29. Saether B., Engen S., Lande R. Finite metapopulation models with density-dependent migration and stochastic local dynamics. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 266:1999;113-118.
30. Shmida A., Ellner S. Coexistence of plant species with similar niches. Vegetatio. 58:1984;29-55.
31. Sutherland L.J., Gill J., Norris K. Density-dependent dispersal in animals. concepts, evidence, mechanisms and consequences Dispersal Ecol. 134-151:2002.
32. Veit R., Lewis M.A. Dispersal, population growth, and the Allee effect. dynamics of the house finch invasion of eastern North America Am. Nat. 148:1996;255-274.
33. Watkinson A., Sutherland W.J. Sources, sinks and pseudosinks. J. Anim. Ecol. 64:1995;126-130.
34. Wolff J.O. Population regulation in mammals. an evolutionary perspective J. Anim. Ecol. 66:1997;1-13.
35. Wootton J.T., Bell D.A. A metapopulation model of the peregrine falcon in California. viability and management strategies Ecol. Appl. 2:1992;307-321.