Evidence for positive density-dependent emigration in butterfly metapopulations

Oecologia

Volumn 167, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 657-665

  Nowicki, Piotr ^a   Vrabec, Vladimir ^b  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Carrying capacity; Dispersal; Maculinea; Mark recapture; Virtual migration model

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; DENSITY DEPENDENCE; DISPERSAL; EMIGRATION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; GENE FLOW; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; METAPOPULATION; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; RANGE EXPANSION; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BUTTERFLY; CZECH REPUBLIC; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION MIGRATION; TIME;

ANIMAL MIGRATION; ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; CZECH REPUBLIC; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DENSITY; TIME FACTORS;

MACULINEA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 80054051920     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2025-x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Aars J, Ims RA (2000) Population dynamic and genetic consequences of spatial density-dependent dispersal in patchy populations. Am Nat 155: 252-265.
2. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267-281.
3. Arnason AN, Schwarz CJ (1999) Using POPAN-5 to analyse banding data. Bird Study 46: 157-168.
4. Baguette M, Vansteenwegen C, Convie I, Neve G (1998) Sex-biased density-dependent migration in a metapopulation of the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Acta Oecol 19: 17-24.
5. Best AS, Johst K, Münkemüller T, Travis JMJ (2007) Which species will successfully track climate change? The influence of intraspecific competition and density dependent dispersal on range shifting dynamics. Oikos 116: 1531-1539.
6. Bowler DE, Benton TG (2005) Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol Rev 80: 205-225.
7. Brown IL, Ehrlich PR (1980) Population biology of the checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas chalcedona. Structure of the Jasper Ridge colony. Oecologia 47: 239-251.
8. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference. Springer, Berlin.
9. Byers JE (2000) Effects of body size and resource availability on dispersal in a native and a non-native estuarine snail. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 248: 133-150.
10. Cassel-Lundhagen A, Sjögren-Gulve P (2007) Limited dispersal by the rare scarce heath butterfly-potential consequences for population persistence. J Ins Conserv 11: 113-121.
11. Clobert J, Ims RA, Rousset F (2004) Causes, mechanisms and consequences of dispersal. In: Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulation. Elsevier, San Diego, pp 307-335.
12. Doak P (2000) Population consequences of restricted dispersal for an insect herbivore in a subdivided habitat. Ecology 81: 1828-1841.
13. Enfjäll K, Leimar O (2005) Density-dependent dispersal in the Glanville fritillary, Melitaea cinxia. Oikos 108: 465-472.
14. Enfjäll K, Leimar O (2009) The evolution of dispersal-the importance of information about population density and habitat characteristics. Oikos 118: 291-299.
15. Fürst MA, Nash DR (2010) Host ant independent oviposition in the parasitic butterfly Maculinea alcon. Biol Lett 6: 174-176.
16. Gilbert LE, Singer MC (1973) Dispersal and gene flow in a butterfly species. Am Nat 107: 58-72.
17. Gros A, Hovestadt T, Poethke HJ (2008) Evolution of sex-biased dispersal: The role of sex-specific dispersal costs, demographic stochasticity, and inbreeding. Ecol Model 219: 226-233.
18. Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19. Hanski I, Alho J, Moilanen A (2000) Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in metapopulations. Ecology 81: 239-251.
20. Hill JK, Thomas CD, Lewis OT (1996) Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. J Anim Ecol 65: 725-735.
21. Hochberg ME, Clarke RT, Elmes GW, Thomas JA (1994) Population dynamic consequences of direct and indirect interactions involving a large blue butterfly and its plant and red ant hosts. J Anim Ecol 63: 375-391.
22. Hovestadt T, Nowicki P (2008) Investigating movement within irregularly shaped patches: Analysis of MRR data using randomisation procedures. Isr J Ecol Evol 54: 137-154.
23. Hovestadt T, Poethke HJ (2006) The control of emigration and its consequences for the survival of populations. Ecol Model 190: 443-453.
24. Hovestadt T, Kubisch A, Poethke HJ (2010) Information processing in models for density-dependent emigration: a comparison. Ecol Model 221: 405-410.
25. Hurvich CM, Tsai C (1989) Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76: 297-307.
26. Kim SY, Torres R, Drummond H (2009) Simultaneous positive and negative density-dependent dispersal in a colonial bird species. Ecology 90: 230-239.
27. Kuussaari M, Nieminen M, Hanski I (1996) An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia. J Anim Ecol 65: 791-801.
28. Lambin X, Aars J, Piertney SB (2001) Dispersal, intraspecific competition, kin competition and kin facilitation: a review of the empirical evidence. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 110-122.
29. Matthysen E (2005) Density-dependent dispersal in birds and mammals. Ecography 28: 403-416.
30. Nachman G (2000) Effects of demographic parameters on metapopulation size and persistence: an analytical stochastic model. Oikos 91: 51-65.
31. Nowicki P, Richter A, Glinka U, Holzschuh A, Toelke U, Henle K, Woyciechowski M, Settele J (2005a) Less input same output-simplified approach for population size assessment in Lepidoptera. Popul Ecol 47: 203-212.
32. Nowicki P, Settele J, Thomas JA, Woyciechowski M (2005b) A review of population structure of Maculinea butterflies. In: Settele J, Kuhn E, Thomas JA (eds) Studies in the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe. vol 2. Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model. Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow, pp 144-149.
33. Nowicki P, Witek M, Skórka P, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2005c) Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous, and its implications for conservation. Popul Ecol 47: 193-202.
34. Nowicki P, Pepkowska A, Kudlek J, Skórka P, Witek M, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2007) From metapopulation theory to conservation recommendations: Lessons from spatial occurrence and abundance patterns of Maculinea butterflies. Biol Conserv 140: 119-129.
35. Nowicki P, Bonelli S, Barbero F, Balletto E (2009) Relative importance of density-dependent regulation and environmental stochasticity for butterfly population dynamics. Oecologia 161: 227-239.
36. Odendaal FJ, Turchin P, Stermitz FR (1989) Influence of host-plant density and male harassment on the distribution of female Euphydryas anicia (Nymphalidae). Oecologia 78: 283-288.
37. Perrin N, Mazalov M (2000) Local competition, inbreeding, and the evolution of sex-biased dispersal. Am Nat 155: 116-127.
38. Petit S, Moilanen A, Hanski I, Baguette M (2001) Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: movements between habitat patches. Oikos 92: 491-500.
39. Poethke HJ, Hovestadt T (2002) Evolution of density- and patch-size-dependent dispersal rates. Proc R Soc Lond B 269: 637-646.
40. Rabasa SG, Gutierrez D, Escudero A (2007) Metapopulation structure and habitat quality in modelling dispersal in the butterfly Iolana iolas. Oikos 116: 793-806.
41. Roland J, Keyghobadi N, Fownes S (2000) Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology 81: 1642-1653.
42. Schtickzelle N, Le Boulenge E, Baguette M (2002) Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: demographic processes in a patchy population. Oikos 97: 349-360.
43. Schtickzelle N, Mennechez G, Baguette M (2006) Dispersal depression with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly. Ecology 87: 1057-1065.
44. Schwarz CJ, Arnason AN (1996) A general methodology for the analysis of capture-recapture experiments in open populations. Biometrics 52: 860-873.
45. Schwarz CJ, Seber GAF (1999) Estimating animal abundance: review III. Stat Sci 14: 427-456.
46. Shapiro AM (1970) The role of sexual behavior in density-related dispersal of pierid butterflies. Am Nat 104: 367-372.
47. StatSoft (2008) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8. 0. StatSoft, Tulsa.
48. Stevens VM, Turlure C, Baguette M (2010) Filling in the tapestry: a meta-analysis of dispersal in butterflies. Biol Rev 85: 625-642.
49. Thomas JA, Elmes GW (2001) Food-plant niche selection rather than the presence of ant nests explains oviposition patterns in the myrmecophilous butterfly genus Maculinea. Proc R Soc Lond B 268: 471-477.
50. Thomas JA, Clarke RT, Elmes GW, Hochberg ME (1998) Population dynamics in the genus Maculinea (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). In: Dempster JP, McLean IFG (eds) Insect population dynamics in theory and practice. Symposia of the Royal Entomological Society 19. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 261-290.
51. Travis JMJ, Mustin K, Benton TG, Dytham C (2009) Accelerating invasion rates result from the evolution of density-dependent dispersal. J Theor Biol 259: 151-158.
52. van Dyck H, Oostermeijer JGB, Talloen W, Feenstra V, van der Hidde A, Wynhoff I (2000) Does the presence of ant nests matter for oviposition to a specialized myrmecophilous Maculinea butterfly? Proc R Soc Lond B 267: 861-866.
53. van Langevelde F, Wynhoff I (2009) What limits the spread of two congeneric butterfly species after their reintroduction: quality or spatial arrangement of habitat? Anim Conserv 12: 540-548.
54. Wahlberg N, Klemetti T, Selonen V, Hanski I (2002) Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checkerspot butterflies. Oecologia 130: 33-43.
55. Wang R, Wang Y, Chen J, Lei GC, Rumei X (2004) Contrasting movement patterns in two species of chequerspot butterflies, Euphydryas aurinia and Melitaea phoebe, in the same patch network. Ecol Entomol 29: 367-374.
56. White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46: 120-138.
57. Witek M, Sliwinska E, Skórka P, Nowicki P, Wantuch M, Vrabec V, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2008) Host ant specificity of large blue butterflies Phengaris (Maculinea) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) inhabiting humid grasslands in East-central Europe. Eur J Entomol 105: 871-877.
58. Witek M, Nowicki P, Sliwinska E, Skórka P, Settele J, Schönrogge K, Woyciechowski M (2010) Local host ant specificity of Phengaris (Maculinea) teleius butterfly, an obligatory social parasite of Myrmica ants. Ecol Entomol 35: 557-564.