Habitat Destruction in a Simple Predator-Prey Patch Model: How Predators Enhance Prey Persistence and Abundance

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 231-249

  Prakash, Sona ^a   De Roos, André M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; HABITAT LOSS; METAPOPULATION; PERSISTENCE; POPULATION MODELING; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0036834923     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.2002.1611     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bascompte J., Solé R. V. Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds in spatially explicit models. J. Anim. Ecol. 65:1996;465-473.
2. Bascompte J., Solé R. V. Effects of habitat destruction in a prey-predator metapopulation model. J. Theor. Biol. 195:1998;383-393.
3. Bernstein C. Prey and predator emigration responses in the acarine system Tetranychus urticae-Phytoseiulus persimilis. Oecologia. 61:1984;134-142.
4. Dubbert M., Tscharntke T., Vidal S. Stem-boring insects of fragmented Calamagrostis habitats Herbivore-parasitoid community structure and the unpredictability of grass shoot abundance. Ecol. Entomol. 23:1998;271-280.
5. Dytham C. Habitat destruction and competitive coexistence: A cellular model. J. Anim. Ecol. 63:1994;490-491.
6. Dytham C. Competitive coexistence and empty patches in spatially explicit metapopulation models. J. Anim. Ecol. 64:1995;145-146.
7. Hanski I. Hanski I., Gilpin M. Metapopulation Biology, Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. 1997;69-92 Academic Press, San Diego.
8. Hanski I. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature. 396:1998;41-49.
9. Holt R. D. From metapopulation dynamics to community structure. Hanski I., Gilpin M. Metapopulation Biology, Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. 1997;149-164 Academic Press, San Diego.
10. Kareiva P., Wennergren V. Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes. Nature. 373:1995;299-302.
11. Levins R. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15:1969;237-240.
12. Lima S. L., Dill L. M. Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation: A review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68:1990;619-640.
13. van der Meijden E., van der Veen-van Wijk C. A. M. Tritrophic metapopulation dynamics: A case study of ragwort, the cinnabar moth and the parasitoid Cotesia popularis. Hanski I., Gilpin M. Metapopulation Biology, Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. 1997;387-405 Academic Press, San Diego.
14. Moilanen A., Hanski I. Habitat destruction and coexistence of competitors in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. J. Anim. Ecol. 64:1995;141-144.
15. Nee S., May R. M. Dynamics of metapopulations: Habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. J. Anim. Ecol. 61:1992;37-40.
16. Nee S., May R. M., Hassell M. P. Two-species metapopulation models. Hanski I., Gilpin M. Metapopulation Biology, Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. 1997;123-147 Academic Press, San Diego.
17. Ohsaki N., Sato Y. Avoidance mechanisms of three Pieris butterfly species against the parasitoid wasp Apanteles Glomeratus. Ecol. Entomol. 15:1990;169-176.
18. Pels B., Sabelis M. W. Local dynamics, overexploitation and predator dispersal in an acarine predator-prey system. Oikos. 86:1999;573-583.
19. Stauffer D., Aharony A. An Introduction to Percolation Theory. 1992;Taylor & Francis, London.
20. Zabel J., Tscharntke T. Does fragmentation of Urtica habitats affect phytophagous and predatory insects differentially? Oecologia. 116:1998;419-425.