Non-random gene flow: An underappreciated force in evolution and ecology

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 659-665

  Edelaar, Pim ^a,b   Bolnick, Daniel I ^c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

^c HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CLIMATE CHANGE; DISPERSAL; GENE FLOW; GENOTYPE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; LOCAL ADAPTATION; METAPOPULATION; RESOURCE USE; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; ANTICIPATION, GENETIC; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENOMICS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84868708188     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.009     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Adaptation 1996, Academic Press. M.R. Rose, G.V. Lauder (Eds.).
2. Natural Selection in the Wild 1986, Princeton University Press. J.A. Endler (Ed.).
3. Räsänen K., Hendry A.P. Disentangling interactions between adaptive divergence and gene flow when ecology drives diversification. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:624-626.
4. Kopp M., Hermisson J. The genetic basis of phenotypic adaptation I: fixation of beneficial mutations in the moving optimum model. Genetics 2009, 182:233-249.
5. Orr H.A. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 1998, 52:935-949.
6. Burger R., Lande R. On the distribution of the mean and variance of a quantitative trait under mutation-selection-drift balance. Genetics 1994, 138:901-912.
7. Yeaman S., Whitlock M.C. The genetic architecture of adaptation under migration-selection balance. Evolution 2011, 65:1897-1911.
8. Lenormand T. Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:183-189.
9. Crespi B.J. The evolution of maladaptation. Heredity 2000, 84:623-629.
10. Bolnick D.I., Nosil P. Natural selection in populations subject to a migration load. Evolution 2007, 61:2229-2243.
11. Slatkin M. Gene flow in natural populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1985, 16:393-430.
12. Edelaar P., et al. Matching habitat choice causes directed gene flow: a neglected dimension in evolution and ecology. Evolution 2008, 62:2462-2472.
13. Shine R., et al. An evolutionary process that assembles phenotypes through space rather than evolutionary time. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:5708-5711.
14. Clobert J., et al. Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:197-209.
15. Bolnick D.I., et al. Phenotype-dependent native habitat preference facilitates divergence between parapatric lake and stream stickleback. Evolution 2009, 63:2004-2016.
16. Stamps J.A., Swaisgood R.R. Someplace like home: experience, habitat selection and conservation biology. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007, 102:392-409.
17. Bowler D.E., Benton T.G. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol. Rev. 2005, 80:205-225.
18. Ronce O. How does it feel to be like a rolling stone? Ten questions about dispersal evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007, 38:231-253.
19. Clobert J., et al. Causes, mechanisms, and consequences of dispersal. Ecology, Genetics and the Evolution of Metapopulations 2004, 307-335. Academic Press. I. Hanski, O.E. Gaggiotti (Eds.).
20. Skov C., et al. Sizing up your enemy: individual predation vulnerability predicts migratory probability. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2010, 278:1414-1418.
21. Cano J.M., et al. Genetic evidence for male-biased dispersal in three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:3234-3242.
22. Ahnesjö J., Forsman A. Differential habitat selection by pigmy grasshopper color morphs; interactive effects of temperature and predator avoidance. Evol. Ecol. 2006, 20:235-257.
23. Cox G.W., Cox D.G. Substrate color matching in the grasshopper, Circotettix rabula (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Great Basin Nat. 1974, 34:60-70.
24. Gillis J.E. Substrate colour-matching cues in the cryptic grasshopper Circotettix rabula rabula (Rehn & Hebard). Anim. Behav. 1982, 30:113-116.
25. Sih A., et al. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:372-378.
26. Cote J., et al. Personality-dependent dispersal: characterization, ontogeny and consequences for spatially structured populations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2010, 365:4065-4076.
27. Dingemanse N.J., et al. Natal dispersal and personalities in great tits (Parus major). Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2003, 270:741-747.
28. Saltz J.B. Natural genetic variation in social environment choice: context-dependent gene-environment correlation in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 2011, 65:2325-2334.
29. Bolnick D.A., et al. Asymmetric male and female genetic histories among Native Americans from eastern North America. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23:2161-2174.
30. Jaenike J., Holt R.D. Genetic variation for habitat preference: evidence and explanations. Am. Nat. 1991, 137:S67-S90.
31. Berlocher S.H., Feder J.L. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy?. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002, 47:773-815.
32. Hawthorne D.J., Via S. Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids. Nature 2001, 412:904-907.
33. Gratton C., Welter S.C. Oviposition preference and larval performance of Liriomyza helianthi (Diptera: Agromyzidae) on normal and novel host plants. Environ. Entomol. 1998, 27:926-935.
34. Agashe D. The stabilizing effect of intraspecific genetic variation on population dynamics in novel and ancestral habitats. Am. Nat. 2009, 174:255-267.
35. Agashe D., Bolnick D.I. Intraspecific genetic variation and competition interact to influence niche expansion. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2010, 277:2915-2924.
36. Shoemaker D.D., Ross K.G. Effects of social organization on gene flow in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Nature 1996, 383:613-616.
37. Barrett S.C.H. The evolution and adaptive significance of heterostyly. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1990, 5:144-148.
38. Hanski I. Eco-evolutionary spatial dynamics in the glanville fritillary butterfly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:14397-14404.
39. Lin J., et al. Fine-scale differentiation between sockeye salmon ecotypes and the effect of phenotype on straying. Heredity 2008, 101:341-350.
40. Saastamoinen M., et al. Predictive adaptive responses: condition-dependent impact of adult nutrition and flight in the tropical butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Am. Nat. 2010, 176:686-698.
41. Travis J.M.J., et al. Towards a mechanistic understanding of dispersal evolution in plants: conservation implications. Divers. Distrib. 2010, 16:690-702.
42. Fretwell S.D., Lucas H.L. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor. 1969, 19:16-36.
43. Maynard Smith J. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 1966, 100:637-650.
44. Jaenike J. Host selection by mycophagous Drosophila. Ecology 1978, 59:1286-1288.
45. Bush G.L. Modes of animal speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1975, 6:339-364.
46. Ravigné V., et al. Live where you thrive: joint evolution of habitat choice and local adaptation facilitates specialization and promotes diversity. Am. Nat. 2009, 174:E141-E169.
47. Armsworth P.R. Conditional dispersal, clines, and the evolution of dispersiveness. Theor. Ecol. 2009, 2:105-117.
48. Armsworth P.R., Roughgarden J.E. The impact of directed versus random movement on population dynamics and biodiversity patterns. Am. Nat. 2005, 165:449-465.
49. Armsworth P.R., Roughgarden J.E. The structure of clines with fitness-dependent dispersal. Am. Nat. 2008, 172:648-657.
50. Davis J.M. Patterns of variation in the influence of natal experience on habitat choice. Q. Rev. Biol. 2008, 83:363-380.
51. Johnson C. Environmental modification of habitat selection in adult damselflies. Ecology 1966, 47:674-676.
52. Aubret F., Shine R. Early experience influences both habitat choice and locomotor performance in tiger snakes. Am. Nat. 2008, 171:524-531.
53. Akhtar Y., Isman M.B. Larval exposure to oviposition deterrents alters subsequent oviposition behavior in generalist, Trichoplusia ni and specialist, Plutella xylostella moths. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29:1853-1870.
54. Imbert E., Ronce O. Phenotypic plasticity for dispersal ability in the seed heteromorphic Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). Oikos 2011, 93:126-134.
55. Massot M., et al. Condition-dependent dispersal and ontogeny of the dispersal behavior: an experimental approach. J. Anim. Ecol. 2002, 71:253-261.
56. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 1931, 16:97-159.
57. Bolnick D.I., et al. Migration load in a pair of ecologically divergent lacustrine stickleback populations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2008, 94:373-387.
58. Kirkpatrick M., Barton N.H. Evolution of a species' range. Am. Nat. 1997, 150:1-23.
59. Holt R.D., Gomulkiewicz R. How does immigration influence local adaptation? A reexamination of a familiar paradigm. Am. Nat. 1997, 149:563-572.
60. Duckworth R.A., Kruuk L.E.B. Evolution of genetic integration between dispersal and colonization ability in a bird. Evolution 2009, 63:968-977.
61. Duckworth R.A., Badyaev A.V. Coupling of dispersal and aggression facilitates the rapid range expansion of a passerine bird. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:15017-15022.
62. Nosil P., et al. Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:375-402.
63. Stinchcombe J.R., Hoekstra H.E. Combining population genomics and quantitative genetics: finding the genes underlying ecologically important traits. Heredity 2007, 100:158-170.
64. Hohenlohe P.A., et al. Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000862.
65. Speciation 2004, Sinauer Associates. J.A. Coyne, H.A. Orr (Eds.).
66. Eroukhmanoff F., et al. The role of different reproductive barriers during phenotypic divergence of isopod ecotypes. Evolution 2011, 65:2631-2640.
67. Dres M., Mallet J. Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2002, 357:471-492.
68. Holyoak M., et al. Trends and missing parts in the study of movement ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:19060-19065.
69. Lard M., et al. Tracking the small with the smallest - using nanotechnology in tracking zooplankton. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e13516.