Ecological and evolutionary limits to species geographic ranges

American Naturalist

Volumn 178, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  Geber, Monica A ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; RANGE EXPANSION;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ECOLOGY; GEOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PLANT; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ANIMALS; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GEOGRAPHY; HOMING BEHAVIOR; PLANTS; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 80053221604     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/661899     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andrewartha, H. G., and L. C. Birch. 1954. The distribution and abundance of animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
2. Angilletta, M. J., Jr. 2009. Thermal adaptation: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Oxford University Press, New York.
3. Antonovics, J. 1976. The nature of limits to natural selection. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 63:224-247.
4. Bohning-Gaese, K., T. Caprano, K. van Ewijk, and M. Veith. 2006. Range size: disentangling current traits and phylogenetic and biogeographic factors. American Naturalist 167:555-567.
5. Bridle, J., J. Polechova, M. Kawata, and R. K. Butlin. 2010. Why is adaptation prevented at ecological margins? new insights from individual-based simulations. Ecology Letters 13:485-494.
6. Bridle, J. R., and T. H. Vines. 2007. Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22:140-147.
7. Brown, J. H., D. W. Mehlman, and G. C. Stevens. 1995. Spatial variation in abundance. Ecology 76:2028-2043.
8. Chown, S. L., and J. S. Terblanche. 2007. Physiological diversity in insects: ecological and evolutionary contexts. Advances in Insect Physiology 33:50-152.
9. Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species. J. Murray, London.
10. Eckhart, V. M., M. A. Geber, W. F. Morris, E. S. Fabio, P. Tiffin, and D. A. Moeller. 2011. The geography of demography: long-term demographic studies and species distribution models reveal a species border limited by adaptation. American Naturalist 178(suppl.):S26-S43.
11. Elith, J., and J. R. Leathwick. 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40:677-697.
12. Elton, C. S. 1930. Animal ecology and evolution. Clarendon, Oxford.
13. Garcia-Barros, E., and H. Romo Benito. 2010. The relationship between geographic range size and life history traits: is biogeographic history uncovered? a test using Iberian butterflies. Ecography 33: 392-401.
14. Gaston, K. J. 2003. The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
15. Gaston, K. J. 2009. Geographic range limits: achieving a synthesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276:1395-1406.
16. Grinnell, J. 1917. The niche relationship of the California thrasher. Auk 34:427-433.
17. Hendry, A. P., and M. T. Kinnison. 1999. Perspective: the pace of modern life: measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53:1637-1653.
18. Hoffmann, A. A., and M. W. Blows. 1994. Species borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Trends in Ecology & Evolutionary Biology 9:223-227.
19. Holt, R. D., and M. Barfield. 2011. Theoretical perspectives on the statics and dynamics of species' borders in patchy environments. American Naturalist 178(suppl.):S6-S25.
20. Holt, R. D., and T. H. Keitt. 2005. Species borders: a unifying them in ecology. Oikos 108:3-6.
21. Hutchinson, G. E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium 22:415-427.
22. Jablonski, D., R. Kaustuv, and J. W. Valentine. 2006. Out of the tropics: evolutionary dynamics of the latitudinal gradient. Science 314:102-106.
23. Kawecki, T. J. 2008. Adaptation to marginal habitats. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 39:321-342.
24. Kearney, M., S. J. Simpson, D. Raubenheimer, and B. Helmuth. 2010. Modelling the ecological niche from functional traits. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365: 3469-3483.
25. Knowlton, N., and L. A. Weigt. 1998. New dates and new rates for divergence across the Isthmus of Panama. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 265:2257-2263.
26. Lomolino, M. V., B. R. Riddle, and J. H. Brown. 2006. Biogeography. 3rd ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
27. MacArthur, R. H. 1969. Patterns of communities in the tropics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 1:19-30.
28. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
29. Mittelbach, G. G., D. W. Schemske, H. V. Cornell, A. P. Allen, J. M. Brown, M. B. Bush, S. P. Harrison, et al. 2007. Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecology Letters 10:315-331.
30. Moeller, D. A., M. A. Geber, and P. Tiffin. 2011. Population genetics and the evolution of geographic range limits in an annual plant. American Naturalist 178(suppl.):S44-S57.
31. Morin, X., and W. Thuiller. 2009. Comparing niche- and processbased models to reduce prediction uncertainty in species range shifts under climate change. Ecology 90:1301-1313.
32. Mouillot, D., and K. J. Gaston. 2007. Geographical range size heritability: what do neutral models with different modes of speciation predict? Ecology and Biogeography 16:367-380.
33. Mouillot, D., and K. J. Gaston. 2009. Spatial overlap enhances geographic range size conservatism. Ecography 32:671-675.
34. Overgaard, J., T. N. Kristensen, K. A. Mitchell, and A. A. Hoffmann. 2011. Thermal tolerance in widespread and tropical Drosophila species: does phenotypic plasticity increase with latitude? American Naturalist 178(suppl.):S76-S92.
35. Parmesan, C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37:637-669.
36. Paul, J. R., S. N. Sheth, and A. L. Angert. 2011. Quantifying the impact of gene flow on phenotype-environment mismatch: a demonstration with the scarlet monkeyflower (Mimulus cardinalis). American Naturalist 178(suppl.):S58-S75.
37. Price, T. D., D. Mohan, D. T. Tietze, D. M. Hooper, C. D. L. Orme, and P. C. Rasmussen. 2011. Determinants of northerly range limits along the Himalayan bird diversity gradient. American Naturalist 178(suppl.):S93-S104.
38. Pulliam, H. R. 2000. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters 3:349-361.
39. Roy, K., and E. E. Goldberg. 2007. Origination, extinction, and dispersal: integrative models for understanding present-day diversity gradients. American Naturalist 170(suppl.):S71-S85.
40. Sexton, J. P., P. J. McIntrye, A. L. Angert, and K. J. Rice. 2009. Evolution and ecology of species range limits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40:415-436.
41. Stevens, G. C. 1989. The latitudinal gradient in geographical range- how so many species coexist in the tropics. American Naturalist 133:240-256.
42. Svenning, J.-C., and F. Skov. 2004. Limited filling of the potential range in European tree species. Ecology Letters 7:565-573.
43. Van Kleunen, M., E. Weber, and M. Fisher. 2010. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecology Letters 13:235-245.
44. Wallace, A. R. 1876. The geographical distribution of animals.Harper & Brothers, New York.
45. Webb, T. J., and K. J. Gaston. 2003. On the heritability of geographic range sizes. American Naturalist 161:553-566.
46. Wiens, J. J., and M. J. Donoghue. 2004. Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 639-644.
47. Wiens, J. J., D. D. Ackerly, A. P. Allen, B. L. Anacker, L. B. Buckley, H. V. Cornell, E. I. Damschen, et al. 2010. Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecology Letters 13:1310-1324.
48. Williamson, M. 1996. Biological invasions. Chapman & Hall, London.
49. Willis, C. G., B. Ruhfel, R. B. Primack, A. J. Miller-Rushing, and C. C. Davis. 2008. Phylogenetic patterns of species loss in Thoreau's woods are driven by climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105:17029-17033