Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 94-101

  Stockwell, Craig A ^a   Hendry, Andrew P ^b   Kinnison, Michael T ^c  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CONSERVATION; EVOLUTION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HARVESTING;

EID: 0037297823     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00044-7     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Palumbi S.R. The Evolution Explosion: How Humans Cause Rapid Evolutionary Change. 2001;Norton.
2. Meffe G.K., Carroll C.R. Principles of Conservation Biology. 1997;Sinauer Associates.
3. Hendry A.P., Kinnison M.T. The pace of modern life: measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution. 53:1999;1637-1653.
4. Kinnison M.T., Hendry A.P. The pace of modern life II. From rates of contemporary microevolution to pattern and process. Genetica. 112-113:2001;145-164.
5. Reznick D.N., Ghalambor C.K. The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica. 112-113:2001;183-198.
6. Franklin I.R., Frankham R. How large must populations be to retain evolutionary potential. Anim. Conserv. 1:1998;69-73.
7. Lynch M., Lande R. The critical effective size for a genetically secure population. Anim. Conserv. 1:1998;70-72.
8. Moritz C. Defining 'Evolutionarily Significant Units' for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:1994;373-375.
9. Fraser D.J., Bernatchez L. Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Mol. Ecol. 10:2001;2741-2752.
10. Crowling R.M., Pressey R.L. Rapid plant diversification: planning for an evolutionary future. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;5452-5457.
11. Moritz C. Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. System. Biol. 51:2002;238-254.
12. Gingerich P.D. Rates of evolution on the time scale of the evolutionary process. Genetica. 112-113:2001;127-144.
13. Sheets H.D., Mitchell C.E. Why the null matters: statistical tests, random walks and evolution. Genetica. 112-113:2001;105-125.
14. Endler J.A. Natural Selection in the Wild. 1986;Princeton University Press.
15. Stockwell C.A., Weeks S.C. Translocations and rapid evolutionary responses in recently established populations of western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Anim. Conserv. 2:1999;103-110.
16. Bone E., Farres A. Trends and rates of microevolution in plants. Genetica. 112-113:2001;165-182.
17. Reznick D.N., et al. Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Science. 275:1997;1934-1937.
18. Hendry A.P., et al. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. Science. 290:2000;516-518.
19. Kinnison M., et al. Migratory costs and the evolution of egg size and number in introduced and indigenous salmon populations. Evolution. 55:2001;1656-1667.
20. Quinn T., et al. Evolution of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations in New Zealand: pattern rate, and process. Genetica. 112-113:2001;493-513.
21. Kingsolver J.G., et al. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157:2001;245-261.
22. Conner J.K. How strong is natural selection? Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:2001;215-217.
23. Grant P.R., Grant B.R. Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science. 296:2002;707-711.
24. Lynch M. A quantitative-genetic perspective on conservation issues. Avise J.C., Hamrick J.L. Conservation Genetics: Case Studies from Nature. 1996;471-501 Chapman and Hall.
25. Ashley M.V., et al. Evolutionary enlightened management. Biol. Conserv. 2002;. in press.
26. Diamond J.M. Overview of recent extinctions. Western D., Pearl M.C. Conservation for the Twenty-first Century. 1989;37-41 Oxford University Press.
27. Wilcove D.A., et al. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience. 48:1998;607-615.
28. Conover D. Darwinian fishery science. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 208:2000;299-313.
29. Conover D.O., Munch S.B. Sustaining fisheries yields over evolutionary time scales. Science. 297:2002;94-96.
30. Haugen T., Vøllestad A. A century of life-history evolution in grayling. Genetica. 112-113:2001;475-491.
31. Macnair M. Heavy metal tolerance in plants: a model evolutionary system. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2:1987;354-359.
32. Richter B.D., et al. Threats to imperiled freshwater fauna. Conserv. Biol. 11:1997;1081-1093.
33. Noss R.F. Beyond Kyoto: forest management in a time of rapid climate change. Conserv. Biol. 15:2001;578-590.
34. Young A., et al. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:2002;413-418.
35. Bradshaw W., Holzapfel C. Genetic shift in photoperiodic response correlated with global warming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;14509-14511.
36. 3 annuals? Oecologia. 123:2000;330-341.
37. Bürger R., Lynch M. Evolution and extinction in a changing environment: a quantitative-genetic analysis. Evolution. 49:1995;151-163.
38. McKay J.K., Latta R.G. Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:2002;285-291.
39. Boulding E.G., Hay T. Genetic and demographic parameters determining population persistence. Heredity. 86:2001;313-324.
40. Carroll S.P., et al. Genetic architecture of adaptive differentiation in evolving host races of the soapberry bug, Jadera haematoloma. Genetica. 112-113:2001;257-272.
41. Huey R.B., et al. Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size of an introduced fly. Science. 287:2000;308-309.
42. Williams C., Moore R. Phenotypic adaptation and natural selection in the wild rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus, in Australia. J. Anim. Ecol. 58:1989;495-507.
43. García-Ramos G., Rodríguez D. Evolutionary speed of invasions. Evolution. 56:2002;661-668.
44. Schmitz D.C., et al. The ecological impact of nonindigenous plants. Simberloff D., et al. Strangers in Paradise. 1997;39-61 Island Press.
45. McKinney M.L., Lockwood J.L. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14:1999;450-453.
46. Tabashnik B. Evolution of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39:1994;47-79.
47. Barrett S.C.H. Microevolutionary influences of global changes on plant invasions. Mooney H.A., Hobbs R.J. Invasive Species in a Changing World. 2000;115-139 Island Press.
48. Goerghiou G.P., Lagunes-Tejeda A. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 1991.
49. Ford M.J. Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conserv. Biol. 16:2002;815-825.
50. Riechert S.E., et al. High gene flow levels lead to gamete wastage in a desert spider system. Genetica. 112-113:2001;297-319.
51. Stockwell C.A., et al. Translocations and the preservation of allelic diversity. Conserv. Biol. 10:1996;1133-1141.
52. Fleming I.R., Gross M.R. Breeding success of hatchery and wild coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in competition. Ecol. App. 3:1993;230-245.
53. Campton D.E. Genetic effects of hatchery fish on wild populations of Pacific salmon and steelhead: what do we really know? Schramm H.L.J., Piper R.G. Uses and Effects of Cultured Fishes in Aquatic Ecosystems. 1995;335-337 American Fisheries Society.
54. Reisenbichler R., Rubin S. Genetic changes from artificial propagation of Pacific salmon affect the productivity and viability of supplemented populations. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56:1999;459-466.
55. Lynch M., O'Hely M. Captive breeding and the genetic fitness of natural populations. Conserv. Genet. 2:2001;363-378.
56. Margan S.H., et al. Single large or several small? Population fragmentation in the captive management of endangered species. Zoo. Biol. 17:1998;467-480.
57. Frankham R. Conservation genetics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29:1995;305-327.
58. Merilä J., Cronkrak P. Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. J. Evol. Biol. 14:2001;892-903.
59. Reed D.H., Frankham R. How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis. Evolution. 55:2001;1095-1103.
60. Koskinen M.T., et al. Contemporary fisherian life-history evolution in small salmonid populations. Nature. 419:2002;826-830.
61. Leberg P.L. Strategies for population reintroduction: effects of genetic variability on population growth and size. Conserv. Biol. 7:1993;194-199.
62. Hendry A.P., et al. Estimating natural selection acting on stream-dwelling Atlantic salmon: implications for the restoration of extirpated populations. Conserv. Biol. 2002;. in press.
63. Stockwell C.A., Leberg P.L. Ecological genetics and the translocation of native fishes: merging experimental approaches. West. N. A. Nat. 62:2002;32-38.
64. Weber E., Schmid B. Latitudinal population differentiation in two species of Solidago (Asteraceae) introduced into Europe. Am. J. Bot. 85:1998;1110-1121.
65. Lee C. Rapid and repeated invasions of freshwater by the copepod Eurytemora affinis. Evolution. 53:1999;1423-1434.
66. O'Steen S., et al. Rapid evolution of escape ability in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution. 56:2002;776-784.
67. Mallet J. The evolution of insecticide resistance: have the insects won? Trends Ecol. Evol. 4:1989;336-340.
68. Hairston N., et al. Rapid evolution revealed by dormant eggs. Nature. 401:1999;446.
69. Rhymer J., Simberloff D. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:1996;83-109.
70. Allendorf F., et al. The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:2001;613-622.