Carbohydrate metabolism during vertebrate appendage regeneration: What is its role? How is it regulated?: A postulation that regenerating vertebrate appendages facilitate glycolytic and pentose phosphate pathways to fuel macromolecule biosynthesis Insights & Perspectives N. R. Love et al.

BioEssays

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 27-33

  Love, Nick R ^a,b,c   Ziegler, Mathias ^a   Chen, Yaoyao ^b,d   Amaya, Enrique ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Genetically encoded indicator; Glycolysis; Metabolism; Pentose phosphate pathway; Tissue regeneration; Warburg effect; Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; GLUCOSE; GLUCOSE 6 PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE; HYPOXIA INDUCIBLE FACTOR 1ALPHA; LEPTIN; PROINSULIN; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE;

ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CITRIC ACID CYCLE; GENE EXPRESSION; GLUCOSE UTILIZATION; GLYCOLYSIS; NONHUMAN; PENTOSE PHOSPHATE CYCLE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; TISSUE REGENERATION; XENOPUS;

VERTEBRATA;

GENETICALLY ENCODED INDICATOR; GLYCOLYSIS; METABOLISM; PENTOSE PHOSPHATE PATHWAY; TISSUE REGENERATION; WARBURG EFFECT; XENOPUS TADPOLE TAIL REGENERATION;

ANIMALS; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; GENE EXPRESSION; GLUCOSE; GLYCOLYSIS; PENTOSE PHOSPHATE PATHWAY; REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES; REGENERATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VERTEBRATES; XENOPUS;

EID: 84889665569     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201300110     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Brockes JP, Kumar A. 2008. Comparative aspects of animal regeneration. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 24: 525-49.
2. Sanchez Alvarado A, Tsonis PA. 2006. Bridging the regeneration gap: genetic insights from diverse animal models. Nat Rev Genet 7: 873-84.
3. Love NR, Chen Y, Bonev B, Gilchrist MJ, et al. 2011. Genome-wide analysis of gene expression during Xenopus tropicalis tadpole tail regeneration. BMC Dev Biol 11: 70.
4. Beck CW, Izpisua Belmonte JC, Christen B. 2009. Beyond early development: Xenopus as an emerging model for the study of regenerative mechanisms. Dev Dyn 238: 1226-48.
5. Gargioli C, Slack JM. 2004. Cell lineage tracing during Xenopus tail regeneration. Development 131: 2669-79.
6. Lin G, Slack JM. 2008. Requirement for Wnt and FGF signaling in Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration. Dev Biol 316: 323-35.
7. Ho DM, Whitman M. 2008. TGF-beta signaling is required for multiple processes during Xenopus tail regeneration. Dev Biol 315: 203-16.
8. Beck CW, Christen B, Slack JM. 2003. Molecular pathways needed for regeneration of spinal cord and muscle in a vertebrate. Dev Cell 5: 429-39.
9. Morris DL, Rui L. 2009. Recent advances in understanding leptin signaling and leptin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 297: E1247-59.
10. Sierra-Honigmann MR, Nath AK, Murakami C, Garcia-Cardena G, et al. 1998. Biological action of leptin as an angiogenic factor. Science 281: 1683-6.
11. Ceddia RB, William WN, Jr, Curi R. 1999. Comparing effects of leptin and insulin on glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle: evidence for an effect of leptin on glucose uptake and decarboxylation. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 23: 75-82.
12. Thorens B, Mueckler M. 2010. Glucose transporters in the 21st century. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 298: E141-5.
13. Agathocleous M, Harris WA. 2013. Metabolism in physiological cell proliferation and differentiation. Trends Cell Biol 23: 484-92.
14. DeBerardinis RJ, Lum JJ, Hatzivassiliou G, Thompson CB. 2008. The biology of cancer: metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation. Cell Metab 7: 11-20.
15. Liu P, Cheng H, Roberts TM, Zhao JJ. 2009. Targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 8: 627-44.
16. Stryer Berg T. 2002. Biochemistry. New York: W H.Freeman.
17. Tian WN, Braunstein LD, Pang J, Stuhlmeier KM, et al. 1998. Importance of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity for cell growth. J Biol Chem 273: 10609-17.
18. Christofk HR, Vander Heiden MG, Harris MH, Ramanathan A, et al. 2008. The M2 splice isoform of pyruvate kinase is important for cancer metabolism and tumour growth. Nature 452: 230-3.
19. Hitosugi T, Kang S, Vander Heiden MG, Chung TW, et al. 2009. Tyrosine phosphorylation inhibits PKM2 to promote the Warburg effect and tumor growth. Sci Signal 2: ra73.
20. Anastasiou D, Poulogiannis G, Asara JM, Boxer MB, et al. 2011. Inhibition of pyruvate kinase M2 by reactive oxygen species contributes to cellular antioxidant responses. Science 334: 1278-83.
21. Love NR, Chen Y, Ishibashi S, Kritsiligkou P, et al. 2013. Amputation-induced reactive oxygen species are required for successful Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration. Nat Cell Biol 15: 222-8.
22. Denko NC. 2008. Hypoxia, HIF1 and glucose metabolism in the solid tumour. Nat Rev Cancer 8: 705-13.
23. Chiarugi A, Dolle C, Felici R, Ziegler M. 2012. The NAD metabolome - a key determinant of cancer cell biology. Nat Rev Cancer 12: 741-52.
24. Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. 2009. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324: 1029-33.
25. Koppenol WH, Bounds PL, Dang CV. 2011. Otto Warburg's contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer 11: 325-37.
26. Roos D, Loos JA. 1973. Changes in the carbohydrate metabolism of mitogenically stimulated human peripheral lymphocytes. II. Relative importance of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation on phytohaemagglutinin stimulation. Exp Cell Res 77: 127-35.
27. Agathocleous M, Love NK, Randlett O, Harris JJ, et al. 2012. Metabolic differentiation in the embryonic retina. Nat Cell Biol 14: 859-64.
28. Krisher RL, Prather RS. 2012. A role for the Warburg effect in preimplantation embryo development: metabolic modification to support rapid cell proliferation. Mol Reprod Dev 79: 311-20.
29. Redel BK, Brown AN, Spate LD, Whitworth KM, et al. 2012. Glycolysis in preimplantation development is partially controlled by the Warburg effect. Mol Reprod Dev 79: 262-71.
30. Panopoulos AD, Yanes O, Ruiz S, Kida YS, et al. 2012. The metabolome of induced pluripotent stem cells reveals metabolic changes occurring in somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Res 22: 168-77.
31. Shyh-Chang N, Daley GQ, Cantley LC. 2013. Stem cell metabolism in tissue development and aging. Development 140: 2535-47.
32. Suh YA, Arnold RS, Lassegue B, Shi J, et al. 1999. Cell transformation by the superoxide-generating oxidase Mox1. Nature 401: 79-82.
33. DeNicola GM, Karreth FA, Humpton TJ, Gopinathan A, et al. 2011. Oncogene-induced Nrf2 transcription promotes ROS detoxification and tumorigenesis. Nature 475: 106-9.
34. Altenberg B, Greulich KO. 2004. Genes of glycolysis are ubiquitously overexpressed in 24 cancer classes. Genomics 84: 1014-20.
35. Hamanaka RB, Chandel NS. 2012. Targeting glucose metabolism for cancer therapy. J Exp Med 209: 211-5.
36. Gambhir SS. 2002. Molecular imaging of cancer with positron emission tomography. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 683-93.
37. Hellsten U, Harland RM, Gilchrist MJ, Hendrix D, et al. 2010. The genome of the Western clawed frog Xenopus tropicalis. Science 328: 633-6.
38. Gilchrist MJ, Zorn AM, Voigt J, Smith JC, et al. 2004. Defining a large set of full-length clones from a Xenopus tropicalis EST project. Dev Biol 271: 498-516.
39. Amaya E. 2005. Xenomics. Genome Res 15: 1683-91.
40. Ishibashi S, Cliffe R, Amaya E. 2012. Highly efficient bi-allelic mutation rates using TALENs in Xenopus tropicalis. Biol Open 1: 1273-6.
41. Love NR, Thuret R, Chen Y, Ishibashi S, et al. 2011. pTransgenesis: a cross-species, modular transgenesis resource. Development 138: 5451-8.
42. Belousov VV, Fradkov AF, Lukyanov KA, Staroverov DB, et al. 2006. Genetically encoded fluorescent indicator for intracellular hydrogen peroxide. Nat Methods 3: 281-6.
43. Hung YP, Albeck JG, Tantama M, Yellen G. 2011. Imaging cytosolic NADH-NAD(+) redox state with a genetically encoded fluorescent biosensor. Cell Metab 14: 545-54.
44. Curtin NJ, Snell K. 1983. Enzymic retrodifferentiation during hepatocarcinogenesis and liver regeneration in rats in vivo. Br J Cancer 48: 495-505.
45. Doherty JR, Johnson Hamlet MR, Kuliyev E, Mead PE. 2007. A flk-1 promoter/enhancer reporter transgenic Xenopus laevis generated using the Sleeping Beauty transposon system: an in vivo model for vascular studies. Dev Dyn 236: 2808-17.
46. Kintner CR, Brockes JP. 1984. Monoclonal antibodies identify blastemal cells derived from dedifferentiating limb regeneration. Nature 308: 67-9.