Amputation-induced reactive oxygen species are required for successful Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 222-228

  Love, Nick R ^a   Chen, Yaoyao ^a,c   Ishibashi, Shoko ^a   Kritsiligkou, Paraskevi ^a   Lea, Robert ^a   Koh, Yvette ^a   Gallop, Jennifer L ^b   Dorey, Karel ^a   Amaya, Enrique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BETA CATENIN; NUCLEOREDOXIN; OXIDOREDUCTASE; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE; THIOREDOXIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR FGF20; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WNT PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL GROWTH; CELL MOTILITY; CELL PROLIFERATION; FGF GENE; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; INFLAMMATORY CELL; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN TARGETING; TADPOLE; TAIL REGENERATION; TISSUE REGENERATION; UPREGULATION; XENOPUS LAEVIS; XENOPUS TROPICALIS;

AMPUTATION; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; ANTIOXIDANTS; BETA CATENIN; CELL PROLIFERATION; ENZYME INHIBITORS; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTORS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; LARVA; NADPH OXIDASE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDES, ANTISENSE; REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES; REGENERATION; TAIL; TIME FACTORS; WNT PROTEINS; WNT SIGNALING PATHWAY; XENOPUS LAEVIS; XENOPUS PROTEINS;

AMPHIBIA; VERTEBRATA; XENOPUS LAEVIS; XENOPUS TROPICALIS;

EID: 84873410016     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: 14764679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb2659     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Slack, J. M., Lin, G. & Chen, Y. The Xenopus tadpole: a new model for regeneration research. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 65, 54-63 (2008).
2. Love, N. R. et al. Genome-wide analysisofgene expression duringXenopustropicalis tadpole tail regeneration. BMC Dev. Biol. 11, 70 (2011).
3. Lin, G. & Slack, J. M. Requirement for Wnt and FGF signaling in Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration. Dev. Biol. 316, 323-335 (2008).
4. Sugiura, T., Tazaki, A., Ueno, N., Watanabe, K. & Mochii, M. Xenopus Wnt-5a induces an ectopic larval tail at injured site, suggesting a crucial role for noncanonical Wnt signal in tail regeneration. Mech. Dev. 126, 56-67 (2009).
5. Beck, C. W., Christen, B. & Slack, J. M. Molecular pathways needed for regeneration of spinal cord and muscle in a vertebrate. Dev. Cell 5, 429-439 (2003).
6. Ho, D. M. & Whitman, M. TGF-ß signaling is required for multiple processes during Xenopus tail regeneration. Dev. Biol. 315, 203-216 (2008).
7. Chamorro, M. N. et al. FGF-20and DKK1 aretranscriptionaltargetsof ß-catenin and FGF-20 is implicated in cancer and development. EMBO J. 24, 73-84 (2005).
8. Finkel, T. & Holbrook, N.J. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature 408, 239-247 (2000).
9. Lambeth, J. D. NOX enzymes and the biology of reactive oxygen. Nature Rev. Immunol. 4, 181-189 (2004).
10. Belousov, V. V. et al. Genetically encoded fluorescent indicator for intracellular hydrogen peroxide. Nat Methods 3, 281-286 (2006).
11. Niethammer, P.,Grabher,C., Look,A.T.&Mitchison,T.J.Atissue- scalegradient of hydrogen peroxide mediates rapid wound detection in zebrafish. Nature 459, 996-999 (2009).
12. Yoo, S. K., Starnes, T. W., Deng, Q. & Huttenlocher, A. Lyn is a redox sensor that mediates leukocyte wound attraction in vivo. Nature 480, 109-112 (2011).
13. Love, N. R. et al. pTransgenesis: a cross-species, modular transgenesis resource. Development 138, 5451-5458 (2011).
14. Owusu-Ansah, E., Yavari, A., Mandal, S. & Banerjee, U. Distinct mitochondrial retrograde signals control the G1-S cell cycle checkpoint. Nat Genet. 40, 356-361 (2008).
15. Miesenbock, G., De Angelis, D.A. & Rothman, J. E. Visualizing secretion and synaptic transmission with pH-sensitive green fluorescent proteins. Nature 394, 192-195 (1998).
16. West, A. P. et al. TLR signalling augments macrophage bactericidal activity through mitochondrial ROS. Nature 472, 476-480 (2011).
17. Costa, R. M., Soto,X., Chen,Y., Zorn, A. M. &Amaya, E.Spib isrequiredforprimitive myeloid development in Xenopus. Blood 112, 2287-2296 (2008).
18. O'Donnell, B. V., Tew, D. G., Jones, O. T. & England, P. J. Studies on the inhibitory mechanism of iodonium compounds with special reference to neutrophil NADPH oxidase. Biochem. J. 290, 41-49 (1993).
19. Kahles, T. & Brandes, R. P. NADPH oxidases as therapeutic targets in ischemic stroke. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 69, 2345-2363 (2012).
20. Stefanska, J. & Pawliczak, R. Apocynin: molecular aptitudes. Mediators Inflamm. 2008, 106507 (2008).
21. Wind, S. et al. Comparative pharmacology of chemically distinct NADPH oxidase inhibitors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 161, 885-898 (2010).
22. Otomo, E. Effect of a novel free radical scavenger, edaravone (MCI-186), on acute brain infarction. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study at multicenters. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 15, 222-229 (2003).
23. Yoneyama, M., Kawada, K., Gotoh, Y., Shiba, T. & Ogita, K. Endogenous reactive oxygen species are essential for proliferation of neural stem/progenitor cells. Neurochem. Int. 56, 740-746 (2010).
24. Ambasta, R. K. et al. Direct interaction of the novel Nox proteinswith p22phox is required for the formation of a functionally active NADPH oxidase. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 45935-45941 (2004).
25. Le Belle, J. E. et al. Proliferative neural stem cells have high endogenous ROS levels that regulate self-renewal and neurogenesis in a PI3K/Akt-dependant manner. Cell Stem. Cell 8, 59-71 (2011).
26. 2 for platelet-derived growth factor signal transduction. Science 270, 296-299 (1995).
27. Yanes, O. et al. Metabolic oxidation regulates embryonic stem cell differentiation. Nat Chem. Biol. 6, 411-417 (2010).
28. Dickinson, B. C., Peltier, J., Stone, D., Schaffer, D. V. & Chang, C. J. Nox2 redox signaling maintains essential cell populations in the brain. Nat Chem. Biol. 7, 106-112 (2011).
29. Hendzel, M. J. et al. Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of histone H3 initiates primarily within pericentromeric heterochromatin during G2 and spreads in an ordered fashion coincident with mitotic chromosome condensation. Chromosoma 106, 348-360 (1997).
30. Nutt, S. L., Bronchain, O. J., Hartley, K. O. & Amaya, E. Comparison of morpholino based translational inhibitionduringthedevelopmentofXenopuslaevisandXenopus tropicalis. Genesis 30, 110-113 (2001).
31. Whitehead, G. G., Makino, S., Lien, C. L. & Keating, M.T. fgf20 is essential for initiating zebrafish fin regeneration. Science 310, 1957-1960 (2005).
32. Lee, Y., Grill, S., Sanchez, A., Murphy-Ryan, M. & Poss, K. D. Fgf signaling instructs position-dependent growth rate during zebrafish fin regeneration. Development 132, 5173-5183 (2005).
33. Stoick-Cooper, C. L., Moon, R. T. & Weidinger, G. Advances in signaling in vertebrate regeneration as a prelude to regenerative medicine. Genes Dev. 21, 1292-1315 (2007).
34. Denayer, T.,Tran, H. T. &Vleminckx, K. Transgenic reportertools tracingendogenous canonical Wnt signaling in Xenopus. Methods Mol. Biol. 469, 381-400 (2008).
35. Funato, Y., Michiue, T., Asashima, M. & Miki, H. The thioredoxin-related redox-regulating protein nucleoredoxin inhibits Wnt-ß-catenin signalling through dishevelled. Nat Cell Biol. 8, 501-508 (2006).
36. Galliot, B. & Chera, S. The Hydra model: disclosing an apoptosis-driven generator of Wnt-based regeneration. Trends Cell Biol. 20, 514-523 (2010).
37. Whyte, J. L., Smith, A. A. & Helms, J. A. Wntsignalingand injury repair. ColdSpring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a008078 (2012).
38. Nieuwkoop, P. D. & Faber, J. Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin): A Systematical and Chronological Survey of the Development from the Fertilized Egg Tillthe End of Metamorphosis (Garland Publishing, 1994).
39. Kroll, K. L. & Amaya, E. Transgenic Xenopus embryos from sperm nuclear transplantations reveal FGFsignaling requirementsduringgastrulation. Development 122, 3173-3183 (1996).
40. Turner, D. L. & Weintraub, H. Expression of achaete-scute homolog 3 in Xenopus embryos converts ectodermal cells to a neural fate. Genes Dev. 8, 1434-1447 (1994).
41. Chen,Y. et al. C/EBPα initiatesprimitive myelopoiesis in pluripotent embryonic cells. Blood 114, 40-48 (2009).
42. Lea, R., Papalopulu, N., Amaya, E. & Dorey, K. Temporal and spatial expression of FGF ligands and receptors during Xenopus development. Dev. Dyn. 238, 1467-1479 (2009).