Peptide docking and structure-based characterization of peptide binding: From knowledge to know-how

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 894-902

  London, Nir ^a   Raveh, Barak ^a   Schueler Furman, Ora ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; COMPLEX FORMATION; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PEPTIDE DOCKING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; HUMANS; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84888851991     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: 1879033X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.07.006     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Blobel G., Sabatini D.D. Ribosome-membrane interaction in eukaryotic cells. Biomembranes 1971, 193-195. Springer.
2. Pawson T., Nash P. Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science 2003, 300:445-452.
3. Akiva E., Friedlander G., Itzhaki Z., Margalit H. A dynamic view of domain-motif interactions. PLoS Comput Biol 2012, 8:e1002341.
4. Petsalaki E., Russell R.B. Peptide-mediated interactions in biological systems: new discoveries and applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2008, 19:344-350.
5. Fuxreiter M., Tompa P., Simon I. Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:950-956.
6. Dyson H.J., Wright P.E. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005, 6:197-208.
7. Wright P.E., Dyson H.J. Linking folding and binding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009, 19:31-38.
8. Dix M.M., Simon G.M., Wang C., Okerberg E., Patricelli M.P., Cravatt B.F. Functional interplay between caspase cleavage and phosphorylation sculpts the apoptotic proteome. Cell 2012, 150:426-440.
9. Bernardo T.J., Dubrovsky E.B. The Drosophila juvenile hormone receptor candidates methoprene-tolerant (MET) and germ cell-expressed (GCE) utilize a conserved LIXXL motif to bind the FTZ-F1 nuclear receptor. J Biol Chem 2012, 287:7821-7833.
10. Sievers S.A., Karanicolas J., Chang H.W., Zhao A., Jiang L., Zirafi O., Stevens J.T., Munch J., Baker D., Eisenberg D. Structure-based design of non-natural amino-acid inhibitors of amyloid fibril formation. Nature 2011, 475:96-100.
11. Belitsky M., Avshalom H., Erental A., Yelin I., Kumar S., London N., Sperber M., Schueler-Furman O., Engelberg-Kulka H. The Escherichia coli extracellular death factor EDF induces the endoribonucleolytic activities of the toxins MazF and ChpBK. Mol Cell 2011, 41:625-635.
12. London N., Raveh B., Movshovitz-Attias D., Schueler-Furman O. Can self-inhibitory peptides be derived from the interfaces of globular protein-protein interactions?. Proteins 2010, 78:3140-3149.
13. Sammond D.W., Bosch D.E., Butterfoss G.L., Purbeck C., Machius M., Siderovski D.P., Kuhlman B. Computational design of the sequence and structure of a protein-binding peptide. J Am Chem Soc 2011, 133:4190-4192.
14. London N., Movshovitz-Attias D., Schueler-Furman O. The structural basis of peptide-protein binding strategies. Structure 2010, 18:188-199.
15. Vanhee P., Reumers J., Stricher F., Baeten L., Serrano L., Schymkowitz J., Rousseau F. PepX: a structural database of non-redundant protein-peptide complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:D545-D551.
16. Stein A., Ceol A., Aloy P. 3did: identification and classification of domain-based interactions of known three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:D718-D723.
17. Trudeau T., Nassar R., Cumberworth A., Wong E.T., Woollard G., Gsponer J. Structure and intrinsic disorder in protein autoinhibition. Structure 2013, 21:332-341.
18. Stein A., Aloy P. Novel peptide-mediated interactions derived from high-resolution 3-dimensional structures. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1000789.
19. Vanhee P., Stricher F., Baeten L., Verschueren E., Lenaerts T., Serrano L., Rousseau F., Schymkowitz J. Protein-peptide interactions adopt the same structural motifs as monomeric protein folds. Structure 2009, 17:1128-1136.
20. London N., Raveh B., Schueler-Furman O. Druggable protein-protein interactions-from hot spots to hot segments. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2013.
21. Vanhee P., van der Sloot A.M., Verschueren E., Serrano L., Rousseau F., Schymkowitz J. Computational design of peptide ligands. Trends Biotechnol 2011, 29:231-239.
22. Rubinstein M., Niv M.Y. Peptidic modulators of protein-protein interactions: progress and challenges in computational design. Biopolymers 2009, 91:505-513.
23. Dinkel H., Michael S., Weatheritt R.J., Davey N.E., Van Roey K., Altenberg B., Toedt G., Uyar B., Seiler M., Budd A., et al. ELM-the database of eukaryotic linear motifs. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40:D242-D251.
24. Bordner A.J., Abagyan R. Ab initio prediction of peptide-MHC binding geometry for diverse class I MHC allotypes. Proteins 2006, 63:512-526.
25. Niv M.Y., Weinstein H. A flexible docking procedure for the exploration of peptide binding selectivity to known structures and homology models of PDZ domains. J Am Chem Soc 2005, 127:14072-14079.
26. Antes I. DynaDock: a new molecular dynamics-based algorithm for protein-peptide docking including receptor flexibility. Proteins 2010, 78:1084-1104.
27. Raveh B., London N., Schueler-Furman O. Sub-angstrom modeling of complexes between flexible peptides and globular proteins. Proteins 2010, 78:2029-2040.
28. Donsky E., Wolfson H.J. PepCrawler: a fast RRT-based algorithm for high-resolution refinement and binding affinity estimation of peptide inhibitors. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:2836-2842.
29. Raveh B., London N., Zimmerman L., Schueler-Furman O. Rosetta FlexPepDock ab-initio: simultaneous folding, docking and refinement of peptides onto their receptors. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e18934.
30. Rohl C.A., Strauss C.E., Misura K.M., Baker D. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 2004, 383:66-93.
31. Trellet M., Melquiond A.S., Bonvin A.M. A unified conformational selection and induced fit approach to protein-peptide docking. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e58769.
32. Hetenyi C., van der Spoel D. Efficient docking of peptides to proteins without prior knowledge of the binding site. Protein Sci 2002, 11:1729-1737.
33. Arun Prasad P., Gautham N. A new peptide docking strategy using a mean field technique with mutually orthogonal Latin square sampling. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2008, 22:815-829.
34. Dagliyan O., Proctor E.A., D'Auria K.M., Ding F., Dokholyan N.V. Structural and dynamic determinants of protein-peptide recognition. Structure 2011, 19:1837-1845.
35. Verschueren E., Vanhee P., Rousseau F., Schymkowitz J., Serrano L. Protein-peptide complex prediction through fragment interaction patterns. Structure 2013, 21:789-797.
36. Petsalaki E., Stark A., Garcia-Urdiales E., Russell R.B. Accurate prediction of peptide binding sites on protein surfaces. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5:e1000335.
37. Trabuco L.G., Lise S., Petsalaki E., Russell R.B. PepSite: prediction of peptide-binding sites from protein surfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40:W423-W427.
38. de Vries S.J., Bonvin A.M. How proteins get in touch: interface prediction in the study of biomolecular complexes. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2008, 9:394-406.
39. Leis S., Schneider S., Zacharias M. In silico prediction of binding sites on proteins. Curr Med Chem 2010, 17:1550-1562.
40. Ben-Shimon A., Eisenstein M. Computational mapping of anchoring spots on protein surfaces. J Mol Biol 2010, 402:259-277.
41. Rajamani D., Thiel S., Vajda S., Camacho C.J. Anchor residues in protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101:11287-11292.
42. Ringe D. What makes a binding site a binding site?. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995, 5:825-829.
43. Lavi A., Ngan C.H., Movshovitz-Attias D., Bohnuud T., Yueh C., Beglov D., Schueler-Furman O., Kozakov D. Detection of peptide-binding sites on protein surfaces: The first step towards the modeling and targeting of peptide-mediated interactions. Proteins Struct, Funct Bioinform 2013, 10.1002/prot.24422.
44. Brenke R., Kozakov D., Chuang G.Y., Beglov D., Hall D., Landon M.R., Mattos C., Vajda S. Fragment-based identification of druggable 'hot spots' of proteins using Fourier domain correlation techniques. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:621-627.
45. Tonikian R., Zhang Y., Sazinsky S.L., Currell B., Yeh J.H., Reva B., Held H.A., Appleton B.A., Evangelista M., Wu Y., et al. A specificity map for the PDZ domain family. PLoS Biol 2008, 6:e239.
46. Dutta S., Gulla S., Chen T.S., Fire E., Grant R.A., Keating A.E. Determinants of BH3 binding specificity for Mcl-1 versus Bcl-xL. J Mol Biol 2010, 398:747-762.
47. Dreier B., Pluckthun A. Rapid selection of high-affinity binders using ribosome display. Methods Mol Biol 2012, 805:261-286.
48. Volkmer R., Tapia V., Landgraf C. Synthetic peptide arrays for investigating protein interaction domains. FEBS Lett 2012, 586:2780-2786.
49. Gfeller D. Uncovering new aspects of protein interactions through analysis of specificity landscapes in peptide recognition domains. FEBS Lett 2012, 586:2764-2772.
50. Reimand J., Hui S., Jain S., Law B., Bader G.D. Domain-mediated protein interaction prediction: from genome to network. FEBS Lett 2012, 586:2751-2763.
51. Gfeller D., Butty F., Wierzbicka M., Verschueren E., Vanhee P., Huang H., Ernst A., Dar N., Stagljar I., Serrano L., et al. The multiple-specificity landscape of modular peptide recognition domains. Mol Syst Biol 2011, 7:484.
52. Chen J.R., Chang B.H., Allen J.E., Stiffler M.A., MacBeath G. Predicting PDZ domain-peptide interactions from primary sequences. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:1041-1045.
53. Lundegaard C., Lund O., Kesmir C., Brunak S., Nielsen M. Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:3265-3275.
54. Fleishman S.J., Corn J.E., Strauch E.M., Whitehead T.A., Karanicolas J., Baker D. Hotspot-centric de novo design of protein binders. J Mol Biol 2011, 413:1047-1062.
55. Ben-Shimon A., Niv M.Y. Deciphering the arginine-binding preferences at the substrate-binding groove of Ser/Thr kinases by computational surface mapping. PLoS Comput Biol 2011, 7:e1002288.
56. Staneva I., Wallin S. Binding free energy landscape of domain-peptide interactions. PLoS Comput Biol 2011, 7:e1002131.
57. Ho B.K., Perahia D., Buckle A.M. Hybrid approaches to molecular simulation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2012, 22:386-393.
58. London N., Lamphear C.L., Hougland J.L., Fierke C.A., Schueler-Furman O. Identification of a novel class of farnesylation targets by structure-based modeling of binding specificity. PLoS Comput Biol 2011, 7:e1002170.
59. Kaufmann K., Shen N., Mizoue L., Meiler J. A physical model for PDZ-domain/peptide interactions. J Mol Model 2011, 17:315-324.
60. London N., Gulla S., Keating A.E., Schueler-Furman O. In silico and in vitro elucidation of BH3 binding specificity toward Bcl-2. Biochemistry 2012, 51:5841-5850.
61. Chaudhury S., Gray J.J. Identification of structural mechanisms of HIV-1 protease specificity using computational peptide docking: implications for drug resistance. Structure 2009, 17:1636-1648.
62. Apgar J.R., Hahn S., Grigoryan G., Keating A.E. Cluster expansion models for flexible-backbone protein energetics. J Comput Chem 2009, 30:2402-2413.
63. Smith C.A., Kortemme T. Structure-based prediction of the peptide sequence space recognized by natural and synthetic PDZ domains. J Mol Biol 2010, 402:460-474.
64. King C.A., Bradley P. Structure-based prediction of protein-peptide specificity in Rosetta. Proteins 2010, 78:3437-3449.
65. Yanover C., Bradley P. Large-scale characterization of peptide-MHC binding landscapes with structural simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:6981-6986.
66. Hwang H., Vreven T., Janin J., Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins 2010, 78:3111-3114.
67. Janin J., Henrick K., Moult J., Eyck L.T., Sternberg M.J., Vajda S., Vakser I., Wodak S.J. Critical assessment of PI: CAPRI: a Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions. Proteins 2003, 52:2-9.
68. Huang Z., Wong C.F. Docking flexible peptide to flexible protein by molecular dynamics using two implicit-solvent models: an evaluation in protein kinase and phosphatase systems. J Phys Chem B 2009, 113:14343-14354.
69. Morrison K.L., Weiss G.A. Combinatorial alanine-scanning. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2001, 5:302-307.
70. Mandell J.G., Falick A.M., Komives E.A. Identification of protein-protein interfaces by decreased amide proton solvent accessibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95:14705-14710.
71. Meyer B., Peters T. NMR spectroscopy techniques for screening and identifying ligand binding to protein receptors. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2003, 42:864-890.
72. Trakselis M.A., Alley S.C., Ishmael F.T. Identification and mapping of protein-protein interactions by a combination of cross-linking, cleavage, and proteomics. Bioconjug Chem 2005, 16:741-750.
73. Chopra N., Agarwal S., Verma S., Bhatnagar S., Bhatnagar R. Modeling of the structure and interactions of the B. anthracis antitoxin. MoxX: deletion mutant studies highlight its modular structure and repressor function. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2011, 25:275-291.
74. London N., Raveh B., Cohen E., Fathi G., Schueler-Furman O. Rosetta FlexPepDock web server-high resolution modeling of peptide-protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:W249-W253.
75. Dundas J., Ouyang Z., Tseng J., Binkowski A., Turpaz Y., Liang J. CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:W116-W118.