Terminal feedback outperforms concurrent visual, auditory, and haptic feedback in learning a complex rowing-type task

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 455-472

  Sigrist, Roland ^a   Rauter, Georg ^a   Riener, Robert ^a   Wolf, Peter ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Augmented feedback; Haptic guidance; Movement sonification; Self controlled feedback; Skill learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSORY FEEDBACK; TOUCH; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84887815904     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: 19401027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2013.826169     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Blandin, Y., Toussaint, L.,& Shea, C. H. (2008). Specificity of practice: Interaction between concurrent sensory information and terminal feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 994-1000.
2. Bluteau, J., Coquillart, S., Payan, Y., & Gentaz, E. (2008). Haptic guidance improves the visuo-manual tracking of trajectories. PLoS ONE, 3(3), e1775.
3. Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 408-415.
4. Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 42-48. (Pubitemid 40353917)
5. Chollet, D., Madani, M., & Micallef, J. P. (1992). Biomechanics and medicine in swimming. London, England: E & FN Spon.
6. Chollet, D., Micallef, J. P., & Rabischong, P. (1988). Swimming science V. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books.
7. Duschau-Wicke, A., von Zitzewitz, J., Caprez, A., Lunenburger, L., & Riener, R. (2010). Path control: A method for patientcooperative robot-aided gait rehabilitation IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 18 38-48.
8. Effenberg, A. O., & Mechling, H. (1998). Bewegung ḧorbar machen-Warum? Zur Perspektive einer systematischen Umsetzung von Bewegung in Kl̈ange [Make motion audible-Why? The perspective of a systematic transformation of movement into sounds]. Psychologie und Sport, 5, 28-38.
9. Eldridge, A. (2006). Issues in auditory display. Artificial Life, 12, 259-74. (Pubitemid 44178184)
10. Eldridge, A. (2006). Issues in auditory display. Artificial Life, 12, 259-74. (Pubitemid 44178184)
11. Emken, J. L., Benitez, R., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2007). Humanrobot cooperative movement training: Learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-asneeded. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 4, 8.
12. Feygin, D., Keehner, M., & Tendick, R. (2002). Haptic guidance: Experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill. Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 40-47.
13. Freides, D. (1974). Human information processing and sensory modality: Cross-modal functions, information complexity, memory, and deficit. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 284-310.
14. Giese, M. A.,& Poggio, T. (2000).Morphable models for the analysis and synthesis of complex motion patterns. International Journal of Computer Vision, 38, 59-73.
15. Godbout, A., & Boyd, J. (2010). Corrective sonic feedback for speed skating:Acase study. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Auditory Display, 23-30.
16. Grond, F., Hermann, T., Verfaille, V., & Wanderley, M. (2010). Gesture in embodied communication and human computer interaction, LNAI 5934. New York, NY: Springer.
17. Holden, M. K. (2005). Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: Review. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 8, 187-211. (Pubitemid 40847797)
18. Huegel, J.,& O'Malley, M. K. (2010). Progressive haptic and visual guidance for training in a virtual dynamic task. Haptics Symposium, 2010 IEEE, 343-350.
19. Huet,M., Camachon, C., Fernandez, L., Jacobs,D.M.,& Montagne, G. (2009). Self-controlled concurrent feedback and the education of attention toward perceptual invariants. Human Movement Science, 28, 450-467.
20. Hummel, J., Hermann, T., Frauenberger, C.,& Stockman, T. (2010). Interactive sonification of german wheel sports movement. Proceedings of ISon 2010, 3rd Interactive Sonification Workshop, 17-22.
21. Ierusalimschy, R. (2013). Programming in Lua (3rd ed.). Available at http://www.lua.org
22. Israel, J., Campbell, D., Kahn, J., & Hornby, T. (2006). Metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns during robotic-and therapistassisted treadmill walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Physical Therapy, 86, 1466-1478. (Pubitemid 44672536)
23. Janelle, C. M., Barba, D. A., Frehlich, S. G., Tennant, L. K., & Cauraugh, H. (1997). Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 269-279. (Pubitemid 127456757)
24. Janelle, C. M., Kim, J., & Singer, R. N. (1995). Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 627-634.
25. Khatib, O. (1986). Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 5, 90.
26. Konttinen, N., Mononen, K., Viitasalo, J., & Mets, T. (2004). The effects of augmented auditory feedback on psychomotor skill learning in precision shooting. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 26, 306-316. (Pubitemid 38835016)
27. Kovacs, A. J., & Shea, C. H. (2011). The learning of 90? continuous relative phase with and without lissajous feedback: External and internally generated bimanual coordination. Acta Psychologica, 136, 311-320.
28. Krakauer, J., & Mazzoni, P. (2011). Human sensorimotor learning: Adaptation, skill, and beyond. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 21, 636-644.
29. Liebermann, D. G., Katz, L., Hughes, M. D., Bartlett, R. M., McClements, J., & Franks, I. M. (2002). Advances in the application of information technology to sport performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 755-769.
30. Liu, D., & Todorov, E. (2007). Evidence for the flexible sensorimotor strategies predicted by optimal feedback control. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 9354-9368. (Pubitemid 47358214)
31. Liu, J., Cramer, S., & Reinkensmeyer, D. (2006). Learning to perform a new movement with robotic assistance: Comparison of haptic guidance and visual demonstration. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 3, 20.
32. Magill, R., & Anderson, D. (2012). Skill acquisition in sports (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
33. Marchal-Crespo, L., Furumasu, J., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2010). A robotic wheelchair trainer: design overview and a feasibility study. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 7, 40-51.
34. Marchal-Crespo, L., Rauter, G., Wyss, D., von Zitzewitz, J., & Riener, R. (2012). Synthesis and control of a parallel tendonbased robotic tennis trainer. 4th IEEE RAS EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), 355-360.
35. Marchal-Crespo, L., & Reinkensmeyer, D. (2008). Haptic guidance can enhance motor learning of a steering task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40, 545-557.
36. Marchal-Crespo, L., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2009). Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 6, 20.
37. Marschall, F., Bund, A., & Wiemeyer, J. (2007). Does frequent feedback really degrade learning? A meta analysis. E-Journal Bewegung und Training, 1, 75-86.
38. Mononen, K. (2007). The effect of augmented feedback on motor skill learning in shooting. PhD thesis, University of Jyv̈askyl̈a, Finland.
39. Nesbitt, K. (2003). Designing multi-sensory displays for abstract data. PhD thesis, School of Information Technologies,University of Sydney, Australia.
40. Park, J.H., Shea, C. H.,& Wright, D. L. (2000). Reduced-frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: A test of the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 287-296.
41. Patoglu, V., Li, Y.,& O'Malley, M. (2009). On the efficacy of haptic guidance schemes for human motor learning. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, 203-206.
42. Patton, J., Stoykov,M., Kovic, M., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. (2006). Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Experimental brain research, 168, 368-383. (Pubitemid 41830946)
43. Proteau, L. (1992). Vision and motor control (volume 85). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland.
44. Proteau, L. (2005). Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a videoaiming task. Experimental Brain Research, 161, 441-456. (Pubitemid 40386305)
45. Proteau, L., & Isabelle, G. (2002). On the role of visual afferent information for the control of aiming movements toward targets of different sizes. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 367-384. (Pubitemid 35334767)
46. Ranganathan, R., & Newell, K. M. (2009). Influence of augmented feedback on coordination strategies. Journal of Motor Behavior, 41, 317-330.
47. Rauter,G., Sigrist,R., Baur,K., Baumgartner,L.,Wolf, P.,& Riener, R. (2011). A virtual trainer concept for robot-assisted human motor learning in rowing. In BIO Web of Conferences; The International Conference SKILLS (Vol. 1).
48. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences. Rauter, G., Sigrist, R., Marchal-Crespo, L., Vallery, H., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2011). Assistance or challenge? Filling a gap in user-cooperative control. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 3068-3073.
49. Rauter, G., von Zitzewitz, J., Duschau-Wicke, A., Vallery, H., & Riener, R. (2010). A tendon based parallel robot applied to motor learning in sports. 3rd IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), 82-87.
50. Reinkensmeyer, D., Akoner, O., Ferris, D., & Gordon, K. (2009). Slacking by the human motor system: Computational models and implications for robotic orthoses. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009. EMBC 2009. Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2129-2132.
51. Robin, C., Toussaint, L., Blandin, Y., & Proteau, L. (2005). Specificity of learning in a video-aiming task: Modifying the salience of dynamic visual cues. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 367-376. (Pubitemid 41026269)
52. Rosenthal, J., Edwards, N., Villanueva, D., Krishna, S., McDaniel, T., & Panchanathan, S. (2011). Design, implementation, and case study of a pragmatic vibrotactile belt. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 60, 114-125.
53. Salmoni, S. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning. A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386.
54. Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience, 62, 59-75.
55. Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
56. Schmidt, R.A.,& Wulf, G. (1997). Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning: Implications for training and simulation. Human Factors, 39, 509-525. (Pubitemid 127466588)
57. Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S.,& Shapiro, D. C. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 352-359.
58. Secoli, R., Milot, M., Rosati, G., & Reinkensmeyer, D. (2011). Effect of visual distraction and auditory feedback on patient effort during robot-assisted movement training after stroke. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 8, 1-10.
59. Shadmehr, R., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. (1994). Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 3208-3224. (Pubitemid 24139004)
60. Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R.,& Wolf, P. (2011). Self-controlled feedback for a complex motor task. In BIO Web of Conferences; The International Conference SKILLS (Vol. 1).
61. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences. Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2013). Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 21-53.
62. Sigrist, R., Schellenberg, J., Rauter, G., Broggi, S., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2011). Visual and auditory augmented concurrentfeedback in a complex motor task. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 20, 15-32.
63. Snodgrass, S. J., Rivett, D. A., Robertson, V. J., & Stojanovski, E. (2010). Real-time feedback improves accuracy of manually applied forces during cervical spine mobilisation. Manual Therapy, 15, 19-25.
64. Swinnen, S. P., Lee, T. D., Verschueren, S., Serrien, D. J., & Bogaerds, H. (1997). Interlimb coordination: Learning and transfer under different feedback conditions. Human Movement Science, 16, 749-785. (Pubitemid 127165109)
65. Swinnen, S. P., Schmidt, R. A., Nicholson, D. E., & Shapiro, D. C. (1990). Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 706-716.
66. Todorov, E. (2004). Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 907-915. (Pubitemid 39129496)
67. Todorov, E., & Jordan, M. I. (2002). Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1226-1235. (Pubitemid 35247183)
68. Todorov, E., Shadmehr, R., & Bizzi, E. (1997). Augmented feedback presented in a virtual environment accelerates learning of a difficult motor task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 147-158. (Pubitemid 27310631)
69. Vallery, H., Guidali, M., Duschau-Wicke, A., & Riener, R. (2009). Patient-cooperative control: Providing safe support without restricting movement. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, 166-169.
70. Van Beers, R. J. (2009). Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise. Neuron, 63, 406-417.
71. Van der Linden, D.W., Cauraugh, J. H.,& Greene, T. A. (1993). The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled subjects. Physical Therapy, 73, 79-87. (Pubitemid 23037375)
72. Van Erp, J. B. F., Saturday, I., & Jansen, C. (2006). Application of tactile displays in sports: Where to, how and when to move. Proceedings of the Eurohaptics International Conference, 1-5.
73. Vlachos, M., Hadjieleftheriou, M., Gunopulos, D., & Keogh, E. (2003). Indexing multi-dimensional time-series with support for multiple distance measures. Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge discovery and Data Mining, KDD '03, 216-225.
74. Von Zitzewitz, J., Wolf, P., Novakovic, V., Wellner, M., Rauter, G., Brunschweiler, A., & Riener, R. (2008). Real-time rowing simulator with multimodal feedback. Sports Technology, 1, 257-266.
75. Wei, K., & K̈ording, K. (2009). Relevance of error: What drives motor adaptation? Journal of Neurophysiology, 101, 655-664.
76. Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638-667.
77. Winstein, C. J. (1991). Knowledge of results and motor learning-implications for physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 71, 140-149.
78. Winstein, C. J., Pohl, P. S., Cardinale, C., Green, A., Scholtz, L., & Waters, C. S. (1996). Learning a partial-weight-bearing skill: Effectiveness of two forms of feedback. Physical Therapy, 76, 985-993. (Pubitemid 26299076)
79. Wishart, L. R., Lee, T. D., Cunningham, S. J., & Murdoch, J. E. (2002). Age-related differences and the role of augmented visual feedback in learning a bimanual coordination pattern. Acta Psychologica, 110, 247-263.
80. Wolpert, D. M., Diedrichsen, J., & Flanagan, J. R. (2011). Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 739-749.
81. Wulf, G. (2007). Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: Implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy, 93, 96- 101. (Pubitemid 47497367)
82. Wulf, G., Ḧorger, M., & Shea, C. H. (1999). Benefits of blocked over serial feedback on complex motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 31, 95-103. (Pubitemid 29133759)
83. Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 185-211.
84. Wulf, G., Shea, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Motor skill learning and performance: A review of influential factors. Medical Education, 44, 75-84.
85. Wulf, G., Shea, C. H., & Matschiner, S. (1998). Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 180-192. (Pubitemid 28228327)