Host shifts, the evolution of communication, and speciation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers

Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation: The Evolutionary Biology of Herbivorous Insects

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 88-100

  Cocroft, Reginald B ^a   Rodríguez, Rafael L ^b   Hunt, Randy E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY SOUTHEAST   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887672002     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (95)

1. Bailey, W. J. 2006. Insect songs: the evolution of signal complexity, pp. 127-136. In S. D. Drosopoulos and M. F. Claridge (eds.), Insect sounds and communication: physiology, behaviour, ecology, and evolution. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
2. Beck, C.W., and L. A. Powell. 2000. Evolution of female mate choice based on male age: are older males better mates? Evol. Ecol. Res. 2: 107-118.
3. Berlocher, S. H., and J. L. Feder. 2002. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 773-815.
4. Blair, F. 1955. Mating call and stage of speciation in the Microhyla olivacea- M. carolinensis complex. Evolution 9: 469-480.
5. Boughman, J.W. 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411: 944-948.
6. Bradbury, J.W. and S. L. Vehrencamp. 1998. Principles of animal communication. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
7. Bridle, J. R., and M. G. Ritchie. 2001. Assortative mating and the genic view of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 878-879.
8. Bush, G. L., and R. K. Butlin. 2004. Sympatric speciation in insects, pp. 229-248. In U. Dieckmann, M. Doebeli, J. A. J. Metz, and D. Tautz (eds.), Adaptive speciation. Cambridge University Press, UK.
9. Claridge, M. F. 1990. Acoustic recognition signals: barriers to hybridization in Homoptera Auchenorryhncha. Can. J. Zool. 68: 1741-1746.
10. Cocroft, R. B., and R. L. Rodríguez. 2005. The behavioral ecology of insect vibrational communication. BioScience 55: 323-334.
11. Cocroft, R. B., H. Shugart, K. Konrad, and K. Tibbs. 2006. Variation in plant substrates and its consequences for insect vibrational communication. Ethology 112: 779-789.
12. Cokl, A., and M. Virant-Doberlet. 2003. Communication with substrate- borne signals in small plant-dwelling insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 48: 29-50.
13. Cokl, A., M. Zorovic, A. Zunic, and M. Virant-Doberlet. 2005. Tuning of host plants with vibratory songs of Nezara viridula L (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). J. Exp. Biol. 208: 1481-1488.
14. Cotton, S., K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski. 2004. Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271: 771-783.
15. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1997. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51: 295-303.
16. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
17. Craig, T. P., J. K. Itami, W. G. Abrahamson, and J. D. Horner. 1993. Behavioral evidence for host-race formation in Eurosta solidaginis. Evolution 47: 1696-1710.
18. Deinert, E.I., J.T. Longino, and L. E. Gilbert. 1994. Mate competition in butterflies. Nature 370: 23-24.
19. Deitz, L. L., and C. Bartlett. 2004. Publications of Thomas Kenneth Wood (1942-2002). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 106: 586-591.
20. Eberhard, W. G. 1985. Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Eberhard, W. G. 1994. Evidence for widespread courtship during copulation in 131 species of insects and spiders, and implications of cryptic female choice. Evolution 48: 711-733.
22. Eberhard, W. G. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Emlen, S.T., and L.W. Oring. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215-23.
23. Endler, J. A. 1992. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. Suppl. 139: S125-S153.
24. Endler, J. A., and A. L. Basolo. 1998. Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 415-420.
25. Etges, W. J. 1998. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. IV. Correlated responses in behavioral isolation to artificial selection on a lifehistory trait. Am. Nat. 152: 129-144.
26. Etges, W. J. 2002. Divergence in mate choice systems: does evolution play by rules? Genetica 116: 151-166.
27. Feder, J. L. 1998. The apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella: flies in the face of conventional wisdom about speciation, pp. 130-140.In D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher (eds.), Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, New York.
28. Feder, J. L., and K. Filchak. 1999. It's about time: the evidence for host plant-mediated selection in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella, and its implications for fitness trade-offs in phytophagous insects. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 91: 21.
29. Funk, D. J. 1998. Isolation a role for natural selection in speciation: host adaptation and sexual isolation in Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles. Evolution 52: 1744-1759.
30. Funk, D. J., K. E. Filchak, and J. L. Feder. 2002. Herbivorous insects: model systems for comparative study of speciation ecology. Genetica 116: 261-267.
31. Gavrilets, S. 2003. Models of speciation: what we have learned in 40 years? Evolution 57: 2197-2215.
32. Gavrilets, S. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
33. Gerhardt, H. C., and F. Huber. 2002. Acoustic communication in insects and anurans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
34. Greenfield, M. D., and R. L. Rodríguez. 2004. Genotype-environment interaction and the reliability of mating signals. Anim. Behav. 68: 1461-1468.
35. Groman, J. D., and O. Pellmyr. 2000. Rapid evolution and specialization following host colonization in a yucca moth. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 223-236.
36. Hansen, T. F., and D. K. Price. 1995. Good genes and old age: do older males provide superior genes? J. Evol. Biol. 8: 759-778.
37. Henry, C. S., and M. L. M. Wells. 2004. Adaptation or random change? The evolutionary response of songs to substrate properties in lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Anim. Behav. 68: 879-895.
38. Herre, E. A., C. A. Machado, and S.A. West. 2001. Selective regime and fig wasp sex ratios: towards sorting rigor from pseudo-rigor in tests of adaptation, pp. 191-218. In S. H. Orzack and E. Sober (eds.), Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press, New York.
39. Higgie, M., S. Chenoweth, and M.W. Blows. 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290: 519-521.
40. Höbel, G., and H. C. Gerhardt. 2003. Reproductive character displacement in the acoustic communication system of green tree frogs (Hyla cinerea). Evolution 57: 894-904.
41. Howard, D. J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis, pp. 46-69. In R. H. Harrison (ed.), Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York.
42. Hunt, R. E. 1994. Vibrational signals associated with mating behavior in the treehopper, Enchenopa binotata Say (Hemiptera: Homoptera: Membracidae). J. New York Entomol. Soc. 102: 266-270.
43. Jiggins, C. D., and J. Mallet. 2000. Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 250-255.
44. Jiggins, C. D., I. Emelianov, and J. Mallet. 2005. Assortative mating and speciation as pleiotropic effects of ecological adaptation: examples in moths and butterflies, pp. 451-473. In M. Fellowes, G. Holloway, and J. Rolff (eds.), Insect evolutionary ecology. Royal Entomological Society, London.
45. Kelly, J. K., and M. A. F. Noor. 1996. Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila. Genetics 143: 1485-1497.
46. Kirkpatrick, M., and V. Ravigné. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159: S23-S35.
47. Kokko, H., and J. Lindstrom. 1996. Evolution of female preference for old mates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 1533-1538.
48. Kondrashov, A. S., and F. A. Kondrashov. 1999. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400: 351-354.
49. Kondrashov, A. S., L.Y. Yampolsky, and S. A. Shabalina. 1998. On the sympatric origin of species by means of natural selection, pp. 90-98. In D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher (eds.), Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, New York.
50. Landolt, P. J., and T.W. Phillips. 1997. Host plant influences on sex pheromone behavior of phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42: 371-391.
51. Leal, M., and L. J. Fleishman. 2004. Differences in visual signal design and detectability between allopatric populations of Anolis lizards. Am. Nat. 163: 26-39.
52. Lorch, P. D., S. Proulx, L. Rowe, and T. Day. 2003. Condition-dependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5: 867-881.
53. Lukhtanov, V. A., N. P. Kandul, J. B. Plotkin, A.V. Dantchenko, D. Haig, and N. E. Pierce. 2005. Reinforcement of pre-zygotic evolution in Agrodiaetus butterflies. Nature 436: 385-389.
54. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
55. Maan, M. E., K. D. Hofker, J. J. M. van Alphen, and O. Seehausen. 2006. Sensory drive in cichlid speciation. Am. Nat. 167: 947-954. Mallet, J. 2001. The speciation revolution. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 887-888.
56. Mallet, J. 2001. The speciation revolution. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 887-888.
57. Marshall, J. L., M. L. Arnold, and D. J. Howard. 2002. Reinforcement: the road not taken. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 558-563.
58. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
59. Messina, F. J. 2004. Predictable modification of body size and competitive ability following a host shift by a seed beetle. Evolution 58: 2788-2797.
60. Michelsen, A., F. Fink, M. Gogala, and D. Traue. 1982. Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11: 269-281.
61. Miyatake, T., and T. Shimizu. 1999. Genetic correlations between life-history and behavioral traits can cause reproductive isolation. Evolution 53: 201-208.
62. Nosil, P., B. J. Crespi, and C. P. Sandoval. 2003. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 1911-1918.
63. Panhuis, T. M., R. Butlin, M. Zuk, and T. Tregenza. 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 364-371.
64. Pratt, G., and T. K. Wood. 1993. Genitalic analysis of males and females in the Enchenopa binotata (Say) complex (Membracidae: Homoptera). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 95: 574-582.
65. Price, P.W. 2002. Resource-driven terrestrial interaction webs. Ecol. Res. 17: 241-247.
66. Proulx, S. R. 1999. Mating systems and the evolution of niche breadth. Am. Nat. 154: 89-98.
67. Proulx, S. R. 2001. Female choice via indicator traits easily evolves in the face of recombination and migration. Evolution 55: 2401-2411.
68. Proulx, S. R., T. Day, and L. Rowe. 2002. Older males signal more reliably. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269: 2291-2299.
69. Rice, W. R., and E. E. Hostert. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 27: 1673-1653.
70. Rodríguez, R. L., and R. B. Cocroft. 2006. Divergence in female duetting signals in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membradicae). Ethol. 112: 1231-1238.
71. Rodríguez, R. L., and M. D. Greenfield. 2003. Genetic variance and phenotypic plasticity in a component of female mate choice in an ultrasonic moth. Evolution 57: 1304-1313.
72. Rodríguez, R. L., L. E. Sullivan, and R. B. Cocroft. 2004. Vibrational communication and reproductive isolation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae). Evolution 58: 571-578.
73. Rodríguez, R. L., K. Ramaswamy, and R. B. Cocroft. 2006. Evidence that female preferences have shaped male signal evolution in a clade of specialized plant-feeding insects. Proc. R. Soc. B. 273: 2585-2593.
74. Rodríguez, R. L., L. M. Sullivan, R. L. Snyder, and R. B. Cocroft. In press. Host shifts and the beginning of signal divergence. Evolution.
75. Rundle, H. D., and P. Nosil. 2005. Ecological speciation. Ecol. Lett. 8: 336-352.
76. Ryan, M. J., and A. S. Rand. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47: 647-657.
77. Sattman, D. A., and R. B. Cocroft. 2003. Phenotypic plasticity and repeatability in the mating signals of Enchenopa treehoppers, with implications for reduced gene flow among host-shifted populations. Ethol. 109: 981-994.
78. Servedio, M. R., and M. A. F. Noor. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34: 339-364.
79. Shuster, S. M., and M. J. Wade. 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
80. Tauber, C. A., and M. J. Tauber. 1989. Sympatric speciation in insects: perception and perspective, pp. 307-344. In D. Otte and J. A. Endler (eds.), Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
81. Tilmon, K. J., T. K. Wood, and J. D. Pesek. 1998. Genetic variation in performance traits and the potential for host shifts in Enchenopa treehoppers (Homoptera: Membracidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 91: 397-403.
82. Tomkins, J. L., J. Radwan, J. S. Kotiaho, and T. Tregenza. 2004. Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 324-328.
83. Tregenza, T., V. L. Pritchard, and R. K. Butlin. 2000. Patterns of trait divergence between populations of the meadow grasshopper, Chorthippus parallelus. Evolution 54: 574-585.
84. Via, S. 1990. Ecological genetics in herbivorous insects: the experimental study of evolution in natural and agricultural systems. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35: 421-446.
85. West-Eberhard, M. J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58: 155-183.
86. West-Eberhard, M. J. 2003. Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.
87. West-Eberhard, M. J. 2005. Developmental plasticity and the origin of species differences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 6543-6549.
88. Wood, T. K. 1980. Divergence in the Enchenopa binotata Say complex (Homoptera: Membracidae) effected by host plant adaptation. Evolution 34: 147-160.
89. Wood, T. K. 1993. Speciation of the Enchenopa binotata complex (Insecta: Homoptera: Membracidae), pp. 299-317. In D. R. Lees and D. Edwards (eds.), Evolutionary patterns and processes. Academic Press, New York.
90. Wood, T. K., and S. I. Guttman. 1982. Ecological and behavioral basis for reproductive isolation in the sympatric Enchenopa binotata complex (Homoptera: Membracidae). Evolution 36: 233-242.
91. Wood, T. K., and S. I. Guttman. 1983. Enchenopa binotata complex: sympatric speciation? Science 220: 310-312.
92. Wood, T. K., and M. C. Keese. 1990. Host-plant-induced assortative mating in Enchenopa treehoppers. Evolution 44: 619-628.
93. Wood, T. K., K. L. Olmstead, and S. I. Guttman. 1990. Insect phenology mediated by host-plant water relations. Evolution 44: 629-636.
94. Wood, T. K., K. J. Tilmon, A. B. Shantz, C. K. Harris, and J. D. Pesek. 1999. The role of host-plant fidelity in initiating insect race formation. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1: 317-332.
95. Zuk, M., and G. R. Kolluru. 1998. Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Q. Rev. Biol. 73: 415-438.