Divergence in mate choice systems: Does evolution play by rules?

Genetica

Volumn 116, Issue 2-3, 2002, Pages 151-166

  Etges, William J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Drosophila mojavensis; Genetic analysis; Incipient speciation; Mate recognition; Sexual isolation; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

ANIMALIA; DROSOPHILA MOJAVENSIS; INSECTA;

EID: 0036872457     PISSN: 00166707     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021284426383     Document Type: Review

References (162)

1. Alatalo, R.V., L. Gustafsson & A. Lundberg, 1994. Male coloration and species recognition in sympatric flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 256: 113-118.
2. Alonso-Pimentel, H. & T.R. Tobin, 1992. Discriminant function analysis of the courtship behavior of Drosophila mojavensis (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Insect Behav. 5: 131-139.
3. Bakker, T.C.M., R. Kunzler & D. Mazzi, 1999. Condition-related mate choice in sticklebacks. Nature 401: 234.
4. Barron, A.B. & S.A. Corbet, 1999. Preimaginal conditioning in Drosophila revisited. Anim. Behav. 58: 621-628.
5. Barth, M., H.V.B. Hirsch & M. Heisenberg, 1997. Rearing in different light regimes affects courtship behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 53: 25-38.
6. Basolo, A.L., 1995. Phylogenetic evidence for the role of a pre-existing bias in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 259: 307-311.
7. Berlocher, S.H. & J.L. Feder, 2002. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 773-815.
8. Bertram, S., M. Berrill & E. Nol, 1996. Male mating success and variation in chorus attendance within and among breeding seasons in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor). Copeia 1996: 729-734.
9. Blair, W.F., 1974. Character displacement in frogs. Am. Zool. 14: 1119-1125.
10. Blows, M.W., 2002. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B269: 1113-1118.
11. Boake, C.R.B., M.P. DeAngelis & D.K. Andreadis, 1997. Is sexual selection and species recognition a continuum? Mating behavior of the stalk-eyed fly Drosophila heteroneura. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 12442-12445.
12. Borgia, G., 1995. Complex male display and female choice in the spotted bowerbird: specialized functions for different bower decorations. Anim. Behav. 1291-1301.
13. Boughman, J.W., 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411: 944-948.
14. Bradshaw, H.D., S.M. Wilbert, K.G. Otto & D.W. Schemske, 1995. Genetic mapping of floral traits associated with reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Nature 376: 762-765.
15. Brazner, J.C., 1983. The influence of rearing environment on sexual isolation between populations of Drosophila mojavensis: an alternative to the character displacement hypothesis. MS Thesis, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
16. Brazner, J.C. & W.J. Etges, 1993. Pre-mating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. II. Effects of larval substrates on time to copulation, mate choice, and mating propensity. Evol. Ecol. 7: 605-624.
17. Bush, G.L., 1975. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects, pp. 187-206 in Evolutionary strategies of parasitic insects and mites, edited by P.W. Price. Plenum Press, New York.
18. Butlin, R., 1995. Genetic variation in mating signals and responses, pp. 327-366 in Speciation and the Recognition Concept: Theory and Application, edited by H.G. Spencer. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
19. Butlin, R.K. & G.M. Hewitt, 1988. Genetics of behavioural and morphological differences between parapatric subspecies of Chorthippus parallelus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 33: 233-248.
20. Butlin, R. & M.G. Ritchie, 2001. Searching for speciation genes. Nature 412: 31-32.
21. Byrne, C., 1999. Behaviour-genetic analysis of lovesongs in desert species of Drosophila. PhD Thesis, University of Leicester, Leicester.
22. Carroll, S.P. & C. Boyd, 1992. Host race radiation in the soapberry bug: natural history with the history. Evolution 46: 1052-1069.
23. Carroll, S.P., H. Dingle & S.P. Klassen, 1997. Genetic differentiation of fitness-related traits among rapidly evolving populations of the soapberry bug. Evolution 51: 1182-1188.
24. Carson, H.L., 1978. Speciation and sexual selection in Hawaiian Drosophila, pp. 93-107 in Ecological Genetics: The Interface, edited by P.F. Brussard. Springer-Verlag, New York.
25. Carson, H.L., 1987. Chromosomal evolution of Hawaiian Drosophila. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2: 200-206.
26. Carson, H.L., 2000. Sexual selection in populations: the facts require a change in the genetic definition of the species, pp. 495-512 in Evolutionary Genetics: From Molecules to Morphology, edited by C. Krimbas. Cambridge University Press, New York.
27. Carson, H.L., 2002. Female choice in Drosophila: evidence from Hawaii and implications for evolutionary biology. Genetica 116: 383-393.
28. Carson, H.L. & K.Y. Kaneshiro, 1976. Drosophila of Hawaii: systematics and ecological genetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7: 311-345.
29. Carson, H.L. & R. Lande, 1984. Inheritance of a secondary sexual character in Drosophila sylvestris. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 6904-6907.
30. Cobb, M. & J.-F. Ferveur, 1996. Evolution and genetic control of mate recognition and stimulation in Drosophila. Behav. Proc. 35: 35-54.
31. Coyne, J.A. & B. Charlesworth, 1989. Genetic analysis of X-linked sterility in hybrids between three sibling species of Drosophila. Heredity 62: 97-106.
32. Coyne, J.A., A.P. Crittenden & K. Mah, 1994. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265: 1461-1464.
33. Coyne, J.A. & H.A. Orr, 1989a. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43: 362-381.
34. Coyne, J.A. & H.A. Orr, 1989b. Two rules of speciation, pp. 180-207 in Speciation and Its Consequences, edited by J.A. Endler. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
35. Coyne, J.A. & H.A. Orr, 1997. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51: 295-303.
36. Coyne, J.A., H.A. Orr & D.J. Futuyma, 1988. Do we need a new species concept? Syst. Zool. 37: 190-200.
37. Coyne, J.A., C. Wicker-Thomas & J.-M. Jallon, 1999. A gene responsible for a cuticular hydrocarbon polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. Camb. 73: 189-203.
38. Craig, T.P., J.K. Itami, W.G. Abrahamson & J.D. Horner, 1993. Behavioral evidence for host-race formation in Eurosta solidaginis. Evolution 47: 1696-1710.
39. Dallerac, R., C. Labeur & C. Wicker-Thomas, 2000. A Delta-9 desaturase gene with a different substrate specificity is responsible for cuticular diene hydrocarbon polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 9449-9454.
40. David, P., T. Bjorksten, A. Pomiankowski & K. Fowler, 2000. Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature 406: 186-188.
41. Dobzhansky, T., 1936. Studies of hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21: 113-135.
42. Dobzhansky, T., 1940. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 74: 312-321.
43. Dodd, D.M.B., 1989. Reproductive isolation as a consequence of adaptive divergence in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 43: 1308-1311.
44. 2 populations. Genetics 134: 559-570.
45. Doi, M., M. Matsuda, M. Tomaru, H. Matsubayashi & Y. Oguma, 2001. A locus for female discrimination behavior causing sexual isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 6714-6719.
46. Downing, R.J., 1985. The chemical basis for host plant selection in Drosophila mojavensis. MS Thesis, University of Denver, Denver, CO.
47. Droney, D.C., 1992. Sexual selection in a lekking Hawaiian Drosophila: the roles of male competition and female choice in male mating success. Anim. Behav. 44: 1007-1020.
48. Durando, C.M., R.H. Baker, W.J. Etges, W.B. Heed, M. Wasserman & R. DeSalle, 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of the repleta species group of the genus Drosophila using multiple sources of characters. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 16: 296-307.
49. Ehrman, L., 1990. Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Behav. Genet. 20: 609-615.
50. Ehrman, L. & M. Wasserman, 1987. The significance of asymmetrical sexual isolation. Evol. Biol. 21: 1-20.
51. Etges, W.J., 1989. Evolution of developmental homeostasis in Drosophila mojavensis. Evol. Ecol. 3: 189-201.
52. Etges, W.J., 1990. Direction of life history evolution in Drosophila mojavensis, pp. 37-56 in Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila, edited by R.J. MacIntyre. Plenum Press, New York.
53. Etges, W.J., 1992. Premating isolation is determined by larval substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 46: 1945-1950.
54. Etges, W.J., 1993. Genetics of host-cactus response and life-history evolution among ancestral and derived populations of cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 47: 750-767.
55. Etges, W.J., 1998. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. IV. Correlated responses in behavioral isolation to artificial selection on a life history trait. Am. Nat. 152: 129-144.
56. Etges, W.J. & M.A. Ahrens, 2001. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. V. Deep geographic variation in epicuticular hydrocarbons among isolated populations. Am. Nat. 158: 585-598.
57. Etges, W.J. & L.L. Jackson, 2001. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. VI. Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation in Drosophila mojavensis cluster species. J. Chem. Ecol. 27: 2125-2149.
58. Etges, W.J., W.R. Johnson, G.A. Duncan, G. Huckins & W.B. Heed, 1999. Ecological genetics of cactophilic Drosophila, pp. 164-214 in Ecology of Sonoran Desert Plants and Plant Communities, edited by R. Robichaux. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
59. Ewing, A.W. & J.A. Miyan, 1986. Sexual selection, sexual isolation and the evolution of song in the Drosophila repleta group of species. Anim. Behav. 34: 421-429.
60. Feder, J.L., S.B. Opp, B. Wlazlo, K. Reynolds, W. Go & S. Spisak, 1994. Host fidelity is an effective premating barrier between sympatric races of the apple magot fly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 7990-7994.
61. Fellers, G.M., 1979. Mate selection in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor. Copeia 1979: 286-290.
62. Filchak, K.E., J.B. Roethele & J.L. Feder, 2000. Natural selection and sympatric divergence in the apple maggot Rhagoletis pomonella. Nature 407: 739-742.
63. Fitzpatrick, M.J. & D.A. Gray, 2001. Divergence between the courtship songs of the field crickets Gryllus texensis and Gryllus rubens (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Ethology 107: 1075-1085.
64. Funk, D.J., 1998. Isolating a role for natural selection in speciation: host adaptation and sexual isolation in Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles. Evolution 52: 1744-1759.
65. Funk, D.J., D.J. Futuyma, G.G. Orti & A. Meyer, 1995. A history of host associations and evolutionary diversification for Ophraella (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): new evidence from mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 49: 1008-1017.
66. Gerhardt, H.C., 1982. Sound pattern recognition in some North American treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): Implications for mate choice. Am. Zool. 22: 581-595.
67. Gerhardt, H.C., 1994. Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim. Behav. 47: 959-969.
68. Giddings, L.V. & A.R. Templeton, 1983. Behavioral phylogenies and the direction of evolution. Science 220: 372-378.
69. Gleason, J.M. & M.G. Ritchie, 1998. Evolution of courtship song and reproductive isolation in the Drosophila willistoni species complex: do sexual signals diverge the most quickly? Evolution 52: 1493-1500.
70. Gray, D.A. & W.H. Cade, 2000. Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 14449-14454.
71. Gray, D.A. & G. Eckhardt, 2001. Is cricket courtship song condition dependent? Anim. Behav. 62: 871-877.
72. Greenfield, M.D., 1997. Sexual selection and the evolution of advertisement signals, pp. 145-177 in Perspectives in Ethology, edited by N. Thompson. Plenum Press, New York.
73. Griffith, S.C., I.P.F. Owens & T. Burke, 1999. Environmental determination of a sexually selected trait. Nature 400: 358-360.
74. Hall, J.C., 1994. The mating of a fly. Science 264: 1702-1714.
75. Hawthorne, D.J. & S. Via, 2001. Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids. Nature 412: 904-907.
76. Heed, W.B. & R.L. Mangan, 1986. Community ecology of the Sonoran Desert Drosophila, pp. 311-345 in The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, edited by J.J.N. Thompson. Academic Press, New York.
77. Henry, C.S., 1985. Sibling species, call differences, and speciation in green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Evolution 39: 965-984.
78. Henry, C.S., 1994. Singing and cryptic speciation in insects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 388-392.
79. Higgie, M., S. Chenoweth & M.W. Blows. 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290: 519-521.
80. Hoikkala, A., S. Crossley & C. Castillo-Melendez, 2000. Copulatory courtship in Drosophila birchii and D. serrata, species recognition and sexual selection. J. Insect Behav. 13: 361-373.
81. Hollocher, H., C.-T. Ting, F. Pollack & C.-I. Wu, 1997a. Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: variation in mating preference among natural isolates. Evolution 51: 1175-1181.
82. Hollocher, H., C.T. Ting, M.L. Wu & C.-I. Wu, 1997b. Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: extensive genetic divergence without reinforcement. Genetics 147: 1191-1201.
83. Hostert, E.E., 1997. Reinforcement: a new perspective on an old controversy. Evolution 51: 697-702.
84. Howard, D.J., 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis, pp. 46-69 in Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process, edited by R.G. Harrison. Oxford University Press, New York.
85. Howard, R.W., 1998. Ontogenetic, reproductive, and nutritional effects on the cuticular hydrocarbons of the host-specific ectoparasitoid Cephalonomia tarsalis (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 91: 101-112.
86. Howard, D.J. & P.G. Gregory, 1993. Post-insemination signalling systems and reinforcement. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 340: 231-236.
87. Howard, R.D. & J.R. Young, 1998. Individual variation in male vocal traits and female mating preferences in Bufo americanus. Anim. Behav. 55: 1165-1179.
88. Jiggins, C.D., W.O. McMillan, P. King & J. Mallet, 1997. The maintenance of species differences across a Heliconius hybrid zone. Heredity 79: 495-505.
89. Kaneshiro, K.Y., 1980. Sexual isolation, speciation and the direction of evolution. Evolution 34: 437-444.
90. Kaneshiro, K.Y., 1983. Sexual selection and the direction of evolution in the biosystematics of Hawaiian Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 161-178.
91. Kim, Y.-K., L. Ehrman & H.R. Koepfer, 1992. Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. I. Survey of the six semispecies. Behav. Genet. 22: 545-556.
92. Kim, Y.-K., L. Ehrman & H.R. Koepfer, 1996. Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behaviour of Drosophila paulistorum. II. Prior experience. Behav. Genet. 26: 15-26.
93. Koepfer, H.R., 1987. Selection for sexual isolation between geographic forms of Drosophila mojavensis. I. Interactions between the selected forms. Evolution 41: 37-48.
94. Krebs, R.A., 1990. Courtship behavior and control of reproductive isolation in Drosophila mojavensis: genetic analysis of population hybrids. Behav. Genet. 20: 535-543.
95. Kyriacou, C.P., 2002. Single gene mutations in Drosophila: what can they tell us about the evolution of sexual behaviour? Genetica 116: 197-203.
96. Lambert, D.M. & H.G. Spencer, 1995. Speciation and the Recognition Concept: Theory and Application. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
97. Lande, R., 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721-3725.
98. Lande, R. & M. Kirkpatrick, 1988. Ecological speciation by sexual selection. J. Theor. Biol. 133: 85-98.
99. Lande, R., O. Seehausen & J.J.M. van Alphen, 2001. Mechanisms of rapid sympatric speciation by sex reversal and sexual selection in cichlid fish. Genetica 112-113: 435-443.
100. Maddison, W.P. & D.R. Maddison, 1992. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 3.08. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
101. Markow, T.A., 1981a. Courtship behavior and control of reproductive isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis. Evolution 35: 1022-1027.
102. Markow, T.A., 1981b. Mating preferences are not predictive of the direction of evolution in experimental populations of Drosophila. Science 213: 1405-1407.
103. Markow, T.A., 1991. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 45: 1525-1529.
104. Markow, T.A., J.C. Fogleman & W.B. Heed, 1983. Reproductive isolation in Sonoran Desert Drosophila. Evolution 37: 649-652.
105. Markow, T.A., M. Quaid & S. Kerr, 1978. Male mating experience and competitive courtship success in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 276: 821-822.
106. Markow, T.A. & E.C. Toolson, 1990. Temperature effects on epicuticular hydrocarbons and sexual isolation in Drosophila mojavensis, pp. 315-331 in Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila, edited by R.J. MacIntyre. Plenum Press, New York.
107. Marshall, C.R., H.A. Orr & N.H. Patel, 1999. Morphological innovation and developmental genetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 9995-9996.
108. Mead, L.S. & P.A. Verrell, 2002. Evolution of courtship behaviour patterns and reproductive isolation in the Desmognathus ochrophaeus complex. Ethology 108: 403-427.
109. Muller, H.J., 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6: 71-125.
110. Murphy, C.G., 1994. Determinants of chorus tenure in barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34: 285-294.
111. Newby, B.D. & W.J. Etges, 1998. Host preference among populations of Drosophila mojavensis that use different host cacti. J. Insect Behav. 11: 691-712.
112. Noor, M.A., 1995. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375: 674-675.
113. Noor, M.A.F., 1999. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83: 503-508.
114. Noor, M.A.F. & J.A. Coyne, 1996. Genetics of a difference in cuticular hydrocarbons between Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genet. Res. 68: 117-123.
115. Noor, M.A.F., K.L. Grams, L.A. Bertucci & J. Reiland, 2001. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 12084-12088.
116. Orr, H.A., 1992. Mapping and characterization of a speciation gene in Drosophila. Genet. Res. Camb. 59: 73-80.
117. Orr, H.A., 1998. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52: 935-949.
118. Panhuis, T.M., R. Butlin, M. Zuk & T. Tregenza, 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 364-371.
119. Paterson, H.E.H., 1993. Evolution and the Recognition Concept of Species: Collected Writings. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
120. Pfennig, K.S., 1998. The evolution of mate choice and the potential for conflict between species and mate-quality recognition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 1743-1748.
121. Phelan, P.L., 1997. Genetic and phylogenetics in the evolution of sex pheromones, pp. 563-579 in Insect pheromone research: new directions, edited by A.K. Minks. Chapman & Hall, New York.
122. Reinhold, K., 1998. Sex linkage among genes controlling sexually selected traits. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 44: 1-7.
123. Rice, W.R. & E.E. Hostert, 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47: 1637-1653.
124. Ritchie, M.G., 2000. The inheritance of female preference functions in a mate recognition system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 327-332.
125. Ritchie, M.G. & S.D.F. Phillips, 1998. The genetics of sexual isolation, pp. 291-308 in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, edited by S.H. Berlocher. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
126. Roelofs, W., T.G.C. Eckenrode, X.-H.T.C. Lofstedt, I.S.B.S. Hansson & P.R.B.O. Bengtsson, 1987. Sex pheromone production and perception in European corn borer moths is determined by both autosomal and sex-linked genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 7585-7589.
127. Ruiz, A., W.B. Heed & M. Wasserman, 1990. Evolution of the mojavensis cluster of cactophilic Drosophila with descriptions of two new species. J. Hered. 81: 30-42.
128. Ryan, M.J. & A.S. Rand, 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47: 647-657.
129. Ryan, M.J. & A.S. Rand, 1999. Phylogenetic influence on mating call preferences in female tungara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus. Anim. Behav. 57: 945-956.
130. Sætre, G.-P., T. Moum, S. Bures, M. Kral, M. Adamjan & J. Moreno, 1997. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387: 589-592.
131. Schemske, D.W. & H.D. Bradshaw Jr., 1999. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 11910-11915.
132. Schluter, D. & T. Price, 1993. Natural selection and parallel speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 197-200.
133. Schwartz, J.M., 1991. Effect of sexual experience on male mating success in Drosophila silvestris. Anim. Behav. 42: 1017-1019.
134. Seehausen, O. & J.J.M. van Alphen, 1998. The effect of male coloration on female mate choice in closely related Lake Victoria cichlids (Haplochromis nyererei complex). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42: 1-8.
135. Shaw, K.L., 1996. Polygenic inheritance of a behavioral phenotype: interspecific genetics of song in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. Evolution 50: 256-266.
136. Spiess, E.B., 1987. Discrimination among prospective mates in Drosophila, pp. 75-129 in Kin Recognition in Animals, edited by C.D. Michener. Wiley, New York.
137. Spiess, E.B. & L.D. Spiess, 1967. Mating propensity, chromosomal polymorphism, and dependent conditions in Drosophila persimilis. Evolution 21: 672-678.
138. Spieth, H.T. & J.M. Ringo, 1983. Mating behavior and sexual isolation in Drosophila, pp. 223-284 in The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, edited by J.N. Thompson. Academic Press, New York.
139. Stennett, M.D. & W.J. Etges, 1997. Pre-mating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. III. Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation is determined by use of different host plants in Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae. J. Chem. Ecol. 23: 2803-2824.
140. Takahashi, A., S.C. Tsaur, J.A. Coyne & C.I. Wu, 2001. The nucleotide changes governing cuticular hydrocarbon variation and their evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 3920-3925.
141. Tan, C.C., 1946. Genetics of sexual isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Genetics 31: 558-573.
142. Tanksley, S.D., 1993. Mapping polygenes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 27: 205-233.
143. Ting, C.T., A. Takahashi & C.I. Wu, 2001. Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila: concurrent evolution at multiple loci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 6709-6713.
144. Turner, G.F. & M.T. Burrows, 1995. A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260: 287-292.
145. Uy, J.A.C. & G. Borgia, 2000. Sexual selection drives rapid divergence in bowerbird display traits. Evolution 54: 273-278.
146. Veen, T., T. Borge, S.C. Griffith, G.-P. Sætre, S. Buresk, L. Gustafsson & B.C. Sheldon, 2001. Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers. Nature 411: 45-50.
147. Via, S., 1990. Ecological genetics and host adaptation in herbivorous insects: the experimental study of evolution in natural and agricultural systems. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35: 421-446.
148. Wasserman, M., 1992. Cytological evolution of the Drosophila repleta species group, pp. 455-552 in Drosophila Inversion Polymorphism, edited by J.R. Powell. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
149. Wasserman, M. & H.R. Koepfer, 1977. Character displacement for sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis. Evolution 31: 812-823.
150. Wasserman, M. & H.R. Koepfer, 1980. Does asymmetrical mating preference show the direction of evolution? Evolution 34: 1116-1124.
151. Welbergen, P., F.R. van Dijken, W. Scharloo & W. Kohler, 1992. The genetic basis of sexual isolation between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Evolution 46: 1385-1398.
152. Welch, A.M., R.D. Semlitsch & H.C. Gerhardt, 1998. Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. Science 280: 1928-1930.
153. Wood, T.K. & S.I. Guttman, 1983. The Enchenopa binotata complex: sympatric speciation? Science 220: 310-312.
154. Wood, T.K., K.J. Tilmon, A.B. Shantz, C.K. Harris & J. Pesek, 1999. The role of host-plant fidelity in initiating insect race formation. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1: 317-332.
155. Woolbright, L.L. & M.M. Stewart, 1987. Foraging success of the tropical frog Eleutherodactylus coqui: the cost of calling. Copiea 1987: 69-75.
156. Wu, C.-I., H. Hollocher, D.J. Begun, C.F. Aquadro, Y. Xu & M.-L. Wu, 1995. Sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: A possible case of incipient speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 2519-2523.
157. Wu. C.-I. & M.F. Palopoli, 1994. Genetics of postmating reproductive isolation in animals. Annu. Rev. Genet. 27: 283-308.
158. Yamamoto, D., M. Kasei, J.-M. Jallon & A. Komatsu, 1997. Genetic dissection of sexual behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42: 551-585.
159. Zouros, E., 1981. The chromosomal basis of sexual isolation in two sibling species of Drosophila: D. arizonensis and D. mojavensis. Genetics 97: 703-718.
160. Zouros, E. & C.J. d'Entremont, 1974. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis race B. Dros. Inf. Serv. 51: 112.
161. Zouros, E. & C.J. d'Entremont, 1980. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis: response to pressure from a related species. Evolution 34: 421-430.
162. Zouros, E., K. Lofdahl & P.A. Martin, 1988. Male hybrid sterility in Drosophila: interactions between autosomes and sex chromosomes in crosses of D. mojavensis and D. arizonensis. Evolution 42: 1321-1331.