Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. IV. Correlated responses in behavioral isolation to artificial selection on a life-history trait

American Naturalist

Volumn 152, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 129-144

  Etges, William J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Cactus; Drosophila; Premating isolation; Rearing substrates; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ISOLATED POPULATION; LARVAL REARING; LIFE-HISTORY TRAIT; PREMATING ISOLATION; SPECIATION; SUBSTRATE;

CACTACEAE; DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA MOJAVENSIS; DROSOPHILIDAE;

EID: 0031840227     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/286154     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alcorn, S. M., T. V. Orum, A. G. Steigerwalt, J. L. M. Foster, J. C. Fogleman and D. J. Brenner. 1991. Taxonomy and pathogenicity of Envinia cacticida sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 41:197-212.
2. Brazner, J. C. 1983. The influence of rearing environment on sexual isolation between populations of Drosophila tnojavensis: an alternative to the character displacement hypothesis. MS thesis. Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y.
3. Brazner, J. C., and W. J. Etges. 1993. Pre-mating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. II. Effects of larval substrates on time to copulation, mate choice, and mating propensity. Evolutionary Ecology 7:605-624.
4. Butlin, R. 1989. Reinforcement of premating isolation. Pages 158-179 in D. Otte and J. A. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
5. 1995. Genetic variation in mating signals and re-sponses. Pages 327-366 in D. M. Lambert and H. G. Spencer, eds. Speciation and the recognition concept: theory and application. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
6. Carson, H. L 1987. The contribution of sexual behavior to Darwinian fitness. Behavior Genetics 17:597-611.
7. 1995. Fitness and the sexual environment. Pages 123-137 in D. M. Lambert and H. G. Spencer, eds. Speciation and the recognition concept: theory and application. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
8. Cohan, F. M., and A. A. Huffman. 1989. Uniform selection as a diversifying force in evolution: evidence from Drosophila. American Naturalist 134:613-637.
9. Dobzhansky, T. 1940. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. American Naturalist 74:312-321.
10. Dobzhansky, T., O. Pavlovsky, and J. R. Powell. 1976. Partially successful attempt to enhance reproductive isolation between semispecies of Drosophila paulistorum. Evolution 30:201-212.
11. Downing, R. J. 1985. The chemical basis for host plant selection in Drosophila mojavensis. MS thesis. University of Denver, Denver.
12. Ehrman, L. 1965. Direct observation of sexual isolation between allopatric and sympatric strains of different Drosophila paulistorum races. Evolution 19:459-464.
13. Etges, W. J. 1989a. Divergence in cactophilic Drosophila: the evolutionary significance of adult ethanol metabolism. Evolution 43:1316-1319.
14. 1989b Evolution of developmental homeostasis in Drosophila mojavensis. Evolutionary Ecology 3:189-201.
15. 1990. Direction of life history evolution in Drosophila mojvensis. Pages 37-56 in J. S. F. Barker, W. T. Starmer, and R. J. Maclntyre, eds. Ecological and evolutionary genetics of Drosophila. Plenum, New York.
16. 1992. Premating isolation is determined by larval substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 46:1945-1950.
17. 1993. Genetics of host-cactus response and life-history evolution among ancestral and derived populations of cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 47:750-767.
18. Etges, W. J., and W. B. Heed. 1987. Sensitivity to larval density in populations of Drosophila mojavensis: influences of host plant variation on components of fitness. Oecologia (Berlin) 71:375-381.
19. Etges, W. J., and C. S. Klassen. 1989. Influences of atmospheric ethanol on adult Drosophila mojavensis: altered metabolic rates and increases in fitness among populations. Physiological Zoology 62:170-193.
20. Etges, W. J., W. R. Johnson, G. A. Duncan, G. Huckins, and W. B. Heed. 1998. Ecological genetics of cactophi-lie Drosophila. In R. Robichaux, ed. Ecology of Sonoran Desert plants and plant communities. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, in press.
21. Falconer, D. S. 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, New York.
22. Fellows, D. P., and W. B. Heed. 1972. Factors affecting host plant selection in desert-adapted cactophilic Drosophila. Ecology 53:850-858.
23. Fogleman, J. C., and W. T. Starmer. 1985. Analysis of community structure of yeasts associated with the decaying stems of cactus. HI. Stenocerens thurberi. Microbial Ecology 11:165-173.
24. Fraser, L, and C. R. B. Boake. 1997. Behavioral isolation, test designs, and Kaneshiro's hypothesis. American Naturalist 149:527-539.
25. Freund, R. J., and R. C. Littell. 1991. SAS system for regression. 2d ed. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C.
26. Gilbert, D. G., and W. T. Starmer. 1985. Statistics of sexual isolation. Evolution 39:1380-1383.
27. Hartley, H. O. 1950. The maximum F-ratio as a short cut test for heterogeneity of variances. Biometrika 37:308-312.
28. Heath, S. C., G. Bulfield, R. Thompson, and P. D. Keightley. 1995. Rates of change of genetic parameters of body weight in selected mouse lines. Genetic Research (Cambridge) 66:19-25.
29. Heed, W. B. 1982. The origin of Drosophila in the Sonoran Desert. Pages 65-80 in J. S. F. Barker and W. T. Starmer, eds. Ecological genetics and evolution: the cactus-yeast-Drosop/n/rt model system. Academic Press, Sydney.
30. Heed, W. B., and R. L. Mangan. 1986. Community ecology of the Sonoran Desert Drosophila. Pages 311-345 in M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson, and J. J. N. Thompson, eds. The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Vol. 3e. Academic Press, New York.
31. Hill, W. G. 1972. Estimation of genetic change. II. Experimental evaluation of control populations. Animal Breeding Abstracts 40:193-213.
32. Hostert, E. E. 1997. Reinforcement: a new perspective on an old controversy. Evolution 51:697-702.
33. Kessler, S. 1966. Selection for and against ethological isolation between Drosophila psendoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Evolution 20:634-645.
34. 1969. The genetics of Drosophila mating behavior. II. The genetic architecture of mating speed in Drosophila psendoobscura. Genetics 62:421-433.
35. Koepfer, H. R. 1987a. Selection for sexual isolation between geographic forms of Drosophila mojavensis. I. Interactions between the selected forms. Evolution 41: 37-48.
36. 1987b. Selection for sexual isolation between geographic forms of Drosophila mojavensis. II. Effects of selection on mating preference and propensity. Evolution 41:1409-1413.
37. Koopman, K. F. 1950. Natural selection for reproductive isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Evolution 4:135-148.
38. Krebs, R. A., and T. A. Markow. 1989. Courtship behavior and control of reproductive isolation in Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 43:908-912.
39. Malagolowkin-Cohen, C., A. S. Simmons, and H. Levene. 1965. A study of sexual isolation between certain strains of Drosophila paulistorum. Evolution 19:95-103.
40. Marin, I. 1991. Sexual isolation in Drosophila I. Theoretical models for multiple-choice experiments. Journal of Theoretical Biology 152:271-284.
41. Markow, T. A. 1982. Mating systems of cactophilic Drosophila. Pages 273-287 in J. S. F. Barker and W. T. Starmer, eds. Ecological genetics and evolution: the cactus-yeast-Drosophila model system. Academic Press, Sydney.
42. 1991. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 45:1525-1529.
43. Markow, T. A., and E. C. Toolson. 1990. Temperature effects on epicuticular hydrocarbons and sexual isolation in Drosophila mojavensis. Pages 315-331 in J. S. F. Barker, W. T. Starmer, and R. J. Maclntyre, eds. Ecological and evolutionary genetics of Drosophila. Plenum, New York.
44. Markow, T. A., J. C. Fogleman, and W. B. Heed. 1983. Reproductive isolation in Sonoran Desert Drosophila. Evolution 37:649-652.
45. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Belknap, Cambridge, Mass.
46. Muir, W. M. 1986. Estimation of response to selection and utilization of control populations for additional information and accuracy. Biometrics 42:381-391.
47. Muller, H. J. 1940. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biological Symposium 6:71-125.
48. Newby, B. D. 1996. Host preference among populations of Drosophila mojavensis that use different host cacti. MS thesis. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
49. Paterson, H. E. H. 1978. More evidence against speciation by reinforcement. South African Journal of Science 74:369-371.
50. 1980. A comment on "Mate Recognition Systems." Evolution 34:330-331.
51. 1993. Evolution and the recognition concept of species: collected writings. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
52. Pletcher, S. D., H. H. Fukui, and J. W. Curtsinger. 1997. Mating behavior in Drosophila melatnogaster selected for altered longevity. Evolution 51:303-307.
53. Rice, W. R., and E. E. Hostert. 1993. Laboratory experi-ments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47:1637-1653.
54. Ruiz, A., and W. B. Heed. 1988. Host plant specificity in the cactophilic Drosophila mulleri species complex. Journal of Animal Ecology 57:237-249.
55. Ruiz, A., W. B. Heed, and M. Wasserman. 1990. Evolution of the mojavensis cluster of cactophilic Drosophila with descriptions of two new species. Journal of Heredity 81:30-42.
56. SAS Institute. 1985. SAS user's guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.
57. Slatkin, M. 1982. Pleiotropy and parapatric speciation. Evolution 36:263-270.
58. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. W. H. Freeman, New York.
59. Starmer, W. T. 1982. Analysis of community structure of yeasts associated with the decaying stems of cactus. I. Stenocereus gumnosus. Microbial Ecology 8:71-81.
60. Stennett, M. D., and W. J. Etges. 1997. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. III. Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation is determined by use of different host plants in Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 23:2803-2824.
61. Toolson, E. C., T. A. Markow, L. L. Jackson, and R. W. Howard. 1990. Epicuticular hydrocarbon composition of wild and laboratory-reared Drosophila mojavensis Patterson and Crow (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 83:1165-1176.
62. Wasserman, M., and H. R. Koepfer. 1977. Character displacement for sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis. Evolution 31:812-823.
63. 1980. Does asymmetrical mating preference show the direction of evolution? Evolution 34:1116-1124.
64. Yule, G. U. 1912. On the methods of measuring association between two attributes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 75:579-642.
65. Zouros, E., and C. J. D'Entremont. 1974. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis race B. Drosophila Information Service 51:112.
66. 1980. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis: response to pressure from a related species. Evolution 34:421-430.