Phenotypic Plasticity and Repeatability in the Mating Signals of Enchenopa Treehoppers, with Implications for Reduced Gene Flow among Host-Shifted Populations

Ethology

Volumn 109, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 981-994

  Sattman, Danielle A ^a   Cocroft, Reginald B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSORTATIVE MATING; GENE FLOW; HOST SELECTION; MATING BEHAVIOR; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PLANTHOPPER; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SIGNALING; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ARCHAEORRHYNCHA; AVES; ENCHENOPA; ENCHENOPA BINOTATA; HEMIPTERA; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; MEMBRACIDAE;

EID: 0345768853     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00940.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Andersson, M. 1994: Sexual Selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Aragaki, D.L.R & Meffert, L.M. 1998: A test of how well the repeatability of courtship predicts its heritability. Anim. Behav. 55, 1141-1150.
3. Beck, C. W. & Powell, L. A. 2000: Evolution of female mate choice based on age: are older males better mates? Evol. Ecol. Res. 2, 107-118.
4. Becker, W. A. 1984: Manual of Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, WA, USA.
5. Boake, C. R. B. 1989: Repeatability: its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior. Evol. Ecol. 3, 173-182.
6. Bush, G. L. 1992: Host race formation and sympatric speciation in Rhagoletis fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Psyche 99, 335-358.
7. Cocroft, R. B. 2003: The social environment of an aggregating, ant-attended treehopper, Vanduzea arquata. J. Insect Behav. 16, 79-95.
8. De Luca, P. A. & Morris, G. K. 1998: Courtship communication in meadow katydids: female preference for large male vibrations. Behaviour 135, 777-794.
9. Dohm, M. R. 2002: Repeatability estimates do not always set an upper limit to heritability. Funct. Ecol. 16, 273-280.
10. Ewing, A. W. 1989: Arthropod Bioacoustics: Neurobiology and Behavior. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.
11. Fisher, R. A. 1958: The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection 2nd edn. Dover Publ., Inc. New York, USA.
12. Gerhardt, H. C. & Huber, F. 2002: Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
13. Guttman, S. I. & Weigt, L. A. 1989: Geographic variation in the Enchenopa binotata complex. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 82, 156-165.
14. Guttman, S. I., Wilson, T. & Weigt, L. A. 1989: Microgeographic genetic variation in the Enchenopa binotata complex (Homoptera: Membracidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 82, 225-231.
15. Higashi, M., Takimoto, G. & Yamamura, N. 1999: Sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Nature 402, 523-526.
16. Higgie, M., Chenoweth, S. & Blows, M. W. 2000: Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290, 519-521.
17. Hunt, R. E. 1994: Vibrational signals associated with mating behavior in the treehopper, Enchenopa binotata Say (Hemiptera: Homoptera: Membracidae). J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 102, 266-270.
18. Hunt, R. E. & Nault, L. R. 1991: Roles of interplant movement, acoustic communication, and phototaxis in mate-location behavior of the leafhopper Graminella nigrifrons. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28, 315-320.
19. Jia, F.-Y., Greenfield, M. D. & Collins, R. D. 2000: Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in waxmoths: maintenance by genotype x environment interaction. Evolution 54, 953-967.
20. Johnson, P. A. & Gullberg, U. 1998: Theory and models of sympatric speciation. In: Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (Howard, D. J. & Berlocher, S. H., eds). Oxford Univ. Press, New York, pp. 79-89.
21. Kaneshiro, K. Y. & Boake, C. R. 1987: Sexual selection and speciation: issues raised by Hawaiian Drosophila. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2, 207-212.
22. Kokko, H. & Lindstrom, J. 1996: Evolution of female preference for old mates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 1533-1538.
23. Kondrashov, A. S., Yampolsky, L. Y. & Shabalina S. A. 1998: On the sympatric origin of species by means of natural selection. In: Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (Howard, D. J. & Berlocher, S. H., eds). Oxford Univ. Press, New York, pp. 90-98.
24. Lande, R. 1981: Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 3721-3725.
25. Lesna, I. & Sabelis, M. W. 1999: Diet-dependent female choice for males with "good genes" in a soil predatory mite. Nature 401, 581-584.
26. Lessells, C. M. & Boag, P. T. 1987: Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104, 116-121.
27. Lin, C. P. & Wood, T. K. 2001: Molecular phylogeny of the North American Enchenopa binotata species complex (Homoptera: Membracidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 95, 162-171.
28. Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W. & Wolfinger, R. D. 1996: SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
29. Lynch, M. & Walsh J. B. 1998: Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Association, Sunderland, MA.
30. Markl, H. 1983: Vibrational communication. In: Neuroethology and Behavioral Physiology (Huber, F. & Markl, H., eds). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 332-353.
31. Martins, E. 1991: Individual and sex differences in the use of the push-up display by the sagebrush lizard, Sceloporus graciosus. Anim. Behav. 41, 403-416.
32. Maynard Smith, J. 1966: Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100, 637-650.
33. Mayr, E. 1963: Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. Michelsen, A., Fink, F., Gogala, M. & Traue, D. 1982: Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11, 269-281.
35. Qvarnstrom, A., Part, T. & Sheldon, B. C. 2000: Adaptive plasticity in mate preference linked to differences in reproductive effort. Nature 405, 344-347.
36. Ritchie, M. G., Couzin, I. D. & Snedden, W. A. 1995: What's in a song? Female bushcrickets discriminate against the song of older males. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 262, 21-27.
37. Rivero, A., Alatalo, R. V., Kotiaho, J. S., Mappes, J. & Parri, S. 2000: Acoustic signaling in a wolf spider: can signal characteristics predict male quality? Anim. Behav. 60, 187-194.
38. Rodriguez, R. L. & Greenfield, M. D. 2003: Genetic variance and phenotypic plasticity in a component of female mate choice in an ultrasonic moth. Evolution 57, 1309-1313.
39. Rodriguez, R. L., Sullivan, L. E. & Cocroft, R. B. in press: Vibrational communication and reproductive isolation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae). Evolution (in press).
40. Ryan, M. J. & Keddy-Hector, A. 1992: Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. Am. Nat. 139, S4-S35.
41. Schluter, D. 1998: Ecological causes of speciation. In: Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (Howard, D. J. & Berlocher, S. H., eds). Oxford Univ. Press, New York, pp. 114-129.
42. Seehausen, O., van Alphen, J. J. M & Witte, F. 1997: Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selction. Science 277, 1808-1811.
43. Simmons, L. W. 1995: Correlates of male quality in the field cricket, Gryllus campestris L.: age, size, and symmetry determine pairing success in field populations. Behav. Ecol. 6, 376-381.
44. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. 1995: Biometry. Freeman, New York.
45. Tilmon, K. J., Wood, T. K. & Pesek, J. D. 1998: Genetic variation in performance traits and the potential for host shifts in Enchenopa treehoppers (Homoptera: Membracidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 91, 397-403.
46. Turner, G. F. & Burrows, M. T. 1995: A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260, 287-292.
47. West Eberhard, M. J. 1983: Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58, 155-183.
48. Wood, T. K. 1980: Divergence in the Enchenopa binotata Say complex (Homoptera: Membracidae) effected by host plant adaptation. Evolution 34, 147-160.
49. Wood, T. K. 1993: Speciation of the Enchenopa binotata complex (Insecta: Homoptera: Membracidae). In: Evolutionary Patterns and Processes (Lees, D. R. & Edwards, D., eds). Academic Press, New York, pp. 299-317.
50. Wood, T. K. & Guttman, S. I. 1981: The role of host plants in the speciation of treehoppers: an example from the Enchenopa binotata complex. In: Insect Life History Patterns: Habitat and Geographic Variation (Denno, R. F. & Dingle, H., eds). Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 39-54.
51. Wood, T. K. & Guttman, S. I. 1982: Ecological and behavioral basis for reproductive isolation in the sympatric Enchenopa binotata complex (Homoptera: Membracidae). Evolution 36, 233-242.
52. Wood, T. K. & Guttman, S. I. 1983: Enchenopa binotata complex: sympatric speciation? Science 220, 310-312.
53. Wood, T. K. & Keese, M. C. 1990: Host plant induced assortative mating in Enchenopa treehoppers. Evolution 44, 619-628.
54. Wood, T. K., Olmstead, K. L. & Guttman, S. I. 1990: Insect phenology mediated by host-plant water relations. Evolution 44, 629-636.
55. Wood, T. K., Tilmon, K. J., Shantz, A. B., Harris, C. K. & Pesek, J. 1999: The role of host-plant fidelity in initiating insect race formation. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1, 317-332.