Reinforcement: The road not taken

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 17, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 558-563

  Marshall, Jeremy L ^a   Arnold, Michael L ^b   Howard, Daniel J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^b Life Sciences Building ^*  (United States)

^c NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL SELECTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

EID: 0036889134     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02636-8     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Darwin C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. 1859;John Murray.
2. Dobzhansky T. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 74:1940;312-321.
3. Blair W.F. Mating call and stage of speciation in the Microhyla olivacea - M. carolinensis complex. Evolution. 9:1955;469-480.
4. Moore J.A. An embryologist's view of the species concept. Mayr E., The Species Problem. 1957;325-388 American Association for the Advancement of Science.
5. Bigelow R.S. Hybrid zones and reproductive isolation. Evolution. 19:1965;449-458.
6. Walker T.J. Character displacement and acoustic insects. Am. Zool. 114:1974;1137-1150.
7. Spencer H.G., et al. A theoretical investigation of speciation by reinforcement. Am. Nat. 128:1986;241-262.
8. Butlin R. Reinforcement of premating isolation. Otte D., Endler J.A., Speciation and its Consequences. 1989;158-179 Sinauer.
9. Littlejohn M.J. Premating isolation in the Hyla ewingi complex (Anura: Hylidae). Evolution. 19:1965;234-243.
10. Jones J.M. Effects of thirty years of hybridization on the toads Bufo americanus and Bufo woodhousii fowleri at Bloomington, Indiana. Evolution. 27:1973;435-448.
11. Stebbins G.L., Daly K. Changes in the variation pattern of a hybrid population of Helianthus over an eight-year period. Evolution. 15:1961;60-71.
12. Turelli M., et al. Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:2001;330-343.
13. Coyne J.A., Orr H.A. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution. 43:1989;362-381.
14. Howard D.J. Reinforcement: origins, dynamics, and the fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Harrison R.G., Hybrid Zones and Evolutionary Process. 1993;46-69 Oxford University Press.
15. Dieckmann U., Doebeli M. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature. 400:1999;354-357.
16. Kirkpatrick M., Ravigné V. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159:2002;S22-S35.
17. Noor M.A.F. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature. 375:1995;674-675.
18. Higgie M., et al. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science. 290:2000;519-521.
19. Sætre G.P., et al. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature. 387:1997;589-592.
20. Rundle H.D., Schluter D. Reinforcement of stickleback mating preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution. 52:1998;200-208.
21. Jiggins C.D., et al. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature. 411:2001;302-305.
22. Cooley J.R., et al. Allochronic speciation, secondary contact, and reproductive character displacement in periodical cicadas (Hemiptera: Magicicada spp.): genetic, morphological, and behavioural evidence. Mol. Ecol. 10:2001;661-671.
23. Noor M.A.F. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity. 83:1999;503-508.
24. Howard, D.J. et al. Evolution in hybrid zones. In The Evolution of Population Biology - Modern Synthesis. (Singh, R.S., ed.), Cambridge University Press (in press)
25. Sanderson N., et al. Variation in mating call across the hybrid zone between the fire-bellied toads Bombina bomina and B. variegata. Evolution. 46:1992;595-607.
26. Doherty J.A., Howard D.J. Lack of preference for conspecific calling songs in female crickets. Anim. Behav. 51:1996;981-989.
27. Butlin R. What do hybrid zones in general and the Chorthippus parallelus zone in particular, tell us about speciation? Howard D.J., Berlocher S.H., Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. 1998;367-389 Oxford University Press.
28. Felsenstein J. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals. Evolution. 35:1981;124-138.
29. Sanderson N. Can gene flow prevent reinforcement? Evolution. 43:1989;1123-1235.
30. Liou L.W., Price T.D. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution. 48:1994;1451-1459.
31. Kelly J.K., Noor M.A.F. Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila. Genetics. 143:1996;1485-1497.
32. Servedio M.R., Kirkpatrick M. The effects of gene flow on reinforcement. Evolution. 51:1997;1764-1772.
33. Cain M.L., et al. Reinforcing selection is effective under a relatively broad set of conditions in a mosaic hybrid zone. Evolution. 53:1999;1343-1353.
34. Kirkpatrick M. Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 267:2000;1649-1655.
35. Kirkpatrick M., Servedio M.R. The reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. Genetics. 151:1999;865-884.
36. Howard D.J. Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:1999;109-132.
37. Andersson M. Sexual Selection. 1994;Princeton University Press.
38. Arnold M.L. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. 1997;Oxford University Press.
39. Gerhardt H.C. Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the gray treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim. Behav. 47:1994;959-969.
40. Patton J.L., et al. Hybrid zones in Thomomys bottae pocket gophers: genetic, phenetic, and ecologic concordance patterns. Evolution. 33:1979;860-876.
41. Parker G.A., Partridge L. Sexual conflict and speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 353:1998;261-274.
42. Bella J.L. Asymmetrical homogamy and unequal sex-ratio from reciprocal mating-order crosses between Chorthippus parallelus subspecies. Heredity. 68:1992;345-352.
43. Gregory P.G., Howard D.J. A post-insemination barrier to fertilization isolates two closely related ground crickets. Evolution. 48:1994;705-710.
44. Veen T., et al. Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers. Nature. 411:2001;45-50.
45. Vacquier V.D., et al. Species-specific sequences of abalone sperm lysine, the sperm protein that creates a hole in the egg envelope. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87:1990;5792-5796.
46. Lee Y.-H., et al. Positive selection is a general phenomenon in the evolution of abalone sperm lysin. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;231-238.
47. Vacquier V.D., Lee Y.-H. Abalone sperm lysin: unusual mode of evolution of a gamete recognition protein. Zygote. 1:1993;181-196.
48. Kresge N., et al. The high resolution crystal structure of green abalone sperm lysin: implications for species-specific binding of the egg receptor. J. Mol. Biol. 296:2000;1225-1234.
49. Ritchie M.G., et al. Assortative mating across a hybrid zone in Chorthippus parallelus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). J. Evol. Biol. 2:1989;339-352.
50. Nakano S. Effect of interspecific mating on female fitness in two closely related ladybirds (Henosepilachna). Kontyû 53:1985;112-119.
51. Metz E.C., et al. Fertilization between closely related sea urchins is blocked by incompatibilities during sperm-egg attachment and early stages of fusion. Biol. Bull. 187:1994;23-34.
52. Howard D.J., et al. The evolution of barriers to fertilization between closely related organisms. Howard D.J., Berlocher S.H., Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. 1998;279-290 Oxford University Press.
53. Hewitt G.M., et al. Sperm precedence and homogamy across a hybrid zone in the alpine grasshopper Podisma pedestris. Heredity. 62:1989;343-353.
54. Hewitt G.M. Divergence and speciation as viewed from an insect hybrid zone. Can. J. Zool. 68:1990;1701-1715.
55. Williams J.H. Jr, et al. Developmental selection within the angiosperm style: using gamete DNA to visualize interspecific pollen competition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;9201-9206.
56. Hauser T.P., et al. Preferential exclusion of hybrids in mixed pollinations between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. campestris (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84:1997;756-762.
57. Smith E.B. Pollen competition and relatedness in Haplopappus section Isopappus (Compositae). II. Am. J. Bot. 57:1970;874-880.
58. Heiser C.B. Jr, et al. The North American sunflowers (Helianthus). Mem. Torrey Bot. Club. 22:1969;1-213.
59. Rieseberg L.H. Interspecific pollen competition as a reproductive barrier between sympatric species of Helianthus (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 82:1995;515-519.
60. Klips R.A. Pollen competition as a reproductive isolating mechanism between two sympatric Hibiscus species (Malvaceae). Am. J. Bot. 86:1999;269-272.
61. Alarcon R., Campbell D.R. Absence of conspecific pollen advantage in the dynamics of an Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) hybrid zone. Am. J. Bot. 87:2000;819-824.
62. Carney S.E., et al. Reproductive interactions between hybridizing irises: analyses of pollen tube growth and fertilization success. Am. J. Bot. 81:1994;1169-1175.
63. Emms S.K., et al. Pollen-tube competition, siring success, and consistent asymmetric hybridization in Louisiana Irises. Evolution. 50:1996;2201-2206.
64. Kiang Y.T., Hamrick J.L. Reproductive isolation in the Mimulus guttatus - M. nasutus complex. Am. Midl. Nat. 100:1978;269-276.
65. Wang J., Cruzan M.B. Interspecific mating in the Piriqueta caroliniana (Turneraceae) complex: effects of pollen load size and composition. Am. J. Bot. 85:1998;1172-1179.