Divergence in female duetting signals in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae)

Ethology

Volumn 112, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1231-1238

  Rodríguez, Rafael L ^a   Cocroft, Reginald B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR; DIVERGENCE; INSECT; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SIGNALING;

ENCHENOPA BINOTATA; HEMIPTERA; MEMBRACIDAE;

EID: 33751255057     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01285.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bailey, W. J. 2003: Insect duets: underlying mechanisms and their evolution. Physiol. Entomol. 28, 157-174.
2. Bailey, W. J. & Hammond, T. J. 2003: Duetting in insects - does call length influence reply latency? J. Zool. 260, 267-274.
3. Claridge, M. F. 1985: Acoustic signals in the homoptera: behavior, taxonomy and evolution. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 30, 297-317.
4. Claridge, M. F. & de Vrijer, P. W. F. 1994: Reproductive behavior: the role of acoustic signals in species recognition and speciation. In: Planthoppers. Their Ecology and Management (Denno, R. F. & Perfect, T. J., eds). Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 216-233.
5. Cocroft, R. B. 1996: Insect vibrational defence signals. Nature 382, 679-680.
6. Cocroft, R. B. & Rodríguez, R. L. 2005: The behavioral ecology of insect vibrational communication. BioScience 55, 323-334.
7. Cocroft, R. B.; Rodríguez, R. L. & Hunt, R. E. 2007: Host shifts, the evolution of communication and speciation in the Enchenopa binotata complex of treehoppers. In: Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation: The Evolutionary Biology of Herbivorous Insects (Tilmon, K, ed). University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. In press.
8. Cocroft, R. B., Shugart, H. J., Konrad, K. T. & Tibbs, K. 2006: Variation in plant substrates and its consequences for insect vibrational communication. Ethology 112, 779-789.
9. Cohen, J. 1988: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
10. De Winter, A. J. & Rollenhagen, T. 1993: Differences in preference for species-specific female calls between acoustically experienced and acoustically naive male Ribautodelphax planthoppers (Homoptera: Delphacidae). J. Insect Behav. 6, 411-419.
11. Gerhardt, H. C. & Huber, F. 2002: Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
12. Greenfield, M. D. 2002: Signalers and Receivers. Mechanisms and Evolution of Arthropod Communication. Oxford University Press, New York.
13. Hall, M. L. 2004: A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55, 415-430.
14. Henry, C. S. 1994: Singing and cryptic speciation in insects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 388-392.
15. Henry, C. S. & Wells, M. L. M. 2004: Adaptation or random change? The evolutionary response of songs to substrate properties in lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Anim. Behav. 68, 879-895.
16. Henry, C. S., Brooks, S. J., Duelli, P. & Johnson, J. B. 2002: Discovering the true Chrysoperla carnea (Insecta: Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) using song analysis, morphology, and ecology. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 95, 172-191.
17. Hunt, R. E. 1994: Vibrational signals associated with mating behavior in the treehopper, Enchenopa binotata Say (Hemiptera: Homoptera: Membracidae). J. NY Entomol. Soc. 102, 266-270.
18. Ichikawa, T.; Sakuma, M. & Ishii, S. 1975: Substrate vibrations: mating signal of three species of planthoppers which attack the rice plant (Homoptera: Delphacidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 10, 162-171.
19. Lin, C. P. & Wood, T. K. 2002: Molecular phylogeny of the North American Enchenopa binotata species complex (Homoptera: Membracidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 95, 162-171.
20. Lloyd, J. E. 1966: Studies on the flash communication system in Photinus fireflies. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 130, 1-95.
21. Michelsen, A., Fink, F., Gogala, M. & Traue, D. 1982: Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11, 269-281.
22. Miklas, N., Cokl, A., Renou, M. & Virant-Doberlet, M. 2003: Variability of vibratory signals and mate choice selectivity in the southern green stink bug. Behav. Process. 61, 131-142.
23. Rodríguez, R. L., Sullivan, L. E. & Cocroft, R. B. 2004: Vibrational communication and reproductive isolation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae). Evolution 58, 571-578.
24. Rodríguez, R. L., Ramaswamy, K. & Cocroft, R. B. 2006: Evidence that female preferences have shaped male signal evolution in a clade of specialized plant-feeding insects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. In press.
25. Sattman, D. A. & Cocroft, R. B. 2003: Phenotypic plasticity and repeatability in the mating signals of Enchenopa treehoppers, with implications for reduced gene flow among host-shifted populations. Ethology 109, 981-994.
26. Stewart, K. W. 1997: Vibrational communication in insects. Epitome in the langauge of stoneflies? Am. Entomol. 43, 81-91.
27. Virant-Doberlet, M. & Cokl, A. 2004: Vibrational communication in insects. Neotrop. Entomol. 33, 121-134.
28. Wells, M. L. M. & Henry, C. S. 1998: Songs, reproductive isolation, and speciation in cryptic species of insects. In: Endless Forms (Howard, D. J. & Berlocher, S. H., eds). Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 217-233.
29. Wood, T. K. 1993: Speciation of the Enchenopa binotata complex (Insecta: Homoptera: Membracidae). In: Evolutionary Patterns and Processes (Lees, D. R. & Edwards, D., eds). Academic Press, New York, pp. 299-317.
30. Wood, T. K. & Guttman, S. I. 1983: Enchenopa binotata complex: sympatric speciation? Science 220, 310-312.
31. Zar, J. H. 1999: Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.