Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation

Nature

Volumn 400, Issue 6742, 1999, Pages 351-354

  Kondrashov, Alexey S ^a   Kondrashov, Fyodor A ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b Simon's Rock College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY;

ARTICLE; GEOMETRY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; PERCHES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0033595199     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/22514     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Mina, M. V., Mironovsky, A. N. & Dgebuadze, Y. Y. Lake Tana large barbs: phenetics, growth and diversification. J. Fish Biol. 48, 383-404 (1996).
2. Berrebi, P. & Valiushok, D. Genetic divergence among morphotypes of Lake Tana (Ethiopia) barbs. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 64, 369-384 (1998).
3. Schliewen, U. K., Tautz, D. & Paabo, S. Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of crater lake cichlids. Nature 368, 629-632 (1994).
4. Johnson, T. C. et al. Late pleistocene desiccation of Lake Victoria and rapid evolution of cichlid fishes. Science 273, 1091-1093 (1996).
5. Ritchie, M. G. & Phillips, S. D. F. in Endless Forms: Species ana Speciation (eds Howard, D. I. & Berlocher, S. H.) 291-308 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1998).
6. Kondrashov, A. S. & Mina, M. V. Sympatric speciation: when is it possible? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 27, 201-223 (1986).
7. Kondrashov, A. S. On the intensity of selection for reproductive isolation at the beginnings of sympatric speciation. Genetika 20, 408-415 (1984).
8. Barton, N. H. On the spread of new gene combinations in the third phase of Wright's shifting-balance. Evolution 46, 551-557 (1992).
9. Doebeli, M. A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 9, 893-909 (1996).
10. Shpak, M. & Kondrashov, A. S. Applicability of the hypergeometric phenotypic model to haploid and diploid populations. Evolution 53, 600-604 (1999).
11. Darwin, C. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (Murray, London, 1859).
12. Kondrashov, A. S. & Shpak, M. On the origin of species by means of assortative mating. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 2273-2278 (1998).
13. Wallace, A. R. Darwinism. (Macmillan, London, 1889).
14. Rice, W. R. Disruptive selection of habitat preference and the evolution of reproductive isolation: a simulation study. Evolution 38, 1251-1260 (1984).
15. Kondrashov, A. S. Multilocus model of sympatric speciation. III. Computer simulations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 29, 1-15 (1986).
16. Maynard Smith, J. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100, 637-650 (1966).
17. Rice, W. R. & Hostert, E. E. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47, 1637-1653 (1993).
18. Kondrashov, A. S., Yampolsky, L. Yu. & Shabalina, S. A. in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (eds Howard, D. J. & Berlocher, S. H.) 90-98 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1998).
19. Felsenstein, J. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35, 124-138 (1981).
20. Karlin, S. General two-locus selection models: some objectives, results and interpretations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7, 364-398 (1975).
21. Turner, G. F. & Burrows, M. T. A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260, 287-292 (1995).
22. Galis, F. & Metz, J. A. J. Why are there so many cichlid species? Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 1-2 (1998).
23. van Doom, G. S., Noest, A. J. & Hogeweg, P. Sympatric speciation and extinction driven by environment dependent sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1915-1919 (1998).
24. Axelrod, H. R. The Most Complete Colored Lexicon of Cichlids (TFH Publications, Neptune City, 1996).
25. Seehausen, O., van Alphen, J. J. M. & Witte, F. Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277, 1808-1811 (1997).
26. Seehausen, O. & van Alphen, J. J. M. The effect of male coloration on female mate choice in closely related Lake Victoria cichlids (Haplochromis nyererei complex). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42, 1-8 (1998).
27. Lewontin, R. C., Kirk, D. & Crow, J. F. Selective mating, assortative mating and inbreding: definitions and implications. Eugen. Quart. 15, 141-143 (1966).