FloTrac/Vigileo system monitoring in acute-care surgery: Current and future trends

Expert Review of Medical Devices

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 717-728

  Tsai, Yung Fong ^a,b,c   Liu, Fu Chao ^a,b   Yu, Huang Ping ^a,b  

^a CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Taiwan)

^c CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

cardiac output; FloTrac system; fluid responsiveness; less invasiveness; stroke volume variation; third generation

Indexed keywords

CARDIAC OUTPUT; FLOTRAC SYSTEM; FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; INVASIVENESS; STROKE VOLUME VARIATIONS; THIRD GENERATION;

EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; HEMODYNAMICS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; PATIENT TREATMENT;

CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY;

DOBUTAMINE; HYPERTENSIVE FACTOR; NORADRENALIN; PHENYLEPHRINE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MONITORING DEVICE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; DRUG MEGADOSE; EMERGENCY SURGERY; FLUID THERAPY; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; PULSE WAVE; RELIABILITY; STROKE VOLUME VARIATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; WAVEFORM;

ALGORITHMS; CARDIAC OUTPUT; HUMANS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;

EID: 84887662273     PISSN: 17434440     EISSN: 17452422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2013.844464     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Eissa D, Carton EG, Buggy DJ. Anaesthetic management of patients with severe sepsis. Br. J. Anaesth. 105(6), 734-743 (2010
2. Bhananker SM, Ramamoorthy C, Geiduschek JM et al. Anesthesia-related cardiac arrest in children: Update from the Pediatric Perioperative Cardiac Arrest Registry. Anesth. Analg. 105(2), 344-350( 2007
3. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth. Analg. 112(6), 1392-1402 (2011
4. Brown JM. Use of echocardiography for hemodynamic monitoring. Crit. Care Med. 30(6), 1361-1364 (2002
5. Cholley BP, Singer M. Esophageal Doppler: Noninvasive cardiac output monitor. Echocardiography 20(8), 763-769 (2003
6. Nusmeier A, van Der Hoeven JG, Lemson J. Cardiac output monitoring in pediatric patients. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 7(4), 503-517 (2010
7. Bendjelid K. When to recalibrate the PiCCOsystem? From a physiological point of view, the answer is simple. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 53(5), 689-690 (2009
8. Beattie C, Moores C, Thomson AJ, Nimmo AF. The effect of anaesthesia and aortic clamping on cardiac output measurement using arterial pulse power analysis during aortic aneurysm repair. Anaesthesia 65(12), 1194-1199 (2010
9. Hadian M, Kook Kim H, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit. Care 14(6), R212 (2010
10. Mayer J, Boldt J, Poland R, Peterson A, Manecke GR Jr. Continuous arterial pressure waveform-based cardiac output using the FloTrac/Vigileo: A review and meta-analysis. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 23(3), 401-406 (2009
11. Conway DH, Hussain OA, Gall I. A comparison of noninvasive bioreactance with oesophageal Doppler estimation of stroke volume during open abdominal surgery: An observational study. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. doi:10.1097/EJA. 0b013e3283603250 (2013)( Epub ahead of print
12. Fagnoul D, Vincent JL, Backer DD. Cardiac output measurements using the bioreactance technique in critically ill patients. Crit. Care 16(6), 460 (2012
13. Marqué S, Cariou A, Chiche JD, Squara P. Comparison between Flotrac-Vigileo and Bioreactance, a totally noninvasive method for cardiac output monitoring. Crit. Care 13(3), R73 (2009
14. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review of the literature. Crit. Care Med. 37(9), 2642-2647 (2009
15. Zhang Z, Lu B, Sheng X, Jin N. Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Anesth. 25(6), 904-916( 2011
16. Montenij LJ, De Waal EE, Buhre WF. Arterial waveform analysis in anesthesia and critical care. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 24(6), 651-656 (2011
17. Renner J, Gruenewald M, Meybohm P et al. Effect of elevated PEEP on dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in a pediatric animal model. Paediatr. Anaesth. 18(12), 1170-1177 (2008
18. Benes J, Chytra I, Altmann P et al. Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: Results of prospective randomized study. Crit. Care 14(3), R118 (2010
19. Scheeren TW, Wiesenack C, Gerlach H, Marx G. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid therapy guided by stroke volume and its variation in high-risk surgical patients: A prospective randomized multicentre study. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 27(3), 225-233( 2013) (Epub ahead of print
20. Ramsingh DS, Sanghvi C, Gamboa J, Cannesson M, Applegate RL 2nd. Outcome impact of goal directed fluid therapy during high risk abdominal surgery in low to moderate risk patients: A randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 27(3), 249-257 (2012) (Epub ahead of print
21. Lichtenstein D. Lung ultrasound in acute respiratory failure an introduction to the BLUE-protocol. Minerva Anestesiol. 75(5), 313-317 (2009
22. Cecconi M, Monti G, Hamilton MA et al. Efficacy of functional hemodynamic parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness with pulse power analysis in surgical patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 78(5), 527-533( 2012
23. Khwannimit B, Bhurayanontachai R. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: Comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 29(2), 64-69 (2012
24. Cannesson M, Tran NP, Cho M, Hatib F, Michard F. Predicting fluid responsiveness with stroke volume variation despite multiple extrasystoles. Crit. Care Med. 40(1), 193-198 (2012
25. Vasdev S, Chauhan S, Choudhury M, Hote MP, Malik M, Kiran U. Arterial pressure waveform derived cardiac output FloTrac/Vigileo system (third generation software): Comparison of two monitoring sites with the thermodilution cardiac output. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 26(2), 115-120( 2012
26. De Backer D, Marx G, Tan A et al. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: A multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 37(2), 233-240 (2011
27. Teng S, Kaufman J, Pan Z, Czaja A, Shockley H, da Cruz E. Continuous arterial pressure waveform monitoring in pediatric cardiac transplant, cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hypertension patients. Intensive Care Med. 37(8), 1297-1301 (2011
28. Fakler U, Pauli Ch, Balling G et al. Cardiac index monitoring by pulse contour analysis and thermodilution after pediatric cardiac surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 133(1), 224-228 (2007
29. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476), 307-310 (1986
30. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 15(2), 85-91 (1999
31. Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, Della RG, Grounds RM. Bench-to-bedside review: The importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies-with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit. Care 13(1), 201 (2009
32. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth. Analg. 111(5), 1180-1192 (2010
33. Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, Genoni M, Zollinger A, Hofer CK. Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br. J. Anaesth. 99(3), 329-336 (2007
34. Mutoh T, Ishikawa T, Nishino K, Yasui N. Evaluation of the FloTrac uncalibrated continuous cardiac output system for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring after subarachnoid hemorrhage. J. Neurosurg. Anesthesiol. 21(3), 218-225 (2009
35. Mutoh T, Ishikawa T, Kobayashi S, Suzuki A, Yasui N. Performance of Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system during hyperdynamic therapy for delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Surg. Neurol. Int. 3, 99 (2012
36. Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, van Hout N. Measurement of cardiac output: A comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br. J. Anaesth. 99(3), 337-342 (2007
37. Krejci V, Vannucci A, Abbas A, Chapman W, Kangrga IM. Comparison of calibrated and uncalibrated arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitors during orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 16(6), 773-782 (2010
38. Biancofiore G, Critchley LA, Lee A et al. Evaluation of a new software version of the FloTrac/Vigileo (version 3.02) and a comparison with previous data in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplant surgery. Anesth. Analg. 113(3), 515-522 (2011
39. Tsai YF, Su BC, Lin CC, Liu FC, Lee WC, Yu HP. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis: Validation of the third-generation software in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 44(2), 433-437 (2012
40. Broch O, Renner J, Gruenewald M et al. A comparison of third-generation semiinvasive arterial waveform analysis with thermodilution in patients undergoing coronary surgery. Scientific World Journal 2012, 451081 (2012
41. Mahjoub Y, Lakhdari M, Lorne E et al. Assessment of an uncalibrated pressure waveform device's ability to track cardiac output changes due to norepinephrine dose adjustments in patients with septic shock: A comparison with Doppler echocardiography. Ann. Fr. Anesth. Reanim. 31(9), 677-681 (2012
42. Su BC, Tsai YF, Chen CY et al. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing liver transplantation: Validity of a third-generation device. Transplant. Proc. 44(2), 424-428 (2012
43. Monnet X, Anguel N, Jozwiak M, Richard C, Teboul JL. Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo does not reliably track changes in cardiac output induced by norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Br. J. Anaesth. 108(4), 615-622 (2012
44. Meng L, Tran NP, Alexander BS et al. The impact of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and increased preload on third-generation Vigileo-FloTrac and esophageal Doppler cardiac output measurements. Anesth. Analg. 113(4), 751-757 (2011
45. Metzelder S, Coburn M, Fries M et al. Performance of cardiac output measurement derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy. Br. J. Anaesth. 106(6), 776-784 (2011
46. Slagt C, De Leeuw MA, Beute J et al. Cardiac output measured by uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis by recently released software version 3.02 versus thermodilution in septic shock. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 27(2), 171-177 (2013
47. Marqué S, Gros A, Chimot L et al. Cardiac output monitoring in septic shock: Evaluation of the third-generation Flotrac- Vigileo(). J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 27(3), 273-279 (2013
48. Suehiro K, Tanaka K, Funao T et al. Systemic vascular resistance has an impact on the reliability of the Vigileo-FloTrac system in measuring cardiac output and tracking cardiac output changes. Br. J. Anaesth. 111(2), 170-177 (2013
49. Squara P, Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Singer M, Chiche JD. Tracking changes in cardiac output: Methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices. Intensive Care Med. 35(10), 1801-1808( 2009