Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: Comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 64-69

  Khwannimit, Bodin ^a   Bhurayanontachai, Rungsun ^a  

^a PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Fluid; Monitoring; Septic shock; Stroke volume

Indexed keywords

DOPAMINE; HETASTARCH; MIDAZOLAM; MORPHINE; NORADRENALIN; VECURONIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FLUID RESUSCITATION; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MALE; MONITOR; PATIENT MONITORING; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE PRESSURE; PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEPTIC SHOCK; STROKE VOLUME VARIATION; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HETASTARCH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PLASMA SUBSTITUTES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOCK, SEPTIC; STROKE VOLUME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84856769201     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834b7d82     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1368-1377.
2. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, et al. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89:1313-1321. (Pubitemid 29001568)
3. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162:134-138. (Pubitemid 30469810)
4. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, et al. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 2001; 119:867-873. (Pubitemid 32197661)
5. Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L, et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21:132-138. (Pubitemid 38176155)
6. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A, et al. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1734-1739. (Pubitemid 39297176)
7. Barbier C, Loubieres Y, Schmit C, et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1740-1746. (Pubitemid 39297177)
8. Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1834-1837. (Pubitemid 39297190)
9. Feissel M, Teboul JL, Merlani P, et al. Plethysmographic dynamic indices predict fluid responsiveness in septic ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:993-999. (Pubitemid 46835401)
10. Durairaj L, Schmidt GA. Fluid therapy in resuscitated sepsis: Less is more. Chest 2008; 133:252-263.
11. Alsous F, Khamiees M, DeGirolamo A, et al. Negative fluid balance predicts survival in patients with septic shock: A retrospective pilot study. Chest 2000; 117:1749-1754. (Pubitemid 30413373)
12. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: Results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:344-353. (Pubitemid 43145611)
13. Murphy CV, Schramm GE, Doherty JA, et al. The importance of fluid management in acute lung injury secondary to septic shock. Chest 2009; 136:102-109.
14. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:691-699. (Pubitemid 38340065)
15. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:64-68. (Pubitemid 46035678)
16. Cannesson M, Slieker J, Desebbe O, et al. The ability of a novel algorithm for automatic estimation of the respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure to monitor fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1195-1200. (Pubitemid 351450545)
17. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al. Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101:761-768.
18. Hofer CK, Senn A, Weibel L, Zollinger A. Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCOplus system. Crit Care 2008; 12:R82.
19. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:2642-2647.
20. Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, et al. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2009; 108:513-517.
21. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Kilger E, et al. Optimizing fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery by on-line monitoring of left ventricular stroke volume variations. Comparison with aortic systolic pressure variations. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:124-126. (Pubitemid 34048570)
22. Derichard A, Robin E, Tavernier B, et al. Automated pulse pressure and stroke volume variations from radial artery: Evaluation during major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103:678-684.
23. Biais M, Bernard O, Ha JC, et al. Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104:407-413.
24. Manecke GR. Edwards FloTrac sensor and Vigileo monitor: Easy, accurate, reliable cardiac output assessment using the arterial pulse wave. Expert Rev Med Devices 2005; 2:523-527. (Pubitemid 41447649)
25. Benes J, Chytra I, Altmann P, et al. Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: Results of prospective randomized study. Crit Care 2010; 14:R118.
26. Aboy M, McNames J, Thong T, et al. A novel algorithm to estimate the pulse pressure variation index deltaPP. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004; 51:2198-2203. (Pubitemid 39578017)
27. Austin D, Staats C, Aboy M. A novel approach to pulse pressure variation estimation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006; 1:1391-1393. (Pubitemid 46520133)
28. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/ SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:530-538. (Pubitemid 36523666)
29. Monge Garcia MI, Gil Cano A, Gracia Romero M. Dynamic arterial elastance to predict arterial pressure response to volume loading in preload-dependent patients. Crit Care 2011; 15:R15.
30. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148:839-843. (Pubitemid 13033817)
31. Hofer CK, Button D, Weibel L, et al. Uncalibrated radial and femoral arterial pressure waveform analysis for continuous cardiac output measurement: An evaluation in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24:257-264.
32. Manecke GR Jr, Auger WR. Cardiac output determination from the arterial pressure wave: Clinical testing of a novel algorithm that does not require calibration. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21:3-7. (Pubitemid 46199245)
33. Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VO, et al. Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007; 11:R100.
34. Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, van Hout N. Measurement of cardiac output: A comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99:337-342. (Pubitemid 47316386)
35. Monnet X, Anguel N, Naudin B, et al. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output in septic patients: Different accuracy of pulse contour and uncalibrated pressure waveform devices. Crit Care 2010; 14:R109.
36. De Backer D, Marx G, Tan A, et al. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: A multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37:233-240.