Arterial pressure waveform derived cardiac output FloTrac/Vigileo system (third generation software): Comparison of two monitoring sites with the thermodilution cardiac output

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 115-120

  Vasdev, Sumit ^a   Chauhan, Sandeep ^a   Choudhury, Minati ^a   Hote, Millind P ^a   Malik, Madhur ^a   Kiran, Usha ^a  

^a ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Arterial waveform derived cardiac output; Cardiac output; Non invasive cardiac output; Pulmonary artery catheter; Thermodilution

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL PRESSURES; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIAC SURGERY; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; FEMORAL ARTERY; GOOD CORRELATIONS; MONITORING SITES; PERCENTAGE ERROR; PULMONARY ARTERY; RADIAL ARTERY; SOFTWARE VERSIONS; THERMODILUTION; THIRD GENERATION; TIME POINTS;

CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; CATHETERS;

HEMODYNAMICS;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; AORTA BALLOON; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL TONE; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART OUTPUT; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT MONITORING; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; THERMODILUTION;

AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CATHETERS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PULMONARY ARTERY; RADIAL ARTERY; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; SOFTWARE; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 84863096128     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-012-9341-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Swan HJC, Ganz W, Forrester J, et al. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med. 1970;283:447-51.
2. De Waal EEC, De Rossi L, Buhre W. Pulmonary artery catheter in anaesthesiology and intensive care. Anaesthesist. 2006;55: 713-30. (Pubitemid 44089994)
3. Connors AF Jr, Castele RJ, Farhat NZ, et al. Complications of right heart catheterization. A prospective autopsy study. Chest. 1985;88:567-72. (Pubitemid 16236292)
4. Peters SG, Afessa B, Decker PA, et al. Increased risk associated with pulmonary artery catheterization in the medical intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2003;18:166-71. (Pubitemid 37413801)
5. Robin ED. Death by pulmonary artery flow-directed catheter. Time for a moratorium? Chest. 1987;92:727-31. (Pubitemid 18000580)
6. Chaney JC, Derdak S. Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring for the intensivist: current and emerging technology. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:2338-45. (Pubitemid 35191588)
7. Langewouters GJ, Wesseling KH, Goedhard WJ. The pressure dependent dynamic elasticity of 35 thoracic and 16 abdominal human aortas in vitro described by a five-component model. J Biomech. 1985;18:613-20. (Pubitemid 15023815)
8. Cannesson M, Attof Y, Rosamel P, et al. Comparison of FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007;24:832-9. (Pubitemid 350194901)
9. Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, et al. Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:329-36. (Pubitemid 47316385)
10. Prasser C, Bele S, Keyl C, et al. Evaluation of a new arterial pressure-based cardiac output device requiring no external calibration. BMC Anesthesiol. 2007;7:9.
11. Hamm JB, Nguyen BV, Kiss G, et al. Assessment of a cardiac output device using arterial pulse waveform analysis, Vigileo, in cardiac surgery compared to pulmonary arterial themodilution. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010;38:295-301.
12. Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1220-35.
13. Schramm S, Albrecht E, Frascarolo P, et al. Validity of an arterial pressure waveform analysis device: does the puncture site play a role in the agreement with intermittent pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution measurements? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:250-6.
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet. 1986;8476:307-10. (Pubitemid 16134762)
15. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15:85-91. (Pubitemid 29278438)
16. Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, et al. Bench-to-bedside review: The importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies - with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care. 2009;13:201.
17. Mohr R, Lavee J, Goor DA. Inaccuracy of radial artery pressure measurement after cardiac operations. J Thorac Vasc Surg. 1987; 94:286-90. (Pubitemid 17122244)
18. Manecke GR Jr, Parimucha M, Stratmann G, et al. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and the femoral-to-radial arterial pressure gradient. J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth. 2004;18:175-9. (Pubitemid 38506864)
19. Manecke GR Jr, Auger WR. Cardiac output determination from the arterial pressure wave: Clinical testing of a novel algorithm that does not require calibration. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:3-7. (Pubitemid 46199245)
20. Lorsomradee S, Lorsomradee SR, de Hert SG, et al. Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:636-43. (Pubitemid 47464954)