A comparison of noninvasive bioreactance with oesophageal Doppler estimation of stroke volume during open abdominal surgery: An observational study

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 501-508

  Conway, Daniel H ^a   Hussain, Osman A ^b   Gall, Iain ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLLOID; DIATHERMY; ELECTRODE; ESOPHAGEAL DOPPLER MONITORING; ESOPHAGUS DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART FAILURE; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NONINVASIVE CARDIAC OUTPUT MONITORING; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY;

ABDOMEN; AGED; ANDROSTANOLS; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIOLOGY; ARTIFACTS; CARDIAC OUTPUT; ESOPHAGUS; FEMALE; FENTANYL; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PIPERIDINES; PROPOFOL; STROKE VOLUME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 84884473073     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283603250     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and metaanalysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011; 112:1392-1402.
2. Giglio MT, Marucci M, Testini M, Brienza N. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy and gastrointestinal complications in major surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaes 2009; 103:637-646.
3. Abbas SM, Hill AG. Systematic review of the literature for the use of oesophageal Doppler monitor for fluid replacement in major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 2008; 63:44-51. (Pubitemid 350233205)
4. Mowatt G, Houston G, Hernández R, et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of oesophageal Doppler monitoring in critically ill and high-risk surgical patients. Health Technology Assessment 2009; 1:1-95.
5. Wilson J, Davies S. Improving surgical outcomes: it is the destination not the journey. Crit Care 2010; 14:177.
6. Thomas AN, Ryan J, Doran BR, Pollard BJ. Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: the Bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgery. Intensive Care Med 1991; 17:383-386.
7. Raval NY, Squara P, Cleman M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. Clin Monit Comput 2008; 22:113-119.
8. Squara P, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:1191-1194. (Pubitemid 47036882)
9. Squara P, Rotcajg D, Denjean D, et al. Comparison of monitoring performance of Bioreactance vs. pulse contour during lung recruitment maneuvers. Crit Care 2009; 13:R125.
10. Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Holte K, Secher NH, Kehlet H. Monitoring of perioperative fluid administration by individualized goal-directed therapy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51:331-340.
11. Chatti R, de Rudniki S, Marqué S, et al. Comparison of two versions of the Vigileo-FloTrac system (1.03 and 1.07) for stroke volume estimation: a multicentre, blinded comparison with oesophageal Doppler measurements. Br J Anaes 2009; 102:463-469.
12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 8476:307-310. (Pubitemid 16134762)
13. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1995; 15:85-91. (Pubitemid 29278438)
14. Cecconi M, Rhodes A. Validation of continuous cardiac output technologies: consensus still awaited. Crit Care 2009; 13:159.
15. Squara P, Cecconi M, Rhodes A, et al. Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:1801-1808.
16. Columb MO. Clinical measurement and assessing agreement. Current Anaes Crit Care 2008; 19:328-329.
17. Dark PM, Singer M. The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:2060-2066. (Pubitemid 40022322)
18. Gunn SR, Kim HK, Harrigan PW, Pinsky MR. Ability of pulse contour and esophageal Doppler to estimate rapid changes in stroke volume. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32:1537-1546. (Pubitemid 44484343)
19. Keren H, Burkhoff D, Squara P. Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007; 293:583-589.
20. Marqué S, Cariou A, Chiche JD, Squara P. Comparison between Flotrac-Vigileo and Bioreactance, a totally noninvasive method for cardiac output monitoring. Crit Care 2009; 13:73.
21. Medin DL, Brown DT, Wesley R, et al. Validation of continuous thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients with analysis of systematic errors. J Crit Care 1998; 13:184-189. (Pubitemid 29015274)
22. Su NY, Huang CJ, Tsai P, et al. Cardiac output measurement during cardiac surgery: esophageal Doppler versus pulmonary artery catheter. Acta Anaesthesiol Sinica 2002; 40:127-133.
23. Conway DH, Mayall R, Abdul-Latif MS, et al. Randomised controlled trial investigating the influence of intravenous fluid titration using oesophageal Doppler monitoring during bowel surgery. Anaesthesia 2002; 57:845-849. (Pubitemid 35021505)
24. Mythen MG, Webb AR. Perioperative plasma volume expansion reduces the incidence of gut mucosal hypoperfusion during cardiac surgery. Arch Surg 1995; 130:423-429.
25. Valtier B, Cholley BP, Belot JP, et al. Noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output in critically ill patients using transesophageal Doppler. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 158:77-83. (Pubitemid 28337161)
26. de Wilde RB, Geerts BF, van den Berg PC, Jansen JR. A comparison of stroke volume variation measured by the LiDCOplus and FloTrac-Vigileo system. Anaesthesia 2009; 64:1004-1009.
27. Le Tulzo Y, Belghith M, Seguin P, et al. Reproducibility of thermodilution cardiac output determination in critically ill patients: comparison between bolus and continuous method. J Clin Monit 1996; 12:379-385.
28. Rubini A, Del Monte D, Catena V, et al. Cardiac output measurement by the thermodilution method: an in vitro test of accuracy of three commercially available automatic cardiac output computers. Intensive Care Med 1995; 21:154-158.
29. Metzelder S, Coburn M, Fries M, et al. Performance of cardiac output measurement derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy. Br J Anaes 2011; 106:776-784.
30. Hofer CK, Mu? ller SM, Furrer L, et al. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing offpump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005; 128:848-854. (Pubitemid 41140517)
31. Lafanechè re A, Albaladejo P, Raux M, et al. Cardiac output measurement during infrarenal aortic surgery: echo-esophageal Doppler versus thermodilution catheter. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2006; 20:26-30. (Pubitemid 43182772)
32. Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, van Hout N. Measurement of cardiac output: a comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaes 2007; 99:337-342. (Pubitemid 47316386)
33. Broch O, Renner J, Ho? cker J, et al. Uncalibrated pulse power analysis fails to reliably measure cardiac output in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care 2011; 15:R76.
34. Maisch S, Bohm SH, Solà J, et al. Heart-lung interactions measured by electrical impedance tomography. Crit Care Med 2011; 39:2173-2176.
35. Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:5-14. (Pubitemid 36026341)
36. Schober P, Loer SA, Schwarte LA. Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring with transesophageal Doppler technology. Anesth Analg 2009; 109:340-353.