Predicting fluid responsiveness with stroke volume variation despite multiple extrasystoles

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 193-198

  Cannesson, Maxime ^a   Tran, Nam Phuong ^a   Cho, Max ^a   Hatib, Feras ^b   Michard, Frederic ^b  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Arrhythmia; Fluid responsiveness; Hemodynamic; Pulse pressure variation; Stroke volume variation

Indexed keywords

HETASTARCH;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL PIG; FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART BEAT; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART VENTRICLE EXTRASYSTOLE; HEART VENTRICLE PACING; HEMODYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WAVEFORM;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIAC COMPLEXES, PREMATURE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; FLUID THERAPY; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; STROKE VOLUME; SWINE; WATER-ELECTROLYTE BALANCE;

EID: 84055195121     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822ea119     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Michard F: Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:419-428; quiz 449-455
2. Cannesson M: Arterial pressure variation and goal-directed fluid therapy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24:487-497
3. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, et al: Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:2642-2647
4. Zimmermann M, Feibicke T, Keyl C, et al: Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 27:555-561
5. Biais M, Bernard O, Ha JC, et al: Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104:407-413
6. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Quinart A, et al: Uncalibrated stroke volume variations are able to predict the hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome after liver transplantation. Anesthesiology 2009; 111:855-862
7. Derichard A, Robin E, Tavernier B, et al: Automated pulse pressure and stroke volume variations from radial artery: Evaluation during major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103:678-684
8. Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, et al: The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 513-517
9. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al: Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101:761-768
10. Hofer CK, Stenn A, Weibel L, et al: Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCOplus system. Crit Care 2008; 12:R82
11. Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VO, et al: Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007; 11:R100
12. Mayer J, Boldt J, Mengistu AM, et al: Goaldirected intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: A randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care 2010; 14:R18
13. Michard F: Stroke volume variation: from applied physiology to improved outcomes. Crit Care Med 2011; 39:402-403
14. Benes J, Chytra I, Altmann P, et al: Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: Results of prospective randomized study. Crit Care 2010; 14:R118
15. Michard F: Volume management using dynamic parameters: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Chest 2005; 128:1902-1903
16. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al: Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: Influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31:517-523
17. De Backer D, Pinsky MR: Can one predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients? Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:1111-1113
18. de Waal EE, Rex S, Kruitwagen CL, et al: Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:510-515
19. Forrest JB, Cahalan MK, Rehder K, et al: Multicenter study of general anesthesia. II. Results. Anesthesiology 1990; 72:262-268
20. Forrest JB, Rehder K, Goldsmith CH, et al: Multicenter study of general anesthesia. I. Design and patient demography. Anesthesiology 1990; 72:252-261
21. Annane D, Sebille V, Duboc D, et al: Incidence and prognosis of sustained arrhythmias in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178:20-25
22. Swamy G, Xu D, Mukkamala R: Estimation of the aortic pressure waveform from a radial artery pressure waveform via an adaptive transfer function: Feasibility demonstration in swine. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009; 2009:2362-2364
23. Pratt B, Roteliuk L, Hatib F, et al: Calculating arterial pressure-based cardiac output using a novel measurement and analysis method. Biomed Instrum Technol 2007; 41:403-411
24. Cannesson M, Vallet B, Michard F: Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation: From flying blind to flying right? Br J Anaesth 2009; 103:896-897; author reply 897-899
25. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148:839-843
26. Cannesson M, Slieker J, Desebbe O, et al: The ability of a novel algorithm for automatic estimation of the respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure to monitor fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1195-1200
27. Reuter DA, Huang C, Edrich T, et al: Cardiac output monitoring using indicator-dilution techniques: Basics, limits, and perspectives. Anesth Analg 2010; 110:799-811