Relationships between listening and speaking in online discussions: An empirical investigation

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 534-541

  Wise, Alyssa Friend ^a   Hausknecht, Simone Nicole ^a   Zhao, Yuting ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYNCHRONOUS ONLINE DISCUSSION; CONTENT QUALITIES; EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY; EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION; FOUR DIMENSIONS; ONLINE DISCUSSIONS; RE VISITATIONS; THREE DIMENSIONS;

CURRICULA; INDEXING (OF INFORMATION); SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

STUDENTS;

EID: 84886535375     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Boulos, M. N., & Wheeler, S. (2007). The emerging web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24(1), 2-23.
2. Cheung, W. S., and Hew., K. F., & Ling Ng, C. S. (2008). Toward an understanding of why students contribute in asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 29-50.
3. De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6-28.
4. Gunawardena, C. N., and Lowe., C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431.
5. Hara, N., Bonk, C. J. & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115-152.
6. Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 3(1/2), 41-61.
7. Hew, K., Cheung, W. & Ng, C. (2010). Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: A review of the research and empirical exploration. Instructional Science, 38(6), 571-606.
8. Hewitt, J. (2003). How habitual online practices affect the development of asynchronous discussion threads. Journal Educational Computing Research, 28(1), 31-45.
9. Hewitt, J., Brett, C., & Peters, V. (2007). Scan rate: A new metric for the analysis of reading behaviors in asynchronous computer conferencing environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(4), 215-231.
10. Ho, C.H. & Swan, K. (2007). Evaluating online conversation in an asynchronous learning environment: An application of Grice's cooperative principle. Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 3-14.
11. Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 35-51.
12. Knowlton, D. S. (2005). A taxonomy of learning through asynchronous discussion. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(2), 155-177.
13. Lin, H., Hong, Z., & Lawrenz, F. (2012). Promoting and scaffolding argumentation through reflective asynchronous discussions. Computers & Education, 59(2), 378-384.
14. Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In Stahl, G. (Ed.) Proceedings of CSCL 2002 (pp. 72-81). Boulder, CO: ISLS.
15. Marbouti, F. (2012). Design, implementation and testing of a visual discussion forum to address new post bias. Unpublished masters thesis. Burnaby, CA: Simon Fraser University.
16. Pena-Shaff, J. B. & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42(3), 243-265.
17. Peters, V. & Hewitt, J. (2010). An investigation of student practices in asynchronous computer conferencing courses. Computers & Education, 54(4), 951-961.
18. Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 79-90.
19. Thomas, M. J. W. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 351-366.
20. Webb, E., Jones, A., Barker, P., & van Schaik, P. (2004). Using e-learning dialogues in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(1), 93-103.
21. Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71-95.
22. Wise, A. F., and Hsiao., Y. T., Marbouti, F., Speer, J. & Perera, N. (2012a). Initial validation of "listening," behavior typologies for online discussions using microanalytic case studies. In J. van Aalst, J., K. Thompson, K., M. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.) Proceedings of ICLS 2012 (pp. 56-63). Sydney, Australia: ISLS.
23. Wise, A. F., Marbouti, F., Hsiao, Y. & Hausknecht, S. (2012b). A survey of factors contributing to learners' "listening," behaviors in asynchronous discussions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 47(4), 461-480.
24. Wise, A. F., Perera, N., Hsiao, Y., Speer, J. & Marbouti, F. (2012c). Microanalytic case studies of individual participation patterns in an asynchronous online discussion in an undergraduate blended course. Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 108-117.
25. Wise, A. F., Saghafian, M. & Padmanabhan, P. (2012d). Towards more precise design guidance: Specifying and testing the functions of assigned student roles in online discussions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(1), 55-82.
26. Wise, A. F., Speer, J., Marbouti, F. & Hsiao, Y. (2013). Broadening the notion of participation in online discussions: Examining patterns in learners' online listening behaviors. Instructional Science. 41(2), 323-343.