A taxonomy of learning through asynchronous discussion

Journal of Interactive Learning Research

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 155-177

  Knowlton, Dave S ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27544503204     PISSN: 1093023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Adams, D.M., & Hamm, M.E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Critical thinking and collaboration across the curriculum. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Press.
2. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373.
3. Bannan-Ritland, B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication, elearning, and interactivity: A review of the research. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 161-179.
4. Barab, S.A., MaKinster, J.G., Moore, J.A., Cunningham, D.J., & the ILF Design Team (2001). Designing and building an online community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum. Educational Technology Research and Development 49(4), 71-96.
5. Berge, Z.L. (1999). Interaction in post-secondary web-based learning. Educational Technology, 39(1), 5-11.
6. Berge, Z.L. (2002). Active, interactive, and reflective elearning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 181-190.
7. Brown, A. (1997). Designing for learning: What are the essential features of an effective online course? Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 115-126.
8. Dede, C. (2004). If design-based research is the answer, what is the question? A commentary on Collins, Joseph, and Bielaczyc; diSessa and Cobb; and Fishman, Marx, Blumenthal, Krajcik, and Soloway in the JLS special issue on design-based research. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 105-114.
9. DeHaan, M. (2002). Distributed cognition and the shared knowledge model of the Mazahua: A cultural approach. The Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(1/2), 31-50.
10. deVries, E., Lund, K., & Baker, M. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 63-103.
11. diSessa, A.A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77-103.
12. Dunlosky, J. (1998). Epilogue: Linking metacognitive theory to education. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 367-381). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Essex, C., & Cagiltay, K. (2001). Evaluating an online course: Feedback from "distressed" students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(3), 233-240.
14. Fulwiler, T. (1986). The argument for writing across the curriculum. In A. Young & T. Fulwiler (Eds.). Writing across disciplines: Research into practice (pp. 21-32). Portsmouth, UK: Boynton/Cook.
15. Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher 15(8), 4-9.
16. Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J. M., Steeples, C., & Tickner, S. (2001). Competencies for online teaching: A special report. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 65-72.
17. Graham, M. & Scarborough, H. (1999). Computer mediated communication and collaborative learning in an undergraduate distance education environment. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 20-46.
18. Hacker, D.J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2001). Students' distress with a web-based distance education course: An ethnographic study of participants' experiences. Information, Communication & Society 3(4), 557-579. Retrieved January 12, 2002, from http://www.slis.indiana.edu/CSI/Wp/ wp0001B.html
20. Jonassen, D.H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophica paradigm? Journal of Educational Research, 39(3), 5-14.
21. Jonassen, D.H. (2001). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(4), 63-86.
22. Jonassen, D.H. (2002). Engaging and supporting problem solving in online learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(1), 1-13.
23. Jonassen, D.H., & Kwon, H.I. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 35-52.
24. Jonassen, D.H., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7-26.
25. Kelly, A.E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115-128.
26. Knowlton, D.S. (2000). A theoretical framework for the online classroom: A defense and delineation of a student-centered pedagogy. In R.E. Weiss, D.S. Knowlton, & B.W. Speck (Eds.), Principles of effective teaching in the online classroom, (pp.5-14). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Knowlton, D.S. (2003a). Evaluating college students' efforts in asynchronous discussion: A systematic process. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(1), 31-41.
28. Knowlton, D.S. (2003b). Preparing students for educated living: Virtues of problem-based learning across the higher education curriculum. In D. S. Knowlton & D. C. Sharp (Eds.). Problem-based learning in the information age, (pp. 5-12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Knowlton, D.S., Eschmann, A., Fish, N., Heffren, B., & Voss, H. (2004). Processes and impact of journal writing in a graduate-level theory course: Students' experiences and reflections. Teaching & Learning: The Journal of Natural Inquiry and Reflective Practice, 18(2), 40-53. Retrieved May 26, 2004, from http://www.und.nodak.edu/dept/ehd/ journal/
30. Knowlton, D.S., Knowlton, H.M., & Davis, C. (2000). The whys and hows of online discussions. Syllabus: New Directions in Educational Technology, 13(10), 54-58.
31. Kolb, D.A., & Fry, R. (1975). Toward an applied theory of prior learning. In G. Cooper (Ed.). Theories of group processes, (pp. 33-57). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
32. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16-25.
33. Land, S.M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 61-78.
34. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
35. Leinon, P., Järvelä, S., & Lipponen, L. (2003). Individual students' interpretations of their contribution to the computer-mediated discussions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(1), 99-122.
36. Lewis, D.C., Treves, J.A., & Shaindlin, A.B. (1997). Making sense of academic cyberspace: Case study of an electronic classroom. College Teaching, 45(3), 96-100.
37. Lin, X. (2001). Designing metacognitive activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 23-40.
38. Liu, Y., & Ginther, D. (1999). Cognitive styles and distance education. The Journal of Distance Learning Administration [On-line], 2(3). Retrieved October 10, 2001, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ liu23.html.
39. Lindemann, E. (1995). A rhetoric for writing teachers (3rd ed). New York: Oxford University Press.
40. McMillan, D.W. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 315-325.
41. Merryfield, M.M. (2001). The paradoxes of teaching a multicultural education course online. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(4), 283-299.
42. Miller, S.M., & Miller, K.L. (1999). Using instructional theory to facilitate communication in web-based courses. Educational Technology and Society, 2(3), 106-114.
43. Moller, L. (1998). Designing communities of participants for asynchronous distance education. Educational Technology Research & Development, 46(4), 115-122.
44. Morrison, G.M., & Guenther, P.F. (2000). Designing instruction for learning in electronic classrooms. In R. E. Weiss, D. S. Knowlton, & B. W. Speck (Eds.), Principles of effective teaching in the online classroom (pp. 15-22). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45. Nicholson, S.A., & Bond, N. (2003). Collaborative reflection and professional community building: An analysis of preservice teachers' use of an electronic discussion board. Journal of Technology in Teacher Education, 11(2), 259-279.
46. Palloff, R.M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47. Pena-Shaff, J., Martin, W., & Gay, G. (2001). An epistemological framework for analyzing student interactions in computer-mediated communication environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(1), 41-68.
48. Prestera, G.E., & Moller, L.A. (2001). Exploiting opportunities for knowledge-building in asynchronous distance learning environments. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(2), 93-104.
49. Rovai, A.P. (2001). Building classroom community at a distance: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 33-48.
50. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.
51. Sitko, B.M. (1998). Knowing how to write: Metacognition and writing instruction, In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice, (pp. 93-116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Speck, B.W. (1998). The teacher's role in the pluralistic classroom. Perspectives, 28(1), 19-43.
53. Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 50-60,
54. Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-41.
55. Weedman, J. (1999). Conversation and community: The potential of electronic conferences for creating intellectual proximity in distributed learning environments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 907-928.
56. Wegerif, R. (2002). Walking or thinking? Images of thinking and learning to think in the classroom. The Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(1/2), 51-70.
57. Weiss, R. E. (2000). Humanizing the online classroom. In R.E. Weiss, D.S. Knowlton, & B.W. Speck (Eds.), Principles of effective teaching in the online classroom, (pp.47-52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
58. Wittrock, M.C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345-376.
59. Wittrock, M.C., & Alesandrini, K. (1990). Generation of summaries and analogies and analytic and holistic abilities. American Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 489-502.
60. Young, A., & Fulwiler, T. (Eds.). (1986). Writing across disciplines: Research into practice. Portsmouth, UK: Boynton/Cook.