A survey of factors contributing to learners' listening behaviors in asynchronous online discussions

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 461-480

  Wise, Alyssa ^a   Marbouti, Farshid ^a   Hsiao, Ying Ting ^a   Hausknecht, Simone ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872957569     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: 15414140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.47.4.f     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium. org/publications/survey/going-distance-2011
2. Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/ Blending-In.pdf
3. Boulos, M. N., & Wheeler, S. (2007). The emerging web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24, 2-23.
4. Cheung, W. S., Hew, K. F., & Ng, C. S. L. (2008). Toward an understanding of why students contribute in asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Educational Computing Research,38(1), 29-50.
5. Clark, D. B., Sampson, V., Weinberger, A., & Erkens, G. (2007). Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 343-374.
6. Darnon, C., Muller, D., Schrager, S. M., Pannuzzo, N., & Butera, F. (2006). Mastery and performance goals predict epistemic and relational conflict regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 766-776. (Pubitemid 44747837)
7. Darnon, C., Butera, F., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Achievement goals in social interactions: Learning with a mastery vs. performance goals. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 61-70.
8. Dringus, L. P., & Ellis, T. (2005). Using data mining as a strategy for assessing asynchronous discussion forums. Computers & Education, 45(1), 141-160. (Pubitemid 40324862)
9. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
10. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
11. Elliot, A., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613-628.
12. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638-645.
13. Herring, S. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00106.x
14. Hewitt, J. (2003). How habitual online practices affect the development of asynchronous discussion threads. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(1), 31-45. (Pubitemid 36783828)
15. Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(4), 567-589. (Pubitemid 41634519)
16. Hewitt, J., & Brett, C. M. (2011). Recommend: A tool for identifying key ideas in asynchronous discourse environments. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 2011, New Orleans, LA.
17. Kim, B., & Johnson, P. (2006). Graphical interface for visual exploration of online discussion forums. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 4(4), 43-47.
18. Koli-Vehovec, S., Ron-evi-, B., & Bajšanski, I. (2008). Motivational components of self-regulated learning and reading strategy use in university students: The role of goal orientation patterns. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 108-113.
19. Marbouti, F. (2012). Design, implementation and testing of a visual discussion forum to address new post bias. Unpublished master's thesis. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
20. Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. (1988). Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 80(4), 514-523.
21. Nesbit, J. C., Zhou, M., Mahasneh, R., & Yeung, P. (2009). The Goal Orientation Questionnaire (GOQ). Simon Fraser University. Available at http://www.sfu.ca/~jcnesbit/EDUC220/StratRef/GOQ.htm
22. Ng, C. S. L., Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2009). Sustaining asynchronous online discussions: Contributing factors and peer facilitation techniques. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(4), 477-511.
23. Nonnecke, B., Preece, J., Andrews, D., & Voutour, R. (2004). Online lurkers tell why. Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York, NY, pp. 2688-2694.
24. Peters, V. L., & Hewitt, J. (2010). An investigation of student practices in asynchronous computer conferencing courses. Computers and Educations, 54(4), 951-961.
25. Poole, D. M. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 162-177. (Pubitemid 33204386)
26. Price, V., Cappella, J. N., & Nir, L. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication, 19(1), 95-112. (Pubitemid 37103904)
27. Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. In Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183-192). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
28. Spatariu, A., Hartley, K., Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Quinn, L. F. (2007). The influence of the discussion leader procedure on the quality of arguments in online discussions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(1), 83-103.
29. Statistics Canada. (2011). Focus on geography series, 2011 census. Retrieved from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/fogs- spg/index-eng.cfm
30. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Needham, MA: Pearson Education.
31. Teplovs, C. (2008). The knowledge space visualizer: A tool for visualizing online discourse. Paper presented at the Common Framework for CSCL Interaction Analysis Workshop at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2008, Utrecht, NL.
32. Thomas, M. J. W. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 351-366. (Pubitemid 36836945)
33. West, M. A. (2000). Reflexivity, revolution, and innovation in work teams. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Product development teams (Vol. 5, pp. 1-29). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
34. Wise, A. F., & Chiu, M. M. (in review). The effects of summarizing roles on learner's listening behaviors in online discussions.
35. Wise, A. F., Hsiao, Y. T., Marbouti, F., Speer, J., & Perera, N. (2012). Initial validation of listening behavior typologies for online discussions using microanalytic case studies. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.) The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences-Volume 1, Full papers (pp. 56-63). Sydney, Australia: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
36. Wise, A. F., Perera, N., Hsiao, Y., Speer, J., & Marbouti, F. (2012). Microanalytic case studies of individual participation patterns in an asynchronous online discussion in an undergraduate blended course. Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 108-117.
37. Wise, A. F., Saghafian, M., & Padmanabhan, P. (2012). Towards more precise design guidance: Specifying and testing the functions of assigned student roles in online discussions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(1), 55-82.
38. Wise, A. F., Speer, J., Marbouti, F. & Hsiao, Y. (2012). Broadening the notion of participation in online discussions: Examining patterns in learners' online listening behaviors. Advance online publication. Instructional Science. doi: 10.1007/s11251-012-9230-9.