Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: A review of the research and empirical exploration

Instructional Science

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 571-606

  Hew, Khe Foon ^a   Cheung, Wing Sum ^a   Ng, Connie Siew Ling ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Asynchronous online discussion; Discussion guidelines; Student contribution; Student facilitation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955836853     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-008-9087-0     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Bodzin, A., & Park, J. (2000). Factors that influence asynchronous discourse with preservice teachers on a public, web-based forum. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 16(4), 22-30.
2. Bonk, C. J. (2004). The perfect E-storm: Emerging technologies, enormous learner demand, enhanced pedagogy, and erased budgets. Part 2: Storms 3 and 4. London: UK: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. Retrieved December 14, 2006, from http://php. indiana. edu/~cjbonk/part2. pdf.
3. Brewer, S., & Klein, J. D. (2006). Types of positive interdependence and affiliation motive in an asynchronous, collaborative learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(4), 331-354. doi: 10. 1007/s11423-006-9603-3.
4. Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2). Retrieved on November 23, 2006, from http://cade. athabascau. ca/vol13. 2/bullen. html.
5. Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 720-735.
6. Chen, S.-J., & Caropreso, E. J. (2004). Influence of personality on online discussion. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(2). Retrieved July 9, 2007, from http://www. ncolr. org/jiol/issues/index. cfm.
7. Chen, G., & Chiu, M. M. (2006). Online discussion processes: Effects of earlier messages' evaluations, knowledge content, social cues and personal information on later messages. Computers & Education. doi: 10. 1016/j. compedu. 2006. 07. 007.
8. Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2004). Evaluating the extent of ill-structured problem solving process among pre-service teachers in an asynchronous online discussion and reflection log environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(3), 197-227. doi: 10. 2190/9JTN-10T3-WTXH-P6HN.
9. Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2005). Factors affecting learners' satisfaction on the use of asynchronous online discussion in a hypermedia design environment. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 5(1& 2), 56-70.
10. Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2006). Examining students' creative and critical thinking and student to student interactions in an asynchronous online discussion environment: A Singapore case study. Asia-Pacific Cybereducation Journal, 2(2). Retrieved from http://acecjournal. org/current_issue/article/2_2_examining_full. php.
11. Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2007). Use of ground rules in online discussion. Paper Presented at the ED-Media World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Toronto: Canada.
12. Choi, I., Land, S. M., & Turgeon, A. J. (2005). Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instructional Science, 33, 483-511. doi: 10. 1007/s11251-005-1277-4.
13. Cifuentes, L., Murphy, K. L., Segur, R., & Kodali, S. (1997). Design considerations for computer conferences. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(2), 177-201.
14. Dennen, V. P. (2001). The design and facilitation of asynchronous discussion activities in web-based courses: Implications for instructional design theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
15. Dennen, V. P. (2005). From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education, 26(1), 127-148. doi: 10. 1080/01587910500081376.
16. Dunlap, J. C. (2005). Workload reduction in online courses: Getting some shuteye. Performance Improvement, 44(5), 18-25. doi: 10. 1002/pfi. 4140440507.
17. Duphorne, P. L., & Gunawardena, C. N. (2005). The effect of three computer conferencing designs on critical thinking skills of nursing students. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 37-50. doi: 10. 1207/s15389286ajde1901_4.
18. Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G., Lei, K., & Mong, C. (2007). Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2). doi: 10. 1111/j. 1083-6101. 2007. 00331. x.
19. Fauske, J., & Wade, S. E. (2003-2004). Research to practice online: Conditions that foster democracy, community, and critical thinking in computer-mediated discussions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(2), 137-153.
20. Feenberg, A. (1987). Computer conferencing and the humanities. Instructional Science, 16(2), 169-186.
21. Fung, Y. Y. H. (2004). Collaborative online learning: Interaction patterns and limiting factors. Open Learning, 19(2), 135-149. doi: 10. 1080/0268051042000224743.
22. Gilbert, P. K., & Dabbagh, N. (2005). How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 5-18. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-8535. 2005. 00434. x.
23. Granovetter, M. S. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 25-56). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
24. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431.
25. Guzdial, M. (1997). Information ecology of collaborations in educational settings: Influence of tool. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 83-90). Toronto, Canada: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 437-469. doi: 10. 1207/S15327809JLS0904_3.
27. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 223-252. doi: 10. 1007/s11423-006-9022-5.
28. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2003a). Evaluating the participation and quality of thinking of pre-service teachers in an asynchronous online discussion environment: Part I. International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(3), 247-262.
29. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2003b). Evaluating the participation and quality of thinking of pre-service teachers in an asynchronous online discussion environment: Part II. International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(4), 355-366.
30. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2003c). An exploratory study of the use of asynchronous online discussion in hypermedia design. Journal of Instructional Science & Technology, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www. usq. edu. au/electpub/e-jist/docs/Vol6_No1/contents2. htm.
31. Hew, K. F., Knapczyk, D., & Frey, T. (2005). Electronically training teachers at a distance: What We've learned from an analysis of six different online pedagogical activities. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2005 (pp. 414-419). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
32. Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(4), 567-589. doi: 10. 1207/s15327809jls1404_4.
33. Hewitt, J., & Teplovs, C. (1999). An analysis of growth patterns in computer conferencing threads. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference, Dec. 12-15. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
34. Hummel, H. G. K., Burgos, D., Tattersall, C., Brouns, F., Kurvers, H., & Koper, R. (2005a). Encouraging contributions in learning networks using incentive mechanisms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 355-365. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2729. 2005. 00140. x.
35. Hummel, H. G. K., Tattersall, C., Burgos, D., Brouns, F., Kurvers, H., & Koper, R. (2005b). Facilitating participation: From the EML web site to the learning network for learning design. Interactive Learning Environments, 13(1-2), 55-69. doi: 10. 1080/10494820500173474.
36. Jeong, A. (2004). The combined effects of response time and message content on growth patterns of discussion threads in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 36-53.
37. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94. doi: 10. 1007/BF02299613.
38. Jones, Q., Ravid, G., & Rafaeli, S. (2004). Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 194-210. doi: 10. 1287/isre. 1040. 0023.
39. Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153-162. doi: 10. 1080/14703290252934603.
40. Kear, K. (2001). Following the thread in computer conferences. Computers & Education, 37, 81-99. doi: 10. 1016/S0360-1315(01)00036-7.
41. Kear, K., & Heap, N. W. (2007). 'Sorting the wheat from the chaff': Investigating overload in educational discussion systems. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 235-247. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2729. 2006. 00212. x.
42. Khan, S. (2005). Listservs in the college science classroom: Evaluating participation and "richness" in computer-mediated discourse. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 325-351.
43. Khine, M. S., Yeap, L. L., & Lok, A. T. C. (2003). The quality of message ideas, thinking and interaction in an asynchronous CMC environment. Educational Media International, 40(1/2), 115-125. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2729. 2006. 00212. x.
44. Kienle, A., & Ritterskamp, C. (2007). Facilitating asynchronous discussions in learning communities: The impact of moderation strategies. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(1), 73-80. doi: 10. 1080/01449290600811594.
45. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
46. Lu, L. L., & Jeng, I. (2006). Knowledge construction in inservice teacher online discourse: Impacts of instructor roles and facilitative strategies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 183-202.
47. Masters, K., & Oberprieler, G. (2004). Encouraging equitable online participation through curriculum articulation. Computers & Education, 42, 319-332. doi: 10. 1016/j. compedu. 2003. 09. 001.
48. Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 279-300.
49. Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 40, 237-253. doi: 10. 1016/S0360-1315(02)00129-X.
50. Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51. Murphy, E., & Coleman, E. (2004). Graduate students' experiences of challenges in online asynchronous discussions. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 30(2). Retrieved April 3, 2007, from http://www. cjlt. ca/content/vol30. 2/cjlt30-2_art-2. html.
52. Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1997). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported cooperative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science American Society for Information Science, 48, 484-495. doi: 10. 1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199706)48: 6< 484:: AID-ASI2> 3. 0. CO; 2-Q.
53. Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2000). Shrewd investments. Science, 288, 819-820. doi: 10. 1126/science. 288. 5467. 819.
54. Nussbaum, E. M., Hartley, K., Sinatra, G. M., Reynolds, R. E., & Bendixen, L. D. (2002). Enhancing the quality of online discussions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
55. Oliver, M., & Shaw, G. P. (2003). Asynchronous discussion in support of medical education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 56-67.
56. Painter, C., Coffin, C., & Hewings, A. (2003). Impacts of directed tutorial activities in computer conferencing: A case study. Distance Education, 24(2), 159-174. doi: 10. 1080/0158791032000127455.
57. Poole, D. M. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 162-177.
58. Poscente, K. R., & Fahy, P. J. (2003). Investigating triggers in CMC text transcripts. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2). Retrieved June 26, 2007, from http://www. irrodl. org/index. php/irrodl/article/view/141/221.
59. Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.
60. Schellens, T., Keer, H. V., & Valcke, M. (2005). The impact of role assignment on knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups. Small Group Research, 36(6), 704-745. doi: 10. 1177/1046496405281771.
61. Tagg, A. C., & Dickinson, J. A. (1995). Tutor messaging and its effectiveness in encouraging student participation on computer conferences. Journal of Distance Education, 10(2). Retrieved November 29, 2006, from http://cade. athabascau. ca/vol10. 2/taggdickinson. html.
62. Teigland, R., & Wasko, M. M. (2004). Extending richness with reach: Participation and knowledge exchange in electronic networks of practice. In P. Hildreth & C. Kimble (Eds.), Knowledge networks: Innovation through communities of practice (pp. 230-242). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
63. Thoms, K. J., & Junaid, N. (1997). Developing critical thinking skills in a technology-related class. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430526.
64. Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 6, 77-90. doi: 10. 1016/S1096-7516(02)00164-1.
65. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Wan, D., & Johnson, P. M. (1994). Computer supported collaborative learning using CLARE: The approach and experimental findings. In R. Furuta & C. Neuwirth (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCW'94 (pp. 187-198). Chapel Hill, NC: ACM.
67. Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). "It is what one does:" Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 155-173. doi: 10. 1016/S0963-8687(00)00045-7.
68. Whittaker, S., Terveen, L., Hill, W., & Cherny, L. (1998). The dynamics of mass interaction. In Proceedings of ACM's Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 257-264, Seattle, WA.
69. Winiecki, D. J., & Chyung, Y. (1998, August). Keeping the thread: helping distance education students and instructors keep track of asynchronous discussions. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison, WI.
70. Xie, K., DeBacker, T. K., & Ferguson, C. (2006). Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: The role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(1), 67-89. doi: 10. 2190/7BAK-EGAH-3MH1-K7C6.
71. Yang, Y. T. C., Newby, T. J., & Bill, R. L. (2005). Using Socratic questioning to promote critical thinking skills through asynchronous discussion forums in distance learning environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 163-181. doi: 10. 1207/s15389286ajde1903_4.
72. Yang, Y. T. C., Newby, T., & Bill, R. (2008). Facilitating interactions through structured web-based bulletin boards: A quasi-experimental study on promoting learners' critical thinking skills. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1572-1585. doi: 10. 1016/j. compedu. 2007. 04. 006.
73. Yeh, H. T., & Buskirk, E. V. (2005). An instructor's methods of facilitating students' participation in asynchronous online discussion. In C. Crawford, D. A. Willis, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, & R. Weber (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2005 (pp. 682-688). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
74. Zhao, N., & McDougall, D. (2005). Cultural factors affecting Chinese students' participation in asynchronous online learning. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005 (pp. 2723-2729). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
75. Zhu, E. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 34, 451-480. doi: 10. 1007/s11251-006-0004-0.